TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Speaker 1 presents evidence of alleged corruption by Joe Biden, including questionable finances and overseas payments. The firing of a prosecutor investigating Biden's son is highlighted as suspicious. Speaker 0 questions the motives behind the impeachment inquiry, suggesting it may be politically motivated. Speaker 1 argues that the evidence points to corruption and influence peddling, not political revenge. The lack of media coverage is blamed for public skepticism.

Speaker 0: President Biden lied to the American people, his family profited through shell companies, and his Federal agencies are obstructing the congressional inquiry. There are numerous scandals and corruption cases that have been uncovered. President Biden claimed he never discussed his son's business dealings, but evidence shows otherwise. He had dinner with Russian and Kazakhstani oligarchs, spoke with Hunter's associates over 20 times, and met with a Chinese energy company while Hunter worked for them. A text message from Hunter implies a commitment not fulfilled. A confidential source alleged a $5 million bribe to President Biden. The House Oversight Committee investigation found that Hunter flew on air force 2 at least 15 times to enrich the Biden family. This impeachment inquiry will give House Investigators more subpoena authority to gather evidence from uncooperative federal agencies. The New York Post's report on Hunter Biden's laptop was falsely labeled as Russian disinformation. Social media banned the story, but it was later revealed to be legitimate. A court opinion confirmed that the White House and federal agencies were censoring conservative speech on social media platforms.

Speaker 0 accuses Joe Biden of pressuring Ukraine to fire Shokin, the state prosecutor, in exchange for a $1 billion loan guarantee. Speaker 1 plays a clip where Biden admits to withholding the money until Shokin was fired. Speaker 0 argues that this is bribery and grounds for impeachment. They claim that Shokin had made significant reforms and that Biden's actions were not in line with official policy. They also mention that a new prosecutor was appointed who stopped investigating Burisma. Speaker 0 concludes by criticizing the lack of action and suggests that Speaker 1 should also be impeached.

The IRS agents found evidence to investigate Joe Biden for financial crimes. Despite claims of no evidence linking Joe to Hunter Biden's businesses, the speaker believes it is untrue.

The speaker discusses a letter from Lev Parnas, a former associate of Rudy Giuliani and President Trump, detailing their efforts to smear Joe Biden before the 2020 election. Parnas states that there is no evidence of any crimes committed by Hunter or Joe Biden in relation to Ukrainian politics. He calls for an end to the committee's investigation and offers to testify. The speaker suggests bringing Parnas in as a witness to shed light on their campaign. The hearing will focus on Hunter Biden's legal issues, but there is no evidence of wrongdoing by President Joe Biden or his administration.

Speaker 0 claims to have evidence that could lead to the imprisonment or impeachment of someone. They mention a grand jury and a special prosecutor. Speaker 1 suggests that Joe Biden's motive for going to Ukraine was not to fight corruption, but rather to assist the natural gas industry. They mention that Biden's son was involved with a major Ukrainian natural gas company.

The speaker discusses the firing of Viktor Shokin, stating it was due to corruption, not to protect Burisma. They agree with witnesses who say there is no evidence to impeach the president. Other colleagues also state there is no evidence of wrongdoing by President Biden.

Biden and the media claimed that Shokin was corrupt and had to be dismissed, but no charges of corruption have been proven against him. Shokin believes the truth lies in the transcripts of Biden's conversations with Poroshenko. He alleges that Biden illegally influenced foreign officials to protect his son and engage in illegal money laundering. One American News verified Shokin's claims with a sworn affidavit to an Austrian court, accusing Biden of interfering with ongoing investigations. To learn more, watch part 3 of One America News investigates debunking the Adam Schiff case for impeachment. I'm Chanel Bian reporting from Washington.

There is no evidence of a link between Hunter Biden and the president regarding business dealings. The hearing did not provide any proof of wrongdoing by the president. The speaker wanted to address a question but was interrupted by Mr. Bobolinski. Translation: There is no evidence connecting Hunter Biden and the president in terms of business dealings. The hearing failed to show any wrongdoing by the president. The speaker tried to respond to a question but was interrupted by Mr. Bobolinski.

Joe Biden has denied involvement in his family's business deals, but witnesses claim otherwise. They believe he lied about interacting with Hunter Biden's associates and is the closer for their business dealings with foreign interests. The speaker challenges the left to prove otherwise before yielding the floor.

Today marks the end of a failed attempt to find wrongdoing by Joe Biden for impeachment. Multiple witnesses couldn't identify any crimes, experts found no evidence, and bank records confirmed Biden's lack of involvement in family businesses. The investigation included irrelevant displays of pornographic images, a Chinese agent as a star witness, and a fabricated tip about a bribe. The key evidence was discredited, and the investigation is seen as a farce.

I have been on this investigating committee for over 20 years and as an attorney, I can confidently say that there is more evidence to impeach Donald Trump for a third time than to implicate President Biden. The focus on the Biden family is a way to deflect from the lack of evidence against President Biden. The shifting arguments have only served to exonerate President Biden.

In 2018, I got involved in digging up dirt on Joe Biden in Ukraine through Rudy Giuliani. Despite efforts, no evidence against Biden was found, only Russian disinformation. Biden was part of an anti-corruption campaign. The focus shifted to spreading lies about Biden when valid information ran out. John Solomon and Rudy Giuliani pushed unverified narratives on Fox News.

Speaker 1 claims that most past presidents for the last 20 years have been aware of corruption within USAID but chose not to act, alleging that many were complicit. Joe Biden, as head of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, oversaw USAID, which allegedly funded Burisma. Barack Obama's mother worked for USAID, and the Bush family also has connections. Speaker 1 suggests the Trump revolution challenged this system, which is why there was such a strong reaction against him. Speaker 1 further alleges that USAID funded the OCCRP, providing $20 million to journalists who then found damaging information on Rudy Giuliani. This information was purportedly used as the basis for the impeachment of President Donald Trump in 2019.

Speaker 1 claims that President Poroshenko fired them under pressure from Vice President Biden, who wanted to halt their investigation. They believe Biden acted in his own interests and treated Ukraine as his own backyard. Speaker 1 oversaw the Burisma case because Hunter Biden was involved, and they suspected illegal activities by the company. They agree with Devin Archer's statement that they were a threat to Burisma because they would have uncovered their corrupt activities. Speaker 1 accuses Burisma of illegal gas production and sales, and mentions a plea deal involving a $6 million bribe. They personally believe that Joe Biden and Hunter Biden received bribes. Speaker 1 denies any personal corruption and blames Biden for damaging America's reputation in Ukraine. They express concern for their safety and claim to have been poisoned twice.

I'm still waiting for proof of Joe Biden enriching himself, especially regarding his son and brother. Despite four years of investigation during Trump's presidency, no charges have been made. If there was evidence of wrongdoing, charges should have followed. A Chinese company did transfer money to Hunter and Jim Biden's shell companies, which then funneled money to their personal accounts, including a $40,000 check to Joe Biden. However, the lack of charges raises questions about the validity of these claims. Until there are actual charges, this discussion remains open. Thank you for joining us; stay tuned for more.

Speaker 0 asks how the speaker plans to convince Americans who are upset about Hunter Biden's laptop that he is fighting for them. Speaker 1 dismisses the laptop allegations as a smear, stating that every serious investigator has debunked them. He mentions previous similar allegations and points to overwhelming evidence from the intelligence community that the Russians are involved. Speaker 1 defends his son's integrity and highlights that during the impeachment, all major Trump officials testified under oath that Biden did his job and broke no laws. He criticizes the president for contributing to the crass and dirty state of politics. Speaker 0 asks one more question.

Speaker 0 asks Biden about the allegations of illegal or unethical behavior regarding his family's business interests in Ukraine and China. Speaker 1 denies the claims, calling them lies. Speaker 0 mentions the lawsuits, but Speaker 1 again denies any interaction.

The impeachment proceedings are based on false information from Russia about the Bidens. Trump, Giuliani, and others spread lies to benefit Trump and Putin. Investigations targeting the Bidens were fueled by false narratives pushed by politicians, media personalities, and Fox News. This conspiracy is tied to the Russian-Ukraine war, with Trump neglecting aid to Ukraine. The speaker admits to past wrongdoings but vows to speak out against those in power. They warn that if Ukraine falls to Russia, American shores will suffer. The speaker is ready to answer questions from the committee.

The impeachment inquiry is based on lies, warned by Pompeo and Lev Parnas, with no specific charges against the president. The committee proceeded despite knowing the evidence was falsified. The focus should be on why the inquiry continues.

There is no evidence to support the claim that President Joe Biden has done anything wrong or broken the law. Republicans have not provided any proof of wrongdoing or impeachable offenses. President Biden is a good, decent, and hardworking man who has dedicated his life to public service.

Since my arrest in 2019, I've tried to share the truth that Trump, Giuliani, and others lied about the Bidens to help Trump win in 2020. Despite a year of searching, I found no evidence of Biden corruption in Ukraine. Even Ukrainian officials deny wrongdoing. The only false info came from Russia. The impeachment is based on lies spread by Trump and his allies.

The witness confirmed that aid to Ukraine was tied to cooperation in a bribery scheme. The man responsible for withholding aid is involved in the House GOP inquiry and has ties to Clarence Thomas' wife. This highlights the larger misinformation campaign linked to Trump, similar to 2020. The hearing is being used to push false information, including evidence planted by a Russian operative now in jail.

Speaker 0: By a member of the Ukrainian parliament. Let's talk about the tape recording evidence. Speaker 1: We don't know. Yeah. We don't know much about it because it's floating around Ukraine, but we do know the general prosecutor of Ukraine, our equivalent of the attorney general, came on our show this morning and said the following. There's enough evidence for me to open up a criminal investigation into the illicit effort by a Ukrainian to try to influence the United States election in favor of Hillary Clinton. That's a profound statement coming from the top law enforcement official of Ukraine. Why is it important? There's a court in Ukraine that's already concluded that, Ukrainian officials leaked Paul Manafort's financial records to try to sway the US election. You haven't heard anything about that in the American press, but that ruling occurred recently. Then a parliamentary member comes out and says, I have a tape of these law enforcement officials saying they did it specifically to help Hillary Clinton. That becomes the foundation of the Ukrainian investigation. Speaker 0: You have talked to people that have heard this tape. Correct? Speaker 1: Well, the, the prosecutor himself has heard the tape and said it was important enough, good enough evidence to warrant opening the investigation. So the tape, the court ruling, the top prosecutor in Ukraine says there was a foreign power Speaker 0: Two separate issues here. Number one Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: Did Ukrainian officials offered us evidence that, in fact, they were involved in election interference in 2016 to help Hillary Clinton's campaign? But why didn't anybody in in the media pursue the interference story? And I thought they cared about interference, but, obviously, only if it's Russian interference and Trump because we know they don't care about the dirty Russian dossier. Speaker 1: That's right. Keep in mind that just a few months ago, Sean, we reported on your on your show and inside the hill that Ukraine's embassy in Washington confirmed on the record that back in 2016, the Democratic National Committee trying to help Hillary Clinton get elected asked the Ukraine Embassy to help interfere in the election by doing two things, dig up dirt on Paul Manafort and have Ukraine's president make a kerfuffle here in Washington about Manafort and Trump when he came to visit. Now the Ukrainians say they they rebuffed that attempt, but Hillary Clinton's campaign, the DNC, made that request according to the, Ukraine embassy in

The committee has not allowed Hunter Biden to testify publicly, nor have they called any first-hand witnesses to support their allegations. They lack any witnesses to back up their claims.