TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Investigations into the family were obstructed, raising suspicions about the timing of pardons issued just before the end of the Biden administration. The pardons appear questionable, especially Fauci's, which is backdated to 2014, coinciding with the start of gain-of-function research. This connection raises doubts about the origins of COVID-19 and suggests further investigation is needed. The pardons for Milley, Cheney, and Kinzinger are also puzzling, and it's crucial to determine if they lobbied for these pardons or if any financial exchanges occurred, given the Biden family's history of potential bribery.

The speaker asks if it is common for the Department of Justice (DOJ) to re-prosecute someone after they have been granted clemency or a commutation by the president. They mention that they could not find any instances of the DOJ re-prosecuting a commutation. Another speaker agrees and adds that they are not aware of any cases where re-prosecution occurs after a clemency grant.

The speaker asks about President Biden's conflicts of interest regarding sanctions on individuals who have done business with his family. They mention a report alleging that the First Son's company received $3,500,000 from a Russian woman. The speaker questions how Biden is navigating these conflicts and asks for an explanation of the $3,500,000. The other speaker responds by saying they have no confirmation of the report's accuracy and no further details. When asked about conflicts of interest, the speaker questions what those conflicts would be and points out that Biden has sanctioned more oligarchs than before, suggesting it is not a conflict of interest.

Speaker 0 is asked if President Biden accepted bribes and if he would comment on the arrest of the former president.

Have you ever heard of someone innocent receiving a preemptive pardon? It seems unlikely, especially when it involves the president's family and associates. Seeking such pardons raises questions about guilt; if someone is innocent, why would they need one? Preemptive pardons suggest that crimes may have occurred, even if they are not publicly known. If the president were to issue these pardons, it might be framed as protecting his family from external threats. However, the underlying concern appears to be about his own and his family's legal troubles. The idea of a permanent pardon for individuals like Rudy Giuliani and the president's children is troubling, especially if they haven't been convicted of any crimes. Many would interpret these pardons as an admission of guilt.

Have you ruled out a pardon for yourself or family members? Yes, I have. What would I pardon myself for? I have no intention of pardoning myself because I didn't do anything wrong. Could you comment on Meta's decision to...

Have you ever heard of someone innocent receiving a preemptive pardon? It seems unlikely, especially when it involves the president's family and associates. Seeking pardons suggests concern over potential wrongdoing. If someone is innocent, why would they need a pardon? Preemptive pardons imply that crimes may have occurred, even if not publicly known. If the president grants these pardons, it could be seen as protecting his family from external threats, but it raises questions about guilt. The idea of a permanent pardon for individuals like Giuliani or the president's children is troubling, especially if they haven't been convicted of any crime. If the president pardons anyone, many would interpret it as an admission of guilt. Recently, it was reported that President Biden will pardon his son, Hunter Biden.

Not much has changed since yesterday, and this is a personal matter. Regarding the possibility of the president pardoning his son, the answer is no. I already addressed that. Please continue.

Have you ever heard of someone innocent receiving a preemptive pardon? It's unusual, especially when it's the president's family involved. Seeking preemptive pardons raises questions about guilt; if there's no wrongdoing, why ask for one? Such actions suggest that crimes may have occurred, even if not publicly known. If pardons are issued, they might be framed as protecting family reputations from external threats. The notion of a permanent pardon raises eyebrows, especially for individuals like Giuliani and the president's children, who haven't been convicted of crimes. If the president pardons them, many would interpret it as an admission of guilt. Meanwhile, there are still legal avenues to pursue accountability for any wrongdoing.

There is no evidence of a link between Hunter Biden and the president regarding business dealings. The hearing did not provide any proof of wrongdoing by the president. The speaker wanted to address a question but was interrupted by Mr. Bobolinski. Translation: There is no evidence connecting Hunter Biden and the president in terms of business dealings. The hearing failed to show any wrongdoing by the president. The speaker tried to respond to a question but was interrupted by Mr. Bobolinski.

Joe Biden has denied involvement in his family's business deals, but witnesses claim otherwise. They believe he lied about interacting with Hunter Biden's associates and is the closer for their business dealings with foreign interests. The speaker challenges the left to prove otherwise before yielding the floor.

Speaker 0 denies any knowledge or discussion about his business or his family's business with his son or anyone else. Speaker 1 reveals that Stephanie, who was vice president, approved a response to a 2015 story about Hunter Biden's connection to Burisma Energy Company. It is also mentioned that Biden's family received less than $1,000,000 from a Chinese firm.

I believe that two other Biden family members, Jim and Joe Biden, knowingly committed crimes alongside Hunter Biden. Joe Biden obstructed investigations and lied about his involvement. Testimonies from Bob Olinsky and Devin Archer indicate he was aware of the dealings and was selling access to foreign adversaries. He also misled about pardoning his son. Jim Biden received loans without paying interest or principal, raising questions about their legitimacy and tax implications. The individuals who sent money to the Bidens were often questionable characters seeking favors from Joe Biden, the "big guy."

Mike, it wasn't surprising that Joe Biden pardoned his family at the end of his term. The Hunter Biden pardon indicated that James Biden, who was involved in Hunter's business dealings, would also be pardoned. If Hunter's activities were criminal, the new Justice Department could have pursued investigations through James. The Biden family's involvement in these deals raises concerns about potential crimes, and the pardons aim to prevent any investigations. With a pre-pardon, there’s no basis for launching an investigation, as the Justice Department would lose the ability to seize evidence or documents related to the case.

I believe they were being bribed. Joe Biden giving away $1 billion in exchange for my firing, isn't that corruption?

The question of whether the president will pardon or commute his son Hunter's sentence if convicted has been addressed multiple times. The answer remains clear: no. Despite inquiries about any potential changes in the next six months, the stance is consistent. The president has firmly stated that he will not grant a pardon or commutation to his son. This position is definitive and will not change. The answer is still a no, and there is nothing further to add on this matter.

Mister Speaker, President Biden's recent pardons for his family were shocking and unprecedented. It’s hard to believe he would issue pardons for over a decade of nonviolent offenses. Four years ago, when there were hints that President Trump might do something similar, prominent figures like Biden, Schiff, and Schumer condemned it as outrageous. Now, they support Biden's actions, which we find disgusting. This raises suspicions about the so-called "Biden crime family." If they truly weren't involved in wrongdoing, why would they need pardons? This issue will receive significant attention, and we will be examining it closely.

Hunter Biden and the Biden family's private citizen status means their work does not reflect administration endorsement. The State Department has no concerns about Hunter Biden's involvement with a Ukrainian gas company. Biden has stated he will not work for foreign companies if his father becomes president. The President's son's investments are being unwound, and any further questions should be directed to his representatives. The President's policy remains that his family will not have business relationships with foreign entities. The focus should be on investigating Trump. Hunter Biden's alleged overseas business dealings are not to be discussed from the podium.

I'm still waiting for proof of Joe Biden enriching himself, especially regarding his son and brother. Despite four years of investigation during Trump's presidency, no charges have been made. If there was evidence of wrongdoing, charges should have followed. A Chinese company did transfer money to Hunter and Jim Biden's shell companies, which then funneled money to their personal accounts, including a $40,000 check to Joe Biden. However, the lack of charges raises questions about the validity of these claims. Until there are actual charges, this discussion remains open. Thank you for joining us; stay tuned for more.

President Biden denies discussing business matters with his son or family members. He claims to have never spoken to his son about it and avoids any knowledge or involvement in their business dealings. When asked if he stands by his statement of not discussing his son's overseas affairs, he affirms his stance.

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 about his son's involvement in a Ukrainian energy company facing corruption charges. Speaker 1 claims to have no knowledge of his son's activities and trusts him. Speaker 0 questions the lack of accountability, but Speaker 1 deflects by mentioning Trump's family. Speaker 1 denies any wrongdoing and states that there is no evidence against his son. When asked about guardrails if elected, Speaker 1 asserts that his relatives will not engage in foreign business due to the current administration's controversies. No foreign business dealings will occur.

Speaker 0 asks if Joe Biden received payments from Burisma or any other foreign companies while he was vice president, president, or a private citizen. Speaker 1 mentions an ongoing investigation led by the US attorney in Delaware, appointed by President Trump. Speaker 1 suggests referring to the US attorney for any information that can be shared. Speaker 0 then asks if the president is under investigation, to which Speaker 1 refuses to confirm or deny, following department policy. The conversation ends without a clear answer regarding Biden's involvement with foreign payments or the president's investigation.

Speaker 0 asks if the FD 1023 and the 17 recordings will be provided to the Senate Judiciary Committee to assess the evidence of Joe Biden taking a $5,000,000 bribe. Speaker 1 responds that they will work with the committee and provide the information within the process. Speaker 0 insists on a direct answer, but Speaker 1 repeats that they will take it back and work with them. Speaker 0 concludes that Speaker 1 is not answering the question.

Hunter Biden falsely claimed under oath that his father had no involvement in his business dealings, but evidence shows otherwise. Texts and testimonies reveal Hunter seeking his father's influence in business matters, contradicting his sworn statements. Bobolinski confirms President Biden is the family brand being sold.

In my year of global interviews, I found no evidence of Biden corruption in Ukraine. No credible source, including FBI, CIA, NSA, or Ukrainian officials, has proven any illegal activity. Even when offered a deal, CEO of Burisma provided no information. The only accusations against the Bidens in Ukraine come from Russia. The impeachment proceedings are based on false Kremlin information. Stay tuned for a heated hearing. Jesse Waters joins us now.