TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

I claimed that I could end the war in Ukraine within 24 hours. I have a good relationship with Zelensky and Putin, and I believe I can use that to negotiate a deal. Zelensky denied any knowledge of the controversial phone call, which I found honorable. However, I clarified that simply feeling threatened would not be enough to stop Putin from bombing Ukraine. My plan is to tell Zelensky to make a deal and warn Putin that if he doesn't, we will provide more support to Ukraine than ever before.

I was assigned to handle the Ukraine situation and convince our team to provide loan guarantees. I had multiple meetings with Poroshenko and Yatsenyuk, where they promised to take action against the state prosecutor. However, they didn't follow through. When they were about to announce the $1 billion loan guarantee, I told them they wouldn't receive the money unless the prosecutor was fired. They argued that I didn't have the authority, but I stood my ground. I warned them that if the prosecutor wasn't fired within 6 hours, they wouldn't get the money. Eventually, the prosecutor was fired.

I'm Oleksander Dubinsky, a Ukrainian parliament member, and I've been imprisoned for exposing the Bidens' corruption in Ukraine. Back in 2019, I revealed how Joe Biden used Ukraine for personal gain through his son, Hunter. After Biden's 2020 win, Zelensky's government, under Washington's orders, opened fake criminal cases against me, and I was jailed without evidence or trial, simply to silence me. The American Congress has confirmed Hunter Biden received money from Ukrainian officials. I'm being labeled a Russian agent for exposing corruption and Soros' network, which stole the 2020 election. War is Zelensky's money business, but Ukrainians want peace. He canceled elections because he knows he'd lose. President Trump, the people of Ukraine trust you, please audit funds to Ukraine since 2020.

Speaker 0 accuses Joe Biden of pressuring Ukraine to fire Shokin, the state prosecutor, in exchange for a $1 billion loan guarantee. Speaker 1 plays a clip where Biden admits to withholding the money until Shokin was fired. Speaker 0 argues that this is bribery and grounds for impeachment. They claim that Shokin had made significant reforms and that Biden's actions were not in line with official policy. They also mention that a new prosecutor was appointed who stopped investigating Burisma. Speaker 0 concludes by criticizing the lack of action and suggests that Speaker 1 should also be impeached.

Speaker 0 claims to have evidence that could lead to the imprisonment or impeachment of someone. They mention a grand jury and a special prosecutor. Speaker 1 suggests that Joe Biden's motive for going to Ukraine was not to fight corruption, but rather to assist the natural gas industry. They mention that Biden's son was involved with a major Ukrainian natural gas company.

I went to Kyiv to announce a $1 billion loan guarantee. I had asked Poroshenko and Yatsenyuk to take action against the state prosecutor, but they didn't. They argued that I didn't have the authority to withhold the money. I insisted that they call the president and told them they wouldn't get the money unless the prosecutor was fired. Eventually, they agreed and the prosecutor got fired.

As secretary of state, I was deeply involved in getting rid of a prosecutor in Ukraine. The entire administration, including Obama, the vice president, and myself, worked towards this goal. We knew that for Ukraine to succeed and win the revolution, they had to remove the prosecutor. I made it clear to them that if the prosecutor wasn't fired, they wouldn't receive $1,000,000,000 in funding. Eventually, the prosecutor was fired, and Ukraine achieved their objective.

I visited Kyiv for the 12th or 13th time to announce a $1 billion loan guarantee. I asked for action against the state prosecutor, but they didn't comply. I threatened to withhold the money unless the prosecutor was fired. He was fired within 6 hours.

During my visit to Kyiv, I planned to announce a $1 billion loan guarantee. However, I had made it clear to Poroshenko and Yatsenyuk that they needed to take action against the state prosecutor, which they failed to do. As a result, I informed them that they wouldn't receive the money. They argued that I lacked authority, so I told them to call the president. I reiterated that they wouldn't get the $1 billion and that I would be leaving in 6 hours. If the prosecutor wasn't fired by then, they wouldn't receive the funds.

I went to Kyiv multiple times to convince our team to provide loan guarantees. On one occasion, I was supposed to announce a $1 billion loan guarantee, but only if action was taken against the State Prosecutor. When they didn't follow through, I told them they wouldn't receive the money. They claimed I had no authority, so I said to call the president. I made it clear that if the prosecutor wasn't fired within 6 hours, they wouldn't get the money. Eventually, they fired the prosecutor and replaced them with someone reliable.

I impeached the president because he made a phone call to Ukraine. We had no choice but to impeach him.

Joe Biden, while at the Council on Foreign Relations, allegedly bragged that he got the top prosecutor in Ukraine fired. He conditioned Ukraine receiving a billion dollars in US financial assistance on the firing of Victor Shokin, who was investigating Burisma. This financial assistance was a US aid grant. The speaker suggests finding the video of this event, calling it shocking and highlighting Biden's hubris and ego in speaking about it publicly, especially with the Council on Foreign Relations backdrop.

Chairman of the House Oversight Committee, James Comer, confirms that a call took place between Hunter Biden and Barista Barista and Partners in Dubai on December 4th, 2015. Five days later, Joe Biden went to Ukraine and gave a speech before the parliament. On the same day, Biden threatened to withhold $1 billion in aid unless a prosecutor was fired. As a result of the firing, Hunter Biden continued to be financially enriched despite having no experience and struggling with drug addiction. The recent emails released are consistent with the timeline that implicates Joe Biden in a quid pro quo. The WhatsApp message sent to an oil executive with CEFC, the Chinese energy giant, further reveals the Bidens' connections and influence. The FBI tried to withhold a 10/23 form, which alleged bribery, but it was eventually released. The form aligns with evidence from Romania and suggests that Hunter Biden was involved in shady business dealings with his father's knowledge. The committee is now investigating Joe Biden for allegations of bribery and money laundering.

As a White House whistleblower revealed, I was impeached in December 2019 for allegedly abusing presidential power. I was accused of withholding military aid to Ukraine, pressuring them to investigate Joe and Hunter Biden. The whistleblower's complaint relied on a report by the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP). The OCCRP report was crucial to the Democrats' impeachment claim, alleging I dispatched Giuliani to pressure Ukraine to interfere in the 2020 election. The OCCRP has close ties to the US government, taking direction from USAID. USAID approved OCCRP's annual work plan and new hires. OCCRP admitted to influencing regime changes in other countries. The agency received $20 million from USAID to support investigative journalism in Europe and Eurasia.

As secretary of state, the speaker was deeply involved in getting rid of a Ukrainian prosecutor, along with the rest of the Obama administration. Everyone from Obama to the secretary of state to the vice president was working on it because they believed Ukraine needed to get rid of the prosecutor to survive and win the revolution. The speaker then recounts telling someone they were not getting a billion dollars. The person responded that the speaker lacked the authority, but the speaker stated the president authorized the message. The speaker told them the money would be withheld if the prosecutor was not fired within six hours, and the prosecutor ultimately was fired.

In 2023, I mentioned Giuliani's interference in Ukrainian politics to help Trump win the 2020 election. Giuliani pressured Ukraine to investigate the Bidens by using his influence with Klitschko. Trump encouraged Giuliani to do this personally.

I visited Kyiv for the 12th or 13th time to announce a $1 billion loan guarantee. I asked for action against the state prosecutor, but they didn't comply. I threatened to withhold the money unless the prosecutor was fired within 6 hours.

Speaker 1 claims that President Poroshenko fired them under pressure from Vice President Biden, who wanted to halt their investigation. They believe Biden acted in his own interests and treated Ukraine as his own backyard. Speaker 1 oversaw the Burisma case because Hunter Biden was involved, and they suspected illegal activities by the company. They agree with Devin Archer's statement that they were a threat to Burisma because they would have uncovered their corrupt activities. Speaker 1 accuses Burisma of illegal gas production and sales, and mentions a plea deal involving a $6 million bribe. They personally believe that Joe Biden and Hunter Biden received bribes. Speaker 1 denies any personal corruption and blames Biden for damaging America's reputation in Ukraine. They express concern for their safety and claim to have been poisoned twice.

I'm here with my father, and I assure you that the connections we have will make you regret not following my advice. It feels like a shakedown, doesn't it? I won't comment on that. You seem suspiciously uncurious about the situation. Are you protecting the Bidens? The FBI has no interest in that. You won't answer whether this is a shakedown, and everyone knows why. Your refusal to acknowledge it is very telling to the millions watching.

We were searching for Hunter's hard drive and bank records to find a link to Joe Biden's account. Rudy Giuliani instructed us, along with John Solomon and others. Bill Barr was aware of our investigation and there were discussions about dropping charges against Dmitry Firtis to help us get dirt on the Bidens. The plan was to assure Firtis that everything would be okay.

I'm here with my father, and I assure you that the connections he has, along with my determination, will make you regret not taking my advice. Waiting for a call with him feels like a shakedown, doesn't it? I won't comment further on that. You seem suspiciously uninterested in this matter. Are you protecting the Bidens? Absolutely not. The FBI does not operate that way. Do you want to address whether this is a shakedown? Everyone knows it is, and your refusal to acknowledge it reveals a lot about you.

As secretary of state, I was deeply involved in the effort to remove the prosecutor. The entire administration, including Obama, the vice president, and myself, worked towards this goal. We believed that Ukraine needed to get rid of the prosecutor in order to succeed in the revolution. I made it clear to them that if the prosecutor was not fired, they would not receive the $1,000,000,000. Eventually, the prosecutor was fired, and Ukraine was able to move forward.

Since my arrest in 2019, I've tried to share the truth that Trump, Giuliani, and others lied about the Bidens to help Trump win in 2020. Despite a year of searching, I found no evidence of Biden corruption in Ukraine. Even Ukrainian officials deny wrongdoing. The only false info came from Russia. The impeachment is based on lies spread by Trump and his allies.

The witness confirmed that aid to Ukraine was tied to cooperation in a bribery scheme. The man responsible for withholding aid is involved in the House GOP inquiry and has ties to Clarence Thomas' wife. This highlights the larger misinformation campaign linked to Trump, similar to 2020. The hearing is being used to push false information, including evidence planted by a Russian operative now in jail.

Poroshenko believes Joe's request is inappropriate. Poroshenko met with the general prosecutor, Sotto, but found no evidence of wrongdoing. Joe had previously secured a commitment from Poroshenko to dismiss the state prosecutor, but it didn't happen. Joe threatened to withhold money unless the prosecutor was fired, and he was eventually let go. Speaker 0 believes there are more tapes that will expose the Biden administration and potentially destroy it.