TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Speaker 1 presents evidence of alleged corruption by Joe Biden, including questionable finances and overseas payments. The firing of a prosecutor investigating Biden's son is highlighted as suspicious. Speaker 0 questions the motives behind the impeachment inquiry, suggesting it may be politically motivated. Speaker 1 argues that the evidence points to corruption and influence peddling, not political revenge. The lack of media coverage is blamed for public skepticism.

Speaker 0 accuses Joe Biden of pressuring Ukraine to fire Shokin, the state prosecutor, in exchange for a $1 billion loan guarantee. Speaker 1 plays a clip where Biden admits to withholding the money until Shokin was fired. Speaker 0 argues that this is bribery and grounds for impeachment. They claim that Shokin had made significant reforms and that Biden's actions were not in line with official policy. They also mention that a new prosecutor was appointed who stopped investigating Burisma. Speaker 0 concludes by criticizing the lack of action and suggests that Speaker 1 should also be impeached.

The IRS agents found evidence to investigate Joe Biden for financial crimes. Despite claims of no evidence linking Joe to Hunter Biden's businesses, the speaker believes it is untrue.

The speaker discusses a letter from Lev Parnas, a former associate of Rudy Giuliani and President Trump, detailing their efforts to smear Joe Biden before the 2020 election. Parnas states that there is no evidence of any crimes committed by Hunter or Joe Biden in relation to Ukrainian politics. He calls for an end to the committee's investigation and offers to testify. The speaker suggests bringing Parnas in as a witness to shed light on their campaign. The hearing will focus on Hunter Biden's legal issues, but there is no evidence of wrongdoing by President Joe Biden or his administration.

Speaker 0 claims to have evidence that could lead to the imprisonment or impeachment of someone. They mention a grand jury and a special prosecutor. Speaker 1 suggests that Joe Biden's motive for going to Ukraine was not to fight corruption, but rather to assist the natural gas industry. They mention that Biden's son was involved with a major Ukrainian natural gas company.

Biden and the media claimed that Shokin was corrupt and had to be dismissed, but no charges of corruption have been proven against him. Shokin believes the truth lies in the transcripts of Biden's conversations with Poroshenko. He alleges that Biden illegally influenced foreign officials to protect his son and engage in illegal money laundering. One American News verified Shokin's claims with a sworn affidavit to an Austrian court, accusing Biden of interfering with ongoing investigations. To learn more, watch part 3 of One America News investigates debunking the Adam Schiff case for impeachment. I'm Chanel Bian reporting from Washington.

There is no evidence of a link between Hunter Biden and the president regarding business dealings. The hearing did not provide any proof of wrongdoing by the president. The speaker wanted to address a question but was interrupted by Mr. Bobolinski. Translation: There is no evidence connecting Hunter Biden and the president in terms of business dealings. The hearing failed to show any wrongdoing by the president. The speaker tried to respond to a question but was interrupted by Mr. Bobolinski.

Joe Biden has denied involvement in his family's business deals, but witnesses claim otherwise. They believe he lied about interacting with Hunter Biden's associates and is the closer for their business dealings with foreign interests. The speaker challenges the left to prove otherwise before yielding the floor.

The speaker urges the chairman to move forward with impeachment, questioning the delay and cost to taxpayers. The other speaker defends the process, stating they are following facts and oversight. The first speaker challenges them to call for impeachment if they truly believe in the evidence. Ultimately, the first speaker believes the impeachment efforts are a show without substance, claiming it will never happen due to lack of evidence and support.

Today marks the end of a failed attempt to find wrongdoing by Joe Biden for impeachment. Multiple witnesses couldn't identify any crimes, experts found no evidence, and bank records confirmed Biden's lack of involvement in family businesses. The investigation included irrelevant displays of pornographic images, a Chinese agent as a star witness, and a fabricated tip about a bribe. The key evidence was discredited, and the investigation is seen as a farce.

The speakers discuss the evidence for an impeachment inquiry against Joe Biden. Speaker 2 argues that the Bidens' ownership of expensive homes and receipt of large sums of money from overseas interests, along with the existence of shell companies, suggest corruption and money laundering. They also mention that the prosecutor investigating the company Biden's son worked for was fired. Speaker 1 supports this argument and mentions the possibility of a foreign corrupt practices act investigation. Speaker 0 questions the lack of indictments and subpoenas, but Speaker 1 explains that an impeachment inquiry is needed for jurisdiction. They conclude by emphasizing the evidence of over $20 million received by the Biden family.

I impeached the president because he made a phone call to Ukraine. We had no choice but to impeach him.

I have been on this investigating committee for over 20 years and as an attorney, I can confidently say that there is more evidence to impeach Donald Trump for a third time than to implicate President Biden. The focus on the Biden family is a way to deflect from the lack of evidence against President Biden. The shifting arguments have only served to exonerate President Biden.

Joe Biden, while at the Council on Foreign Relations, allegedly bragged that he got the top prosecutor in Ukraine fired. He conditioned Ukraine receiving a billion dollars in US financial assistance on the firing of Victor Shokin, who was investigating Burisma. This financial assistance was a US aid grant. The speaker suggests finding the video of this event, calling it shocking and highlighting Biden's hubris and ego in speaking about it publicly, especially with the Council on Foreign Relations backdrop.

Speaker 1 denies ever discussing his son's overseas business dealings and claims to have never discussed anything related to Ukraine. He also states that he has never discussed his own business or his children's business. Speaker 1 dismisses claims that he was on speaker phone discussing business matters and points out that he was aware of his son's business but never talked about it. Speaker 2 admits to having shell companies that collected money through tax fraud, and compares it to what he sees happening with Biden. Speaker 1 emphasizes that there is no evidence to support any wrongdoing.

Speaker 1 claims that President Poroshenko fired them under pressure from Vice President Biden, who wanted to halt their investigation. They believe Biden acted in his own interests and treated Ukraine as his own backyard. Speaker 1 oversaw the Burisma case because Hunter Biden was involved, and they suspected illegal activities by the company. They agree with Devin Archer's statement that they were a threat to Burisma because they would have uncovered their corrupt activities. Speaker 1 accuses Burisma of illegal gas production and sales, and mentions a plea deal involving a $6 million bribe. They personally believe that Joe Biden and Hunter Biden received bribes. Speaker 1 denies any personal corruption and blames Biden for damaging America's reputation in Ukraine. They express concern for their safety and claim to have been poisoned twice.

Speaker 0 asks how the speaker plans to convince Americans who are upset about Hunter Biden's laptop that he is fighting for them. Speaker 1 dismisses the laptop allegations as a smear, stating that every serious investigator has debunked them. He mentions previous similar allegations and points to overwhelming evidence from the intelligence community that the Russians are involved. Speaker 1 defends his son's integrity and highlights that during the impeachment, all major Trump officials testified under oath that Biden did his job and broke no laws. He criticizes the president for contributing to the crass and dirty state of politics. Speaker 0 asks one more question.

The speaker discusses the analogy of a criminal ordering a hit and how it relates to the impeachment inquiry of Joe Biden. They claim that Joe Biden was involved in his family's business schemes in Romania while he was president. They mention that Biden delivered an anti-corruption speech in Romania and had discussions with the Romanian president about anti-corruption efforts. They also highlight that the Biden family received money from a corrupt Romanian oligarch through a company called Bladen Enterprises. They mention Hunter Biden's meetings with the US ambassador to Romania and the flow of over $1,000,000 to the Bidens.

The impeachment inquiry is based on lies, warned by Pompeo and Lev Parnas, with no specific charges against the president. The committee proceeded despite knowing the evidence was falsified. The focus should be on why the inquiry continues.

In this conversation, dated February 18, 2015, Poroshenko seems to admit that Shokin did nothing wrong but was forced to resign at Biden's request. The call starts with some technical difficulties, but they eventually connect. Poroshenko expresses his happiness and mentions positive and negative news. He then informs Biden that he met with the general who is facing corruption charges, but they don't have any information about him doing something wrong. Poroshenko specifically asked the general about this.

Bobolinski testified that he personally witnessed President Biden commit a crime, specifically related to corruption statutes, Rico, and conspiracy theories. He criticized the impeachment inquiry for being based on false allegations and lacking a specific high crime or misdemeanor. Bobolinski highlighted the arrest of the individual who made the bribery scheme allegations against Biden, questioning why the inquiry is proceeding despite this. He called for responsible leadership to withdraw the inquiry based on false charges. The focus should be on why the committee is moving forward with flawed evidence.

There is no evidence to support the claim that President Joe Biden has done anything wrong or broken the law. Republicans have not provided any proof of wrongdoing or impeachable offenses. President Biden is a good, decent, and hardworking man who has dedicated his life to public service.

Since my arrest in 2019, I've tried to share the truth that Trump, Giuliani, and others lied about the Bidens to help Trump win in 2020. Despite a year of searching, I found no evidence of Biden corruption in Ukraine. Even Ukrainian officials deny wrongdoing. The only false info came from Russia. The impeachment is based on lies spread by Trump and his allies.

Poroshenko believes Joe's request is inappropriate. Poroshenko met with the general prosecutor, Sotto, but found no evidence of wrongdoing. Joe had previously secured a commitment from Poroshenko to dismiss the state prosecutor, but it didn't happen. Joe threatened to withhold money unless the prosecutor was fired, and he was eventually let go. Speaker 0 believes there are more tapes that will expose the Biden administration and potentially destroy it.

In my year of global interviews, I found no evidence of Biden corruption in Ukraine. No credible source, including FBI, CIA, NSA, or Ukrainian officials, has proven any illegal activity. Even when offered a deal, CEO of Burisma provided no information. The only accusations against the Bidens in Ukraine come from Russia. The impeachment proceedings are based on false Kremlin information. Stay tuned for a heated hearing. Jesse Waters joins us now.