TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

I was asked about Trump becoming speaker and I answered honestly. I think "speaker Trump" sounds great.

A conversation takes place between two speakers. Speaker 0 mentions a person who was a senior adviser to Donald Trump at the Pentagon. Speaker 1 finds it amusing that Speaker 0, who is a Republican, would support Trump, considering Trump's strong support for Israel. Speaker 0 clarifies that they are actually a communist.

Stop! This has gone too far. I have a duty to be in this room, representing 200,000 people from Northwest Georgia who elected me to be here today.

Have you said thank you at all during this entire meeting today? You went to Pennsylvania and campaigned for the opposition in October. Can you offer some appreciation for the United States of America and the president who is trying to save your country?

I'm not on vacation in Europe, even though it may seem that way. I'm actually here working for you all. I have obtained something on this trip that, in the past, could have led to the president's impeachment if posted online. I have evidence that makes it very easy to impeach Joe Biden for criminal activity.

I want to talk about waste, fraud, and abuse. People like President Musk and Trump are using their public offices to enrich themselves by billions of dollars. Why is there silence about looking into the actions of the president and the richest man on Earth? I will say President Musk and Trump often use their public offices to enrich themselves. I will withdraw calling Trump "grifter-in-chief." It's despicable that this committee is silencing me for bringing up that Trump is making millions of dollars.

I am the Chief Technology Officer. Mister Bobolinski, please proceed. I apologize for the disruption. I want to know if decorum rules apply to witnesses. The chairman says it applies to members, not witnesses. Mister Bobolinski, please continue your statement. I want to make sure the American people hear all the facts. Thank you.

The speaker thanks the chairman and addresses someone named Hunter, suggesting they are afraid of the speaker's words. The speaker reclaims their time. The speaker says that the House committees should provide relevant information to any legitimate inquiry. The speaker claims their first five offers were ignored. Then in November, a subpoena was issued for a behind-closed-doors deposition. The speaker asserts that Republicans have repeatedly misused this tactic in their political crusade to selectively leak and mischaracterize witness statements.

Chairman Schiff should be disqualified from running an investigation because his committee members or staff are fact witnesses regarding contact with the whistleblower and the whistleblower process. The speaker has not spoken directly with the whistleblower but would like to. Acclaimed Republican Intelligence Committee members question this.

We are contacting witnesses convicted of stealing $80,000,000 from workers' pensions. The star witness, in prison for the scam, cannot testify. Republicans chose him to testify against the president, a low choice. Mister Parnas, you...

I would like to reclaim my time and address the chairman. It seems that Hunter is afraid of what I have to say. It's unfortunate that I burst their bubble.

In the transcript, Speaker 0 recalls that while driving through a struggling neighborhood in Chicago, he commented that "only black people could live that way." Speaker 1 responds with "Privilege? Yes. I will turn it over." Speaker 2 accuses Speaker 1 of misleading the committee, noting a written submission that contradicted his testimony, and asks if he will review it during the next break to correct the record, to which Speaker 1 answers "Yes." Speaker 2 then questions Speaker 1 about campaign involvement, asking if he helped out the president's campaign or was involved as a representative or spokesman, and states that it was Speaker 1’s idea for the campaign dating back to 2011; Speaker 1 answers "Yes." Speaker 2 asks about Miss Rona Graf, described as Mister Trump’s executive assistant who sits next to him and is involved in a lot of what went on, and whether she would be able to corroborate many of the statements Speaker 1 has made.

If we were playing a drinking game every time someone said "if" or "Hunter," I'd be drunk by now. I'm curious, to understand your ruling, if someone on this committee starts talking about someone's "bleach blonde, bad built butch body," that wouldn't be engaging in personalities, correct? It sounds like you need to know math to be with the IRS. I agree. Right now, they're peddling Russian lies. Republicans have become synonymous with Russians. When I ask a question, that's when you answer. Otherwise, I'm talking, because it's my time. You'll know when I ask a question, I promise. No, because this is what... I'm trying to get directions, but I can't hear you with your yelling. Can you please calm down? Y'all are out of control.

I impeached the president because he made a phone call to Ukraine. We had no choice but to impeach him.

I am deeply troubled by your responses today. You need to acknowledge that Donald Trump lost the 2020 election. You avoided answering that question when asked by Senator Durbin. Additionally, you should clearly state that those involved in the January 6th insurrection who committed violence should not be pardoned. I don’t have to say what you want me to say. I speak the truth and won’t say anything just to gain confirmation. I will answer questions to the best of my ability.

I personally witnessed President Joe Biden commit a crime. He was with me while I was putting something together. The crime I witnessed was related to corruption statutes, Rico, and conspiracy. Rico is not a crime but a category of crimes. I have charges against him. I reclaim my time. Thank you.

The speaker mentioned the goal of getting Republicans elected. However, the gentleman was not recognized and members were reminded not to engage in personal attacks against each other.

I support President Donald Trump and share the concerns of many Americans about voting irregularities in the last election. I want to assure you that on Wednesday, we will have our day in Congress to address these concerns. We will hear objections and review the evidence.

Speaker 0: Reclaiming time from Chairman, Hunter is avoiding my words. Speaker 1: House committees seek relevant info, but GOP misuses subpoenas for political gain, ignoring offers and leaking witness statements. Translation: Speaker 0 reclaims time from the Chairman as Hunter avoids their words. Speaker 1 mentions that House committees are seeking relevant information, but Republicans are misusing subpoenas for political purposes by ignoring offers and leaking witness statements.

The speaker proposes bringing someone up for a couple of minutes. The speaker states that the world will see a vibrant Republican.

I'd like the Republicans to remain on the line. Democrats are welcome to leave if they choose, but I want the Republicans to stay connected. Mister president, mister president, mister president.

Congressman, why did the J6 committee delete their files? I have no idea. It's all in the bipartisan report by Republican Representative Liz Cheney, who chairs the Republican conference. Do you think Liz Cheney is a true Republican? Well, you tell me. You seem to be a true Republican. And what about Governor DeSantis? He was a Democrat, then a Reform Party member, and independent, but he's a con man and your boss. Thank you for your input. Are you sure you don't want to answer about the committee's handling of Donald Trump? Thank you, congressman.

I want to reclaim my time, Mr. Chairman. The house committees issued a subpoena for a closed-door deposition after our first five offers were ignored. Republicans misuse this tactic to leak and mischaracterize witness statements.

Mister Parnas questions the committee about text messages from Mister Bob. Mister Chairman interrupts, saying there's no time for Democratic games. Parnas insists on discussing important investigative matters. The chairman grants Parnas 7 minutes, equal to Bobolinski's time.

Speaker 0 states: "It's disruptive. It's ridiculous." "Obviously, it's to persecute an enemy, which I can't believe the FBI is being so politicized." "However, I will say, if he would have testified in the first impeachment hearing, maybe we wouldn't be here." "So there's a little bit of karma also."