reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 1 respects the right of people to vote for the president. However, it is questioned why, for the first time in American history, a president won every swing state while also being best friends with and having their largest donation from a man who owns and runs the Internet. It is hoped that this will be investigated to determine if it was an anomaly. It is curious, especially since Kamala Harris was filling up stadiums with supporters, while Donald Trump was not. As an American and believer in democracy, Speaker 1 hopes to look at all the reasons why this happened in the country.

We need to address issues with computer voting, as seen in Antrim County, Michigan. Despite a programming error, it was caught and corrected the same day. There is no evidence of a statewide software glitch affecting other elections. Let's focus on winning elections instead of worrying about false claims.

A candidate was winning on election night, but California's voting system allows voting 30 days before the election and counting for 30 days after. Unlike Florida, which announces results on election night, California's system makes it easier to cheat. The candidate won narrowly, by about 2,000 votes in a state of 40 million, after weeks of ballot counting. Cheating is assumed, though not proven. This is suggested by a single-party state, machine politics, and inconsistent application of safeguards in vote counting. Some counties match signatures while others don't, despite legal requirements. Some counties ignore irregularities like missing ballot dates.

To lower tensions and unite the country, we must investigate election irregularities. Allegations include ballots being backdated in Detroit, late unsealed ballots counted for Democrats, and deceased individuals voting. Whistleblowers in Nevada reported witnessing voter fraud. An election official in Georgia admitted to finding illegal and double voters on the rolls. False claims of fraud are harmful, so we must approach this issue carefully and responsibly.

Late in the evening, six states that exit polls showed were going to carry suddenly veered off to Bush. Ohio then became the tipping point of the entire national election. There were tens of thousands of acts of irregularity. In a single precinct in Ohio, a total of 638 ballots were cast on election day. Bush received over 4,000 of them. Warren County is the last county in Ohio to come in with their vote totals, and they won't allow any witnesses in, won't allow any media in, and they say it's because of a homeland security threat. And yet the next day, we check with homeland security, they say we never spoke to anyone in Ohio. The function of the secretary of state's computer servers to report election results was moved during the night of the election from Ohio to servers in Chattanooga, Tennessee.

The transcript discusses concerns about election irregularities and voting machines. One speaker claims a voting machine subtracted votes, displaying a negative number. Another speaker states that such subtraction cannot occur accidentally and that someone consciously tried to steal votes. A third speaker says that when they press the button next to their name, another person's name appears on the display, questioning the accuracy of the vote count. Another speaker asserts that the machines are working correctly, recording votes accurately, and that the results will be accurate and reliable. One speaker expresses concern about private corporations controlling the voting system and calls for a formal debate about election irregularities, warning that the democracy and republic are at risk.

Miss Waters from California rises to object to the fraudulent 25 Florida electoral votes. The objection is in writing but not signed by a senator. The chair advises that the rules require a senator's signature. Miss Waters mentions gross violations of the voting rights act in Florida but acknowledges that the objection is not signed by a senator. The chair thanks Miss Waters but states that the point of order may not be received.

The speaker questions the certification of the election results, stating that the margin of victory is less than 1%. They mention testimony from the secretary of state's counsel, who sent letters to 8,000 people who voted illegally, advising them not to vote in the US senate race. This number is almost three-fourths of the margin of victory. The speaker also points out that there is a 10% margin that is not accurate. They ask how the senate and house can stand by the certification.

The chair hands the certificate of the electors for president and vice president of the state of Florida to the tellers. An objection to Florida’s votes is presented in writing, signed by a number of members of the House of Representatives, but not by a member of the Senate. A member of the Congressional Black Caucus states that he is objecting to the counting of the 25 electoral votes from Florida, thanking the president for the inquiry, and says the objection is signed on behalf of his diverse constituents and the millions of Americans disenfranchised by Florida’s inaccurate vote count. The clerk reports the objection, noting that it is signed by a member of the House and a United States senator. The objection to Ohio’s electoral votes is read, raised on the ground that the votes were not “under all of the known circumstances regularly given.” It is signed by Stephanie Tubbs Jones of Ohio and Barbara Boxer of California. Another speaker says the objection today is raised because there are irregularities across the country with regard to voting, and that Congress has an obligation to step up to the plate and correct them. A further speaker dedicates the Ohio objection to Michael Moore, the producer of the documentary Fahrenheit 9/11. A speaker notes that, first of all, no election official in Ohio has provided any explanation for the massive and widespread irregularity in the state, including machines in Mahoning County that recorded “carry” votes for Bush. There is a sense of concern about irregularities across the nation. In closing, another speaker remarks that people are dying all over the world, many from his state, in the name of bringing democracy to distant parts of the world, and asks, “Let’s fix it here, and let’s do it first thing out.”

The speaker discusses an incident where there were errors in the vote count for Biden and Trump. They explain that the voting machine generated a high number of errors, which were then sent for adjudication. The rate of ballots needing adjudication was 68%, much higher than the federal allowable rate of 1 in 125,000. The speaker suggests that this program is designed to generate errors and manipulate votes. They also mention that on November 4th, all system files related to adjudication were deleted. This is seen as a significant issue.

Congratulations to all Americans on this historic victory. However, there are concerns about voter fraud, particularly in Maricopa County, Arizona. Adrian Fontes, the Arizona Secretary of State, claims the election process is secure, but there are accusations of mishandling voter registration. Reports indicate that 90,000 registration forms submitted by a third party were mostly damaged or incomplete. Additionally, the Election Fairness Institute has identified 500,000 cloned voters in Arizona. The counting process in Arizona is criticized for taking much longer than in Florida, despite a smaller population. Many believe that late ballots will favor Republican candidates, and there is skepticism about the integrity of the election process. Voters in Arizona are encouraged to verify that their votes are counted, especially regarding the important Kary Lake Senate race. We must ensure transparency and accountability in this election.

On November 9th, there was a mysterious occurrence where 25,000 ballots went missing in the reported count. The next day, on November 10th, these ballots magically appeared, affecting the outcome of the race. This doesn't make sense and is completely wrong. The law exists to safeguard the integrity of the vote.

Miss Waters from California rises to object to the fraudulent 25 Florida electoral votes. The objection is in writing but not signed by a senator. The chair advises that a senator's signature is required. Miss Waters mentions gross violations of the Voting Rights Act in Florida, but the objection is still not signed by a senator. The chair thanks Miss Waters but states that the objection may not be received based on the previously stated point of order.

In Antrim County, a software glitch caused a 6,000 vote swing from Republicans to Democrats. The county clerk admitted to the error, leading to a manual recount of all ballots. It was discovered that 47 other counties in Michigan use the same software and should review their results for discrepancies. Transparency and openness are essential for the people of Michigan.

Speaker 0 asks for reassurance that the upcoming election won't be rigged or stolen. Speaker 1 responds by mentioning that having Democrats in charge of the voting machines in Ohio is helpful. However, they also acknowledge that both Republicans and Democrats have manipulated elections in the past. Speaker 1 explains that those in power tend to try to tilt things in their favor.

Four years ago, there were concerns about uncounted votes in Illinois. A computing error in Franklin County gave extra votes to George Bush. This raises questions about the accuracy and integrity of our election system, not just in Ohio but also in other states. It is important to address these issues to maintain the legitimacy of our elections, especially when promoting democracy in other countries. The objection is raised in Ohio, but similar situations have occurred in Michigan and Arizona. This debate should continue to shed light on the irregularities observed. The golden rule of politics, treating others as you would like to be treated, should guide our actions regardless of the election outcome.

Four years ago, there were concerns about uncounted votes in Illinois. A computing error in Franklin County gave extra votes to George Bush. This raises questions about the accuracy and integrity of our election system, not just in Ohio but also in other states. It is important to address these issues to maintain the legitimacy of our elections, especially when promoting democracy in other countries. The objection is raised in Ohio, but similar situations have occurred in Michigan and Arizona. This debate should continue to shed light on the irregularities observed. The golden rule of politics, treating others as you would like to be treated, should guide our actions regardless of the election outcome.

In Ohio, having Democrats in charge of the voting machines is seen as an advantage. However, it's important to acknowledge that election manipulation has occurred in the past, not just by Republicans but also by Democrats. When people hold power, they often try to influence things in their favor. This has been observed in my hometown of Chicago as well.

Votes in Michigan were miscounted due to software errors, favoring Democrats over Republicans. This affected 47 counties using the same software. Antrim County had to manually count all ballots. Other counties should review their results for discrepancies. Michigan residents deserve transparency in the election process.

The speaker discusses various issues related to the election. They mention instances of duplicate scanning of ballots and non-unique cast vote records in Allegheny. They also bring up a case in Antrim County, Michigan, where software settings changed the winner in a small area. Another instance is mentioned in Fulton County, Pennsylvania, where an IP address connected to the voting system from a foreign location. The speaker expresses concern about the security and transparency of the election due to the possibility of data being transmitted to foreign IP addresses. They mention a Python script and a foreign IP address found on the same adjudication workstation. Additionally, they highlight a signature mismatch error code in Georgia's system log files.

The speaker witnessed multiple instances where the Delaware County Board of Elections did not follow proper procedures during the election. They personally saw the voting machine warehouse supervisor uploading USB cards into the machines without being observed. The speaker raised concerns to the deputy sheriff and the clerk of elections, but their objections were ignored. It was later revealed that the warehouse manager usually inserts a few USBs into the machines after each election, but the number observed was unusually high. Currently, 47 USB cards are missing and cannot be located.

Multiple speakers express concerns about the legitimacy of elections, focusing on the 2016, 2000, 2004, and 2018 elections. Several speakers claim that Russian interference affected the outcome of the 2016 election, leading them to view Trump as an illegitimate president. Some believe Trump is aware of this illegitimacy. The 2000 Bush v. Gore election is cited as an example of a court-appointed president, with claims that Al Gore won Florida but the Supreme Court halted the vote count. The 2004 election in Ohio is described as riddled with problems, including malfunctioning machines and allegations of voting rights violations. Some believe John Kerry privately thought the election was stolen. The 2018 Georgia gubernatorial election is also disputed, with accusations that Brian Kemp, then Secretary of State, suppressed votes and disenfranchised voters, leading to Stacey Abrams' loss. Speakers assert the election was not fair and that Abrams likely won. Concerns are raised about the integrity of electronic voting machines and the lack of paper trails.

The speaker discusses how the vote total may have been altered through the HAMMER program and ScoreCard software, affecting the election outcome. They mention a computer glitch in Michigan that favored President Trump, suggesting similar issues in other states. They question the sudden appearance of thousands of ballots for Biden, deeming it statistically improbable.

Democrats mistakenly received votes meant for Republicans in Michigan due to a software glitch, causing a 6,000 vote swing. The county clerk admitted to the error, prompting a hand count of all ballots in one county. It was discovered that 47 counties used the same software, raising concerns about similar discrepancies. Transparency and scrutiny are needed in Michigan's election process. Translation: Due to a software error, votes were incorrectly assigned to Democrats instead of Republicans in Michigan, leading to a significant swing in votes. This mistake has raised concerns about the accuracy of the election results in 47 counties that used the same software. Transparency and careful review of the results are necessary for the people of Michigan.

In Ohio, having Democrats in charge of the machines is beneficial. However, it's important to be honest about the fact that both Republicans and Democrats have manipulated elections in the past. When people are in power, they tend to try to sway things in their favor.