TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 asks how many transgender Americans have been mass shooters over the last ten years; Speaker 1 responds, Too many. The discussion shifts to the total number of mass shooters in America over the last decade, with Five presented as the count and described as a lot. The exchange ends with Speaker 0 asking again, Do you mind do you know how many mass shooters there have been in America over the last ten years? Speaker 1 says, Counting or not counting gang violence. Great.

That there our system is reactive. Something bad happens, we react to it. And what people are crying for now is how can we prevent this? How can we stop it? And the only way to stop it is to identify the shooter ahead of time or keep the weapons out of their hands. And so we're gonna have to have a conversation of freedom versus protecting children. I mean, how many school shootings does it take before we're gonna have a conversation about keeping firearms out? It's always a young white male, almost always. I mean, did anyone this morning think, I wonder if that was a female? Did any of y'all think that? I mean, there's been one school shooting involving a female. Wasn't in Tennessee. Yeah, Tennessee. But other than that, it is usually young white males.

So do you know how many transgender Americans have been mass shooters over the last ten years? Speaker 1: Too many. Okay. I think there's a There is five. Now five is a lot. Right? I'm gonna give you I'm give you some credit. Do mind do you know how many mass shooters there have been in America over the last ten years? Speaker 1: Counting or not counting gang violence. Great.

That there our system is reactive. Something bad happens, we react to it. And what people are crying for now is how can we prevent this? How can we stop it? And the only way to stop it is to identify the shooter ahead of time or keep the weapons out of their hands. And so we're gonna have to have a conversation of freedom versus protecting children. I mean, how many school shootings does it take before we're gonna have a conversation about keeping firearms out? It's always a young white male, almost always. I mean, did anyone this morning think, I wonder if that was a female? Did any of y'all think that? I mean, there's been one school shooting involving a female. Wasn't in Tennessee. Yeah. Tennessee. But other than that, it is usually young white males.

Speaker 1: Of course, as you all know, in the wake of Charlie's murder, there was an incredible amount of angry discourse from the right. Blaming the Democrats, blaming liberals saying, you're the reason this happened. Only to find out, surprise, 22 year old white dude, loved guns, raised by two parents, lived in a good home, dad as a minister, also a sheriff, didn't check it in boxes. Y'all thought he would check, did he? Speaker 0: Okay. First of all, a coat of mascara would be your friend. Speaker 0: That is disgusting. That was absolutely disgusting. Fuck her. Speaker 0: It's it's weird how she lost the points about him being a furry loving trans dating.

Why are we cheering for someone getting shot? He's dead. Like, no matter what political beliefs are, should not be cheering that someone got shot. He has a family. We do. We I value everyone's beliefs, but we should not be cheering as a class that someone got shot. He has a family. Yes. And who shot them? A transgender person. Oh. Oh. Oh. So that's what it is. Yes. Five males. It doesn't matter. You should not be cheering that someone got shot. Yes. You should not be cheering that someone got shot. Yeah. He's still, like, attacking you guys don't care what other people got.

Speaker 0: You know how many mass shooters there have been in America over the last ten How many transgender Americans have been mass shooters over the last ten years? Speaker 1: Too many. Speaker 0: Credit. Do you mind do you know how many mass shooters there have been in America over the last ten years? Speaker 1: Counting or not Counting gang violence. Great.

Speaker 0 argues that white Americans will soon be a minority, and that this is great. Speaker 1 counters that whites will not be the majority and describes it as an exciting transformation and evolution, a progress of the country. Speaker 2 states that whites will be a minority very soon and says, “I'm okay with that.” Speaker 1 asks, if the white working class is in trouble, whether new Americans should be brought in. Speaker 3 predicts America will look very different in a hundred years, with racial labels becoming less distinct (“You're black, you're white, you're Hispanic, you're Puerto Rican, whatever”), and says that complexity will be good in the end. Speaker 2 contends that white Americans feel they are losing their country and ownership, and that they are, in the end, not the future. Speaker 3 asserts that for the first time in American history, the number of white people went down; “White population is declining for the first time in history in America.” Speaker 3 cautions that white people will not be the majority in the country anymore, noting it will be the first generation with whites as a minority. Speaker 1 proclaims, “Treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity.” Speaker 3 proclaims that to abolish whiteness is to abolish white people. Speaker 1 contends that white people are committed to being villains in the aggregate. Speaker 3 declares, “We gotta take these motherfuckers out.” Speaker 2 asks whether it was the duty of every good revolutionary to kill all newborn white babies. Speaker 3 responds, “We have to kill white people,” and, when pressed, mirrors that sentiment with, “When we say we wanna kill whites, we don't really mean we wanna kill whites. We do. We have to exterminate white people off of the face of the planet to solve this problem.” Speaker 1 comments, “When do we start killing white people?” and then, “start killing all white folks, but maybe?” Speaker 3 reiterates the extermination goal, stating, “We have to exterminate white people off of the face of the planet to solve this problem.” Speaker 5 adds, “An unrelenting stream of immigration. Nonstop. Nonstop. Folks like me who were Caucasian of European descent will be in an absolute minority in The United States Of America. Absolute minority.” He concludes that this shift is not a bad thing and calls it a source of strength.

Speaker 0: Yes. Is that fair to say? Alright. Great. So do you know how many transgender Americans have been mass shooters over the last ten years? Speaker 1: Too many. Speaker 0: I'm gonna hear a Speaker 0: lot of Americans. Five. Okay. Now five is a lot. Right? Speaker 0: I'm gonna give you I'm gonna give you some credit. Do you mind do you know how many mass shooters there have been in America over the last ten years? Counting or not counting gang violence. Great. Speaker 1: What the fuck?

Speaker 0 states: "Your big shots. Already have a nigger mare. We don't need any more nigger big shots. Already have a nigger mare. We don't need any more nigger big shots." Speaker 1 describes a future problem and the current crisis: "There's about a 100,000 of them who are the predators. A 100,000 of the kids you read about in the front page of the newspaper every day. Unless we do something about that cadre of young people, tens of thousands of them, born out of wedlock, without parents, without supervision, structure, without any conscience developing. A portion of them will become the predators fifteen years from now. And, madam president, we have predators on our streets." He adds that "They are beyond the pale, many of those people. We have no choice but to take them out of society."

Speaker 0: Hey, yo. Stop scrolling for one second for me. Give me just one second. Look, we were not there to figure out who killed Kennedy. We were not there to figure out who killed King, but we did figure out one thing. That this dude right here look. This guy right here running, you see him running? That is the guy that took out Kurt. That's the guy. That's him right there. Speaker 1: If speech is violence, then some are bound to conclude that violence is justified to stop speech. And we're not gonna let that be justified.

Why aren't we blowing up their communities and flooding their spaces like they used to do to us? They don't care about us, so fuck peace and love because it hasn't gotten us anywhere in 400 years. People should be angry, but many don't take things seriously anymore. They've been had it out for us for ages, and nothing has changed, even with some of us working for them. The Joey Swole situation should have opened eyes, but many are still asleep. We build ourselves up, and they tear us down. It's frustrating to be around a generation that doesn't give a fuck anymore.

Speaker 0 says, “They doing too much, man, and they keep pushing people. You know?” Speaker 1 erupts, “Oh, shit. What the fuck? They killed my did they fucking kill that guy? Are you fucking kidding me, dude? Not again. Are you fucking kidding me? That guy's dead. Yo. We need people on”

Speaker 0: So do you know how many transgender Americans have been mass shooters over the last ten years? Speaker 1: Too many. Okay. Speaker 0: I think there's a There is five. Now five is a lot. Right? I'm gonna give you I'm give you some credit. Do mind do you know how many mass shooters there have been in America over the last ten years? Speaker 1: Counting or not counting gang violence. Great.

The speakers discuss a GoFundMe for a black teen who killed a white teen, contrasting it with the hypothetical reaction if the races were reversed. One speaker says the GoFundMe comments reveal hatred against white people and that it feels like rewarding the killer, which could lead to societal breakdown. Another speaker says racial conflict reveals an ugly truth: many black people harbor ingrained racial hatred towards white people due to historical injustices. He says this surfaces during incidents like this, as seen in the GoFundMe comments. He contrasts this with support for the white victim, which he attributes to the tragedy of his death and potential. He says this underbelly of racism from the black community will always emerge in similar situations, regardless of who is right or wrong.

That there our system is reactive. Something bad happens, we react to it. And what people are crying for now is how can we prevent this? How can we stop it? And the only way to stop it is to identify the shooter ahead of time or keep the weapons out of their hands. And so we're gonna have to have a conversation of freedom versus protecting children. I mean, how many school shootings does it take before we're gonna have a conversation about keeping firearms out? It's always a young white male, almost always. I mean, did anyone this morning think, I wonder if that was a female? Did any of y'all think that? I mean, there's been one school shooting involving a female. Wasn't in Tennessee. Yeah. Tennessee. But other than that, it is usually young white males.

Speaker 0 opened by saying that over the last week he has interacted with over 300,000 plus real Chicagoans who say it is hate speech to evoke the Civil War or the Confederacy, to say that law enforcement is a sickness, while the other person has over 150 sworn CPD officers on his detail. He asked what the other person would say to those people and whether he would ask his 150 sworn officers to stand down if he and his wife Stacy are ever attacked, shot at, or rammed with a protester’s vehicle. Speaker 1 responded with sarcasm about the large number, joking that the interactions had “gone down to 300,000,” and claimed he had checked the other person’s comments. He asserted that the addiction on jails and incarceration and the addiction of militarism is evil, referencing Doctor King, and said it is incumbent to ensure that “the real Chicagoans” or the real people of America receive attention, suggesting we should spend billions of dollars overseas on the people in Chicago instead. Speaker 0 pushed back, saying that the real Chicagoans he talks to, mostly Black and Brown, feel that the other person does not distinguish between illegal aliens and real Chicago citizens, and that he is siding with illegal aliens over communities. He asserted that a recent incident involved “an illegal alien from Nicaragua” who grabbed a woman on the North Side, bashed her head into the sidewalk, knocked her unconscious, and raped her. He asked whether, if that had been the other person’s wife, Stacy, he would want ICE to deport that illegal alien, and asked for a yes or no answer. Speaker 1 pressed to get a direct answer, asking for a response “as a man, not as mayor,” and repeated the question about whether ICE should deport the rapist. Speaker 0 reiterated his question and stated that the answer for real Chicagoans is the deportation of the rapist, and that was the “answer for real Chicagoans.” Speaker 1 then apologized for being late, blaming traffic, and the other person quipped about the traffic, noting, “You’re not blaming me for the traffic, are you?” and said he had been watching.

Speaker 0 believes Democrats are cynically toying with the anti-racist movement, which will cause whites to see things racially, leading to a conflict with no clear solution, unlike the first civil war. Speaker 0 claims a well-armed rural white population is now correctly understanding that it is being targeted by a mob that claims it's guilty of things it isn't guilty of yet. Speaker 1 suggests many whites are no longer interested in their own identity and won't take up that war, complicating the situation. Speaker 0 agrees it's complicated and asks if there's an acceptable way it ends.

White people are every single bit justified in being racist. Every single bit justified. That's pattern recognition. That's not racism. That's pattern recognition. Aren't you people ashamed? Who's raising these fucking people? Who's raising these people? It's other black people. It's baby mamas and baby daddies. We are fucking tired of you. It's you, it's black people. We are too broke to be woke. We want our lives back. We want our cities back. The crime. It's the chaos. It's the violence. And you know what demographic is almost exclusively responsible for it? It's you, it's black people. Jason Whitlock... said that this is a demonic sentiment. Who does it benefit to make these excuses and to say it's everybody else? We are done. We want our lives back.

White people are tired of hearing about racism and oppression. They are tired of black people's excuses for not graduating high school or raising their kids. Black kids are running all over the city with no parents because the parents let them. Black parents won't cooperate, especially black mothers. Some black mothers chase away men who want to be there for their kids with obnoxious and degrading behaviors. White people are done and getting ready to remove their support. Then black people will understand what racism and oppression is all about.

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 if they are ruling out the possibility of calling for the slaughter of white people in the future. Speaker 1 responds by saying they don't know what will happen and it may or may not be them. Speaker 0 clarifies that it could be Speaker 1 and asks what would necessitate that. Speaker 1 doesn't know and questions why they would do that. Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 to pledge to never call for the slaughter of white people, but Speaker 1 refuses to make that pledge. Speaker 0 understands.

Speaker 1: "Just because the other side... jokes about the bad things that happened to them, I don't think that makes it okay for us to turn around and do the same." Speaker 0: "No. We need to stop... the left just haven't cucked out enough." Speaker 0: "Trump is fucking insane because he has support from 90% of the conservatives in the Republican party who are entirely un American." Speaker 1: "One person is dead... a swing state voter." Speaker 1: "We don't know what the motivation of the shooter was." Speaker 1: "Just because there is fire burning doesn't give us leave to throw more wood on it." Speaker 0: "Donald Trump wanted absolute criminal immunity." Speaker 0: "Democracy only works when everybody participates." Speaker 1: "I reject this framing entirely."

Patrick Crusius was white, correct? I don't know his parentage. He was white. I don't understand why you're focusing on race. Because black lives matter, sir. All lives matter, sir. Every single life matters—white, black, Asian. Professor Butler.

Speaker 0 challenges Speaker 1 to publicly address an issue larger than Austin, accusing him of "white guilt" and weakness that is creating more "Austin Metcalfs." Speaker 0 urges Speaker 1 to condemn his son's killer and the culture that caused it. Speaker 1 accuses Speaker 0 of being degenerate, murdering white people, and not being patriotic. Speaker 1 claims that silence has not helped and asks where Speaker 0 was on January 6th. Speaker 1 states that Speaker 0 is only condemning his solution to help people where they're weak, particularly young black males. Speaker 1 says he will run for Senate in Florida as a Republican and defeat Speaker 0. Speaker 1 accuses Speaker 0 of wanting to shut down a white man. Speaker 1 states he came to give a message from his father. Speaker 0 accuses Speaker 1 of trying to shut him down because he is a black man.

Speaker 1: "The narrative that they have pushed forward in the last ten years is that there is a relentless assault on against black people be on behalf of white people, and the data does not show that." Speaker 1: "White individuals are actually more likely to be attacked, especially even per capita, by black individuals in this country." Speaker 3: "it's just pure race race mongering, hate mongering. It's wrong." Speaker 3: "Where is the George Floyd policing act? It didn't pass." Speaker 0: "The media doesn't care about this, and we should start asking why." Speaker 1: "All of a sudden, when we make the left live up to their own standard of rules, there is complete silence by the entire American media."