TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

"I had the pleasure of talking with both Nick Sorter, the journalist who was attacked in Portland yesterday and then arrested there, oddly enough." "And also the attorney general, Pam Bondi, my boss, about what is happening in Portland and the urgent need for federal civil rights investigation over there." "we promptly moved to open up that federal civil rights investigation." "Portland is already under a federal consent decree for its failed police practices." "our very detailed demands for information are requiring body cam information and details about why, multiple journalists have been attacked there in Portland and the police seem to do nothing about it." "National Guard is being activated in Portland, thanks to our president's leadership." "So, follow along and we will keep everyone posted as we go forward in this situation."

There needs to be better coordination to address the issue of right wing extremism targeting democratically led cities, particularly those led by people of color. Their aim is to create disruption and chaos. This same political party has a history of denying President Obama's American citizenship, storming the Capitol, and refusing to accept the results of the civil war. It is disrespectful, mean-spirited, and driven by an unclean spirit. The faith community must play a crucial role in addressing this situation.

The speaker states that more arrests are likely coming and that they have body camera footage of members of Congress assaulting ICE enforcement officers, including body slamming a female ICE officer. The speaker confirms there is a video of members of Congress body slamming ICE officials. When asked if members of Congress will be arrested, the speaker says it is an ongoing investigation and that is definitely on the table. ICE has the video, and it will be released very shortly.

"You just announced the official civil rights investigation into the Portland Police Bureau." "She called me this morning about this." "Portland Police Department has absolutely failed to protect the people of Portland going back well over a decade." "A federal consent decree was actually issued against Portland's police department in 2012." "They tried to delay it up by a couple of years, but it went into effect eleven years ago in 2014." "Since that time, as we've all seen on the television, there have been numerous riots with Antifa over the last five years." "So what we're doing today is actually under the purview of an existing federal consent decree over bad police practices." "Why does it seem like the Portland police are actually working for antifa as opposed to the people of Portland?"

Speaker 0 says they will pursue charges in this case and see various crimes that have occurred, with the FACE Act mentioned as one predicate. He notes that the Biden DOJ used the Klan Act conspiracy charges tacked onto the FACE Act in cases of protests outside abortion clinics to bring longer sentences, and that there are a number of tools available. He asks who funded the operation and what other crimes may have occurred, including possible use of wires or the mails, and whether anyone crossed state lines—all potential predicates for additional federal charges. Speaker 1 responds, saying he pulled up the Klan Act, the 1871 Enforcement Act (Force Act) designed to counter the Ku Klux Klan and protect African American voting rights, and provides an explanation of its context. He describes the Klan Act as a law that makes it illegal to terrorize citizens or violate their civil rights, or to conspire to violate civil rights. He explains it is often used against law enforcement but now used against others as well. When anyone conspires to violate protected civil rights, the Klan Act can be used to bring a conspiracy charge. He explains that the Biden administration has treated actions as a violation of the Klan Act and a conspiracy to violate civil rights, turning a potential misdemeanor under the FACE Act into a felony under the Klan Act. He cites the example of potential actions by “three grandmas” praying outside an abortion clinic being treated as a conspiracy to violate the civil rights of women seeking abortions. Speaker 0 adds that President Trump pardoned the pro-life protesters in those cases. He notes he recently defended successfully in the Eleventh Circuit a case called Ora Pesa, involving Jane’s Revenge protests against crisis pregnancy centers in Florida, where the court upheld the Klan Act criminal enhancement to the FACE Act. He acknowledges this is technical, but emphasizes that FACE Act is just the starting point, with additional charges such as material support for disruptive activities, conspiracy to violate civil rights, and potentially the use of other instrumentalities to commit crimes. He asserts that some involved individuals have identified themselves, stating Don Lemon claimed he knew what would happen inside the facility and proceeded to “commit journalism,” implying involvement in a criminal conspiracy. Speaker 0 concludes that they are gathering facts and that this is a very serious matter. He warns that come next Sunday, no one should think they can get away with this in the United States. He states that everyone in the protest community should know that the fullest force of the federal government will come down to prevent this from happening and to put people away for a long time.

Speaker Harmit Dillon discusses the current situation in Portland. He notes that the United States Department of Justice is under shutdown orders like the rest of the government, but those responsible for law and order remain on the job. He mentions a conversation with Nick Sorter, the journalist who was attacked in Portland yesterday and then arrested there, and with Pam Bondi, his boss, about what is happening in Portland and the urgent need for a federal civil rights investigation. Dillon states that they promptly moved to open a federal civil rights investigation. He explains that Portland is already under a federal consent decree for its failed police practices, in place for over a decade. Their very detailed demands for information are requiring body cam information and details about why multiple journalists have been attacked there and why the police seem to do nothing about it. He recalls litigating in Portland about journalist Andy Ngo being viciously attacked there while the police again did nothing about it. Dillon notes that the National Guard is being activated in Portland, attributed to the president's leadership. He says they will ask folks to stay tuned and have faith. He emphasizes that the United States Department of Justice Civil Rights Division is extremely aggressive in protecting the rights of American citizens, protecting the First Amendment, and ensuring that police practices in the United States are not discriminatory in violation of federal law. He asserts it is about time that Portland residents and people in Oregon felt safe from the scourge of Antifa and from lax and unacceptable police practices, and invites people to follow along as they go forward in this situation.

A journalist asks about a recent FBI action at the Fulton County, Georgia elections office, where twenty twenty ballots, voter rolls, and scanner images were seized. The journalist notes that the president claimed, “they got into the votes. You're going to see some interesting things happening,” and asks why the president was so involved in an FBI and DOJ raid. A spokesperson responds that the president’s statements do not imply his involvement. He emphasizes that this is a criminal grand jury investigation, and clarifies that there was a search warrant authorized by a federal judge, a magistrate judge in Atlanta, which allowed the FBI to seize the records. The spokesperson notes that the records have been seized by the FBI as part of the ongoing investigation. The journalist presses on what the investigation is about. The spokesperson reiterates that he cannot discuss specifics of any grand jury investigation, but previously stated that election integrity is of the highest importance to the American people, and that the efforts are aimed at ensuring free and fair elections for everyone in the country, Democrats and Republicans alike. The spokesperson adds that they are doing everything possible to uphold election integrity. The journalist mentions that in Georgia, claims of voter fraud related to the twenty twenty ballots have been debunked repeatedly and that there were multiple recounts. The transcript ends without further elaboration on those claims. Key points conveyed: - The FBI seized twenty twenty ballots, voter rolls, and scanner images from the Fulton County elections office. - The president suggested that “interesting things” would occur, prompting questions about his involvement. - A spokesperson denies the president’s involvement and describes the actions as part of a criminal grand jury investigation. - A federal magistrate judge in Atlanta issued the search warrant permitting the seizure; the FBI conducted the seizure. - The investigation’s specifics cannot be discussed, but officials assert a commitment to election integrity and ensuring free and fair elections for all Americans. - The dialogue references prior debunking of voter fraud claims in Georgia and multiple recounts, without presenting new specifics.

Protesters forced their way into a federal government building in Washington, D.C. The speaker asks if both incidents, including the Capitol riot on January 6th and the extremists forcing their way into the Interior Department, should be considered domestic terrorism. The other speaker refuses to comment on specific matters and states that they need more evidence to make a legal determination. The first speaker criticizes the lack of transparency in releasing video footage and accuses the Department of Justice of not addressing the issue directly. They argue that both incidents should be prosecuted regardless of ideology, but the second speaker continues to avoid giving a clear answer.

The speaker asks the Attorney General if the Justice Department cultivates sources and spies in Latin Mass parishes and other Catholic parishes. The speaker references a document that explores developing tripwires and sources against traditionalist Catholics, including those who favor the Latin Mass. The Attorney General calls the document appalling, states the Justice Department does not investigate based on religion, and says the FBI has withdrawn the document and is looking into how this happened. The speaker claims the memorandum cites the Southern Poverty Law Center to identify Catholics as part of hate groups and asks if the FBI uses left-wing advocacy groups to target Catholics. The Attorney General denies the FBI targets Catholics and says the memorandum is inappropriate and doesn't reflect FBI methods, stating they shouldn't rely on single organizations without doing their own work. The speaker asks how many informants are in Catholic churches across America. The Attorney General doesn't know but doesn't believe there are any informants aimed at Catholic churches, citing a rule against investigations based on First Amendment activity. The speaker accuses the Justice Department of targeting Catholics for their faith views.

The speaker stated firmly that the perpetrators of the incident committed a grave error, and asserted that the investigation is actively pursuing who they are, who coordinated with them, who financed the operation, and who was present at the scene. It was emphasized that the United States Department of Justice will respond with full force to the matter, under the direction of the attorney general. The speaker noted that this commitment to action follows discussions held yesterday with a pastor who was completely shaken, and who was with his family at the time of the incident. The aim highlighted is to ensure the safety of everyone involved, with ongoing assurances of security for the community. The speaker underscored that the investigation will identify and verify all key participants and facilitators, including the individuals responsible for planning and funding, and those who attended the scene. The reference to the attorney general’s directive indicates that the case will be addressed at the highest level of federal law enforcement, signaling a strong and comprehensive legal response. There was an explicit intention to communicate that there will be additional legal actions in the near future. The speaker connected the present measures to broader safety concerns, noting the need to protect individuals and families affected by the incident and to restore a sense of safety in the greater community. The pastor’s experience—being with his family and being understandably shaken—was highlighted to illustrate the human impact of the event and the urgency of addressing it with decisive legal follow-through. In summary, the speaker conveyed a commitment to a thorough and transparent investigation aimed at identifying every stakeholder involved in planning, coordination, funding, and presence at the scene, with the full support and directives of the Department of Justice. The message also conveyed reassurance that additional legal steps will be taken in the coming days to ensure the safety of all involved and to hold accountable those responsible.

"There's a concern that there were agents of the government or assets of the government present on January 5 and January 6, during the protests." "I'm need afraid I can't see that at all." "Alright. You have you have those images there, and they're captioned. They were from January 5 and January 6." "As far as we can determine, the individual who was saying he'll probably go to jail, he'll probably be arrested, but he wants every but they need to go into the capital the next day, is then the next day directing people to the capital." "And as far as we can find, this individual has not been charged with anything." "One of the norms of the justice department is to not comment on impending investigations and particularly not to comment about, particular scenes or particular individuals." "So I'm not gonna violate this norm of, of of, the rule of law. I'm not gonna comment on an investigation that's ongoing."

After a 4-year investigation, the justice department released a 300-page report on the FBI's failures. Members of Congress will bring in John Durham to review the findings. The investigation confirms what we already knew from a previous inspector general report: the FBI did not uphold their duty to follow the law in certain events and activities related to the crossfire hurricane and intelligence operations.

The transcript presents a highly inflammatory, pro-immigration-enforcement narrative centered on recent unrest in Portland and Chicago, with broad claims about law enforcement, media, and politics. - In Portland, Kristi Noem, the secretary of homeland security, is described as visiting “Rip City,” inspecting what is framed as Antifa’s “mini confederacy,” and interacting with an undocumented migrant in a way likened to a dramatic arrest, with wording implying removal from the country. - The situation at protests is depicted as chaotic and violent, with ICE vans “busting through barricades” and targeting a fentanyl trafficker, a murder suspect, sex predators, and pedophiles “all iced in Oregon.” Protesters are accused of throwing rocks and using lasers and dye, while Democrats are described as saying it’s all “smoke and mirrors.” - Protesters are described as peaceful on the surface but with videographers behind them to create a perception of chaos; a tone is set that the media is biased, and there is contempt for mainstream outlets, including a claim that “Legacy Media doesn’t have any reporters filming the riots.” - Chief Bob Day is introduced as a police chief who is also a DEI consultant, previously working for a DEI nonprofit, and accused of coaching Antifa to avoid arrest. The narrative suggests that Day prioritizes positive media coverage and that his actions reflect a broader strategy to reimagine policing. - The piece asserts a strained relationship between people of color, police, and a broader social order, with speakers claiming that bias and racism within policing have not been adequately addressed and that challenges will increase unless something changes. - There are repeated claims that Antifa is attacking immigration officers for an extended period, while Portland is described as aiding Antifa and resisting ICE. A meeting between Kristi Noem and Bob Day is described as unfavorable to law enforcement, with Day allegedly dissatisfied by the outcome. - Chicago is portrayed similarly: federal agents’ operations are described as being hampered by a stand-down order, with a female rioter who allegedly doxxed ICE agents and rammed a car later described as extremely dangerous; prosecutors reportedly characterize the individual as dangerous, while the left is accused of prioritizing “micro confederacies” to protect alleged criminals. - The transcript ties these events to political figures and themes: mentioning Mayor Johnson and “no ICE zones,” referencing violent crime, and portraying actions by Democrats and certain judges as lenient toward criminals. A Latin King calls for a $10,000 hit on a border patrol commander. - There is a recurring narrative about the 2024-2025 political climate: immigration, crime, media bias, and political power. Claims include that illegal crossings have declined to the lowest level since 1970, that the FBI has arrested thousands in crime sweeps, and that political operatives hope to deploy troops to polling places to “protect the vote.” - The piece ends with criticisms of Kristi Noem and others, accusing them of sensationalism and of inciting actions, and portraying discussions about immigration and policing as deeply adversarial, with calls for stronger enforcement and political maneuvering to influence elections.

Many people entered the Capitol building without permission, which is a federal crime. Our focus is on prosecuting those who entered the building or engaged in violent or corrupt behavior on Capitol grounds. However, it's important to note that even those who entered the restricted area without authorization committed a federal crime. Thousands of people occupied an area where they were not allowed to be in the first place.

Don Lemon and Greta discussed the response to a pastor who protected his parishioners, noting that the pastor’s actions were remarkable. Greta added that the parishioners felt intimidated, and there will be arrests in the next several hours connected to the incident, with people being brought to justice for how they violated the law in that situation. Greta then reflected on Don Lemon’s role, suggesting that when she first saw the coverage she assumed he was there as a journalist asking questions, but his later comment about white supremacy led her to wonder if he wasn’t there in a journalistic capacity. Don Lemon’s activities were described by Greta as involving prior surveillance before they entered the church, identifying individuals going in with him who were activists and the work they had done in the past. Greta noted that the entire situation was posted on the Black Lives Matter website, and said that those involved would be held responsible for that.