reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The president has secret powers called presidential emergency action documents (PIATs) that allow him to suspend the constitution. These powers are worrying, especially before a national election. PIATs are essentially presidential orders created for worst-case scenarios. They originated during the Eisenhower administration to plan for a potential Soviet nuclear attack but have since expanded to address other emergencies. Very little is known about PIATs as they are kept in secret and have never been released or leaked. Not even Congress has access to them. The president's references to these secret powers are not made up, but the limits of these authorities remain unknown.

President Biden was photographed with a cheat sheet during a press conference, including a reporter's name and question. He was seen reading answers from it, which is concerning. It's sad and unusual to witness this behavior.

Congressmen Roy, Crane, Biggs, and Mills are urged to act immediately to protect the president and potential next president. Legislation reforming 18 USC 3056, which grants power to the Secret Service, must be passed today. The speaker believes that without this reform, specifically removing the Secret Service's investigative function, the president may not make it to inauguration day, even if he wins. The speaker emphasizes the urgency of the situation, stating action was needed "10 minutes ago."

The US intelligence community allegedly asked foreign spy agencies to help monitor over 2 dozen associates of Donald Trump during the 2016 election, according to a report. The report suggests that President Obama's CIA director, John Brennan, identified these individuals as targets for collection and misinformation. The Five Eyes nations (US, UK, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand) were involved. The release of this report coincides with house conservatives preparing a bill to reauthorize section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. The House Rules Committee is set to meet regarding Pfizer reform.

"Did president Obama ordered any kind of surveillance of the president? Well elect." "We don't know we don't know who sent the taskings, if the taskings were changed into what went into these intelligence reports, but we're gonna try to find that out." "And I thought it was important for the president to know this." "That's why I briefed the speaker this morning, and I came down here, as soon as I could." "I think the president is is concerned, and he and he should be." "He'd like to see these reports." "Hopefully, when we get them, hopefully, they'll get them to the White House also."

Peter Doocy brought a prop to the White House briefing: a document from justice.gov that he printed. He stated that one document looked different and authentic. Doocy pointed out that the last name on the document looked as if the president had difficulty spelling it. He then asked why the one thing Joe Biden signed the day before he left was so messy.

President Trump announced a regulatory freeze, halting bureaucrats from issuing new regulations until the administration gains full control of the government.

Pen that can do that. Right? Look at that, Pam. Is that a good signature? Seriously. Is that a good signature? Who can who can write like that? Nobody. I assume we're looking at the whole auto pen scam, sir, because the person that ran it said he spoke to briefly twice about nothing. That means that all those partners that he gave to some very bad people, very unpatriotic people, very evil people, it looks to me like those partners are are worthless. Because number one, you shouldn't use an auto pen very specifically. And they have to know that the president wanted it. The president didn't want this. The president didn't know he was alive. Okay? He never approved any of this stuff. He wasn't for open borders and all of the other thing. He was never for open borders. I've known Biden a long time. He was never very sharp, but he was never in favor of open borders and all of the other things he did to destroy our country. Let's go. Lastly, sir, this is an executive order on flag burning.

Speaker 1 believes there's an open legal challenge regarding the use of an AutoPen for pardons. The typical AutoPen approval process requires signatures from at least five people, including attorneys, policy makers, and the president. Speaker 1 claims President Trump stated that there are no records of these required signatures, and it's unknown who used the AutoPen. Speaker 1 agrees with President Trump that this is a problem. Speaker 1 suggests testing the legality of the pardons by indicting someone who received one.

An executive order signed by the president last week suspended a previous order aimed at preventing foreign interference, particularly from China, in the U.S. power grid for 90 days. Given the concerns about China, questions arise about the rationale behind this suspension, especially regarding national security. The president's perspective on the U.S.-China relationship was shared, but clarification on this specific decision will be provided later.

An individual asked who in the Obama administration authorized foreign nationals' involvement in a government database, given Microsoft's contract stipulated foreign tech support. In 2016, the speaker inquired about the approval authority with Insight Global, raising concerns and requesting documentation, but received no information until 2020. In 2020, after being recruited by Insight Global as a principal software developer, the speaker claims to have discovered that Barack Obama authorized everything between 2014 and 2016. The speaker assumes Obama also approved similar agreements with companies like Amazon and Oracle, possibly during the final years of his administration.

Biden auto pen thing was Payola. People were paying for pardons. New revelations from the New York Times about Joe Biden and the auto pen scandal. According to New York Times, mister Biden did not individually approve each name for the categorical pardons. Rather than ask Biden to keep signing revised versions, his staff waited and then ran the final version through the auto pen, which they saw as routine. Jeff Zients, former Biden chief of staff, three minutes later, hit reply all and wrote, 'I approve the use of the auto pen for the execution of all of the following pardons.' The final list reportedly included Fauci. 'cash for clemency deal' and 'three people controlled access, and they were making money off of it.' The House Oversight Committee has brought in a number of former Biden aides to speak about this, and this will drive a wave of questions.

The first participant asks the second to identify who did each major event. For MLK Jr., the second participant says, “That was a CI operation because they considered him a dangerous communist. And but the FBI was bugging the, in churches where he was giving some of his speeches in churches. They were bugging the podiums and following him around. He was a top target, for elimination.” For JFK, the second participant states, “I think that was a CI hit. They they may have employed some mafia connections to carry it out because that was their mafia assassination program.” Concerning LBJ, the first participant notes, “LBJ was very involved in all that in Dallas. So,” and the second participant adds, “he an evil man.” The first participant affirms, “He was an evil man.” Turning to Pearl Harbor, the second participant claims, “They knew the attack was coming was coming. They knew where it was gonna happen in Pearl Harbor and when. And they they told no one, and they let it happen on purpose. That that's from the commander of the Pacific Fleet. I would say that's a pretty pretty credible witness.” He continues, “So, yeah, that that was a false admitted that. They admitted they had the and they heard it was gonna happen. And, you how know, else were you gonna get Americans to be on the side of this war that had nothing to do with us?” This leads to the discussion of 9/11. The second participant says, “My opinion. As a criminal investigator, as a former CI officer, nine eleven was not the act of a bunch of poorly flight trained terrorists that executed an unbelievably meticulous, piloting of those aircraft, even even pilots. There's there's pilots for nine eleven truth now, and they say, we could not have done that. Not possible.” He adds, “And then we go to the passport issue, and we go to the Tower 7, which was a controlled demolition.” The second participant further asserts, “You talk to any structural engineer, and and and I I have. And the fact I think George w Bush blacked out. I think it was 40 pages of the 09/11 report dealing with Saudi Arabia. So what wait a minute. This report was supposed to be for the American people on what happened, and you blacked all these pages out? What in the world?” He continues, “I do not think that it was a bunch of un poorly trained or untrained terrorists that did it. I think there was another source behind it. I think it was intentional, and I'm going just from a a criminal invest investigative perspective just looking at the evidence, what evidence we have, that that was an intentional act, And it would fall right into the MO that you and I are talking about.” He concludes that the event was “Horrible” and emphasizes that “the shadow government deep state or especially the CIA. It does not matter. Their pawns on their chessboard, they don't care that three thousand people were horribly killed that day, but it achieved the aim of gutting the US constitution, bringing in the horrific Patriot Act Mhmm. Giving the CIA unthinkable authority for secret prison prisons and torture beyond waterboarding and and secret renditions and all of that, the FBI, the ability to to, spy on Americans came out of the Patriot Act. So it was the perfect national security state, energizer that the Patriot Act was, and 70 of the congressmen and senators that read the Patriot Act didn't even read it. They just signed off on it without even reading the bill.”

Auto pens are described as widely used on Capitol Hill. “I do it because I respect your signature. Mhmm.” Staffers push a button to pass off documents as authentic, not the elected official signing. “They’d be like, oh, I didn’t know. Lock. Get out of jail free card.” The esign Act, signed 06/30/2000, “it is legal for senators to use an auto pen for their signature. However, the esign Act also states that all parties must consent to the use of their signature and must be aware of what they're actually signing.” The gray area: whether staffers used it “without the direction and authorization of the senator.” Senator Ed Markey: “staff uses an auto machine that replicates the senator's signature all the time” for “everything from Veterans Affairs cases to visa issues.” In 2025, “Biden issued 14 executive orders. Every single one was auto pinned.” “staff quietly added violent criminals to the list and then ran them through the AutoPen without telling him.” Hidden Camera shows Markey’s aide bragging “fucked up” while driving, mocking Markey's wife as a Karen, and claiming that white people are afraid of him because he's a black n word. Markey also “takes an aggressive stance against Tesla's autopilot feature.” “This is ironic considering the senator often doesn't even sign his own name without his pen on autopilot.” Tips: o'keefmediagold.com; 0keefemediagold.com or 833324gold. This is James O'Keefe.

The Biden White House is under investigation regarding the use of an "auto pen" to sign documents, with Trump now calling Biden "the auto pen." Bondi's team is investigating Biden's competence and whether others exploited him, questioning if he knew what he was signing, including 8,000 pardons. The investigation was launched after Ed Martin made an announcement at the Department of Justice. The Heritage Foundation found that many documents with Biden's signature used the same auto pen signature. The auto pen was first used regularly by President Truman for simple tasks, but Obama used a portable auto pen in Europe to sign major legislation. The question is whether Biden directed someone to sign his name or if aides had free rein. Speaker Johnson suggests Biden was out of the loop. One source claims a top Biden aide may have misused the auto pen, while David Sacks alleges Elizabeth Warren controlled it. If Biden didn't approve its use, it could be forgery. Some believe Biden wasn't running the country, while others insist he was engaged and gave directives. Jake Tapper's coverage of Biden has prompted CNN to cover the auto pen investigation. Some suggest Democrats should abandon their current machine and rebuild. There's a divide within the Democratic Party between "team restraint" and "team resistance."

Speaker 0 contends that a large number of pardons were issued by the auto pen on the final day of the Biden presidency, and asserts there is no record showing that Joe Biden participated in the authorization of those pardons. The speaker claims that these pardons include notable examples such as those for Dr. Anthony Fauci, members of the Biden family, Adam Schiff, the January 6 committee, and an extensive list that the speaker describes as continuing at length. The core assertion is that every one of these pardons was signed with the auto pen and there is no evidence that Joe Biden was personally involved in the decision-making process behind them. According to the speaker, the absence of Biden’s involvement in the decision-making is a key element of the argument, and the implication is that this absence of direct participation should be recognized in legal terms. The speaker further states that these pardons could be declared null and void by the Department of Justice. The underlying claim is that there is a basis for such a nullification rooted in the way the pardons were issued, specifically the use of the auto pen and the lack of documented presidential involvement. The speaker also asserts that the ongoing investigation will produce evidence that will support the DOJ’s decision to void the pardons. In this framing, the investigation’s forthcoming findings are presented as capable of reinforcing the claim that the pardons were improperly issued or improperly authorized due to the absence of direct presidential action. The overall narrative presented is one of procedural challenge to the pardons, anchored in the asserted method of issuance (the auto pen) and the supposed lack of Biden’s participation in the process. The speaker emphasizes a sequence in which the pardons, if deemed void, would be reversed or nullified by official action from the Department of Justice, with future investigative evidence expected to validate that outcome in court.

Speaker 1 believes there's an open legal challenge regarding the use of an AutoPen for pardons. The typical AutoPen approval process requires signatures from at least five people, including attorneys, policy makers, and the president. Speaker 1 claims President Trump stated that no such signatures exist and the origin of the AutoPen use is unknown. Speaker 1 agrees with President Trump that this is a problem. Speaker 1 suggests testing the legality of the pardons by indicting someone who received one.

Donald Trump reportedly stated that the U.S. had completed a successful attack on three nuclear sites in Iran. This news is alarming and unconstitutional because only the U.S. Congress can take the country to war. The president does not have that right.

The Biden White House is under investigation regarding the use of an "auto pen" to sign documents, with Trump now calling Biden "the auto pen." Bondi's team is investigating Biden's competence and whether others exploited him, questioning if he knew what he was signing. Concerns arose over last-minute pardons, with signatures appearing identical, suggesting auto pen use. The Heritage Foundation found consistent auto pen signatures on Biden's documents, except for the announcement of Trump dropping out of the race. While Truman used the auto pen for simple tasks, Obama used a portable one to sign major legislation. The Justice Department allows auto pen use if the president approves the decision. Speaker Johnson suggests Biden was out of the loop, with claims that a top aide misused the auto pen, possibly Elizabeth Warren controlling it to target crypto. If Biden didn't approve the auto pen use, it constitutes forgery. Questions about his competence are also raised. Jake Tapper's coverage of Biden prompted CNN to cover the auto pen investigation. MSNBC is critical of CNN's focus on Biden's mental acuity. Joy Reid says Comcast was worried she would blame the Jews. The Democratic party is divided between "team restraint" and "team resistance" regarding Trump.

I asked colleagues to create a committee with subpoena power to investigate the lack of Secret Service protection for the president. The Secret Service director agreed to brief us, but it hasn't happened yet. I question why the president wasn't given more protection and who is responsible for that decision.

Air Force One is making history, flying over the newly named Gulf of America in international waters. We're headed west to Super Bowl LIX. This is a momentous occasion; we're making America great again. This pen, by the way, is quite famous.

The House Oversight Committee is expanding its investigation into Biden's alleged mental decline, interviewing five members of the Biden administration and deposing former physician Dr. Kevin O'Connor. Chairman James Comer stated that they are serious about the investigation, especially regarding the use of an auto pen to sign executive orders and pardons. Comer said that President Trump has waived executive privilege, and if witnesses don't answer questions or show up for interviews and depositions, they will be held in contempt of Congress. The committee aims to discover who authorized the use of the auto pen, especially since many documents were signed while Biden was supposedly at the White House. Comer believes there was a cover-up of Biden's mental decline and that Anthony Bernal, former chief of staff to Jill Biden, was a major part of that inner circle.

The discussion centers on the legality and appropriateness of Joe Biden's use of an autopen, particularly concerning pardons. It's claimed that the Trump administration believes Biden's autopen use may be unconstitutional if he wasn't fully competent or if others used it on his behalf. A former US attorney claims to have contacted senior Biden officials early on regarding Biden's competence and the pardons, receiving some responses. The speaker argues that incompetence could invalidate contracts and pardons, even though the pardon power is plenary. He alleges a whistleblower from the 2020 Biden campaign identified three "gatekeepers"—Clayne, Anita Dunn, and Bob Bauer—who controlled access and potentially profited from it. While not yet verified, this information is deemed potentially scandalous. The speaker clarified that he contacted the Biden family and others in the US attorney's office.

The governor signed the driver's license for all bill into law, causing a packed room at the Saint Paul armory to erupt in cheers.