reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Responsible behaviors are expected from everyone in the community. Legal gun possession within a locked home does not preclude authorities from entering to ensure responsible and safe conduct.

I'm in Baytown, Texas, and this officer is checking my trailer. He just told me what I need to know about protecting my property here in Texas. According to the police here, you should carry a gun. If anyone tries to steal from your truck or trailer, you're within your rights to shoot them. In Texas, your truck is considered your home, and you're allowed to protect it and your belongings. If someone presents themselves as a threat, you can shoot them. Wish I had my gun with me right now.

Every city police force in the US is under the United Nations. Police departments are instructed to confiscate firearms by the UN through the State Department. There are warehouses across the country with UN vehicles and assault vehicles for police use. Licensing departments and agencies will be influenced by the new world order and good governance. The Inspector General will oversee this.

We are introducing legislation to freeze handgun ownership in Canada, meaning no more buying, selling, transferring, or importing handguns. We will also combat gun smuggling and trafficking by increasing penalties and providing more tools for law enforcement. Additionally, long gun magazines will be permanently altered to hold a maximum of 5 rounds. These actions are based on the advice of doctors, experts, and police chiefs. We thank the advocates present for their tireless efforts, acknowledging that their work stems from grief and loss. On behalf of all Canadians, we express gratitude for their strength.

I'm Kate Vantanel, also known as Laney Liberty, discussing the Western Australian Firearms Act Voluntary Buyback Scheme. The WA State Labour Party government is offering $64.3 million to encourage firearm owners to surrender their guns, with valuations based on registration age, not manufacturing age. Many firearm values are significantly lower than market prices, as seen with a 1963 Winchester offered only $525. The government claims public support for fewer guns, but many are unaware of current laws and restrictions. There are concerns about the government's consultation process and transparency. I urge firearm owners not to participate in this buyback scheme. Instead, consider alternative options for your firearms. Now is the time to stand firm and resist these measures. I'm here to support and listen to your stories as we fight against this initiative.

I own a Glock, which I've had for quite some time, and my background is in law enforcement. Yes, I've fired it at a shooting range. Regarding assault weapons, I support a mandatory buyback program and a ban on their importation. We need to address the over 2 million assault weapons already in circulation. If Congress doesn’t act within 100 days, I will implement comprehensive background checks and an assault weapons ban through executive action. We will also work to pass universal background checks and red flag laws. It's important to ensure responsible gun ownership in the community, and we will check for safety in homes where guns are legally possessed.

I own a B&B housing refugees. The government gave me money to accommodate them, but then delivered crates of weapons. I found AK-47s and explosives. I can't let them have it. I'm moving the crates to a secure location. I don't want to be responsible for any harm.

Speaker 0 notes that the declaration period for firearm owners is scheduled to end next week. So far, only 2.5% of the estimated 2,000,000 affected firearms have been declared, leaving 98% of firearm owners without a declaration. The question posed is: if these owners do not declare by the deadline, what is the plan? Speaker 1 responds that the RCMP and other agencies will be available throughout the spring and summer to carry out the collection. Speaker 0 presses the point, asking whether Speaker 1’s plan involves deploying RCMP officers to go door to door to firearms owners to seize their firearms. The question emphasizes concern about using officers who are off duty or retired, and notes that many police forces across the country are refusing to participate in the program. The question expresses worry about sending former RCMP officers to knock on doors and collect firearms, and asks if Speaker 1 is not concerned about this approach. Speaker 1 clarifies that the program is not a door-to-door operation. He states that it is a mobile collection program and describes the program as voluntary. He adds that the participation is strictly voluntary, while compliance with the law is not voluntary. He also references the amnesty that was extended and notes that it expires on October 30 or 31 of this year. Speaker 0 asks what the government’s plan will be for firearms owners who may still possess firearms after the amnesty expires. Speaker 1 concludes by stating that every police jurisdiction will need to enforce the law.

I have a 20-gauge shotgun for hunting. You're not allowed to own any weapons, but I'm not taking your gun away. You need 100 rounds, and we’re discussing a veto. There’s misinformation circulating; I never said I would take your gun. That’s a viral video spreading lies. You just claimed I said I would take your AR. Let’s clarify what was actually said.

The government announced the establishment of a national gun buyback scheme to purchase surplus, newly banned, and illegal firearms, describing it as the largest buyback since the Howard Government initiated one in 1996. The proposal follows reforms made after the Port Arthur tragedy and references the Bondi incident as evidence of the need to remove more guns from the streets. It is stated that one of the terrorists held a firearm licence and had six guns while living in Sydney’s suburbs at Bonnyrigg, indicating that someone in that situation did not need that many firearms. There are now more than 4,000,000 firearms in Australia, which is higher than the number at the time of the Port Arthur massacre nearly thirty years ago. The government will introduce legislation to support funding for the buyback scheme, with costs to be shared on a fifty-fifty basis with states and territories. It is expected that hundreds of thousands of firearms will be collected and destroyed through the scheme. Consistent with the approach taken in 1996, the states and territories will be responsible for collection, processing, and payment to individuals for surrendered firearms, while the Australian Federal Police will be responsible for the destruction of the firearms. Australians are described as rightly proud of their gun laws, and, until five years ago, proud that there had not been a repeat of Port Arthur, nor constant carnage seen in other countries. The statement acknowledges that there have been incidents in Queensland and Victoria involving so-called sovereign citizens who murdered police officers. The National Buyback Scheme is presented as a measure to get guns off the streets and to help make all Australians safe.

Speaker 0 guarantees that the person they are speaking to will help solve the gun problem. Speaker 1 confirms their support for gun confiscation and explains that if people refuse to give up their weapons, law enforcement will take them away and there will be consequences. Speaker 1 acknowledges that some gun owners believe a Biden administration will come for their guns, and they confirm that this is true.

My husband, who owns a gun shop, informed me that the ATF has updated their background check policy. As of today, illegal immigrants are exempted and allowed to purchase firearms. This coincides with California, New York, and Chicago legalizing the employment of illegal immigrants as police officers. It seems like our government is about to engage in some questionable actions without informing us.

The gun buyback program is set to begin in the next month to month and a half, following the recent expenditures of $67 million. Concrete steps for retrieving and disposing of military-style assault weapons will be announced soon. There is a commitment to meet the timeline promised to Canadians, and preparations are well underway. The first phase of the program will launch this fall, while the second phase, which involves individual buybacks from Canadian gun owners, is scheduled for 2025. Overall, the program is on track, and there is optimism about its successful delivery.

Smuggled guns are rarely used to harm police officers, women, or in mass shootings, suicides, or unintentional injury.

Arizona is one of the first states, and there are wands for security at every event. However, it is dangerous and not smart to bring weapons to events unless you are a police officer or security personnel. The speaker would never do such a thing and advises against traveling with a gun from another state. It is suggested that if someone wants to shoot at the event, they should do it for the call.

We need a buyback program for the millions of assault weapons already out there. I support a mandatory buyback, but it has to be done smartly and correctly.

The government of Western Australia is facing criticism for its confusing firearms policy. A text was sent to gun owners stating that a buyback scheme for banned guns would end in August 2024. However, it was later revealed that the guns had not been banned, leading the government to advise gun owners to disregard the text. New laws will take effect in March 2025, and taxpayers may need to fund the buyback of up to 100,000 guns from approximately 95,000 gun owners. Additionally, recent regulations announced on December 23 included new firearms that will become obsolete, leaving owners without the opportunity to participate in the buyback.

Responsible behaviors are expected from everyone in the community. Legal gun possession within a locked home does not preclude authorities from entering the home to ensure responsible and safe conduct.

The speaker discusses assault weapons and shows a device that emits radiation. They argue that this device is an assault weapon because it exceeds the acceptable radiation level. The speaker suggests that instead of focusing on banning traditional assault weapons, efforts should be made to ban devices that emit harmful radiation. They mention going to a business to give them the device as a way to make the community safer.

You agree that using deadly force to protect property is not allowed. However, you mentioned wanting your AR 15 to protect someone's property in the past. Let's revisit this topic briefly.

Congress did not pass a law giving the ATF authority to criminalize 10 million Americans. The ATF's rule, not a law, is being questioned for overreach. The ATF's regulation of gun accessories and the Biden administration's involvement are criticized for potentially turning law-abiding citizens into felons. The discussion also touches on the ATF's regulation of short-barreled rifles and the perceived attack on the Second Amendment. The focus is on the perceived inconsistency in addressing gun control versus disarmament.

In New Mexico, many people carry guns illegally, but it's impossible to arrest them all. If upheld, this law would allow police officers to focus on real criminals. Some argue that it's unconstitutional to restrict the right to bear arms, except in emergencies when additional powers can be invoked. No constitutional right, including my oath, is absolute. There are restrictions on free speech and personal freedoms.

Lloyd notes that the declaration period for firearms owners is ending next week, and highlights that only 2.5% of the estimated 2,000,000 affected firearms have been declared, with 98% of firearms owners not making a declaration. He asks what the plan is if declarations aren’t made by the deadline. The Minister responds that the RCMP and other agencies will be available throughout spring and summer to conduct the collection. Lloyd presses further, asking if the plan is to deploy RCMP officers to go door to door to firearms owners and seize their firearms, describing it as additional resources. He notes concern that many police forces across the country are refusing to participate and worries about sending former RCMP officers door to door. The Minister clarifies that the program is not door-to-door. He describes it as a mobile collection and states the program is voluntary. He emphasizes that compliance with the law is not voluntary and reminds that, as of October 30 of this year, the amnesty that was extended expires. Lloyd asks what the government’s plan will be for firearms owners who still possess firearms after the amnesty expires. The Minister concludes by saying that every police jurisdiction will need to enforce the law.

Responsible behaviors are expected from everyone in the community. Legal gun possession within a locked home does not preclude authorities from entering to ensure responsible and safe conduct.

The government is prohibiting an additional 324 unique makes and models of assault-style firearms in Canada, effective immediately. These firearms can no longer be legally used, sold, or imported, and their transfer or transport is allowed only under very limited conditions. Additionally, the Canadian government has committed to exploring the possibility of donating some of these firearms to support Ukraine in its fight for democracy.