reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Michael, hello. I can't... I've blocked it. I'm calling 911.

Pilar Plasencia says she does not know if she will stay alive and hopes someone finds the phone. She reports they are at Residencias El Camaruno, on the 5th floor, with her mother and her dog trying to get out. She says she cannot see anything downstairs and mentions a person on the 7th floor, Leomín. She states that “Acosta” is asking for help. She also mentions other nearby residences to the side but says she cannot see them. She ends by asking that God allow them to be “agarre confesados,” saying “Amén.”

Mehrere Sprecher wollen: "Wir würden gerne einen Terroristen melden. Wir haben Beweise, dass dieser Mann eine sehr schreckliche Tat plant." Die Beamten antworten: "Entschuldigung, aber dafür sind wir hier nicht zuständig." Es folgt: "Versuchen Sie es doch im sechsten Stopp bei nicht so wichtig." Die Bemerkung über Gesetzesbürokratie: "Die Mühen des Gesetzes malen bei diesen Sachen leider sehr, sehr langsam, mein dicker Freund." Weiter heißt es: "Wir haben Grund zur Annahme, dass ein Terrorist bald zuschlagen wird." "Ein Terrorist? Lächerlich." Eine Meme-Frage: "Hat dieser Mensch zufällig in letzter Zeit ein Meme über einen Politiker geteilt?" Die Antwort: "Aktiv eingreifen können wir nur, wenn jemand das Ego 1 Politikers mit einem harmlosen Witz beleidigt." Dann: "Vielleicht versuchen Sie's mal im zweiten Stock, Raum 113. Ach ja, Bademantelverleih ist im Keller." Spätere Ablenkungen: "Terrorist? Ha, wir haben alle Hände voll zu tun, Menschen einzusperren, die ihre GEZ Gebühren nicht bezahlt haben." "In Frankfurt hat ein Onkel bei 1 Weihnachtsfeier doch tatsächlich die Deutschlandfahne aufgehangen." "Wird schon nichts passieren." "Haben Sie Dubai Schokolade? Nichts," "Können Sie das nicht selbst erledigen?" "Wie spinnen die Deutschen?" "Das kannst Du laut sagen." Has anyone Almighty? English translation: Several speakers want to "report a terrorist." "We have evidence that this man plans a very terrible act." The officials respond: "Sorry, but that's not our responsibility." It continues: "Try it at the sixth stop with not so important." The remark about the slowness of the law: "The burdens of the law are, unfortunately, very, very slow in these matters, my big friend." It says: "We have reason to believe a terrorist will strike soon." "A terrorist? Ridiculous." A question about a meme: "Has this person recently shared a meme about a politician?" The answer: "We can intervene only if someone insults the ego of the politician with a harmless joke." Then: "Maybe try it on the second floor, room 113. Oh yes, bathrobe rental is in the basement." Later diversions: "Terrorist? Ha, we have our hands full locking up people who haven't paid their GEZ fees." "In Frankfurt, at a Christmas party, an uncle actually hung the Germany flag." "Nothing will happen." "Have you Dubai chocolate? Nothing," "Can't you handle that yourself?" "How crazy the Germans are?" "You can say that aloud."

I saw a person on a building and alerted officers. Shots were fired, and I helped someone with a child escape. The shooter moved between buildings. I informed law enforcement about his location. I do not know how he got up there. The incident ended when I left. The building behind us is the American Glass Research Company. The shooter was on the buildings behind it. Translation: I saw someone on a building and told the police. Shots were fired, and I helped someone with a child escape. The shooter moved between buildings. I informed law enforcement about his location. I do not know how he got up there. The incident ended when I left. The building behind us is the American Glass Research Company. The shooter was on the buildings behind it.

The speaker says they are going to send it to Bill. They describe that a “lady” is marking ballots and that the speaker filmed her a half hour earlier while she was doing six ballots, yet she is still working at it. The speaker says that they instruct to “stamp it, received.” They then explain the process for completing the ballots: fill in the six blanks. The speaker specifies that the blanks are “all at the top of the tickets on each one.” They provide a numbered sequence for the six tickets: “One. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.” The speaker emphasizes that the filling-in should be done on each ticket at the top. The speaker adds that there is a security guard right there who is watching the woman while she marks the ballots. They also state that “the cops are on, in on it,” describing police involvement in the scene. The speaker concludes with the statement “Disgusting.”

I witnessed a ballot being changed from Trump to Biden in the duplication room. When we reported it, we were scolded and threatened not to speak up. I believe it is important to speak the truth. Translation: I observed a ballot being changed from Trump to Biden in the duplication room. After reporting it, I was scolded and threatened not to talk about it. I believe it is important to tell the truth.

The speaker is shocked to learn from surveillance footage that they were close to a dangerous individual. They agree to pick up their belongings at the FBI building in Pittsburgh at 10 AM. The speaker expresses disbelief and struggles to sleep after hearing the news. They plan to visit the barracks to see the video of their encounter. Translation: The speaker is surprised to find out they were near a dangerous person. They agree to pick up their things at the FBI building in Pittsburgh at 10 AM. The speaker is in disbelief and has trouble sleeping after hearing the news. They plan to visit the barracks to watch the video of their encounter.

The speaker tries to contact the state and local police departments but struggles to get assistance. They mention filing complaints in the past and receiving threats due to their involvement in politics. They express frustration with not receiving police reports and describe a recent threat from a woman named Linda Waterman. The speaker wants the police to take their threats seriously but refuses to provide their address. The conversation becomes heated, with the speaker insisting on knowing the names of the officers they would meet. The call ends abruptly without a resolution.

Bis heute wurde kein Messer gefunden. Die Polizei führt Personenkontrollen durch. Eine Kollegin überprüft die Handtasche und fragt, ob ein Messer dabei ist. Es wird ein Messer auf der Seite gefunden. Es gibt Bedenken, dass es als Ordnungswidrigkeit gilt. Daher muss die Polizei das Messer behalten. --- To date, no knife has been found. The police are conducting personal checks. A colleague inspects a handbag and asks if there is a knife inside. A knife is discovered on the side. There are concerns that it may be considered an administrative offense. Therefore, the police must keep the knife.

They're banging on the door, and we finally got into the room. A few people are with us, but the noise from the banging and yelling is really annoying. I don't see the hold-up; the alarms are off.

Speaker 0 describes a man who tried to run her over with his car; she avoided him and is driving to the police to make a report: "I am the problem. I am not the problem. I am the one who he tried to run me over with his car. I avoided him, and I avoided him successfully, and I'm still scared. So here I am driving to the police to make the police report." She says she avoided him because "I don't know if he has a gun." He followed and threatened, "I'm gonna shoot you." She insists, "I'm not scared of you," and says, "He attacked me first and I protected myself." He called her "Muslim terrorists," "Muslim terrorist," and "he tried to assassinate me." She adds, "If I wasn't a smart driver, I would have hit the cars in front of me." She says she "manipulated him to go somewhere inside so I can get away from him."

I broke the law, and you've been posting concerning things. Are you going to let me talk? You won't let me talk. It's in the notes. Do you want me to explain? There's been concerning behavior with no explanation at my house. I'm just telling you what's happened. We've had no explanation of the concerning things. There was a leak of flames. I tried to get in my house before it's clear. That's my supervisor; don't talk to her like that.

The speaker describes a sequence of events starting with entering through a small door, then going up some stairs, and entering a room. Inside, there was an attempt to make the speaker lower their pants, described as “intentaron que me bajara los pantalones,” and a reference to someone being “arrested por el culo,” which the speaker preserves as the exact phrasing from the transcript. The narrative then shifts to a question directed at Mariela, asking for her belief about whether “they” would have been dead, with the speaker prompting Mariela: “¿Que estarían muertas?” and continuing, “¿Tú qué crees? ¿Que estarían muertas?” The text captures a moment of speculation about a possible outcome, though the speaker does not specify who would be dead or the context of that hypothetical. Following this portion, the speaker introduces a named individual: “Este señor, Este señor, que se llama Bernard Alapetite,” and states that this person “también abusó de mí sexualmente.” The structure indicates a firsthand confession of sexual abuse by the named individual, Bernard Alapetite, with the speaker asserting that this person “también abusó de mí sexualmente.” Key points emphasized by the speaker include: - A sequence of entering a space through a small door, ascending stairs, and entering a room. - An attempted act of coercion involving forcing the speaker to lower their pants. - A phrase indicating someone was “arrested por el culo,” preserving the original wording for emphasis and accuracy. - An interjected inquiry directed at Mariela about whether certain people would have been dead, highlighting a moment of speculation about a potential outcome. - A direct assertion naming Bernard Alapetite as someone who “también abusó de mí sexualmente,” indicating multiple violations by that individual. The transcript presents these events as part of a personal account, with the speaker naming the alleged perpetrator and recounting a coercive incident and a subsequent admission of sexual abuse by the same person.

Stop shouting, I can't understand you. There are a lot of people around, please listen. What is it that you need? Do you want the police? Stop struggling, calm down. We know who you are, just listen. Stop struggling.

The speaker calls the Bridgeport State Police and then the Connecticut State Police Headquarters to report death threats and request an investigation into the person behind them. They mention Linda Waterman as a suspect and ask for her interoffice emails. The police advise them to contact the local police department and the state's attorney's office. The speaker expresses frustration with the lack of action and protection they have received in the past. They also mention allegations of election fraud and corruption. The call ends with the speaker requesting an email address to send their information to. (149 words)

The speaker confronts someone, asking for their name and threatening to call the police. The person being confronted refuses to give their name and tells the speaker to walk away. The speaker insists on calling the police and threatens to ruin the person's job. Another person intervenes, asking everyone to step away and calling for the police. The speaker continues to demand the person's name. The video ends abruptly.

If he did his job, I wouldn't need to do this. I received a malicious report. Look, they're all pointing. Someone's on the roof. There he is, laying down. We have dangerous people in our country causing trouble.

Speaker 0 states, “J 6 Insurrection is right over there. What? I'm at this fucking scene. This” as they indicate being at a scene related to January 6. The conversation shows they are physically present at the location and reacting to the surroundings. Speaker 1 describes the situation as “harassment. Stalking and harassment,” and expresses a desire to file a police report, saying, “I’d like to file a police report for stalking and harassment.” They repeat the request, asking, “Can I file a police report for stalking and harassment?” They claim, “She won’t leave leave me alone,” and state they’d like to file a police report for stalking and harassment, adding, “I’d like to follow a police report.” They ask for guidance about the legality of the behavior: “If she follows me, will she be arrested for stalking?” They further describe the immediate scenario as occurring “Across the street.” Speaker 0 interjects with further location detail, saying, “the street,” and then adds a string of hostile remarks including, “Bug pussy bitch,” and “There you go. My Rolly Pole. Back to blue. White is right. Get the fuck out of my country, Patricia.” These lines convey aggression and attempts to assert identity or affiliation. Speaker 1 continues with a distressed tone, muttering, “Oh my god. Take that stress,” before being told, “Shut up, cunt” by Speaker 0, indicating continued hostility and verbal abuse. Overall, the transcript captures a confrontation at a scene that centers on concerns about stalking and harassment, with Speaker 1 seeking a police report to document the alleged stalking; Speaker 0 responds with aggressive commentary and insults, including politically charged and profane statements. The exchange conveys an urgent emotional confrontation regarding harassment, with explicit requests to file formal complaints and questions about potential arrest for stalking.

Speaker 0 questions Nicole about online posts to the Prime Minister of Canada, asking if she has anything to say about that. Speaker 1 asks for specifics: what post, what she specifically said, and whether there is a screenshot. Speaker 0 cites that she online said something specific and asks for clarification. Speaker 1 replies that she said, "he's a Zionist scumbag, and he's not my prime minister," adding that she believes she is not spoken to properly and questions whether she looks like a threat. Speaker 0 explains that they came to talk because those threats were made. Speaker 1 pushes back, saying that the officers should be busy addressing real crime rather than harassing her over things she says online, and questions whether she seriously looks like a threat. Speaker 0 acknowledges and continues. Speaker 1 accuses the officers of wasting tax dollars and asserts that they should not be harassing her for what she says online because she dislikes the prime minister. Speaker 0 states Nicole should be aware that if such behavior continues, there will be consequences, implying potential arrest for threats. Speaker 1 asks what kind of threats they are referring to and demands to see what she said, noting that she still has not been shown. Speaker 0 attempts to explain what she said and what constitutes threats, warning that if those threats continue, she could be arrested and charged. Speaker 1 complains about being interrupted, asking to show what she said, and then launches into a hostile remark, calling the situation Communist Canada and asking how the officers can take pride in their work. Speaker 0 reiterates that she may have her opinion, but she insists she cannot say what she says. Speaker 1 refuses to discuss further, telling them not to touch her door. Speaker 0 says a report will be filed, stating that the search behavior continues, and mentions Trump in a dismissive way ("the Trump blah blah blah blah blah"). Speaker 1 asserts she will say whatever she wants about the prime minister and that they cannot control her speech, calling it just words. Speaker 0 responds that they are asking for non-threatening language. Speaker 1 concludes by stating they will continue to speak freely and that the conversation is over, wishing them a nice day and goodbye.

A woman is accused of stealing with her children. The accuser threatens to send her to jail and claims to have her face on camera. The accuser demands the woman get off of her.

A person is requesting that an individual named "mister Patel" obtain the identification of a woman before she leaves. The speaker claims the woman assaulted them and expresses concern that she will disappear into the crowd, making it impossible to find her later.

A woman is being taken into an elevator, but someone is objecting, stating, "You can't manhandle her into an elevator." They claim her lawyer is in the bathroom. The woman is reportedly fainting in the hallway, and the speaker insists they need to get medical services and cannot transport her in that condition. The speaker repeats, "You can't manhandle her into an elevator," while stating that her lawyer is in the bathroom.

The speaker asks an officer what is happening and what is going on. The speaker repeats, "What's that?" and "What?" The officer responds that they can't describe exactly what's going on, stating, "It's an ongoing investigation." The speaker repeats the word "crime" multiple times.

“I don’t know if I’ll stay alive and someone will find this phone. These are the El Camaruno residences. I’m on the 5th floor with my mom and my dog trying to get out. I’m here. Down below, I can’t see anything. There’s a person on the 7th floor named Leomín. Acosta is asking me for help. Next to these there were other residences, but I can’t see them. My name is Pilar Plasencia. I only ask that God allows us and holds us, confessed and safe. Amen.”

I observed a ballot being changed from Trump to Biden in the duplication room. When we reported it, we were scolded and threatened not to speak up. I believe it's important to speak the truth. Translation: I witnessed a ballot being switched from Trump to Biden, reported it, and was warned not to talk about it. I feel it is important to tell the truth.