reSee.it - Related Video Feed

There were very fine people on both sides of a white supremacist rally. I’m not referring to the neo-Nazis and white nationalists, who should be condemned entirely. However, there were many individuals in that group who were not neo-Nazis or white nationalists.

The marchers in Charlottesville chanted anti-Semitic slogans like "Jews will not replace us" and used phrases linked to Nazi ideology. Many viewers were outraged by this. The former president commented on the protest, mentioning that while there were bad people in the group, there were also "very fine people on both sides." This statement sparked controversy, as it implied that some participants were not associated with the neo-Nazis or white nationalists, who should be condemned entirely.

In Charlottesville, white nationalists and Neo-Nazis chanted anti-Semitic slogans, including a Nazi slogan "Blood and Soil." The former president commented that while there were some bad people in that group, there were also very fine people on both sides. However, he clarified that he was not referring to the Neo-Nazis and white nationalists, as they should be completely condemned.

There were very fine people on both sides, but this does not include neo-Nazis and white nationalists, who should be condemned entirely. The president did condemn these groups in his remarks, clarifying that he is not referring to them as very fine people.

Speaker 0 asks if the use of the word "vermin" by Donald Trump is neo-Nazi rhetoric. Speaker 1 criticizes the mainstream media for focusing on one word instead of the substance of the issues. Speaker 1 argues that there are serious problems in the country, such as Antifa's violent actions, a border crisis, economic stagnation, and a loss of national pride. They also mention the dependence on China and criticize the media for not discussing these issues. Speaker 1 calls for a policy debate instead of focusing on one word said by Trump. They express frustration with being asked to comment on it.

Donald Trump is blamed for political divide and seen as a domestic terrorist by some. He's compared to historical figures and criticized for his actions.

There were individuals on both sides that night, including some Americans chanting Nazi slogans. It's important to clarify that I'm not referring to the neo-Nazis and white nationalists, who should be completely condemned.

The Republicans chose Candace Owens, and the speaker plays a clip of her discussing Adolf Hitler. Owens says she doesn't have a problem with nationalism, but it gets associated with Hitler. She clarifies that if Hitler had only focused on Germany, it would have been fine, but he wanted to globalize and make everyone German. The speaker then asks if Owens legitimizing Hitler feeds into white nationalist ideology. Another speaker expresses concern over Owens' comments, and Owens accuses the speaker of assuming black people won't watch the full clip. She clarifies that she was not defending Hitler, but rather stating that he was not a true nationalist. Owens criticizes the speaker for presenting a dishonest narrative and defends her work for Prager University. The video ends with the speaker yielding their remaining time.

There were very fine people on both sides of a white supremacist rally. I'm not referring to the neo-Nazis and white nationalists, who should be condemned entirely. However, there were many individuals in that group who were not neo-Nazis or white nationalists.

Speaker 0 asks if the language used by Donald Trump is neo-Nazi rhetoric. Speaker 1 criticizes the mainstream media for focusing on specific words without addressing the underlying issues. Speaker 1 mentions Antifa's violent actions, the border crisis, economic stagnation, national identity crisis, and dependence on China. Speaker 1 argues that the media should focus on substance and policy debates instead of fixating on one word from Trump's speech. They also criticize San Francisco's problems and Gavin Newsom's response. Speaker 1 concludes by expressing frustration with the media's approach and asks for a focus on policy substance.

This is CNN, not Fox. It's crucial to tell the truth, especially regarding alarming choices made by individuals who struggle to denounce white supremacists. Donald Trump's past comments, like referring to "very fine people on both sides," carry significant weight and are heard by neo-Nazis and white supremacists. Why can't he outright reject their support? He has condemned neo-Nazis and white nationalists, but his language remains extreme. Recently, he suggested Liz Cheney should be fired and has warned of potential dangers to the country if he doesn't win in November, using terms like "bloodbath."

Two speakers criticize treating a 'de minimis time in American history' as a tool for power, urging context beyond 'the honorable sacrifices' that ended slavery and 'America and England were the first to end slavery.' They claim, 'Slavery has existed for five thousand years in Africa. Shockingly, it still exists today,' and question why issue ignores slavery in Africa today. They warn that painting 'one race with this brush' fuels racism, arguing, 'The vast majority of white people weren't bad guys and didn't perpetrate evil' and, 'it's 2% of American whites that owned slaves.' They critique Smithsonian displays: 'not for gay pride month' at the Museum of American History; Latino history with Batista/Cuba and 'no mention of Fidel Castro'; gender testing described as 'genitals' and 'cheek swab DNA test'; and 'The Star Spangled Banner' as 'a racist' with the Betsy Ross flag. They conclude there's 'no balance' in the narrative.

The speaker argues that indoctrination in schools and universities is far beyond what parents realize. He shares an example: a man in the Bay Area with daughters in a high school asks them who the first presidents of the United States were. They can name Washington, but when asked what they know about him, the response is that he was a slave owner. The conversation underscores that, beyond mentioning slavery as a horrific institution, there is little knowledge about George Washington. The speaker concludes that, while slavery is horrific, we should still know more about George Washington than that.

The speakers are asked what makes Trump a fascist. One speaker says Trump "just does everything he wants" and is a "convicted felon." Another speaker claims Trump is trying to control the media narrative, citing the renaming of the Gulf of Mexico and allegedly not allowing the Associated Press into the White House. When asked if renaming the Gulf of Mexico is pointless, the speaker agrees. The speakers are asked again what makes Trump a fascist. One speaker says a core tenet of fascism is creating an enemy. The speaker admits they received the sign and talking points from someone else. They say they came out to protest because of executive overreach.

The discussion revolves around trans rights, the woke mind virus, and the overemphasis on race issues in society. The speakers debate the importance of acknowledging historical inequities while advocating for a future where individuals are treated based on who they are. They touch on the legacy of slavery and racism in the country, with one speaker emphasizing the need to move forward and treat everyone as individuals rather than constantly revisiting the past. The conversation highlights the complexity of addressing societal issues while striving for a more inclusive and equitable future.

What what I do know for sure is that, you know, Charlie was someone who once said, you know, guns save lives after school shooting. He was willing to debate and downplay the death of George Floyd in the hands of Minneapolis police. 'you called him a scumbag. Right.' There are a lot of people out there talking about him just wanting to have a civil debate, a complete rewriting of history. There is nothing more effed up than to completely pretend that, you know, his words and actions have not been recorded and in existence for the last decade or so. And there are people downplaying slavery and what black people have gone through in this country, by saying Juneteenth should never exist.

Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1 about past tweets and NPR content. Speaker 0 asks if Speaker 1 believes America is addicted to white supremacy, if America believes in black plunder and white democracy, and if white people inherently feel superior. Speaker 1 says their thinking has evolved and denies holding those beliefs now, also stating they don't recall some tweets. Speaker 0 confronts Speaker 1 with their past tweets about reparations, asking if white people should pay them. Speaker 1 claims the tweet wasn't about fiscal reparations. Speaker 0 asks if Speaker 1 believes looting is morally wrong, and Speaker 1 confirms that it is. Speaker 0 then questions Speaker 1 about NPR content, including a book called In Defense of Looting, an article about gender queer dinosaur enthusiasts, and an editorial stating that fear of fatness is more harmful than actual fat. Speaker 1 says they are unfamiliar with some of the content. Speaker 0 accuses NPR of editorializing and promoting garbage, vowing to defund them.

President Trump stated there were "very fine people on both sides" at a Charlottesville march alongside neo-Nazis and white supremacists. He claimed he condemned neo-Nazis and other groups, but not all attendees were neo-Nazis or white supremacists. It is claimed that candidate Trump wouldn't condemn David Duke. Trump called David Duke a bigot, a racist, and a problem, stating he's not the kind of person wanted in the party. Trump stated that the egregious display of hatred, bigotry, and violence has no place in America. He said racism is evil, and those who cause violence in its name are criminals and thugs, including the KKK, neo-Nazis, white supremacists, and other hate groups. It is claimed that Trump supporters are trying to say that the president didn't say what he said, calling it a hoax. Trump reiterated that many people in the group were other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists.

In a 40-minute compilation, Damon Imani presents a series of contentious exchanges with The View’s hosts, framing it as some of the “absurd and deranged takes” from the show and his responses to them. He opens by noting that in 2025 he had nearly 100 clip conversations with The View’s hosts and that he sent them a framed gift—FedEx confirmed delivery to the studio, though he says he does not know if they kept it. He highlights a clip in which he pressed Sunny Hostin on reparations for slaveholding ancestors, which he says received over 27,000,000 views, a record for the show. He asserts that the hosts “hate my guts” and that he critiques their alleged hypocrisy and “bullshit” daily from Denmark. Key exchanges and themes run throughout: - Immigration and work: The panel discusses Trump’s stance on illegal immigrants taking jobs, with Speaker 0 urging a distinction between legal and illegal immigration. The group debates job availability and immigration policy, with back-and-forth questioning about what is meant by “the difference between legal and illegal immigrants.” - Gender roles and DEI: Sunny is criticized for comments about women’s opportunities and affirmative action. Speaker 0 argues DEI programs discriminate against more qualified applicants, while Sunny defends protections for women and minorities and argues against woke “oppression” narratives. The conversation touches on gender roles, with Sunny describing supportive domestic work by a partner; Speaker 0 contends this contradicts previous critiques of men. - Wealth inequality and philanthropy: Joy and others discuss wealth, the World Food Program’s suggested priorities, and the responsibility of billionaires to aid global causes. Speaker 0 interrupts to question Joy’s net worth relative to charitable action, suggesting reparations as a personal example. - Trump and media: The panel debates Trump’s consistency, media portrayal, and political double standards. Speaker 0 accuses the liberal media of fakery, while others compare Trump’s diplomacy to past criticisms of his behavior. The segment also touches on Trump’s impeachment-era rhetoric and coverage, including discussions of dictators, civility, and the ethics of political messaging. - Race, history, and representation: The discussion includes provocative lines about “White History Month,” and the portrayal of race in immigration and crime. Speaker 0 and others debate how crime statistics and immigrant appearances intersect with policy narratives, with contributions about melanin, geography, and implicit biases. - Religion, culture, and social values: The panel discusses religious symbols, memes, and public discourse around Christian and Catholic imagery, with references to mocking depictions and the legitimacy of free expression on public airwaves. A debate about the ethics of political memes versus real-world symbols emerges. - Education and governance: There is debate about the Department of Education, its dismantling, and shifting control to states. One participant entertains the idea that dismantling federal control could empower states to tailor education. - Public safety and free speech: The dialogue covers threats and violence linked to political rhetoric, the First Amendment, and the tension between expressing beliefs and the consequences of those expressions in political life. The discussion also critiques media coverage of violence and protest, arguing about responsibility and accountability on both sides. - Personal narratives and family: The panel includes personal anecdotes about marriage, parenting, and representation in media, including references to individual experiences with marriage, single life, and the pursuit of balance in leadership and family roles. - Endnote: The show wraps with a nod to the host’s own channel and a holiday closing, inviting viewers to subscribe for more commentary. Overall, the transcript portrays a polarized, high-energy debate in which Damon Imani challenges The View’s hosts on reparations, woke culture, gender and DEI, immigration, domestic politics, and media responsibility, peppered with provocative humor, sharp rebuttals, and personal jab-for-jab exchanges.

Speaker 0 asks if the language used by Donald Trump is neo-Nazi rhetoric. Speaker 1 criticizes the mainstream media for focusing on specific words without addressing the underlying issues. Speaker 1 mentions Antifa's violent actions, the border crisis, economic stagnation, national identity crisis, and dependence on China. They argue that the media should focus on substance and policy debates instead of fixating on one word from Trump's speech. Speaker 1 also criticizes San Francisco's problems and suggests that the media should prioritize discussing important issues rather than seeking comments on trivial matters.

There were fine people on both sides of the protest over a statue being taken down and a park being renamed from Robert E. Lee.