reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 argues that the real risk in the US isn’t multiculturalism itself, but the influence of a multibillionaire who runs the largest social media platform in the world, which has become an echo chamber for “your ridiculous ideology.” He asserts that the UK public, and especially someone raised in multicultural, working-class Birmingham, should recognize that “there’s not a Muslim there who’s read the Quran and went, oh, you know what? I didn’t rule out sexual violence, so I might I might just crack on with that.” He questions the other speaker’s perspective, implying a disconnect from reality or a failing to understand religious studies, and suggests that the other person would benefit from taking a course in religious studies before continuing the discussion. Speaker 1 responds by dismissing the previous remarks as ad hominem attacks, suggesting that the argument is weak and implying the opposite side should still be able to present a strong case. He asserts that the young working-class girls who grew up in similar areas would beg to differ with the other speaker’s view. He states that he has read the Quran and, regardless of whether his interpretation is accepted by the other party, points to countries with significant issues related to child brides and the rape of young girls and children, arguing that this is a systemic cultural problem associated with Islam rather than something confined to the West. He further contends that the grooming gang phenomenon “is what contained primarily to Muslim men,” and he adds that it “really only started when you started seeing mass migrate,” tying the issue to migration patterns. In sum, Speaker 0 frames the conversation around the risk posed by a powerful social media platform shaping public discourse, tying concerns to multiculturalism and warning of insufficient religious literacy; he challenges the other speaker to engage with religious studies. Speaker 1 counters with personal experience and interpretation of religious texts, arguing that the sexual violence and grooming issues reflect a broader systemic cultural problem linked to Islam, which he claims has emerged in connection with mass migration and is not limited to Western contexts.

"Perhaps thousands of young women have been drugged, raped, and beaten across dozens of UK cities by men belonging to so called grooming gangs." "December 2020, British authorities charged 32 men in a grooming gang with 200 sexual exploitation offenses against eight girls, some as young as 13." "Most perpetrators convicted so far are reportedly Muslim. The majority of their victims are white." "because she was white, a non Muslim, a virgin, and didn't dress modestly, that she deserved to be punished." "She escaped a year later, becoming part of The UK's largest ever child sexual abuse investigation." "In her new book, Pray, Somali born women's rights activist Ayan Hirsi Ali argues that immigration and Islam are major factors threatening women's safety."

There are alarming reports indicating that over 250,000 young white girls have been victims of rape this century, predominantly by Muslim men. These girls often endure repeated abuse over many years. The chief constable of Northumbria has stated that grooming gangs are likely operating in every major city. What actions is the government taking to address this issue? Specifically, what measures are in place to prosecute those in authority who ignored these crimes due to fears of being labeled Islamophobic? Additionally, what support is being provided to help the victims recover mentally?

Speaker 0 contends that there is no link between immigration and sexual violence against women and girls. They then raise a pointed question about grooming gangs, identifying them as being of largely Pakistani descent that are “blotting our communities,” and ask if there is anything the other speaker has to say about this issue. Speaker 1 responds by saying the question is perfectly valid, but notes that they have moved on to other topics. They request to stick with the subject at hand. They explain that they were not asked to come in, and that they have strong feelings about immigration, which they stated in their reply. They state clearly that they are not going to start injecting racial connotations into discussions about immigration or crime. The brief phrase “The woman behind” appears at the end, implying a note about a person present, but the sentence is cut off.

The speaker asserts that organized grooming gangs, mostly of Muslim origin, exist in various locations, citing Rochdale, Rotherham, Telford, and Norfolk. They claim court cases reveal most perpetrators are of Kashmiri Pakistani origin. The speaker alleges police and social workers avoided addressing the problem due to fear of being labeled racist. In response, another speaker accuses them of turning a question about sexual violence into one about religion. They state that the majority of rapes and sexual violence in the country are perpetrated by white people.

Labour is not addressing the grooming gang issue, fearing backlash from the Muslim community. Jess Phillips, now at the Home Office, has rejected a national inquiry into rape gangs despite the ongoing crisis, similar to past incidents in Rochdale. Reports detail horrific abuses, including young girls being gang-raped and even murdered. Both Labour and the Tories share the blame; while the Tories initially called for an inquiry, they previously refused one. The lack of action on this issue, affecting vulnerable young girls across the UK, is a national scandal that demands a full independent inquiry.

The speaker delivers a stark account of a grave moral failure in British history: for decades, children across the United Kingdom, some as young as four, were groomed, trafficked, raped, beaten, tortured, drugged, impregnated, criminalized, murdered, and psychologically destroyed by organized groups. These were not isolated incidents or expressions of sexual gratification; they were sustained campaigns of exploitation against terrified, vulnerable children who were systematically trapped. Children were degraded, humiliated, and controlled through violence, threats, drugs, alcohol, and terror. They were forced to fight to carry weapons, sell drugs, and commit murder, with some made to dig their own graves. Extreme abuses are described, including petrol poured over victims and set on fire, scriptures from the Koran read during gang rapes, young children placed inside microwaves, ovens, and freezers in attempts to murder them, ouija boards used to call spirits, and animals killed in sexual acts against children. Some were passed from rapist to rapist, and not all survived; survivors faced suicide, substance abuse, or murder. The abuse extended beyond sexual exploitation, reflecting a pursuit of power and domination and the systematic destruction of a child’s sense of self. The speaker emphasizes that, years later, professionals pressured survivors to take medication or risk losing custody of their children, and victims were told they were too damaged to care for their own kids. They were removed from families, placed into the care system, and trafficked, with rapists invited into the lives and custody of the next generation. Children born from these crimes were forced into contact with their mothers’ rapists by social workers and the family courts. The professionals who should have protected them did not, and some still do not. The inquiry is exposing the scale of institutional failure: warning signs, reports, patterns, and evidence ignored or destroyed; victims dismissed as troubled, promiscuous, or consenting; children in care raped by staff and sold to gangs; parents threatened with fines or arrests for attempting to safeguard their children. The speaker notes that whistleblowers were targeted and silenced, and politics played a role. Political parties sacrificed children for votes, and leaders hesitated to confront abuse due to discomfort or concerns about appearing racist or Islamophobic. The inquiry will follow evidence into institutions, systems, cultures of silence, and places where truth has been buried, with no race, religion, profession, or agency exempt from scrutiny. Survivors are acknowledged: they were children, not to blame but failed by the system. The true scale of what happened and continues to happen is described as too large for the inquiry to fully resolve quickly; many victims may never receive justice, but the inquiry aims to be ambitious in pursuing truth. The speaker thanks MP Rupert Loh for establishing the inquiry andextends gratitude to the participants, survivors, and the team for their bravery and resilience in confronting this evil crime.

The speaker claims the government promised local inquiries into rape gangs but has not followed through. They state that at least 50 towns are affected, listing Peterborough, Derby, Birmingham, Nottingham, Leicester, Rotherham, Rochdale, and Preston as examples. Another speaker expresses concern over the lack of focus on individual victims, instead listing towns and principalities. They question why those who speak about the "rape gang crisis" are ostracized, citing Tommy Robinson's imprisonment for contempt of court as an example. They suggest this is part of a plan to destabilize the Western world, particularly the Anglosphere, by creating moral confusion and uncertainty about fundamental concepts like gender, family, and even the definition of rape. They reference an Olympic ceremony as an example of this moral decay.

The speaker criticizes the government's handling of rape gang inquiries, stating that local inquiries are now minister-led instead of independent. Funds for inquiries are now opt-in, and some local leaders deny the need for them. The speaker claims that victims are predominantly white, and perpetrators are predominantly Muslim men of Pakistani heritage, suggesting racial and religious aggravation in some cases. They cite instances of institutional failure, including a social worker attending a wedding between a 14-year-old victim and her abuser, and a welfare rights officer being the ringleader of a rape gang. The speaker questions why no one has been convicted for covering up these rapes and calls for a dedicated unit in the National Crime Agency to investigate collusion and corruption, including within the police. They highlight a case where a father was arrested for trying to rescue his daughter from abuse. The speaker advocates for a national inquiry, quarterly ethnicity data publication, termination of parental rights for convicted sex offenders, and harsher sentences for grooming gang members. They share a graphic account of a 13-year-old gang rape victim. They question why the government won't investigate the full extent of the issue.

Reports indicate that there may be around 250,000 young white girls who have been victims of rape this century, predominantly by Muslim men. These girls often endure repeated abuse over many years. What is the government's response to the chief constable of Northumbria, who suggests that grooming gangs are likely active in all major cities? Additionally, what actions are being taken to hold accountable those in authority who ignored these issues due to fears of being labeled Islamophobic? Lastly, what measures are in place to provide mental health support and compensation for the victims?

The speaker asserts that discussions of child abuse and child trafficking are avoided in the UK Parliament, implying that avoidance signals a problem. They claim there is no separate crime of satanic child abuse in the UK; they say it’s simply child abuse, and suggest that the Netherlands similarly erases the subject. The speaker relates local discoveries in Leicester, described as the nearest city to their area, where they found extensive child abuse linked to both historic and current politicians and to the police. They state they gave evidence against the head of police about “industrial child trafficking.” A central claim is that there is industrial-scale trafficking of children from Ukraine via Moldova to the UK for sexual abuse and organ harvesting. The speaker says this information came from two Ukrainian secret service agents who independently reported the same scheme, without knowing each other. They alleged that Ukrainian secret services collected children during the conflict in the Donbas and handed them over to UK secret services. The two informants reportedly named individuals and were appalled by the task of collecting children for trafficking. The speaker recounts that one whistleblower was killed in a cafe when a bomb was placed under his table, and the second survived a car bombing after being warned by a car park camera clip showing the explosion as he approached his car. They claim the whistleblowers named people very close to President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and his regime, asserting that those individuals purportedly benefit financially from the war by enabling child trafficking. Further claims include that there is more money in child trafficking and sex trafficking than in drugs or weapons because of the trafficked children’s organs. The speaker contends that the trafficking scheme involves selling the children multiple times, and that victims disappear after organs are harvested, which is why victims are not found in the end. Throughout, the speaker emphasizes the alleged connection between wartime activity, Ukrainian whistleblowers, assassination attempts, and a broader network that allegedly profits from child trafficking and organ harvesting.

- Speaker 0 states that trafficking is one of the worst evils worldwide and is happening globally and in the US, with somewhere between 300,000 to a million people trafficked in the US this year, many of whom are minors. He distinguishes exploitation from trafficking: trafficking is primarily for profit; exploitation is primarily for pleasure, and exploitation often occurs on the Internet via peer-to-peer networks sharing child videos and images. - He shares a visual example: red dots representing unique IP addresses in New York State downloading and sharing child images and videos in the last thirty days; blue dots represent those being investigated. He notes that many people ask why enforcement isn’t doing more, and explains that law enforcement is undermanned and lacks the best technology. - Speaker 0 argues that increasing funding is necessary, not defunding, and supports escalating hires, especially in victim identification, to keep boys and girls safe. He mentions a bill in Congress, the Renewed Hope Act, aiming to hire more victim identification specialists to identify victims and safeguard them. - He observes that this issue is not unanimously supported or spoken about; it seems uncomfortable for people, and is framed as not about politics but about people, especially those suffering. He asserts that trafficking occurs “down the hall,” highlighting that the number one offender for this exploitation is biological fathers. - Speaker 1 asks whether FBI arrests are being made, and whether blue dots indicate investigations. Speaker 0 clarifies that blue dots are those being investigated, while a confirmed IP address sharing this content would be indicated differently. - Speaker 0 claims the issue is not just overseas but also in the US; he asserts that the US is the number one buyer of videos of boys and girls around the world, including paying for the rape of children in the Philippines, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, and Thailand. He adds that the US is third worst in the world for peer-to-peer sharing of this information, with China, Russia, the US, and Italy (Italy being fourth). - He emphasizes that this is one of the worst evils in the world and argues that people think the problem is “over there” while it is happening domestically, requiring attention and action. - Speaker 1 and Speaker 0 discuss law enforcement burnout, noting heroes working daily to combat this crime but lacking access to better technology. They describe the burnout rate for officers exposed to such content, with an example of a month-old or nine-month-old victim, and mention that burnout is a major issue, with training time taking a year and subsequent burnout necessitating new hires.

Are you aware that the report revealed children were exploited by someone posing as their aunt, who wasn't actually related? There are several incidents in that Florida report. I may recall some better than others, and I might dispute some, but I don't remember that specific case. What about the teenage girl living in a house with unknown men, lacking a private bedroom? Are you aware that sponsors used a Jacksonville strip club's address for a child? I don’t have the details of the Florida grand jury report in front of me, but I can review it and follow up with you.

The speaker discusses a report called the 8 March Principles for Human Rights Based Approach to Criminal Law. They claim that this report aims to establish pedophilia rights and decriminalize the sexual exploitation of children worldwide. The speaker believes that the elite global elites want to legitimize pedophilia and destigmatize it. They express concern about children being groomed through books and sex education. The report's opening statement is from a retired judge who is a gay activist. The speaker concludes by stating that this agenda should not come as a surprise.

Speaker 0 notes a doubling or tripling of baby deaths in the last year, which sparked curiosity. Speaker 1 says their own government told them a medical treatment was safe, and it killed babies. Speaker 2 states they have lost all faith that Health Canada is looking out genuine for the best interests of Canadians. Speaker 1 says doctors made extra money to push vaccines and were given a billing code to do it, and she has pulled all the billing codes. Speaker 3 asserts they’ve purchased the vaccine that hasn’t been approved and distributed it to the provinces, so the second it’s approved they can start jabbing themselves and pregnant mothers with it. Speaker 4 asks why vaccinations were necessary, noting that when going to the hospital for birth, you expect to go home, and then you don’t. Speaker 0 suspects criminal negligence by the government and public health officials. Speaker 2 agrees, saying “Possible.” Speaker 0 contends they pushed a narrative to everybody, including pregnant and breastfeeding women, that the mRNA shots were safe and effective. Speaker 2 recalls wiretapping, harassment, and charges, and that they didn’t allow any expert witnesses to testify. Speaker 1 says Canadian babies died, and police are trying to cover it up by stopping detective Helen Graves from testifying about it. Speaker 3 comments that dominant individuals maintain subordinates’ place through constant aggression. Speaker 5 argues that choosing not to vaccinate is one thing, but being unable to fly or ride trains with vaccinated people and thus putting them at risk is another issue. Speaker 2 says CBC started with a story to implicate her and paint her in an uncomplimentary light to the public. Speaker 6 claims Canada must shift its understanding of CBC, describing it as a state broadcaster pushing the agenda of the Liberal government of Canada. Speaker 3 declares this is the most significant health matter affecting children today, and they are still not investigating. Speaker 2 asserts that everything emanates outward from this case involving law enforcement, the judicial system, the pharmaceutical industry, and health agencies, and how they work together and censored information; all of it ties to this one case, making it dangerous.

Grooming gangs are a serious issue, and Keir Starmer's response to calls for a national inquiry raises concerns about political honesty. Kemi Badcock, the Conservative leader, plans to propose an amendment in the House of Commons for a full public inquiry. However, the previous government failed to conduct a thorough investigation, limiting it to only six towns instead of the fifty known cases. There is a need for a focused inquiry addressing the racist behavior towards young white girls, particularly from some in the Pakistani community. If the government does not initiate a comprehensive review, funds will be raised for an independent inquiry. The public demands the truth, as past responses from police and social services may have been influenced by fears of inciting racial division, despite the racist nature of the crimes.

The speaker claims their soon-to-be-released research shows 35,000 "tender age kids" have been rescued. They allege that 70% of documentation from sponsors, arranged by NGOs through HHS, is fraudulent. This created a pipeline of children into sex trafficking and slave labor. Criminal case files are being built by interviewing these children to find out what happened to them. The speaker states they are identifying, locating, and rescuing more children, and building criminal files based on testimony and fraudulent vetting documentation. They predict many NGO employees will be arrested.

Suzanne Delaney reports a connection between a murder in the prior week and a new case in which a 10-year-old Irish child was raped by an African asylum seeker in his thirties at an IPAS center in City West, Dublin. She explains why the Irish child could be at an IPAS center and connects this to broader concerns about outsourcing care for vulnerable people to private contractors. Key points raised: - Public-private partnerships and unregulated SCA (special emergency arrangement) providers have placed vulnerable children at risk of sex trafficking. Tusla has paid 215,000,000 to unregulated SCAs, with Beg and Mirza Health Services receiving a total of 41,000,000 and operating the apartment where the Ukrainian was stabbed over 100 times by a Somali asylum seeker last week. Directors/CEOs of Beg and Mirza are Mohammed Usain Beg and Farhan Mirza. - Unregulated SCAs provide care in hotel rooms, apartments, and Airbnbs, sometimes with unvetted staff. Some background checks have reportedly been falsified; an African pastor and his wife were involved in such falsifications and did not receive prison sentences. - Allegations of children going missing from these placements, being sex trafficked, and not adequately supervised. She draws parallels to UK cases of grooming and trafficking (Rotherham, Rochdale) to suggest similar patterns. - A 12-year-old boy with severe disabilities was targeted by gangs; referenced in a paper titled “Protecting against predators: an exploratory study on the sexual exploitation of children and young people in Ireland,” noting similarities to UK predator networks targeting vulnerable girls. - A 14-year-old African child in care for one hour was found a year later in a brothel, having been raped hundreds or thousands of times. - Unregulated SCAs not reporting rape or exploitation cases, potentially to protect lucrative contracts; staff in SEAs may be involved in trafficking, and there is a view that the state’s system hides these problems to avoid public oversight. - HICWA inspections reportedly found unvetted staff and neglect, abuse, and isolation among children in SEAs. Tusla is said to knowingly place adult male asylum seekers claiming to be children in SCAs with actual children and in schools when backgrounds are untraceable. - Delaney references a prior video about how a 10-year-old Irish child could be raped at an IPAS center by an unvetted African male asylum seeker, and laments the transfer of taxpayers’ wealth to SEAs instead of providing safe, cost-effective state accommodation for traumatized, vulnerable children. - She claims political and media silence on these issues, accuses politicians and media of looking backward yet continuing the status quo, and alleges covering up by public figures and entities including Catherine Connolly, Heather Humphreys, the government, media, NGOs, and an “Open Borders Brigade.” - She notes the cancellation of a child law project by Roderick O’Gorman to prevent public oversight in Tusla, and offers condolences to the vulnerable girl who was raped, recognizing that similar cases will continue without change. - She ends with a personal appeal to stand up for children in care, stating her own child’s safety underscores the urgency.

Young girls in South Wales have reportedly been recruited by grooming gangs, leading to horrific abuse and trafficking. One victim recounted being threatened and assaulted multiple times. In response, there was a call for a respectful discussion about these serious issues. The conversation shifted to the need for a Wales-wide inquiry into child sexual exploitation, especially given the public concern and the lack of assurances from leadership. The urgency of addressing these matters was emphasized, with a clear request for accountability and action to prevent similar situations as seen in Rotherham and Rochdale.

Rape gangs and child grooming have been persistent issues in Keighley and the Bradford district, yet local leaders have avoided launching an inquiry. The recent national report does not address these specific concerns, raising fears that the scale of abuse in Bradford may exceed that of Rotherham. Questions remain about the number of children affected, the identities of the perpetrators, and when justice will be served. There are ongoing, appalling crimes against children in Bradford and beyond. It’s crucial to focus on both historical and current abuse. Reforms are needed to ensure victims' voices are prioritized and to improve collaboration between policing and councils. Local efforts will involve working with survivors to ensure their experiences inform future changes and that they are properly heard in the process.

Are you aware that a report revealed children were exploited by someone posing as their aunt, who wasn't actually related? There are several incidents in that Florida report. Some I can recall, while others I might dispute, but I don't remember that specific case. Do you recall the teenage girl living in a house with unknown men, lacking a private bedroom? Are you aware that sponsors used a strip club in Jacksonville as the address for where a child should be placed? I don't have the Florida grand jury report in front of me, but I can review it and follow up with you later.

Former Labour adviser Scarlett Maguire and political commentator Amon Bogle discuss front-page claims about the grooming inquiry, framing it as sabotage by Labour and a government-controlled process. - Speaker 1 (Amon Bogle) says the Telegraph front page alleges the grooming inquiry was sabotaged by Labour, and argues the inquiry from the outset was a follow-up of a cover-up spanning three decades, noting Labour initially refused a national inquiry. He asserts the government is manipulating the inquiry by refusing victims and survivors the chance to name perpetrators as Pakistanis, and by preventing examination of religious aspects of the abuse. - Speaker 2 (Scarlett Maguire) contends the issue is not an “Asian grooming gangs” problem but a Pakistani problem in the UK, with the vast majority of perpetrators from Mirpur in Pakistan. She says two women removed themselves from the inquiry because they were being silenced by the government from looking into race. - Speaker 0 (host) remarks on the broader fear of addressing the issue, recounting community knowledge of grooming in shops, gyms, and corner shops, and says he knows the abuse continues and no one is doing anything about it. - Speaker 2 adds that the country has been too scared to discuss the perpetrators, noting that police, social workers, and care workers were afraid of being labeled racist if they spoke out. - Speaker 3 (another participant) notes that there were conflated timelines and that early on, victims faced police or social workers who could be perceived as perpetrators in some cases. He mentions Kirsty Dahmer as the person who first brought grooming cases to court and reopened cases that had been closed, stressing the difficulty of running any inquiry that listens to all parties. - Speaker 3 emphasizes the challenge of conducting an inquiry where social workers and police are involved, and argues that victims and vulnerable young women in care were abused by social workers, the men who did it, and later by the police. He underlines the horrific nature of these events and notes that what happened is still happening today. - The discussion notes the ongoing impact on young women in care, with a final, emotive remark that reading a certain girl’s book would break one’s heart, signaling the lasting harm and urgency of the issue.

The report reveals a systemic failure among various agencies to address the widespread abuse of children in Rochdale over the past 10 to 20 years. It highlights numerous missed opportunities for decisive action that could have prevented or disrupted this abuse. Greater Manchester Police is among the agencies criticized, and an apology is extended to the victims for the significant shortcomings in their response.

How many grooming gangs are there in London? Can you clarify what you mean by that? I'm referring to the gangs in places like Rotherham that groom young girls for sex. In London, there are issues with the exploitation of young people, but they may not fit the specific definition you're using. Are you saying we don't have similar gangs in London as in Rotherham and Bradford? It's important to understand what you mean. I’ve clarified: these are gangs that groom young girls for sex. How much clearer can I be?