TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

We now know without a doubt that Obama, Brennan, Clapper, and Comey were attacking our democracy, all while accusing us of attacking democracy. We know these things because director of national intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has released hundreds of documents revealing that the mindful objections of senior intel officials were ignored. Foreign spies were given a US government endorsed platform to smear Trump with abject lies. They used these lies to illegally spy on the Trump campaign. Former CIA director John Brennan lied to congress about his role. The cover up effort was real. Now that director Gabbard has revealed the truth, where will it all lead?

There is irrefutable evidence that detail how president Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false. They knew it would promote this contrived narrative that Russia interfered in the twenty sixteen election to help president Trump win, selling it to the American people as though it were true. It wasn't. The report that we released today shows in great detail how they carried this out. They manufactured findings from shoddy sources. They suppressed evidence and credible intelligence that disproved their false claims. They disobeyed traditional tradecraft intelligence community standards and withheld the truth from the American people. In doing so, they conspired to subvert the will of the American people who elected Donald Trump in that election in November 2016.

One speaker asserts Brennan may claim a statute of limitations as a defense, but in a 2023 deposition, Brennan said he had no role in getting the Steele dossier into the intelligence community assessment. The speaker claims whistleblowers at CIA and John Ratcliffe say this is false. The speaker believes Brennan should be charged for lying to Congress, stating intelligence chiefs have avoided perjury charges, citing James Clapper's testimony on bulk domestic intelligence collection followed by the Snowden leaks. The speaker argues there needs to be accountability at the CIA, otherwise, people will feel emboldened. The speaker believes Russiagate hamstrung the entire presidency, leading the world to believe Trump was a Russian asset. They claim that in a July 2019 congressional hearing, Mueller had nothing, and they took down key elements of an entire presidency.

As documents are declassified and released, more is being learned about who was directly involved and implicated in past wrongdoings. Some individuals loudly protested against these actions, and whistleblowers are coming forward with documentation of their protests and unwillingness to participate. As those who had a hand in these actions are identified, it will provide an opportunity to ensure that they, and others willing to weaponize intelligence to subvert the will of the American people, can no longer work in the intelligence community.

CIA whistleblower reveals a cover-up by the Biden administration regarding attacks from directed energy weapons by foreign adversaries. In an interview, the whistleblower confirms being attacked and states that the intelligence community has obstructed congressional investigations, calling it a terrifying cover-up. The whistleblower discusses experiencing gaslighting from the CIA, which aimed to make victims doubt their injuries. A recent congressional report suggests foreign involvement in these injuries. The whistleblower expresses gratitude for the report and criticizes the CIA for betraying its personnel. She urges for acknowledgment of the situation to prevent further harm and hopes for change under a potential Trump administration, emphasizing that those involved in the previous report should not be allowed to handle this issue.

Recently, in January, a member of the Senate Intel Committee tried to block someone from getting a job in the intel world because this person would push for the release of the JFK files. This senator's main goal is to keep those files secret, but I don't understand why they would be protecting the CIA, especially after the Church Committee hearings already discredited them. I know that a member of the Senate Intel Committee made that call to block the appointment. Someone asked if it was Tom Cotton from Arkansas, but I haven't asked him directly for an interview, even though I probably should.

Your investigation uncovered witnesses who told you that or told your team that CIA Director John Brennan overruled intelligence officials who were objecting to the inclusion of the Steele dossier in the intelligence community assessment. How well would some of those witnesses hold up in court or in a public hearing of the House Oversight Committee? Well, these are some of the most senior intelligence officials within the CIA who came forward and spoke the truth to the House Intelligence Committee's, majority staff team that launched this investigation. They invest they they spoke to and interviewed over 20 intelligence community professionals, senior officials within the CIA, which is how they uncovered the truth of what actually happened as reported in the documents that we released yesterday.

The conversation centers on a so-called “rear guard” and how it operates inside the U.S. government, as described by the speakers. - Speaker 0 asks about the identity and role of the “rear god/rear guard.” - Speaker 1 defines the rear guard as a group ideologically driven to a particular point of view not shared by the current administration, and asserts that it is organized. - The mechanism of influence is explained: in a large, geographically dispersed organization, if one doesn’t have a loyal team, the team can undermine leadership. The claim is that even with good intentions, without a loyal crew, the organization won’t respond to the boss, leading to actions that bypass or undermine higher authority. - The discussion claims a current case where the president signs a presidential policy directive stating that corruption will not be tolerated, and the attorney general issues a memorandum declaring alignment with the boss to fix corruption inside the department. The attorney general allegedly helps set up a weaponization working group, and an assistant U.S. attorney asserts representation of The United States of America while saying they do not want an investigation into corruption involving the DOJ. The speakers label this as illegal and a violation of jurisprudence and canons for a government attorney. - The question is asked: who directed the assistant attorney general to act this way? Speaker 1 suggests that, as an investigator, one would subpoena the assistant to determine who directed them and who told them to do what, implying chain-of-command exposure—but cannot provide the name in this moment. - They insist that the actions are not random but come from the rear guard. The whistleblower disclosure is mentioned: before Pam Bondi’s appointment, a disclosure claimed that all assistant U.S. attorneys who had worked for Jack Smith should be investigated, but nothing was done to hold anyone accountable, and those involved were let go. The disclosure’s author is not named in the moment, but Speaker 1 says they will provide it. - The rear guard is further described as an organized group; the organization named is the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency (SIGI). The discussion covers SIGI’s creation in 2008, in conjunction with legislation and Senator Grassley, as a bipartisan effort to establish an independent entity inside the executive branch to oversee, train, educate, and provide counsel for all inspectors general. - The speakers explain that SIGI operates within the executive branch but is independent; the implied tension is whether an entity can be independent while being “inside” the executive branch, challenging the unitary executive view that the president controls the entire executive branch. - They discuss the concept of the administrative state: unelected officials who operate with their own power, suggesting a two-tiered system in America between “them and us.” They note that this view affects multiple agencies, including the Department of Justice and the EPA. - The president’s belief in leading the country by the majority is noted, along with the tension between the executive branch and the administrative state, which allegedly believes it serves its own interests rather than those of elected leaders. The dialogue hints at a broader narrative where the president is not always perceived as fully in charge, and a cultural portrayal—via media—that suggests the president is not the sole driver of policy.

I blew the whistle on the American Taliban case after discovering that torture had been used during the investigation. The Department of Justice failed to disclose this evidence during the prosecution. I went to the media about it, which led to a criminal investigation against me and being put on the no-fly list. This experience showed me the power and aggression of the government when you go against their narrative, even if it's based on falsehoods.

The speaker notes that mainstream media outlets are strangely silent about declassified Russia hoax material. The speaker is not surprised because many of these outlets received leaks from John Brennan, James Clapper, and their people almost immediately after the Obama directed National Security Council meeting. These leaks occurred weeks before the intelligence community assessment was completed or even drafted. The media outlets printed what they were told without vetting or evidence because it didn't exist. These outlets repeated and built upon this lie created by President Obama's administration and went on to win awards.

Chuck Schumer said the intelligence community has many ways to retaliate against those who challenge it. Faulty intelligence has led to failures, such as the Iraq invasion, which caused many deaths, destabilization, and the rise of ISIS. The FBI and intelligence agencies were used to undermine Donald Trump's presidency, falsely portraying him as a puppet of Putin. FISA was used illegally to obtain a warrant on Carter Page using a Clinton-funded dossier. Tony Blinken prompted 51 intelligence officials to dismiss Hunter Biden's laptop as disinformation to help Biden win the election. James Clapper lied to a committee about mass collection of Americans' records. The CIA, under John Brennan, spied on Congress. The FBI tried to surveil Catholics attending traditional Latin mass. The speaker was placed on a secret domestic terror watch list after criticizing Kamala Harris. The speaker believes Trump's reelection is a mandate to end the weaponization of the intelligence community and restore trust. If confirmed as DNI, the speaker will focus on the essential mission of ensuring the safety, security, and freedom of the American people by delivering unbiased intelligence.

"You wanna talk about an insurrection? This is a insurrection against the American people that was thwarted at multiple times." "He looked me in the eye and said, the truth of the matter is we took the playbook for psychological operations and information warfare that we would use against our enemies, and we turned it against the American people to undo the twenty sixteen election and to make sure they didn't elect Donald Trump in 2020." "Now that is a senior intelligence officer with more than thirty years of experience, a patriot who served in some of the most dangerous parts of the world, and he understood that the tactics of making something fake look real were ripped right up our out of our intelligence communities." "Our intelligence agencies not only harm Donald Trump, they were harming the American public, the national security interest of the American public."

James Clapper was allegedly on the team that manufactured the intelligence assessment about Iraq's WMDs that led to the Iraq war. According to Clapper's book, he and his team created something that was not there. Considering his actions then and in 2016 as Obama's director of national intelligence, Clapper allegedly has no problem politicizing, manufacturing, and weaponizing intelligence for a political outcome.

There is irrefutable evidence that detail how president Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false. The Obama administration doctored the intelligence to make it look like Putin and Trump stole the election. A month after Trump beat Hillary, Barack Obama wasn't satisfied with his intelligence reporting and ordered his CIA director to create a new assessment of how Russia interfered with the election. John Brennan handpicked five CIA analysts to write the assessment, and they were siloed. None of them knew what the other was doing, and only one analyst was in charge of drafting this report. There was a massive pressure campaign that came right from the top. Obama and his spy chiefs knew that Putin didn't prefer Trump over Hillary, but they cooked the intelligence to make it look like he did.

The speaker expresses concern over media silence and the deletion of online posts. Speaker 1 is unsurprised by the mainstream media's refusal to cover or their attempts to diminish the impact of revelations found in declassified documents. The speaker claims the media avoids specific evidence and the voices of intelligence professionals who protested against malicious actions taken by figures like John Brennan and James Clapper under President Obama's direction. These actions allegedly involved creating an intelligence assessment filled with falsehoods. The speaker asserts the media avoids these voices because it would expose their complicity in pushing a lie and hoax throughout President Trump's first administration.

Congressman: The Department of Justice has unfairly treated whistleblowers like Mr. Allen. Mr. Allen: The treatment is unfair, and the process felt like the punishment. Mr. Horowitz: Putting someone like Mr. Allen on unpaid leave for over two years is unfair. Congressman: The process was to punish whistleblowers and make an example of them for reporting improper actions at the FBI and DOJ. Congress has not appropriately protected whistleblowers, and continuing resolutions put no consequence on the DOJ or FBI for their actions. Congress should ensure whistleblowers receive back pay; otherwise, maybe the FBI director and attorney general shouldn't get their paychecks or perks. Voting for these continuing resolutions perpetuates the punishment of whistleblowers, and Congress underwrites the weaponization of the Justice Department.

The speaker distrusts the government, claiming the CIA has lied since 2001, regardless of who is president. They allege the White House killed 424 uncharged people in August 2015 based solely on the CIA's word. An attorney for a drone whistleblower recounted an incident where the operator refused to launch a drone strike because the target was a child, not a goat as claimed by CENTCOM. The operator now faces court martial for refusing to kill the child. The speaker questions whether America has abandoned civil liberties in the name of national security since 9/11. They believe Edward Snowden's courage in revealing information opened doors for discussion, but he faces severe repercussions. The speaker advised Snowden not to return to the US, as a fair trial is impossible due to the jury pool's ties to intelligence agencies.

"In some cases, they are very unwilling to come to express a view or a certain opinion on something." "This this gets to the real heart of the challenge here and the problems that we've seen is the politicization of intelligence to meet a certain objective or to influence a certain policy." "When you look at the so called intelligence that really was used to spur the Iraq regime change war." "And look at what that has cost our country in lives and treasure." "This goes all the way back to why this organization was founded." "So so, again, this is this is really what is at the heart of needs of what needs to be addressed within the intelligence community and why leadership matters so much."

James Clapper was allegedly on the team that manufactured the intelligence assessment about Iraq's WMDs that led to the Iraq war. According to the speaker, Clapper wrote in his book that he and his team created something that was not there. The speaker claims that Clapper's actions in 2016, as Obama's Director of National Intelligence, show that he has no problem politicizing, manufacturing, and weaponizing intelligence for a political outcome.

The speaker reported a subordinate for criminal conflict of interest but was discouraged from doing so, learning that reporting corruption leads to trouble. Subsequently, the speaker was accused of publishing classified information from two years prior and fired, while those engaged in corruption kept their jobs. This created a culture where criticizing corruption leads to retaliation using tools meant for criminals. The speaker has been in court for three years trying to get the facts released, similar to cases with Senator Ernst, where information is withheld from courts and Congress. Regarding uncovering fraud inside USAID, the speaker believes forensic accountants are needed due to bureaucrats' crafty methods of hiding money. Even in 2019, programs unknown to political appointees were still being discovered. The speaker suggests that during the Trump term, some appointees were not vigilant enough, but now there is a stronger, more concerted effort to obtain all the information.

Government officials, like James Clapper and John Brennan, have been accused of lying under oath before Congress. Clapper denied the domestic surveillance program, but his body language suggested otherwise. When asked if the NSA spied on US citizens, he initially denied it, but later admitted to it. Similarly, Brennan initially denied spying on the Senate, but later apologized when evidence was presented. These officials have managed to avoid charges despite their dishonesty.