reSee.it - Related Video Feed

If a genetic sequence is injected that causes the body to manufacture a foreign protein, the body recognizes it as an invasion and launches an attack on cells. This autoimmune reaction can occur anywhere the injection lands, potentially causing myocarditis or a heart attack if it lands in the heart, stroke or neurological conditions if in the brain, blindness if in the eyes, or sterilization if in the ovaries. The body is being made to manufacture something that does not belong in it. The speaker believes the so-called vaccines encode spike proteins, which are acutely toxic to blood cells, prompting blood clots, and to nerve cells, causing them to malfunction. The body is forced to make something directly toxic, intentionally. The injectables are wrapped in lipid nanoparticles.

The speaker asks whether vaccinated friends or family have “a whole different personality” or are “more angry” since getting injections, and then claims there is “a strong association between COVID-nineteen injections and neuropsychiatric disorders.” They say the information comes “directly from the FDA and the CDC,” and that they will provide a link to the study. The speaker states that “thresholds that were all breached” were “way over,” and that the factors listed next are “a more likely determination.” They then list specific reported increases in neuropsychiatric conditions, including: psychosis being “four forty times more likely,” dementia being “140 times,” schizophrenia being “three fifteen times,” and suicidal thoughts.

The speaker discusses a paper that confirms the presence of spike protein in various organs, including the deltoid muscles where the vaccine is administered. They present two cases showing strong expression of spike protein in the testes, leading to a decrease in spermatocytes and sperm production. The speaker personally finds these findings disturbing and advises women of fertile age to reconsider motherhood with vaccinated men.

The speaker confirms that the spike protein from the COVID-19 vaccine is produced in the deltoid muscles where it is injected. However, they also found the spike protein expressed in various organs, including the testes. In a 28-year-old man who died 140 days after vaccination, the spike protein was strongly expressed in the testes, leading to a decrease in spermatocytes. The same was observed in an older man. The speaker personally comments that if they were a woman of fertile age, they would be hesitant to plan motherhood with a vaccinated man due to these findings, which they find disturbing.

The speaker expresses concern about the mRNA vaccines, specifically the Pfizer and Moderna ones, stating that they believe there are deliberate toxicities built into these vaccines. They argue that when the body is instructed to make a piece of foreign non-human protein, every cell that expresses it is seen as an invasion, leading the immune system to attack and potentially harm the body's own cells. The speaker also claims that all four companies producing COVID-19 vaccines intentionally chose the spike protein, which is biologically active and potentially toxic, as a component of their vaccines. They find this choice unusual and believe it to be a deliberate decision.

Studies show that more people who received the injections are ending up in the hospital and dying. Repeat injections can lead to tolerance issues by the immune system, preventing an effective immune response. The speaker is focused on the damages caused by these products and believes that the voices of the injured have been taken away. They hypothesize that the spike protein in the injections could cause hyper inflammation, especially in people with preexisting conditions. The speaker also mentions that the contents of the injection were supposed to remain at the injection site, but evidence suggests they can travel to the ovaries. They suspect that there is information being withheld from the public.

Speaker 0: The transcript cites multiple studies indicating severe behavioral changes in those who receive mRNA shots. A study by Oten colleagues found that the mRNA vaccine mRNA and spike protein were being produced in cerebral arteries of stroke patients. It is stated that the mRNA shot is based on the second largest COVID vaccine safety study ever conducted with eighty five million people in it, which purportedly found a two hundred percent increased risk of stroke after dose two of mRNA shots. The claim is that the vaccine goes to the brain, causes brain damage and neuronal destruction, and that this is reflected in neuropsychiatric conditions. This is linked to a study by Doctor James Thorpe and colleagues, which allegedly identified eighty-six neuropsychiatric safety signals for these COVID shots, including homicide, homicidal tendencies, psychosis, schizophrenia, Alzheimer's, cognitive impairment, and violent behavior, all claimed to be far in excess of what was reported with flu vaccinations, and described as corroborating multiple other studies. The transcript also references a study from Korea finding increased Alzheimer's risks and increased cognitive impairment risks, and another Korea study reporting a massive increased risk of depression, sleep disorders, and anxiety from these injections. The overall assertion is that, based on peer reviewed evidence, the injections damage the brain, cause brain damage resulting in neuropsychiatric conditions.

The speaker discusses how the spike protein in vaccines can lead to clotting issues, immune suppression, and reactivation of latent viruses like mono. This can also weaken the body's ability to fight off other viruses and cancers. An increase in cancer cases post-vaccination is noted anecdotally. The speaker attributes these effects to the spike protein in the vaccines.

Speaker 0 states that the study confirms suspicions from the past five years that common sense has deteriorated in the population. The study analyzed the VAERS system from the 1990s to 2024 and examined PRRs (proportional reporting ratios), which measure how many more adverse events occur with the COVID shots compared to the flu shot or other vaccines. It reports 8686 safety signals of neuropsychiatric adverse events, with some up to 3,000 times higher than the flu shot. The safety signal threshold defined by CDC/FDA for PRRs is greater than two, and all reported signals exceeded this threshold. The listed conditions include schizophrenia, dementia, Alzheimer's, cognitive impairment, strokes, brain clots, homicidal tendencies, homicidal behavior, and psychosis, described as people hallucinating and brain damage. The speaker notes that this large number of safety signals aligns with a recent study indicating that people who had strokes showed toxic spike protein production in their brains for up to seventeen months after vaccination, which the speaker suggests explains the observed deterioration in cognitive function.

The speaker claims SV40 in literature turns on cancer genes. They further claim the spike protein impairs tumor suppressor systems P53 and BRCA, promoting cancer and inhibiting the ability to fight it. The speaker suggests cancer rates are up, and the question is how much is due to vaccines. They state that repeated shots every six months increase the chances of getting loaded with synthetic genetic material that will cause harm, including heart disease, neurologic disease, blood clotting, immunologic problems, and cancer.

The speaker discusses the harmful effects of the spike protein found in COVID-19 vaccines. They mention a study showing that almost a third of patients experienced neurological issues from the spike protein. They express concern about the lack of an off switch for this gene and the potential for autoimmune and neurological harm. The speaker also addresses criticism of fearmongering and highlights the connection between the spike protein and HIV. They mention studies linking COVID-19 vaccines to autism in rats and discuss the use of edible vaccines in plants. The speaker emphasizes the importance of sharing information and concludes by promoting their video game.

Speaker 1 asks for information on how the vaccine links to dementia, citing a grandmother who suffered from dementia after the COVID vaccine. Speaker 0 responds: "I'm so sorry, and thank you for bringing that up." He notes: "lipid nanoparticles traverse the blood brain barrier" and "lipid nanoparticles were developed and understood to traverse the blood brain barrier." He cites "the indoctrinated brain" by doctor Michael Nels and says "the combination of propaganda, repetition of messages while people are in a state of fear actually damages and rewires the brain" and that there is "this actual brain damage from the injection specifically destroying or damaging the prefrontal cortex." He mentions "lost their memories of themselves" and "there's so much dementia and Alzheimer's type damage in the Pfizer documents." He adds "these lipid nanoparticles damage the brain as they circulate through the system, you know, crossing the blood brain barrier." He suggests "traumas based interventions" and "you can possibly rebuild the myelin sheath of the nervous system." "So that's the best I can do, and I'm really sorry that that happened to your grandma."

The speaker discusses a paper that confirms the presence of spike protein in various organs, including the deltoid muscles where the vaccine is administered. They show a case of a 28-year-old man who died 140 days after vaccination, where the spike protein is strongly expressed in the testes, affecting spermatogenesis. They also mention a similar effect in an older man. The speaker concludes by expressing a personal opinion that if they were a fertile woman, they would be hesitant to plan motherhood with a vaccinated man due to the concerning findings.

Some people are concerned about personality changes after receiving mRNA vaccines. They believe that these vaccines can cause clotting in the brain's capillaries, leading to cell death and changes in personality. There are also reports of increased rigidity in thinking, anger, and a lack of emotional modulation in vaccinated individuals. These changes may contribute to a willingness to cut off unvaccinated individuals. Additionally, there are comparisons made to lobotomy, suggesting that the vaccines may impair higher faculties and the ability to process contradictory evidence. Overall, there are concerns about brain damage and reduced communication abilities caused by the vaccines.

The speaker discusses a paper that confirms the presence of spike protein in various organs, including the deltoid muscles where the vaccine is administered. They present two cases showing strong expression of spike protein in the testes, leading to a decrease in spermatocytes and sperm production. The speaker personally finds these findings disturbing and suggests that women of fertile age should reconsider motherhood with vaccinated men.

Speaker 0 added a comment building on what Tina said about changes in personality, depression, and related symptoms. They stated that the issues are “very real” and said they have identified the reasons “from theory” and with “some doctors in Italy,” as well as “some pathologists” who have confirmed these reasons. Speaker 0 claimed that the spike protein “unfortunately attacks and destroys also the endocrine system.” They explained that the endocrine system includes “the glands producing hormones,” and they said that these hormones “are what make our emotions and feelings and all those things.” In their view, this connection is directly relevant to why people experience changes in personality and other emotional or mental effects. Speaker 0 then referenced an Italian pathologist “near Venice.” They said this pathologist “went on a newspaper” and reported that, among “all the brains he had investigated,” he found the pineal gland “completely destroyed” in “all the people who were vaccinated.” Speaker 0 presented this as an example supporting the idea that the spike protein is dangerous to the endocrine system. According to Speaker 0, because the spike protein affects the endocrine system—particularly through harm to hormone-producing glands, and specifically via the pineal gland as described by the Italian pathologist—the result is changes in personality. They also linked the endocrine disruption to depression, describing the emotional and personality changes as a downstream effect of the claimed destruction of hormone-related systems. Overall, Speaker 0’s main points were: (1) changes in personality and depression are described as real; (2) the reasons are said to come from theory and confirmation by doctors and pathologists in Italy; (3) the spike protein is described as attacking and destroying the endocrine system; (4) hormones from endocrine glands are said to govern emotions and feelings; (5) an Italian pathologist near Venice is said to have reported pineal gland destruction in the brains of vaccinated individuals; and (6) this endocrine-system impact is said to be why people experience changes in personality.

The speaker says that changes in personality and depression are very real and have been identified as resulting from the spike protein attacking and destroying the endocrine system. Hormones produced by glands in the endocrine system are responsible for emotions and feelings. An Italian pathologist, Nirvanis, reported in a newspaper that in all the brains he investigated, the pineal gland was completely destroyed in vaccinated people. The speaker concludes that the spike protein is dangerous for the endocrine system, causing changes in personality.

The speaker asserts that COVID-19 shots do more than affect the immune system; they can damage the brain and worsen mental health. They claim a wave of studies shows sharp increases in various strokes: ischemic strokes up to 44%, hemorrhagic strokes up to 50%, and transient ischemic attacks (mini strokes) up to 67%. They also report increases in neurological and autoimmune conditions, including myasthenia gravis up 71% and Alzheimer’s disease up 22%. Cognitive impairment is claimed to have risen by nearly 138%, while depression is up 68%, anxiety disorders up 44%, and sleep disorders up 93%. The speaker links all of these increases to “toxic spike protein accumulation and persistence in the brain.” The speaker states this is not a conspiracy theory and cites what they describe as documented peer‑reviewed research and studies by experts. They name epidemiologist Nicholas Holcher, who allegedly says that using mRNA to hijack cells in various organ systems to produce a highly toxic spike protein that persists in the body for months or years was “one of the worst ideas in medical history.” The speaker then asks, “So what can you do?” as a transition to presumably recommendations or actions, though no specific actions are listed in the provided segment.

The speaker presents findings that show the spike protein from the COVID-19 vaccine is produced not only in the deltoid muscles where it is injected, but also in various organs. They provide examples of the spike protein being strongly expressed in the testes of a 28-year-old man who died after vaccination, leading to a decrease in spermatocytes. They also mention a similar expression in the testes of an older man. The speaker concludes with a personal comment, stating that if they were a woman of fertile age, they would be hesitant to plan motherhood with a vaccinated man due to the concerning findings.

Speaker 0 asserts that truth is out and that scientists are now confirming long-suspected effects of the COVID-19 shots beyond the immune system, specifically that they can damage the brain and devastate mental health. The claim is that the evidence is overwhelming and that a new wave of studies has revealed significant increases in various neurological and psychiatric conditions, all linked to the presence of toxic spike protein accumulation and persistence in the brain. The summary of claimed study findings includes: - Ischemic strokes: up forty-four percent. - Hemorrhagic strokes: up fifty percent. - Transient ischemic strokes (mini strokes): up sixty-seven percent. - Myasthenia gravis, described as a debilitating autoimmune condition: up over seventy-one percent. - Alzheimer’s disease: up twenty-two percent. - Cognitive impairment: up nearly one hundred and thirty-eight percent. - Depression: up over sixty-eight percent. - Anxiety disorders: up nearly forty-four percent. - Sleep disorders: up over ninety-three percent. Speaker 0 links all of these increases to one cause: toxic spike protein accumulation and persistence in the brain. The statement "This isn't a conspiracy theory" is used to bolster the claim that there is documented peer-reviewed research and published studies supporting these observations. The speaker cites epidemiologist Nicholas Holcher as an example of an expert who has commented on the issue. The quote attributed to Holcher describes using mRNA to hijack cells in various organ systems to produce a highly toxic spike protein that persists in the body for months or even years, and characterizes this approach as one of the worst ideas in medical history. In closing, Speaker 0 poses a question, "So what can you do?" signaling a transition from presenting the alleged findings to offering potential actions or recommendations. The overall message is that COVID-19 vaccines are claimed to cause widespread brain toxicity and mental health problems through persistent spike protein, with purported evidence from peer-reviewed studies and expert commentary cited to support the assertions.

- Speaker 0 describes a doctrine where an agent or pathogen works best as a binary weapon if followed by mass exposure with vaccines, noting the insistence on gene transfection technologies to create a peptide with a prion-catalyzing epitope and pointing out that lipid nanoparticles are highly labile and inflammatory, constituting a combination of chemical and biological warfare. - Speaker 0 adds that if this was a weapon release, it may be done and now data will reveal its effects, and expresses doubt about how much trust can be placed in normal scientific methods and institutions to relay data to the public, inviting Speaker 1’s thoughts. - Speaker 1 (Stephanie) says the discussion has been an incredible and difficult ride since things began unfolding, with questions about natural versus lab-based origins, vaccine development versus biowarfare, and concerns about funding by China for bioweapons, acknowledging the impossibility of definitively answering many questions. - Speaker 0 agrees that ambiguity is the point and calls it the strength of the weapon. - Speaker 1 asks why someone would inject something to inflict a bioweapon on the entire population, suggesting population control as a possible motivation. - Speaker 0 notes the need to consider literature from top transnational power structures and corporations, asserting that it is not hidden. - Speaker 1 recalls prior concerns about population-control vaccines, referencing reports about vaccines used in Argentina and Africa that allegedly caused infertility, describing an example where a vaccine given to teenage girls could lead to antibody development to a fetus, making infertility less detectable over time. She mentions a memory of a “benign disease” vaccination program in Argentina that led people to suspect infertility, and notes that it could be a stealth method. - Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the idea that vaccines may have had effects on fertility and reference terms like human chorionic something, with Speaker 1 acknowledging possible occurrences in India as well as Africa and Argentina. - Speaker 0 refers to bioaccumulation seen in reproductive organs and cites pharmacokinetic studies beginning in Japan, noting the vaccine’s presence in the placenta and testes and recalling reports of harmful effects on male reproductive organs. - Speaker 0 mentions Anna Burkhart’s data as dark regarding spike protein expression in reproductive organs found in autopsies, while acknowledging uncertainty about how much weight to attribute to that data, but maintaining that biowarfare cannot be dismissed. - The discussion returns to the mechanism of biowarfare being distinct from a pathogen, describing a scenario where exposure leads to effects years later due to the disease mechanism being induced, rather than immediate pathogen-driven illness.

We have multiple studies now indicating severe behavioral changes in those who receive mRNA shots. a study by Oten colleagues that found the mRNA, vaccine mRNA, and spike protein was being produced in cerebral arteries of stroke patients. the mRNA shot's based on the second largest COVID vaccine safety study ever conducted with eighty five million people in it. They found two hundred percent increased risk of stroke in after dose two of mRNA shots. They actually identified 86 neuropsychiatric safety signals for these COVID shots, including homicide, homicidal tendencies, psychosis, schizophrenia, Alzheimer's, cognitive impairment, violent behavior. All of this stuff was found to be in far exceedance of what was reported with the flu vaccinations. We clearly now know based on the peer reviewed evidence, it damages the brain, causes brain damage resulting in neuropsychiatric conditions.

Speaker 0 raises a concern about the vaccine, asking why every new paper or study seems to claim the vaccine is responsible for a new problem. The question posed is whether the vaccine is really responsible for every negative outcome discussed in the literature, noting rises in cancers and cognitive decline. The speaker questions the blanket attribution of all adverse effects to the vaccine. Speaker 1 responds by suggesting that the world’s population has been poisoned, stating that the protein was devised in the Chinese security lab in Wuhan, China. The speaker claims it is not a natural protein and is not supposed to be in the body. They assert that one can obtain spike protein from having the infection, which almost everyone has had, and from taking the vaccine. The speaker contends that “it’s almost as if we’ve all been poisoned.” They further claim that the spike protein stays in the body and causes disease, listing several specific adverse outcomes: heart disease, neurologic disease, autoimmunity, blood clots, and maybe even cancer.

The speaker presents findings that show the spike protein from the COVID-19 vaccine is produced not only in the deltoid muscles where it is injected, but also in various organs. They provide examples of the spike protein being strongly expressed in the testes of a 28-year-old man who died after vaccination, leading to a decrease in spermatocytes. They also mention a similar expression in the testes of an older man. The speaker concludes with a personal comment, stating that if they were a woman of fertile age, they would be hesitant to plan motherhood with a vaccinated man due to the concerning findings.

The speaker discusses a paper that confirms the presence of spike protein in various organs, including the deltoid muscles where the vaccine is administered. They present two cases showing strong expression of spike protein in the testes, leading to a decrease in spermatocytes and sperm production. The speaker personally finds these findings disturbing and suggests that women of fertile age should reconsider motherhood with vaccinated men.