TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

According to the latest report, US government data confirms a 143,233 percent increase in cancer cases due to COVID vaccination.

I was corrected on a statement I made about $50,000,000 in condoms being sent to Gaza. The condoms were actually sent to Mozambique for an HIV prevention program. I admit to making mistakes; it's impossible to be perfectly accurate all the time. I will correct errors quickly. However, I question whether sending that many condoms anywhere is a good use of funds, and I doubt it's something most Americans would support. The sheer volume is significant.

There has been a significant increase in unexplained child deaths since 2020, not 350% as originally thought, but actually 3,380%. This is 33 times the average. The speaker questions why this alarming statistic is being overlooked by medical professionals and the government. They aim to provide answers based on science, not speculation or rumors.

In 1987, 330 out of every million children were diagnosed with autism. Today, that number is 27,777 per million. To deny an autism epidemic, one must believe that researchers in North Dakota missed 98.8% of autistic children, including thousands with profound disabilities who were somehow invisible to doctors, teachers, parents, and their own study. The same researchers followed the original group for 12 years and, upon double-checking, found they had missed only one child. Doctors and therapists in the past were not missing all these cases, therefore the epidemic is real.

At a recent conference on the COVID crisis in Romania, a credible estimate suggested that there could be around 17 million deaths globally from the COVID vaccine. This number may seem high, but when you consider the global population, it is not surprising. It is a tragedy on a massive scale, comparable to the death toll of a global war. What's even more concerning is that the recommendation to vaccinate healthy children, who are unlikely to benefit from it, continues. There has never been a proper justification for administering the vaccine to children, as healthy kids do not typically die from COVID, and the vaccine does not prevent transmission. It is time to reevaluate this decision.

I have 43 years of experience in high-risk obstetrics, seeing a large number of patients yearly. Stillbirth rates have decreased from 10 to nearly 6 in my career. In 2021, stillbirth rates for fetuses are alarming, with a rate of 29.3, indicating a significant deviation. Instances of stillbirths and fetal abnormalities are on the rise, possibly linked to the inflammatory effects of vaccines. Safety monitoring systems have not identified increased risks for pregnant individuals receiving vaccines. Inflammation in pregnancy can lead to harm, as known for decades.

- The speaker notes dated 07/25/2022, reporting on developments related to baby deaths and baby funerals. They reference the UK government website, and specifically Northampton NHS in detail mentioning children's funerals, noting that contracts for this area have appeared that were previously unseen. They point to contractfinderservice.gov.uk and advise looking for “children's and babies' funerals.” They identify several awarded contracts, including one for Hertfordshire, another for Hertfordshire specifically for baby funerals, and contracts awarded for Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS, and Leicester Hospitals NHS. - The speaker mentions that the WNHS is another organization involved for those who do not want to have Mexican arranged funerals, stating that they will do that for you now. - A doctor in Australia, Dr. Luke McClinton, is described as leading the fertility services at the Mater Hospital and as a principal investigator for a series of randomized controlled trials. He is also described as the president of the Australian Institute for Restorative Reproductive Medicine and is labeled as “the top doctor in Australia in this field.” - The speaker asserts that Dr. Luke McClinton was sacked on Friday for not getting the jab and for attempting to release his data on miscarriages post-vaccination. They state that he has until the following Friday to exit his private practice rooms, as he is no longer allowed to practice in public or private settings. - The speaker claims that Dr. McClinton has been investigating miscarriages in couples post-vaccination and states that the “normal miscarriage rate” is between five and perhaps as high as sixteen percent. They then claim that since the introduction of the vaccine, he has found that seventy-four percent of women who are vaccinated are now having miscarriages. - The speaker reiterates the statistic: “Seventy four percent of women are having miscarriages who are vaccinated.” They suggest that this statistic would explain why hospitals allegedly want to deal directly with crematoria, with vans taking multiple babies directly to the crematorium, bypassing funeral directors. The speaker emphasizes that they had previously mentioned these points.

The speaker discusses signals of transgenerational harm, clarifying they are not referring to transgender issues but harms that span generations. They cite CDC data to support a claim that, beginning right after mass vaccination of childbearing-age women in early 2021, there is a statistically significant inflection point in infant mortality. They state that infant mortality rates had been steadily decreasing for thirty years, but in 2021, after mass vaccination, the rate “shoots right up,” and it “hasn't gone down since.” As of 2025, they assert, babies are dying at seventy-seven percent excess, with Mississippi reportedly declaring a state of emergency over the situation. The speaker further claims that mothers are not taking the shots anymore. They suggest that some of the genetic material from the vaccination appears to integrate into the body and may be passed on, describing it as a legacy effect. They emphasize that most people took the shots in 2021, and express concern that there could be effects through the generations as a result.

We initially reported 1400 casualties, but we later corrected it to 1200 as we realized our overestimation. We made a mistake by identifying badly burnt bodies as ours, but they turned out to be Hamas terrorists. We acknowledge our errors and take responsibility for them.

I have 43 years of experience in high-risk obstetrics, seeing a large number of patients yearly. Stillbirth rates have decreased from 10 to 5.8-6 per 1,000 live births. In 2021, the stillbirth rate for fetuses is alarming at 29.3 per 1,000. Reports from Waterloo, Canada show 83 stillbirths out of 4,000 deliveries, with 13 dead fetuses in a 24-hour period. Vaccines are linked to inflammatory effects causing fetal harm. Safety monitoring systems found no significant risks for pregnant women. Inflammation in pregnancy can lead to damage, injury, and death, a known fact for decades.

The speaker claims that women who received the vaccine in the first trimester had an 82% miscarriage rate. They state that this is the same miscarriage rate observed in the Pfizer 5.3.6 post-market analysis.

We discussed the high number of unexplained deaths in aborted children at our event. I mistakenly stated it was 350%, but it's actually 3,328%. This data comes from AHS, which is posted on our website. I apologize for the error with the decimal point.

Speaker 0 explains that even the obstetrics and gynecology association has reportedly pushed to vaccinate pregnant women as a duty, but doctors are the ones who do not know the facts. They reference a highly regarded medical journal, the New England Journal of Medicine, which published a study claiming a 12.6 percent user rate for the vaccine’s research results. Based on that paper, the 三 富 士 川 学 会 then attempted to vaccinate pregnant women. In reality, among the 827 individuals involved, 700 were in the postpartum period, 127 were in the antepartum period, and initial data were from that group. Specifically, for the group limited to those under twenty weeks (twenty weeks or less), which is 127 people, the miscarriage rate was 82 percent. Therefore, the argument is that, going forward, one can see how dangerous the vaccine is from those numbers. The speaker contends that data were hidden and later mixed into the 700-person postpartum group, yielding a miscarriage rate of 12.6 percent. Because of this, the claim is that even a leading medical journal has been influenced by money to publish such conclusions. Overall, the points presented are: - The obstetrics field is described as advocating vaccination of pregnant women as a duty, while physicians allegedly lack awareness of the underlying facts. - The NEJM published a study deemed to show a 12.6 percent user rate, which the speaker implies is problematic. - The 三 富 士 川 学 会 vaccinated pregnant women, but the data show that among 127 women under twenty weeks, the miscarriage rate was 82 percent. - The speaker asserts that this information was hidden and later combined with data from the 700 postpartum cases to produce a 12.6 percent miscarriage rate. - The implication is that even a top medical journal can be swayed by financial influence, resulting in biased reporting.

And do you have any signs to back up your your opinion? The best data are autopsies. So in the largest autopsy series published to date, I know because I'm the senior author. Of all the deaths examined and we re reviewed them. We had an adjudication committee. We had ways of arbitration deciding on did the vaccine cause death. The answer is of these cases that came in for autopsy after vaccination, seventy three point nine percent of individuals, it was determined that the vaccine was the cause of death. First off, there's Hocher and colleagues who's sitting right behind me.

It was determined that in 73.9% of autopsy cases following vaccination, the vaccine was the cause of death. Holsher and colleagues are cited as the source.

In the Waterloo area, there have been 86 stillbirths from January to July, which is higher than the usual rate of 1 stillbirth every 2 months. The mothers of these stillborn babies were fully vaccinated, despite previous claims that vaccines are safe. The speaker questions the minister about what should be said to the doctors who advised pregnant women to get vaccinated and what should be told to the mothers who experienced stillbirths.

Research from Basel, Switzerland shows that 5 to 9% of people in a study experienced cardiac harm from the vaccine, resulting in 50,000 to 90,000 cases of heart damage per million citizens. If someone develops myocarditis, there is a 75% chance of death within 10 years. Menstrual abnormalities, infertility, and aggressive cancers are also spreading among the vaccinated population. This is all part of a big lie perpetuated by multiple agencies. We need to consider the health and fertility of our nation as a patient in the emergency room.

The speaker says that even for obstetrics and gynecology societies, vaccination during pregnancy has been pursued as a duty, but physicians do not know the actual facts. They reference the New England Journal of Medicine, a famous medical journal, where a study of a vaccine’s adverse outcomes claimed that the user rate was 12.6%. Based on that paper, the Sanpeshikawa (Sanbushikawa) Association reportedly promoted vaccination for pregnant women as well. In reality, the data were as follows: of 827 people, 700 were in late pregnancy, and 127 were in the early stages (first trimester). When restricting to the 127 people who were under 20 weeks, the usage rate was 82%. Therefore, the speaker argues that this data reveals how dangerous the vaccine is, and that the data were hidden and mixed with high-profile 700-person data to produce the 12.6% miscarriage rate that was published. This is presented as evidence of a situation where even in medical journals, information was handled to favor the other side due to money and other influences.

Dr. McCulloch is asked to weigh in. Speaker 1 responds that he has presented at FDA advisory meetings and advised companies for decades on regulatory science. He states that when a product definitely results in death, and there are thousands of peer-reviewed papers on this, the COVID vaccines in some people sadly result in death—some on the very first day they take the shot. He argues that this must be a black box warning on the product immediately. He says he checked the package inserts for the currently available products, noting that the ones Senator Blumenthal wants to pursue, and what the Governor still wants to pursue, and what the FDA still wants administered, do not have the word “death” in the package insert. He asserts that Americans are not fairly informed. Speaker 0 asks whether Speaker 1 doubts that the COVID injection caused some deaths, and asks for his view on the numbers listed on VAERS (thirty-seven thousand, six hundred seven, per the prompt) and whether he has any science to back up his opinion. Speaker 1 replies that the best data are autopsies. He references the largest autopsy series published to date and notes that he is the senior author. He says they examined deaths after vaccination, had an adjudication committee and methods of arbitration to decide whether the vaccine caused death, and that in these autopsy cases, seventy-three point nine percent of individuals, it was determined that the vaccine was the cause of death. He mentions Holsher and colleagues, who are right behind him. Speaker 0 reiterates the FDA’s own laws, asking that this be included in the package insert, correct? Speaker 1 confirms, noting that in 2021 Dr. Carol Tocetta, working with the Daily Cloud, wrote about Peters’ marks in 2023 and asked, “where’s the black box warning? Where is it?”

The speaker claims the risk of death from whooping cough is less than one in 2.3 million, while the risk of death from the vaccine is greater than one in 76,000. They state the vaccine is killing far more children than the disease itself, estimating potentially 20 to 40 times more deaths from the vaccine. Another speaker emphasizes that any vaccine, specifically DTaP, carries the risk of death for a child.

The speaker discusses a review of 325 autopsies, which they claim is the largest autopsy series in the world, of COVID-19 vaccinated individuals who died shortly after vaccination. According to the speaker, this review found that the vaccine caused or contributed to approximately 74% of the sudden deaths. The speaker states that this information will be published in a peer-reviewed paper. The speaker anticipates a "tsunami of evidence" regarding the harm caused by COVID-19 vaccines to children, pregnant women, and adults. The speaker urges politicians to "get ahead of this" issue now.

In mid-March, UNICEF reported 13,000 children dead in Gaza, but recent UN numbers show less than 8,000 deaths. The figures are constantly revised during conflict due to multiple sources. The accuracy improves as more information is verified. Despite the adjustments, the confirmed numbers are always on the lower side. The reliability of the numbers is ensured through continuous checking to provide valid information. Translation (if needed): The UNICEF initially reported 13,000 children dead in Gaza, but recent UN numbers show less than 8,000 deaths. The figures are constantly revised during conflict due to multiple sources. The accuracy improves as more information is verified. Despite the adjustments, the confirmed numbers are always on the lower side. The reliability of the numbers is ensured through continuous checking to provide valid information.

A new analysis of CDC data by Ethical Skeptic shows children born following mass mRNA vaccination of mothers are dying at a seventy seven percent excess rate. That's nearly eighteen thousand additional deaths in ages zero to four since 2021. The CDC's own death certificate records revealed an inflection point after thirty years of steady decline in infant and child mortality. So two distinct signals emerged, teratogenic effects, so rising deaths among infants exposed in utero, but the most concerning is transgenerational effects sustained excess mortality rates seen in children who were never infected, never injected, but whose parents previously were. These findings are not speculative models. They come straight from the government's records. If confirmed, this represents a public health crisis of historic magnitude, one affecting not those who were injected, but their children, grandchildren, and generations yet to be born.

Our event focused on explaining the high number of unexplained deaths in aborted children. I previously misstated the percentage of unexplained deaths as 350%, but the correct figure is actually 3,328%. I apologize for the error; it was a mistake with the decimal point. Some may doubt this number, but it is based on data from AHS, which we have posted on our website, an injection of truth dot.

Speaker 0 argues that, when re-examining the data from the original study, the raw numbers reveal a different pattern than what the study’s modeling suggested. Specifically, they state that, in the raw proportions, every single one of the 22 chronic disease categories was proportionally higher in the vaccinated group. This includes cancer, which the study reportedly treated as a control condition and claimed there was no difference for. According to Speaker 0, the study’s use of cancer as a control is at odds with the raw data they observed. They claim that there was a difference in cancer outcomes, contrary to the study’s implication of no difference. They emphasize that, with rare outcomes, the modeling employed in the original analysis is not very reliable, and as a result, the study did not perform any basic proportional analysis. Speaker 0 states that when they performed a basic proportional analysis themselves, cancer was fifty-four percent higher in the vaccinated group compared to the unvaccinated children. They mention that this result is “explained biologically” and assert that there is biological plausibility behind it. Key points: - Raw proportions show all 22 chronic disease categories higher in the vaccinated group, including cancer. - The original study used cancer as a control and claimed no difference, which Speaker 0 disputes based on the raw data. - Modeling for rare outcomes is described as not very reliable. - A basic proportional analysis by Speaker 0 indicates cancer is 54% higher in the vaccinated group versus the unvaccinated. - A biological explanation or plausibility is asserted for the observed cancer difference in the vaccinated group.