reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that top law enforcement officials expected Hillary Clinton to win the 2016 election and manipulated the law to ensure her victory and Trump's defeat. He cites James Comey's alleged admission of operating in an environment where a Clinton victory was expected. The speaker discusses the alleged intrusion into the Democratic National Committee (DNC), pointing to "telltale signs in Cyrillic" and the name "Felix Dzerzhinsky" as either sloppy or overly clever attempts to implicate Russia. He alleges that the persona "Guccifer 2.0" is a fraud, based on forensic analysis of metadata by former NSA technical directors. The speaker criticizes Bob Mueller, claiming he falsified intelligence before the Iraq War and approved of torture and wiretapping. He recounts an encounter where he questioned Mueller about "parallel construction," the practice of using illegally acquired information in prosecutions without revealing its source. The speaker describes James Comey's leaking of a conversation with President Trump to prompt the appointment of a special prosecutor, Bob Mueller. He questions Comey's decision not to seize the DNC computers after the alleged Russian hacking, relying instead on CrowdStrike, a firm with a "disastrous record of veracity." The speaker claims that the DNC blamed Russia for the hacking to divert attention from the content of the leaked emails. He references Jennifer Palmieri, Hillary Clinton's PR person, allegedly pushing the "Russians hacked" narrative. Chuck Schumer is quoted as saying the intelligence community has "six ways to Sunday" to get back at Trump. The speaker discusses the Steele dossier and claims that the FBI also paid for it. He alleges that the intelligence community assessment on Russian hacking was based on handpicked analysts and that Obama stated the conclusions of Russian hacking getting to WikiLeaks were inconclusive. He claims NSA collects everything and there is no evidence of Russian hacking. The speaker references Peter Strzok and Lisa Page's text messages, where they expressed support for Hillary Clinton and a determination to "stop" Trump. He claims Strzok, who led the investigation of Hillary Clinton's emails, later said there was "no there there" regarding Russia gate. The speaker claims Julian Assange released documentation of the CIA's cyber tool to hack into systems and leave telltale signs giving the responsibility to someone else. He concludes that a "deep state" within the FBI, CIA, and Justice Department acted to ensure Hillary Clinton's victory and undermine Trump.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
There are some very suspect things about how the Hillary Clinton email investigation was handled. The fact that Loretta Lynch, who was the attorney general at the time, met with Bill Clinton on the tarmac right before Hillary had to speak with the FBI is definitely one of them. Also, Loretta Lynch told Jim Comey to publicly call this a matter, instead of a criminal investigation. These actions downplayed what Hillary Clinton had done while all the drama was being created around Donald Trump and the Russia collusion, which never materialized. What the American people are going to find out about the FBI is astonishing, especially the level of bias.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims John Brennan, Clapper, and Comey pushed the fake Steele dossier into intelligence assessments, forming the basis for Crossfire Hurricane. According to the speaker, underlying intelligence, soon to be declassified in the Durham Report annex, will show Hillary Clinton and the FBI amplified the fake Russia collusion claims. Brennan, Clinton, and Comey testified within the last five years, and their testimonies are allegedly inconsistent with the soon-to-be-declassified intelligence. The speaker suggests there's an opportunity for indictments and prosecutions of those who may have lied under oath, and that referrals have been made. The speaker believes the individuals discussed conspired against President Trump and the American people. The statute of limitations may not apply because the conspiracy is ongoing, as those involved haven't admitted wrongdoing in 2016 and 2020.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The American people wanna know what happened on Epstein Island. "I'm not gonna drop this topic." You've subpoenaed Bill Clinton. He's gonna fight you tooth and nail, with the best lawyers in the country. Do you think Bill Clinton ever actually testifies? This is a bipartisan, congressionally approved subpoena, and I think that will hold a lot of weight in court. America wants to know what went on at Epstein Island. The Oversight Committee is going back to the earliest days of Jeffrey Epstein's involvement with the Justice Department, including Acosta, who said, I was told to go easy on him because he's intel. They're going back to Mueller as FBI director. Hillary Clinton is on the list—what does she have to do with Epstein? Flight logs. This is extremely broad: everything the DOJ has except the names of the victims. How did he die? The MAGA base has been vocal; they want to know answers.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Devin says he's expecting a full investigation and notes transparency from the intelligence agencies under Trump. He argues the 'Russia hoax' was designed to get Trump and that officials were worried about Hillary Clinton emails coming public in 2016. He asks how Jack Smith was appointed in 2022, who decided the Mar-a-Lago raid, and what documents they were seeking. He asserts there was a conspiracy to weaponize US intelligence against the Republican, citing 'five investigations tied to the Russia hoax and Ukraine impeachment hoax,' accusing officials of lying and misleading Congress. He mentions 'August 2016 discussions in the Obama White House' and the 'August 2022 Mar-a-Lago raid,' Monaco’s role, and the '40-page Russia influence report' concluding Russia didn't think Trump would win. On Gaza, he says no one trusts Hamas, but sees an opportunity with Trump's diplomacy. He closes as chairman of President Trump's advisory intelligence committee.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
This Friday is significant as it marks the day grand jury indictments may be announced. It’s preferable to avoid the Ides of March next week for such announcements. There are expectations for more indictments, particularly concerning criminal conspiracy involving U.S. persons and Russians. The investigation was ongoing during my tenure, focusing on potential collaboration between U.S. individuals and Russian entities. I anticipated that some individuals would face issues with the Department of Justice, and several have already been indicted or pled guilty. If any Trump family members are to be indicted, it would likely occur at the conclusion of Mueller's investigation, as such actions could jeopardize the special counsel's office's future.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker asserts that Comey, Clapper, Brennan, Obama, Monaco conspired together, all worked together to try to sabotage, undermine, unravel the democratic institutions and structures of this country. The Russiagate hoax, the Russiagate conspiracy, and all of the assaults against our liberties that went with it. The predawn raids, the handcuffing of innocent Americans, the the espionage against president Trump's campaign and staff, the removal of his national security adviser, one fake indictment, one fake charge after another, the special counsel, all of it was a unrelenting attempt to overthrow the government the American people voted for. I cannot find words harsh enough to condemn the conduct of these conspirators, these insurrectionists.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
There is now incontrovertible evidence that Barack Obama spearheaded a seditious conspiracy to subvert the will of the American people and overthrow the United States government in 2016. James Comey, John Brennan, Clapper, Rice, and Biden were involved. On July 28 in the Oval Office, they briefed Barack Obama on Hillary Clinton's plan to tie Trump to Russia collusion lies. This consumed national discourse for five years, undermined a sitting president, sabotaged an administration, framed a three-star general, and destroyed the country. This constitutional crisis was atrocious, and every one of them must be held accountable for these heinous crimes.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The Russia collusion hoax against president Trump remains the single greatest hoax and the greatest assault on our democracy in the history of this country. It was a coup to overthrow a democratically elected government, a coup carried out by the intelligence apparatus of this country, by the deep state, by Hillary Clinton, the Democrat party. The new information revealed eliminates any scintilla of doubt about the intention, the premeditation, the planning and orchestration of this conspiracy. It meets all of the criminal elements of a seditious conspiracy against The United States, it meets the criminal elements of an insurrection, a conspiracy against the government and a conspiracy to deprive citizens of their civil rights under color of law. One egregious felony after another. Every single actor is now part of that conspiracy, including Brennan, Clapper, Comey, Hillary, Schiff, and others. There must be accountability to reclaim this democracy.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
He laundered Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign talking points through the American intelligence services. That's a violation of the people's trust. That's a violation of what our intelligence services should be doing, and I absolutely think they broke the law. You're gonna see a lot of people get indicted for that. Here's the thing that should really bother the American people. What do you want our intelligence community to be doing? I want them to be catching bad guys. I want them to be making sure that terrorists aren't gonna kill innocent American civilians. I don't want them laundering Hillary Clinton's campaign talking points into the American media and giving them this air of legitimacy. It is sick and it's disgusting. It hurt the intelligence community. It hurt the American people, and it hurt the first Trump administration. We've gotta have consequences for it.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Alvin Bragg says influencing elections illegally is a felony. Hillary Clinton and DNC violated laws, fined $1,000,000 but no indictment. Trump not found guilty of election law violations but indicted. FBI used unverified dossier to spy on Trump, commit treason. FBI suppressed info to influence election outcome. When will future indictments happen for these crimes? No clear underlying crime in Trump's case. Excuses awaited.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
"James Comey decided not to work through the FBI press office when he wanted to change the narrative in Washington, burnish his reputation, against attacks from Democrats, and try to sully Donald Trump's reputation." "my goal was to improve negative stories about James Comey and to set a narrative, I e, set the Russia collusion narrative." "it depends what the meaning of the word is." "these are documents that were never given to Jim Jordan." "most classified information statutes have a five year statute of limitations, but there is a provision that extends it to ten years if it's willing and knowing." "Tomorrow though, I think we're gonna take people on a new destination, which is how often did the FBI get blocked in trying to investigate Hillary Clinton corruption at the Clinton Foundation?"

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2019, the FBI determined that in an effort to facilitate at least one leak, maybe more, James Comey's inner circle team, including his chief of staff, set up a private email account where they would forward government information into it in the furtherance of trying to leak unauthorized information, meaning information that should not be leaked to the media. They were using private email. They learned about this in '19, but they were doing this back in early twenty seventeen, just a few short weeks after clearing Hillary Clinton, but also shaming her. They didn't bring criminal charges against her, but they did in fact say that she should never have used private email. And a short while later, there they are doing the exact same thing, with complete impunity to the very standards that they told the American public the FBI was gonna hold up to.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
There are more documents to be declassified that will show how sinister the FBI was in amplifying Hillary Clinton's steel dossier as real and credible, and how they buried the counterintelligence referral memo. According to Speaker 1, he and FBI director Patel will be declassifying these additional documents. Speaker 1 stated that there is no Russia collusion hoax file cabinet at the FBI or CIA, and that they have to look for well-hidden documents by tracing through emails and looking for signs and clues. The Trump administration will continue to shed transparency, light, and truth because this was the greatest political scandal of our lifetime. It derailed the country and President Trump's first four years in office, and Donald Trump is committed to making sure it doesn't happen again.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Comey, Clapper, Brennan, Obama, Monaco conspired together, all worked together to try to sabotage, undermine, unravel the democratic institutions and structures of this country. The Russiagate hoax, the Russiagate conspiracy, and all of the assaults against our liberties that went with it. The predawn raids, the handcuffing of innocent Americans, the espionage against president Trump's campaign and staff, the removal of his national security adviser, one fake indictment, one fake charge after another, the special counsel; all of it was a unrelenting attempt to overthrow the government the American people voted for. I cannot find words harsh enough to condemn the conduct of these conspirators, these insurrectionists.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The Durham report allegedly reveals the Trump-Russia collusion story was a hoax known by Democrats, the FBI, the CIA, and Barack Obama. Hillary Clinton allegedly started the collusion story to distract from her email scandal, including a fabricated "pee tape" lie pinned on a Russian, conceived by DNC operative Charles Dolan. The FBI allegedly shut down investigations into the Clinton Foundation and Hillary's campaign taking illegal foreign contributions. James Comey allegedly pushed to spy on the Trump campaign, instructing people to not put anything in writing. Obama allegedly lied about his involvement in these investigations. The New York Times allegedly colluded with the Clinton campaign on stories, even seeking approval on drafts. The Biden administration allegedly obstructed the Durham report. While CNN acknowledged the report is devastating to the FBI and exonerates Trump to a degree, MSNBC claimed the report is a "big fat nothing." The speaker suggests the media believes they won because no one was jailed.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
I hate to say this, but president Barack Obama, there is now incontrovertible evidence that he was the spearhead of a seditious conspiracy to subvert the will of the American people and overthrow the United States government back in 2016. We must, absolutely must, hold every one of these criminals accountable for the crimes that they committed. They are the most heinous crimes committed in American history. James, James Comey, John Brennan, Clapper, Rice, Biden was in the meeting in July 28 in the Oval Office. They briefed Barack Obama on Hillary Clinton's plan to, quote, tie Trump to Russia collusion lies. It consumed our national discourse for five years. It undermined the sitting duly elected president. It sabotaged administration. It framed a three star general. It destroyed and ripped this country apart. We had a constitutional crisis, the likes of which I don't think any American can fully comprehend. It is atrocious, and every single one of them must be held accountable. Yeah. And, of course,

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
We're still waiting for accountability on the whole Russia collusion made up story. Now that DNI, Kelsey Gabbard has released all of those classified documents, we're actually seeing who was behind all of this. Do you wanna see indictments? I absolutely wanna see indictments. Tulsi and Cash Patel reveal aggressive violations of the law: "What they basically did is they defrauded the American people in order to take Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign talking points and turn them into intelligence... by defrauding the American people, defrauding the intelligence agencies, lying about what the intel said, they would take something that supported a Hillary Clinton campaign talking point, and they would overemphasize it and exaggerate it." They "took anything that actually contradicted that narrative and they buried it deep" and "laundered Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign talking points through the American intelligence services." That's "a violation of the people's trust" and "I absolutely think they broke the law." You'll see a lot of people get indicted. What do you want our intelligence community to be doing? Catching bad guys, not laundering Hillary Clinton's campaign talking points into the American media and giving them this air of legitimacy. It is sick and it's disgusting. It hurt the intelligence community. It hurt the American people, and it hurt the first Trump administration. We've gotta have consequences for it or we're just gonna see the same play repeated again and after again.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Fox News alert: Tulsi Gabbard releases a report alleging a conspiracy by a sitting president, Barack Obama, and his intel agencies to sabotage the president-elect Donald Trump, brainwash the electorate, and undermine the legitimacy of an election. There is irrefutable evidence detailing how Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment they knew was false, promoting a narrative that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help Trump win, selling it to the American people as true. Gabbard obtained a House Intelligence Committee report locked away in a CIA vault for almost a decade. Investigators spent over two thousand hours interviewing 20 CIA and FBI officials, and it shows the Obama administration doctored intelligence to make it look like Putin and Trump stole the election. A month after Trump beat Hillary, Obama wasn’t satisfied with intelligence reporting and ordered his CIA director to create a new assessment of how Russia interfered with the election. This was a highly unusual move. John Brennan handpicked five CIA analysts to write the assessment, and they were siloed; none knew what the others were doing, and only one analyst was in charge of drafting the report. It was not routine, and it was rushed to publish before Trump’s inauguration. Nothing was coordinated with other intelligence agencies. Basically, this was “home cooking” for Barack Obama. Four key elements were repeated to form the basis of the Russia hoax and the Mueller investigation: 1) that Vladimir Putin wanted Trump to win; 2) Putin took action to help Trump win; 3) the Russians had blackmail on Trump (the Steele dossier); and 4) that the Russians tried colluding with the Trump campaign. None of this was ever true; there was no reliable intelligence to support these allegations. Senior CIA officials repeatedly refused to traffic in these allegations, but were overruled by CIA director Brennan and FBI director Comey, who insisted they be pushed without verifiable evidence. The Obama administration cherry-picked intelligence, lied about sources, misquoted sources, did not corroborate claims, suppressed intelligence counter to their narratives, and even used anonymous Internet postings. Rank-and-file CIA admitted violations of tradecraft standards; a massive pressure campaign came from the top, with unusual directives from political appointees, the CIA director, and Obama himself. This is how the Russia hoax was born. Donald Trump knows that the Russians helped him win in 2016. Putin hated Hillary Clinton, with a noted preference for the opponent he disliked least. It was Russia in a systematic effort to interfere in the election and advance Trump’s prospects. The report notes that at one point, 60% of Democrats believed the Russians hacked voting machines to help Trump win, but the report shows Russians sought to create chaos and undermine democracy; solid intelligence suggested Putin had no preference, and expected Hillary to win, holding compromising dirt on her that he never released. If Putin wanted Trump to win, why didn’t he drop the dirt? There were high-level DNC emails detailing Hillary’s psycho-emotional problems, uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression, and a daily regimen of tranquilizers; Brennan and the intelligence community mischaracterized intelligence and relied on dubious sources to create a narrative of Putin’s preference for Trump, though Obama and intelligence leaders knew Putin did not collude with Trump and did not direct his people to help Trump win, yet they published it anyway. Obama and his intel spies purportedly cooked intelligence to look like Putin preferred Trump, undermining faith in elections and causing chaos. Do you believe this implicates Obama in criminal behavior? There is a referral of documents to the Department of Justice and the FBI to investigate criminal implications. Evidence points to Obama leading the manufacturing of the intelligence assessment. Even two years after the election, Obama pushed a hoax he knew wasn’t true. Brennan, Comey, and others may have liability. Trey Gowdy claims Brennan committed perjury for lying to Congress. When asked who commissioned the Steele dossier, responses indicate the CIA did not rely on it; it was not part of the intelligence community assessment. The broadcast concludes with the assertion that what happened to these officials is not revenge, but accountability, while noting ongoing questions about potential criminal action.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses confidence in the Department of Justice to hold accountable those involved in what they describe as a coup attempt. They believe a "new avalanche of evidence" will lead to justice for the "wrongdoers, the coup plotters, the schemers, and the insurrectionists." Referring to John Ratcliffe's statements, the speaker agrees that the statute of limitations does not apply because the conspiracy is ongoing. They claim the conspiracy continued through both Trump's and Biden's terms and persists today, with "deep state coup plotters" concealing information. The speaker accuses figures like Comey of perpetuating the conspiracy through lies and false statements. They emphasize the need for severe criminal penalties for fabricating evidence and targeting political enemies, warning that without accountability, such actions will continue to undermine the country.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Revelations involving Michael Cohen raise serious questions about the president's legal exposure. The speaker says the president is nervous as time runs out to 'hold himself above the law.' The claim that 'the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians in trying to subvert the election' is highlighted, with Manafort and Trump Jr. meeting Russian agents who offered dirt on Hillary as part of the Russian government's attempt to help them, and 'it's clear that the campaign colluded.' Two developments are noted: 'the president's personal attorney lied to congress, but about the fact that he was personally involved on behalf of the president in arranging business deals with the Russians during the campaign.' And 'the president's campaign manager was involved with communicating with WikiLeaks during the 2016, at the time, you know, well before they served as a conduit to release the the emails that that the Russians'

The Megyn Kelly Show

Did Comey Leak to NYT, Leftists Want DC Crime, & Fixing CA, w/ Solomon, Steve Hilton, Lowry & Cooke
Guests: Solomon, Steve Hilton, Lowry, Cooke
reSee.it Podcast Summary
Megyn Kelly and her panel discuss new reporting on intelligence leaks aimed at undermining President Trump, focusing on declassified material that points to James Comey leaking through a Columbia University professor friend and shaping narratives about Russia and Trump. The guests explain that FBI inspector general findings show Comey and two aides discussed leaks to the New York Times, with Richmond, a Columbia law professor placed on the payroll, given access to top secret information to burnish Comey’s image and set future narratives. The reporter involved, Michael Schmidt of the Times, later won Pulitzers for Russia Gate coverage. The panel notes that the FBI traced six code-named leak investigations and, in every case, the Justice Department declined prosecution, they point out a double standard that appears to treat Democrats more leniently, while Donald Trump faced a raid and indictment over classified material at Mar-a-Lago. Solomon walks through an episode where Richmond met Comey, used the special government employee arrangement to bypass the FBI press office, and told investigators he didn’t “leak” with a discount denial. The discussion includes the implication that Comey’s team and the Obama Justice Department may have interfered in investigations into Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation, and that this would be part of a larger pattern of political interference. The hosts turn to broader media dynamics, noting how outlets like the New York Times and Washington Post have handled Russia Gate coverage, including interviews with reporters and critics, and the way some correspondents are portrayed as sympathetic to official narratives. They reference CrowdStrike’s assessment of the DNC hack and underscore the distinction between intrusion into systems and evidence of exfiltration, arguing that some coverage overstated conclusions. The conversation touches on Tulsi Gabbard’s declassification efforts and the response from Daniel Richmond’s circle, including a note about Ellen Nakashiska’s reporting. In a separate segment, Rich Lowry and Charles C.W. Cook discuss the politics of California. Steve Hilton, a candidate for governor, describes a top-two primary dynamic that currently pairs him with Katie Porter. Hilton criticizes Gavin Newsom’s redistricting efforts and argues that California’s one-party rule has produced high costs, ineffective homelessness policies, and a climate policy regime that has driven up housing and energy costs. He describes his plan to reverse this trajectory, addressing education, safety, immigration, and the state’s regulatory environment, and argues that federal policy alone cannot fix California. The program then shifts to cultural commentary, including a lengthy discussion of Monica Lewinsky’s reflections on immigration and of John Oliver’s satirical framing, followed by Christine Baranski weighing in on billionaire space travel and publicity. The conversation closes with reflections on the national mood around crime, policing, border control, and the role of the media in reporting controversial topics, along with a brisk nod to the ongoing coverage of Tulsi Gabbard’s disclosures and Steve Hilton’s campaign in California. That’s the show’s update.

The Megyn Kelly Show

Comey Indicted, Kamala Word Salad, and Hoda Kotb's Inane Book, with Maureen Callahan & Legal Experts
Guests: Maureen Callahan
reSee.it Podcast Summary
A historic indictment of former FBI director James Comey dominates this episode, signaling a high-stakes legal battle over statements to Congress and potential obstruction. Comey is charged with two felony counts—false statements to Congress and obstruction of a congressional proceeding—each carrying up to five years in prison. The case was presented by a grand jury in the Eastern District of Virginia. Megan Kelly anchors the discussion with Dave Arinberg, Mike Davis, and John Solomon, who preview forthcoming details at the arraignment and the potential path of the case. The indictment centers on Comey’s testimony about whether he authorized FBI colleagues to anonymously leak information to the press. The government says he lied when he testified that he had not authorized anyone at the FBI to leak to news outlets, including a 2016 October Wall Street Journal article tied to the Hillary Clinton email probe. Two Comey-era officials—James Baker and Andrew McCabe—are discussed; McCabe’s credibility is questioned, while Baker’s interview asserts that leaks were directed through Comey’s chief of staff. John Solomon notes the timeline’s documentary basis and the indictment’s lean frame. Panelists debate the indictment’s strength and scope. Mike Davis says probable cause likely existed, but the case may hinge on proving the exact leak and who authorized it. Dave Arinberg pushes for identifying the article and leakers, noting a possible earlier leak associated with Comey. John Solomon cautions that the public record may be thin and that forthcoming documents, including FBI affidavits, will shape the argument. They discuss defenses such as vindictive or malicious prosecutions and the judge’s role in pretrial rulings. Beyond the Comey case, the episode turns to public figures and publishing. The hosts critique Kamala Harris’s book tour, referencing crowd reactions and media narratives about her tone. They discuss Hoda Kotb’s new book, Jump and Find Joy, and how it’s being marketed. The conversation weaves political-media analysis with pop-culture commentary, including brief remarks about Harris’s tour coverage and related online discourse, and about Kotb’s promotional appearances.

The Megyn Kelly Show

Dangers of Mamdani, Shapiro vs. Tucker, and the Strong Case Against Comey, with Matt Walsh and VDH
Guests: Matt Walsh
reSee.it Podcast Summary
The Megyn Kelly Show, now on its own SiriusXM channel, featured Matt Walsh and Victor Davis Hanson discussing a range of pressing political and cultural issues. The show opened with a discussion about the New York City mayoral race, focusing on candidate Zoran Mamdani, who is described as a communist with alleged ties to radical Islamists. Walsh and Kelly expressed concern over his potential victory, highlighting his anti-American rhetoric, lack of assimilation, and the perceived threat of Islamic tenets to Western civilization, particularly given New York City's high immigrant population and the controversial ballot structure. They also touched on similar political trends in Minneapolis with Omar Fetay. The conversation then shifted to transgender issues, sparked by an incident at a Gold's Gym in Los Angeles where a woman was expelled for objecting to a man in the women's locker room, a situation enabled by California state law. Walsh criticized both the law and the gym's compliance, advocating for stronger resistance to such policies. The discussion extended to transgender and intersex athletes in women's sports, specifically the National Women's Soccer League, where a player's eligibility based on biological sex was questioned, leading to accusations of racism and transphobia against those advocating for clear, biologically-based eligibility rules. Walsh condemned these accusations as "emotional blackmail" and a rejection of reality by the left. A significant portion of the show addressed the "conservative civil war" between prominent figures like Tucker Carlson and Ben Shapiro, ignited by Carlson's interview with white nationalist Nick Fuentes. Matt Walsh emphasized loyalty to friends and the importance of focusing conservative efforts on the "radical left," whom he characterized as the true enemy. He argued that internal squabbles distract from this primary fight, particularly after the death of a mutual friend, Charlie Kirk. Finally, Victor Davis Hanson joined to discuss the legal challenges facing former FBI Director James Comey, specifically his indictment for allegedly lying to Congress about authorizing media leaks related to the Hillary Clinton email investigation. New evidence, including Comey's communications with Daniel Richmond, suggests he did authorize leaks. Hanson and Kelly also discussed Comey's denial of receiving intelligence about Hillary Clinton's plan to tie Donald Trump to Russia. The segment concluded with a critique of former CIA Director John Brennan, who was confronted about his role in dismissing the Hunter Biden laptop story as Russian disinformation, highlighting what they view as a pattern of deception by intelligence officials.

The Rubin Report

Press Stunned by Trump’s Brutally Honest Reaction to James Comey Question
reSee.it Podcast Summary
Memorial reverberations from Charlie’s death ignite a sweeping political conversation that links grief to power, truth, and the week’s battles over media and memory. Lash describes the memorial as heavy yet communal, while Marowitz recalls Charlie as a movement leader whose loss marks a turning point. The conversation acknowledges ongoing left-wing violence, noting a Texas ICE facility shooting that surfaced in coverage, and they promise to tie these threads back to Charlie’s legacy as the show aims to extract meaning amid the rapid news cycle. Attention then shifts to the Justice Department’s reported move to indict James Comey for perjury in relation to his 2016 Russia inquiry testimony, with the five-year statute looming. Dana argues Comey’s qualification of ‘I think so’ in response to whether there was surveillance creates a defensible buffer, but she and Rubin reject the idea that he was genuinely truthful. Carol adds that other Comey-era actions, including leaks approved by Comey that were later attributed to others, complicate the picture. Trump’s public reaction—calling Comey a bad person—frames the broader calculus about accountability and political risk. The panel pivots to media portrayal and the political theatre around charges against Comey, criticizing Jake Tapper for injecting partisan spin and noting that prosecutors must decide whether a viable case exists, independent of Trump’s desires. Dana reminds viewers of historic patterns in the FBI investigation era, while Carol points to the reliability of leaks and media framing. The discussion broadens to a Tennessee State University incident where MAGA supporters faced a hostile campus reception, highlighting perceived asymmetries in how conservative voices are treated on campus versus liberal voices. They review President Trump’s UN speech moment and his critique of the UN, including claims of funding migrants and alleged sabotage of his teleprompter and escalator course, framing it as part of a broader clash with global institutions. A closing segment invokes Thomas Sowell’s critique of the managerial class and its distance from consequences, tying the thread to a call for accountability and a new generation of voters—Gen X and Gen Z—prepared to challenge established power structures. The conversation closes with personal notes about weekend plans and mutual support.
View Full Interactive Feed