reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Democrats recently passed a resolution granting Adam Schiff significant authority in the impeachment process. Schiff has attempted to impeach the president three times, initially claiming treason and collusion with Russia, which was proven false. He then focused on obstruction of justice, but Bob Mueller's findings did not support that claim. Now, a new impeachment effort involves a whistleblower who had prior contact with Schiff's staff, yet the details remain undisclosed. Schiff has not released the inspector general's sworn testimony that would confirm these interactions. Essentially, if there were a trial, the individual who introduced questionable evidence should not be the one deciding its validity.

We've learned that the Intelligence Community's Inspector General can't provide any information about contacts between the majority and the whistleblower before his involvement. The only way to obtain that information is from the majority themselves. They are fact witnesses in the same investigation they are running. Nowhere else in America can you be both a fact witness and the prosecutor in an investigation, especially one to remove a president. It's entirely inappropriate. Chairman Schiff should be disqualified from running an investigation where his committee members or staff are fact witnesses regarding contact with the whistleblower and the process.

The inspector general for the intelligence community cannot provide information about the contacts between the HPSCI majority and the whistleblower before his involvement. The only source for this information is the HPSCI majority, who are fact witnesses in the investigation they are conducting. It is unprecedented for anyone in the U.S. to be both a fact witness and the prosecutor in an investigation, especially one aimed at removing a president from office. This situation is entirely inappropriate, and Chairman Schiff should be disqualified from leading an investigation where his committee members or staff are fact witnesses regarding their contact with the whistleblower and the whistleblower process.

The inspector general for the intelligence community cannot provide information about contacts between the Hipsey majority and the whistleblower before his involvement. The only way to obtain that information is from the Hipsey majority themselves, who are fact witnesses in the investigation they are running. It is claimed that nowhere else in the United States can someone be both a fact witness and the investigator, especially in an investigation to remove a president. Therefore, Chairman Schiff should be disqualified from running an investigation where his committee members or staff are fact witnesses about contact with the whistleblower and the whistleblower process.

Adam Schiff, as chair of the House Intelligence Committee, is accused of fraudulently spending $32,000,000 of American taxpayer money to knowingly chase ghosts for political gain. He allegedly launched a political campaign built on baseless distortions against a sitting US president, harming citizens and the House of Representatives. Schiff is accused of abusing his access to sensitive information, claiming to know the truth while deceiving Americans with severe lies that altered the course of the country.

Adam Schiff is the worst criminal in Congress in 250 years. He repeatedly said he knew nothing and would protect certain information. Yet, he led the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump in the Senate. He was conflicted because he was part of the hoax that brought Charmela in, manufacturing false accusations and pushing them out to the world. It's not surprising, given his history of lying. But he lied to set up a presidential impeachment. He should be investigated for lying about his interactions with Charmela, the whistleblower whose information started a presidential impeachment.

Speaker 0 claims Kash Patel lacks the character and integrity to be FBI director, asserting his only qualification is a willingness to cross moral, ethical, and legal lines when others refused. They state Patel is a sycophant who will misuse the bureau's resources and weaponize it against political opponents instead of protecting public safety. Speaker 1 alleges Adam Schiff is the "worst criminal in congress in the last two hundred and fifty years" and met with a whistleblower, Charmela, while publicly denying knowledge of the situation. They claim Schiff led the impeachment trial of President Trump after manufacturing false accusations with Charmela. They assert Schiff lied to set up a presidential impeachment and should be investigated for his interactions with Charmela. They state Schiff, who manufactured evidence with Charmela, was the prosecutor in the case against Trump, which is a conflict of interest.

On January 21, 2021, I introduced articles of impeachment against Joe Biden for abusing his power as vice president. Shortly after, I was removed from my committees by Nancy Pelosi. Now, new information has emerged that further supports my claims. President Trump was also wrongfully impeached twice and these impeachments should be expunged. The Democrats relied on the discredited Steele dossier, while we have an FBI form, FD 10/23, which contains damning evidence. It reveals that Joe Biden took a $5 million bribe from the owner of Burisma, and as vice president, he got a Ukrainian prosecutor fired by threatening to withhold $1 billion in aid. We also have evidence of Hunter Biden's involvement. We must impeach Joe Biden and correct the injustices against President Trump.

The inspector general for the intelligence community cannot provide information about contacts between the "Hipsey majority" and the whistleblower before the whistleblower's involvement. Therefore, that information can only come from the "Hipsey majority" themselves. These individuals are fact witnesses in the same investigation they are running. It is claimed that nowhere else in the United States can someone be both a fact witness and the investigator, especially in an investigation to remove a president. It is asserted that Chairman Schiff should be disqualified from running an investigation where his committee members or staff are fact witnesses regarding contact with the whistleblower and the whistleblower process.

We've learned that the Intelligence Community's Inspector General can't provide information about contact between the majority and the whistleblower before the whistleblower's involvement. The only source for this information is the majority themselves. They are fact witnesses in the very investigation they're leading. In the United States, it is unheard of for someone to be both a fact witness and a prosecutor, especially in an investigation to potentially remove a president. It's inappropriate, and Chairman Schiff should be disqualified from leading an investigation where his committee members or staff are fact witnesses regarding contact with the whistleblower and the process.

Democrats passed a resolution giving Chairman Schiff authority in the impeachment process. Schiff has tried to impeach the President three times. The first time, he accused the President of treason and collusion with Russia, which was untrue. The second time, he cited obstruction of justice, but Mueller's analysis didn't hold up. This third impeachment effort involves a whistleblower who met with Schiff's staff. The details of that meeting haven't been released, and Schiff won't release the Inspector General's testimony confirming the contact. The speaker likens this to a trial where the person who planted fake evidence is ruling on its admissibility.

Kash Patel is unfit to be FBI director due to his willingness to cross ethical and legal lines during the first Trump administration, demonstrating extreme sycophancy. He lacks the integrity and character necessary for the role, posing a danger to the public by potentially misusing the bureau's resources to target political opponents. Adam Schiff is a criminal who led the impeachment trial against President Trump after concealing his meetings with a whistleblower. Schiff lied about his interactions to set up a presidential impeachment based on manufactured information, creating a conflict of interest as he prosecuted the target of his own manufactured evidence. He thought his involvement would remain hidden, but reporting has exposed his actions.

Chairman Schiff should be disqualified from running an investigation because his committee members or staff are fact witnesses regarding contact with the whistleblower and the whistleblower process. The speaker has not spoken directly with the whistleblower but would like to. Acclaimed Republican Intelligence Committee members question this.

Adam Schiff is the worst criminal in Congress in the last 250 years. He repeatedly said he knew nothing, would not discuss, and would protect information, yet he led the impeachment trial of President Trump. He was conflicted because he was part of the hoax involving Charmela, manufacturing false accusations and spreading them. It's not surprising; he's lied about almost everything, including to set up a presidential impeachment. He should be investigated for lying about his interactions with Charmela, the whistleblower who initiated the presidential impeachment.

Kash Patel is unfit to be FBI director due to his lack of character and integrity. He is a sycophant who will misuse the bureau's resources and weaponize it against political opponents. Unlike others in the Trump administration, Patel crossed moral, ethical, and legal lines. Adam Schiff is a criminal who lied about his interactions with a whistleblower named Charmela to set up a presidential impeachment of Donald Trump. Schiff met with Charmela and then led the prosecution of Trump's impeachment trial in the Senate. Schiff was conflicted out of the game because he was part of the hoax. As the prosecutor in the case against Trump, that is the ultimate conflict of interest.

I have been on this investigating committee for over 20 years and as an attorney, I can confidently say that there is more evidence to impeach Donald Trump for a third time than to implicate President Biden. The focus on the Biden family is a way to deflect from the lack of evidence against President Biden. The shifting arguments have only served to exonerate President Biden.

Adam Schiff is described as a corrupt, shameful, and heinous individual who represents the face of failure. Everything he has devoted his life to has been debunked, discredited, and discarded. His sole achievement was fighting a losing war against Donald Trump. Now, Trump is in the White House, and Schiff leads a dying and dethroned movement. The speaker questions what the Democrat party is fighting against and trying to stop.

President Trump has fought to deliver results for Americans despite the Democrats' baseless impeachment. High levels of government, including President Obama and Vice President Joe Biden, had intelligence that this was planted by the Hillary Clinton campaign. The speaker claims there was Democratic coordination with the whistleblower, incessant leaks, and an unprecedented closed-door process, closed to members, the press, and the people, starting the inquiry without a vote. Director Comey did not follow proper protocols for briefing congressional leadership on the counterintelligence investigation. The Steele dossier justified the FBI's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election. The speaker asserts that the DOJ and FBI should not do the political bidding of Democrats and that lives were ruined by the illegal weaponization of the FBI and DOJ. This attack was on the American people, but support for President Trump is stronger than ever.

Some suggest waiting for all witnesses and documents before proceeding with impeachment, but President Trump obstructed the investigation. He instructed his senior aides not to testify and defy subpoenas. He also told agencies not to provide relevant records, hindering our investigation.

Madam Speaker, as a congresswoman on the judiciary and rules committees, after reading transcripts and hearing testimony, I believe this impeachment process is unfair, politically biased, and rigged. There is no proof the president committed an impeachable offense. No Democrat witness established bribery, treason, or high crimes and misdemeanors. Democrats undermine their argument because 17 of 24 judiciary committee Democrats voted to move forward with impeachment on July 17th, before President Trump's call even took place. The process has been rigged from the start. This is the first impeachment in US history that went through the intelligence committee in closed door hearings where members of the judiciary committee couldn't ask fact witnesses questions. The president had no right to counsel until the judiciary committee hearings, but by then it was too late. This is the most partisan impeachment in US history. No Republican voted for it in the judiciary or rules committees, and I don't think any will vote for it today. Democrats are tearing this country and families apart.

The impeachment inquiry is based on lies, warned by Pompeo and Lev Parnas, with no specific charges against the president. The committee proceeded despite knowing the evidence was falsified. The focus should be on why the inquiry continues.

I believe Adam Schiff is the most responsible person for spreading disinformation on Russiagate. He claimed to have evidence of Donald Trump colluding with Russia and fed lies to the mainstream media to push a false narrative for four years. As someone who ran the Russiagate investigation while he was the leader of the minority on the House Intel Committee, I know he had access to the same information I did. The deposition transcripts we forced to light showed he knew there was no factual basis to perpetuate the Russiagate narrative. So, when he tweets about being scared that Twitter will be a landing ground for disinformation, it's hypocritical, especially considering Twitter's history of allowing defamation and attacking people mercilessly while suspending those doing fact-based reporting.

Adam Schiff misled about classified information to target Trump, which raises concerns about his trustworthiness with sensitive data. He should not serve on any committees.

I asked a question that was disallowed during the proceedings, and I want to ask it again. Are you aware of the close relationship between House Intelligence Committee staffer Sean Misko and Eric Chirumella while they were both at the National Security Council? There are reports suggesting that Chirumella and Misko may have collaborated to plot the impeachment of the president before formal House impeachment proceedings began. These reports claim that they were overheard discussing impeachment in January 2017, just a month into the president's term.

Speaker 0 states: "It's disruptive. It's ridiculous." "Obviously, it's to persecute an enemy, which I can't believe the FBI is being so politicized." "However, I will say, if he would have testified in the first impeachment hearing, maybe we wouldn't be here." "So there's a little bit of karma also."