reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 notes that the last administration was not transparent on the issue, but with the task force created, they have guided members within what they're cleared for. He asserts that they have encountered alien beings and recovered vehicles, with physical proof, and that he was partially cleared into those activities, having read intelligence reports from those programs. Speaker 1 reflects that online discourse about encounters and videos is plentiful, and asks if there is belief that the US government knows about alien beings coming to Earth. Speaker 0 responds that he doesn’t like to characterize where they came from, but they are definitely some kind of nonhuman sentience. He claims to have recovered vehicles and physical proof and says he had partial access to the data and to intelligence reports. He confirms seeing with his own eyes according to his account. Speaker 2 says NASA speaks for itself and claims transparency with data, and asks whether to believe David Crush or if he is lying, and where the evidence is. Speaker 0 asserts that members of the current administration are very aware of this reality and the current president is knowledgeable on the subject. He trusts the president’s leadership and believes the president has assembled a team; he says if Trump wants to be the greatest president and the most consequential leader in world history, he certainly has the knowledge, capabilities, and understanding of some of these sensitive government transparency issues. Speaker 3 says he has access and has had meetings with very smart people who believe there is something out there, and it makes sense there could be. He is not convinced himself. He asks if the person believes one, that he knows, and two, that he’s open to transparency on UAPs. Speaker 0 reiterates that the president is very well informed on the issue, and avoids revealing more than the president might want to reveal. He notes a role to cover this up through administrations. Speaker 1 asks about years of threat and testimony. Speaker 0 says he was physically threatened even before submitting his intelligence community inspector general report under the previous administration, and sought legal protection because of professional and personal fear. Speaker 1 asks about recovering pilots or remains and whether that was seen with his own eyes. Speaker 0 confirms there were pictures and says yes, there were remains. Speaker 1 questions whether the origin is from another planet or outer space, and if it is interdimensional, seeking clarification. Speaker 0 explains he has talked to many veterans of the program and keeps an open mind on origin. He acknowledges an extraterrestrial hypothesis but does not usually go there because he did not see the data, and he is not conversant in the high-confidence theories the US government has. He is not aware of any remains or signs of extraterrestrial beings or technology by his department. Speaker 3 says the US government knows, but asks whether other governments know. Speaker 0 says they know and have their own programs, and notes that two and a half years ago the US has been in an arms race with peer competitors like Russia and China, who have their own programs. He says he was able to view intelligence discussing adversarial programs and will leave it at that. Speaker 3 states that they’ve recovered things, and Speaker 0 confirms, noting there were bodies and physical remains. They discuss whether the motive or intent of the visitors was peaceful or not, acknowledging a mixed bag of activity and motive. They consider whether Earth’s genetic material could be a reason for visits, even jokingly proposing Jurassic Park as a tourist attraction for genetic material on Earth.

China is on the far side of the moon, potentially mining helium-3, and the U.S. doesn't know the extent of their activities due to a lack of monitoring infrastructure. Helium-3 could power the globe for thousands of years and is crucial for cooling quantum computers. If China masters quantum computing first, they could break all encryption and dominate the information market. The speaker believes a superior strategy trumps better technology and that China is building a space strategy focused on logistics and infrastructure, while the U.S. is focused on building better satellites. Understanding China's cultural mindset is crucial to avoid being victimized. The speaker asserts that truth and free will are essential, but truth is being manipulated in the information domain. The speaker believes President Trump understood the importance of space and created the Space Force. If China can cool their quantum computers with helium three before the U.S. can, "the jig is up."

The US possesses advanced weaponry, possibly including tectonic, earthquake, and volcanic weapons, as suggested by former Secretary of Defense William Cohen. Trump hinted at secret weapons, and the White House Office of Science Technology director stated the US can manipulate time and space. Technological progress has been intentionally suppressed, leading to stagnation and dependence. Technologies have been hoarded and developed primarily for weapons. The US created artificial suns by the 1950s and has gravitic craft and weapons. Russia and China also possess similar advanced systems. Quantum entanglement weaponry allows for carrier wave-free communication and potentially detonating enemy nuclear weapons remotely. Magnetic drones can destroy rockets, and direct energy weapons exist that cannot be shielded against. The Ice Cube Neutrino Detector in the South Pole is allegedly a directed energy weapon capable of causing earthquakes. CERN's experiments pose a risk of planetary destruction. The speaker suggests these technologies are dangerous and that humanity risks repeating the mistakes of Atlantis. The alexshowstore.com now offers high-quality methylene blue.

The transcript outlines major concerns about neuroscience and neuroweaponry, highlighting both technical advances and the risks they pose to privacy, security, and human autonomy. It begins with the potential to use nanoparticulate and aerosolizable nanomaterials as weapons that disrupt blood flow and neurological networks, and to deploy nanomaterials for implantable sensor arrays and real-time brain reading/writing without invasive surgery, as in DARPA’s N3D program (Next Generation Non-Invasive Neuromodulation). Advances in artificial intelligence are driving breakthroughs such as devices that can read minds and alter brain function to treat conditions like anxiety or Alzheimer's. This progress raises privacy concerns, leading to Colorado enacting a pioneering law that protects brain data as part of the state privacy act, analogous to fingerprints when used to identify people. The discussion notes that at-home devices, such as EarPods, can decode brainwave activity to determine whether someone is paying attention or their mind is wandering, and progress suggests it can already discriminate the types of attention (central tasks like programming vs. peripheral tasks like writing or online browsing). The narrative emphasizes that “the biggest question” is who has access to these technologies. It asserts that devices connected to AI can change, enhance, and even control thoughts, emotions, and memories. Brainwave patterns can be decrypted to convert thoughts to text, and patterns can reveal a person’s internal states. Lab-grade capabilities include reading brain activity from multiple regions and writing into the brain remotely, enabling high-resolution monitoring and intervention. The conversation underscores the sensitivity of brain data, with potential misuse by data insurers, law enforcement, and advertisers, and notes that private companies collecting brain data often do not disclose storage locations, retention periods, access controls, or security breach responses. A first-in-the-nation Privacy Act in Colorado is described as a foundational step, but more work remains. The discussion also covers the broader ecosystem: consumer devices, corporate investments by major tech companies (e.g., those that acquired brain-computer interface firms like Control Labs), and the emergence of ubiquitous monitoring through wearables and bossware in workplaces. There is concern about the ability to identify not just attention but specific tasks or intents, which raises questions about surveillance and control. Security and misuse are central themes. There are accounts of attempts to prime recognition signals (P300, N400) to reveal private data such as PINs without conscious processing. The possibility of hacking brain interfaces over Bluetooth is raised, along with debates about technologies that aim to write signals to the brain, potentially enabling manipulation or coercion. The potential for “Manchurian candidates” and covert manipulation is discussed, including examples of individuals who perceived voices or were influenced by harmful ideation. Finally, the transcript touches on geopolitical and ethical implications: rapid progress and heavy investment (notably by China) in neurotechnology, the risk that AI could be used to read thoughts and target individuals, and concerns about the broader aim of controlling narratives and people. There is acknowledgment of the difficulty in proving tampering with the brain and a warning about the dangerous, uncharted territory at the intersection of AI, neuroscience, and weaponization.

- Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the possibility that a friend was murdered and suggest that both victims died suddenly from fast-moving cancer, a method they say the agency uses overseas to eliminate people. Speaker 1 admits he cannot prove this but notes the sudden deaths. - The conversation asserts that the US government has technology to infect people with fast-moving cancer and to perform cognitive and directed-energy warfare. Speaker 0 states the government has the technology to infect with fast-moving cancer and to do so absolutely. - In 1997, Speaker 1 describes a hearing on asymmetric threats where he chaired the research committee and focused on four threats: drones, cyberattacks, electromagnetic pulse (EMP), and cognitive warfare. He asserts that cognitive warfare is now being labeled by some as Havana syndrome and that directed-energy weapons are the underlying technology. - Speaker 2 recounts a recent homeland security hearing about foreign adversaries using direct weapons against US citizens, enabling incapacitation. He emphasizes the chilling nature of the briefing and criticizes current domestic leadership as foolish, corrupt, incompetent, and wicked. - Speaker 3 notes that up to 40% of the Air Force equipment budget in the 1990s was classified, making much of it “black.” He emphasizes that military and security research often precedes civilian medical science, and that servicemen were used in experiments without fully informed consent, referencing NK Ultra-era disclosures of thousands of service members used as subjects. - Speaker 4 discusses MKUltra, describing a Canadian experiment involving psychic driving with massive LSD doses, eye-tracking, and memory loss, funded by MKUltra and affecting civilians. He mentions Project Midnight Climax, where Johns were observed in brothels while subjected to LSD, and notes similar experiments by the British Royal Air Force and Army. The results of Midnight Climax are unknown, with no published after-action reports. - Speaker 3 adds that Secretary of Energy O’Leary stated under Clinton that over a half a million Americans had been used in human experiments over four decades without informed consent, including mind control, with no accountability. He argues that mind-control technology has advanced, and questions who should govern its use, given the lack of legal frameworks. - The discussion covers mind-effects research and the lack of treaties governing such technologies. They reference a European Parliament security and disarmament resolution (1999) addressing mind-effects and mind-control technology, and Russian Duma resolutions (2002) seeking similar safeguards. Zabigniew Brzezinski’s Between Two Ages is cited regarding electronically stroking the ionosphere to influence behavior over geographic areas, connecting it to HARP and other electromagnetic carriers capable of mass or individual influence. - Speaker 6 explains historical demonstrations of electronic mind control, starting with Jose Delgado’s remote manipulation of a charging bull using radio energy and electrodes, and notes later work showing noninvasive techniques to influence behavior using low-power magnetic fields. Speaker 7 reiterates Delgado’s animal studies and the potential for noninvasive methods to affect emotions and memory, with broader implications for humans. - Speaker 3 discusses the progression of research funded by DARPA and others toward higher-resolution control of brain activity, enabling controlled effects that override senses and create synthetic memories, raising questions about future justice and evidence. They describe European Parliament and NATO/US military interest in mind-control technologies and the absence of robust legal protections. - Speaker 9 presents advances in AI-enabled brain-reading and memory-altering devices, including mind-reading and emotion decoding, while Speaker 10 and Speaker 12 discuss privacy concerns, brain-data privacy laws (Colorado’s law adding brain data to privacy protections), and the availability of consumer devices that decode brainwaves. They warn that brain data can be misused by insurers, law enforcement, advertisers, and governments, with private companies often sharing data without clear disclosure. - The segment concludes with a note that devices can infer attention and thoughts, and that DARPA’s N3D program aims for noninvasive neuromodulation with implantable electrodes read/write capabilities. It references 1980s–1990s discussions of RF energy as a potential nonlethal mind-control technology, and a 1993 Johns Hopkins conference listing low-frequency weapons as attractive options.

Directed EMP weapons have been developed, and the founder of Palantir, an AI platform used by the military, has played a significant role in revolutionizing warfare. The capability to neutralize drones was available at any moment.

Dan Farrah, director and producer of The Age of Disclosure, discusses his new documentary, which he says reveals an eighty-year cover-up of nonhuman intelligent life and a secret race among major nations to reverse engineer advanced technology of nonhuman origin. The film opens in select theaters in New York, Washington, and Los Angeles on November 21 and is available worldwide to purchase or rent on Prime Video. Farrah notes that he interviewed 34 extremely high-level military, government, and intelligence officials who have direct knowledge of the issue. Much of what they know is classified, but in the film they break their silence on what they can lawfully disclose. He states that every interviewee makes it clear that it is no longer a question of whether this is real; it is a very real situation and humanity is not the only intelligence in the universe. Nonhuman intelligence exists, UAPs are real, and they are not human. The film explores questions about who is controlling these UAPs, where they come from, and what their intention might be. Farrah explains that a long time ago the topic was moved away from congressional oversight and even away from presidential oversight, with certain elements within the government and defense contractors gatekeeping knowledge about the topic. Some officials in the film claim to have seen craft and recovered nonhuman bodies, and there are claims of crashed craft and nonhuman bodies within them. He emphasizes that having 34 credible people willing to put their name and reputation on the line constitutes strong evidence in a time when videos and photos can be created or manipulated. A major reveal in the film is that elements of the US government are in a high-stakes secret cold war with adversarial nations like China and Russia to reverse engineer technology of nonhuman origin. The discussion highlights that the first country to crack this technology could lead for years to come. China is said to have established its own UAV task force, signaling a strategic race akin to the Manhattan Project, but on “the atomic weapon on steroids.” The fear is that if another nation wins this race, it could significantly alter global power dynamics. Regarding public reception, Farrah acknowledges skepticism and stigma around the topic. For a long period, the public, Congress, and even the president were kept out of the loop, but in recent years senior Congress members and administration officials, aided by whistleblowers, have begun pursuing the truth for the American people. He suggests that it is only a matter of time before a sitting president steps forward to tell humanity that we are not alone and that the United States intends to lead the way.

Speaker 0 (anonymous whistleblower): Government seems to be involved. They’re definitely some kind of nonhuman sentience. We’ve recovered the vehicles and have physical proof. I was partially cleared into those activities and had access to the data, reading intelligence reports resulting from those programs. Speaker 1: And with your own eyes you’ve seen it. So when people say this is kooky, there’s nothing to back it up… Speaker 2 (NASA): NASA is open and transparent with our data. Do you believe what Mister David Crush said, or is he lying? Whatever he said, where’s the evidence? Speaker 1: What do you say? Speaker 0: Members of this administration are very aware of this reality; the current president is very knowledgeable on this subject, and I trust his leadership. I think he’s assembled a cabinet, and I believe if Trump wants to be the greatest president and the most consequential leader in world history, he certainly has the knowledge, the capabilities, and understanding of some of these sensitive government transparency issues. Speaker 3: I have access and have spoken to people about it. I’ve had meetings with very smart, solid people who believe there is something out there. It makes sense there could be, but I’ve never been convinced, despite that. It’s not my thing. Speaker 1: So you think, one, he knows, and two, he’s open to transparency on UAPs? He’s very well informed on this issue. Leave it at that. I don’t want to get ahead of what the president might want to reveal. There’s been a role to cover this up through administrations. Speaker 0: I was physically threatened even before I sent in my intelligence community inspector general report under the previous administration. I had to seek legal protection because I was fearful professionally and personally. Speaker 1: And when you mention recovering pilots or remains nonhuman, that’s something you saw in the intelligence with your eyes? Speaker 0: Yes. There were pictures. It’s uncomfortable to discuss because it’s outside a normal worldview to understand there is a biological sentience that piloted these crafts and does not necessarily look 100% like us. Speaker 1: Were there pictures? Speaker 0: There were. Speaker 1: When I said from another planet or outer space, you said you don’t know where they’re from. Is it interdimensional? What are we talking about? Speaker 0: I’ve talked to a lot of graybeards about the origin. I leave an open mind. There is an extraterrestrial hypothesis, and they could be coming from elsewhere off Earth, but I didn’t see that data. I’m not conversant in the high-confidence theories the US government had. I’m not aware of any remains the department has of extraterrestrial beings or technology. Speaker 1: Do other governments know? Do they have programs? Speaker 0: They have their own programs. Two and a half years ago we’ve been in an arms race with peer competitors—Russia and China—and they have their own programs. I viewed a body of intelligence that discussed adversarial programs. Speaker 1: We’ve recovered things—bodies and physical remains. Was there a sense of their motive or whether it’s peaceful or not? We’ve seen a mixed bag of motives. Speaker 0: Activity and motive vary; the reasons for visiting are not fully understood. Could it be because we have interesting genetic material on Earth and we’re a Jurassic Park tourist attraction? There could be a myriad of reasons. Speaker 1: For other people coming forward, what do you say about intimidation? There are reports of harassment. There’s hope. Congress values whistleblower information now, and there’s appetite to do the right thing. There are things happening behind the scenes that the administration may discuss when ready. Speaker 1: We’ll follow every element. It’s fascinating. Speaker 0: Thanks for having me. Speaker 4: Sean Hannity here. Subscribe to Fox News YouTube pay.

Speaker 0: There have been briefings to Congress that lead us to believe there is definitely an advanced technology out there that's not created by mankind. Speaker 1: About a decade ago I revealed on Joe Rogan that from my research in the Global Sun Admissions, aliens don’t come from distant star systems—they come interdimensionally. We have limited sight across our normal light spectrum and into other dimensions. I’ve spoken to high-level Pentagon people, CIA, scientists, physicists, who’ve said it’s an interdimensional invasion. The Bible and other ancient religions reference an unseen presence entering our universe, our domain, our dimension. There’s a clip of her on Fox News Friday night saying it’s interdimensional, but classified. A craft will show up 100 miles away instantly or fly Mach 20 and make a perfect turn—things that would crush solid stainless steel due to gravity. So we know they’re interdimensionally jumping. Now Trump talks about a big reveal; Obama says aliens are real. This isn’t just about UFOs—it's part of a broader awakening. It’s a distraction from Epstein, perhaps, but Trump said after reelection he’d disclose, and there’s a report due. Disclosure is happening on many fronts. We’re focused on UFOs and extraterrestrials, not taking away from exposing Epstein. There’s a lot of disclosure and crazy stuff happening on every front. Speaker 2: He (the other speaker) gave classified information and wasn’t supposed to. Speaker 1: Aliens are real? He gave classified information, whether they’re real or not. Speaker 3: Hours later, the president posted on Truth Social directing the release of government files related to alien and extraterrestrial life and UFOs. We bring in Florida Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna, chair of the Oversight Committee Task Force on declassification of federal secrets. She has said there is evidence of interdimensional beings that can operate through the time spaces we have. You told Joe Rogan you’ve viewed evidence of interdimensional beings on Earth that operate through time spaces—can you explain? Speaker 0: Yes. In classified briefings we’ve seen evidence suggesting advanced technology not created by mankind. There are videos, including one where a UAP deflects a Hellfire missile, taken from ISR footage off the coast of Yemen. Some physics defy explanation; not the only government to examine this. I view it through national security: are these technologies adversarial weapons or not? The federal government denying access to Congress is alarming in a free society. We expect the American people to decide after reviewing the evidence. Gates has said that if you’ve seen what we’ve seen, you’ll believe it too. Speaker 3: So you’re saying the Air Force has covered up UAP sightings? Is it because we or others have advanced technology, or because a foreign actor has abilities beyond our understanding? Speaker 0: Based on our interviews and testimony, we have reason to believe this tech is not created by mankind. It’s possible there are advanced US weapons denied access to the public. Unelected bureaucrats denying access to Congress is problematic, and there have been whistleblower threats and even deaths discussed in testimony. There’s bipartisan momentum toward disclosure, and we’ll continue to explore with the American people. President Obama’s remarks and Trump’s anticipated declassification are fueling this process. Speaker 1: The elite seek transcendence and to know the secrets of the universe; some are good, some bad, some mixed. Einstein and Planck suggest multiple dimensions; top scientists and billionaires are now speaking of a false hologram, artificial constraints, and gravity bleeding into this universe, with dark matter as a sign of something deeper. Some say we’re in a computer-generated projection, a thought or dream in a programmer’s mind. There’s talk of a sub-transmission zone below the third dimension fighting to ascend. Some believe humanity is at a fifth or sixth dimension intellectually, while a war rages to determine whether humanity will advance or be controlled by a breakaway civilization merging with machines. Google and others allegedly contemplated building a giant artificial system—a hive-mind AI connected to billions of people—that could predict and influence the future, potentially erasing individual free will. A counterstrike is underway to block such systems and promote genuine debate about humanity’s path, including addressing alleged pedophiles and “psychic vampires” in control of AI before humanity is harmed. The interdimensional force behind these developments is said to grant advanced knowledge to certain groups, sometimes described in religious terms as Satan. There’s more to come as disclosures unfold, including anticipated declassification next week when Trump allegedly releases UFO files. Speaker 3: We’ll be watching and covering it next week as disclosure unfolds.

Directed EMP weapons were discussed, highlighting their potential to disable drones at any moment. The conversation also touched on the founder of Palantir, a significant AI platform utilized by the military, which has transformed modern warfare.

UFO sightings are predominantly reported in the United States, leading to skepticism about their credibility. There's speculation that some phenomena might be linked to altered states of consciousness, possibly during psychedelic experiences. Additionally, the conversation shifts to a Chinese scientist, Dr. Ning Li, who worked on anti-gravity technology and vanished, likely returning to China. Her groundbreaking research attracted attention and funding, but after starting her own company, she stopped publishing results. An obituary later surfaced, raising questions about her fate. It’s suggested that if she made significant advancements, the government may have isolated her to prevent information leaks, especially given her background. Concerns about espionage and the potential military implications of her work are discussed, highlighting the delicate balance between innovation and national security.

An Intel source mentioned that a Chinese satellite, visible to the naked eye, went down. Reports indicated it burned up, but this source claimed it was taken down by the US government. This satellite was reportedly a command and control unit for drones. The implication was that the Chinese government was signaling its intentions regarding Taiwan and possibly other actions, suggesting that the US could not intervene.

The Chinese and us are both developing ethnic bioweapons, with labs in Ukraine collecting Russian and Chinese DNA to target people by race.

If Russia owned it, the conflict in Ukraine wouldn't exist, as Putin's ego would prevent it. If China had control, they would dominate us even more than they do now. This leads back to my main point: it could either be extraterrestrial or technology we are reverse engineering from our own secret projects.

Speaker 0 discusses Wernher von Braun’s warning about a potential hoaxed alien attack on the planet. He says the idea is “it will trick and fool almost everyone,” and that those with certain technologies could stage it, fooling the public for decades. He notes that people have long been misled into thinking alien events are real, while military or covert aerospace programs are behind what’s observed. Speaker 1 asks what the goal would be in staging a false alien attack on the world. He inquires what would be accomplished by such an act. Speaker 0 explains the objective: to unite the world around a military junta and a totalitarian system. He asks how to get a single race, ethnicity, or nation to stop fighting each other, suggesting that creating a larger external threat would unify everyone against a common enemy. He asserts that such unity could allow the imposition of totalitarian controls during a supposed world war rather than in peacetime. He cites a seventy-year plan and claims to have a CIA document from 1953 or 1954 stating that the UFO issue can be used “to great advantage for its quote psychological warfare value.” He says that after mastering the technology in the mid-1950s, there has been a long-term program to brainwash the public into believing there’s a threat from space. The discussion then shifts to whether this brainwashing could also affect political leaders, including President Trump, noting there are “devils on these deep state operations around the president giving him the opposite perspective.” Speaker 0 continues by describing the tension between true narratives and false flag narratives, and notes that with a very busy president who receives a one-sheet summary amid many duties, it would be easy for bad actors within the system to influence him, portraying them as “foxes in the hen house.” The overall claim is that there is an ongoing, deliberate manipulation of public perception regarding extraterrestrial threats, with the potential to steer political decisions by presenting a false flag scenario as real.

The segment compiles a series of high-profile disappearances and deaths connected to prominent scientists and military-related figures from July 2023 through the present, noting that some cases remain unexplained or lack full public detail while others appear sudden with few answers. The overarching implication presented is that these cases involve individuals tied to advanced national security work, prompting calls for heightened inquiry. Most recently, retired Air Force General William McCaslin vanished in February. He walked out of his Albuquerque home, leaving behind his phone, after having previously overseen some of the Pentagon’s most advanced aerospace programs. In the same month, astrophysicist Carl Grillmeier—who worked closely on NASA missions—was killed outside his home; a suspect has been arrested in that case. Eight months prior to these events, US rocket scientist Monica Reza disappeared while hiking in California’s Angeles National Forest; records indicate she worked on advanced aerospace materials. The report notes that Congress is weighing an FBI involvement: Congressman Eric Burleson is calling for an FBI investigation, underscoring the perceived severity of the cases and the potential implications for national security. In supporting remarks, a statement attributed to Burleson emphasizes the unusual nature of the individuals involved and the seriousness of the situations. Speaker 1 (the reporter’s interlocutor) adds context by describing these victims as not ordinary citizens but “some of the most advanced scientists that are working on our some of our most critical, nation’s secrets.” The speaker frames the situation as having “all of the hallmarks of a foreign operation,” signaling a belief that foreign involvement could be a factor, and stresses the need for investigation. The report notes that, to date, no local authority has publicly connected these mysterious deaths and disappearances. When the inquiry was directed to the FBI, they declined to comment. The segment closes with a follow-up acknowledgment from the host that these cases have heightened curiosity and understanding but remain unresolved in many aspects. Overall, the compilation highlights a pattern involving high-profile scientists and aerospace professionals with missing or violent end-points, the call for federal scrutiny, and the lack of publicly disclosed connections by local authorities, while the FBI maintains silence on the matter.

Perspective is important. Are there reports about advanced technology in aircraft? If we could access this energy, would it benefit or harm humanity? It would save money on projects like Artemis and is a national security concern. Other countries may also have access to this technology, and we need to be prepared to avoid being caught off guard by technological advancements.