TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Коли я чую, що США надали Україні сотні мільярдів доларів, зокрема 177 мільярдів, хочу уточнити: ми отримали лише понад 75 мільярдів. З цих 177 або 200 мільярдів, про які говорять, ми ніколи не отримували. Це важливо, адже ми отримували не гроші, а зброю — на понад 70 мільярдів. Також були навчання, транспорт та гуманітарні програми. Тому, коли стверджують, що Україна отримала 200 мільярдів для підтримки армії, це неправда. Я не знаю, куди поділися ці гроші. --- When I hear that the U.S. has provided Ukraine with hundreds of billions, specifically 177 billion, I want to clarify: we have received only over 75 billion. Of the 177 or 200 billion mentioned, we have never received that amount. This is important because we received not money, but weapons — over 70 billion. There were also training, transport, and humanitarian programs. So, when it is claimed that Ukraine received 200 billion to support the army, that is not true. I don't know where that money went.

Last weekend, I was at a very expensive ski resort in the Alps, filled with wealthy Ukrainians spending lavishly. This is happening all over Europe. This money, I believe, should be ours—American taxpayer money. Furthermore, I know that a significant portion, up to half, of the arms we send to the Ukrainian military is being sold off, a lot of it ending up in the hands of drug cartels at our border. This is criminal. Our intelligence agencies are aware of this, and I believe they are profiting from it. Billions of dollars in aid are being stolen and sold to our enemies. This is unacceptable, and no one in America seems to know about it.

The Ukrainian military is reportedly selling about half of the arms received from the U.S. on international black markets, with some ending up in Latin American drug cartels. This includes dangerous conventional weapons that could threaten commercial air travel. There are concerns about the pathogens in biolabs in Ukraine, and whether the Biden administration has a clear record of what's in those labs. It appears they do not intend to share this information with the Trump administration. The situation in Ukraine has the potential to destabilize the world more than anything seen in recent history, which raises significant alarm.

Leftlezer investigates why the Dutch C7NLD assault rifle—a standard weapon of the Dutch military—appears in the hands of the Russian Volunteer Corps (RDK), an extreme-right group fighting on Ukraine’s side, and what the Netherlands’ weapon exports mean for who ultimately uses them. Key findings and claims presented: - The Russian Volunteer Corps is described as an extremist group that fights for Ukraine but is led by a Russian founder, Dennis Capushtin, born in Moscow and later active in Germany. Capushtin is portrayed as having organized extensive neo‑Nazi-leaning activity, including fighting trainings and weapon training; the German Interior Ministry labeled him one of the most influential neo‑Nazi activists in Germany, effectively barring him from entry. - The RDK portrays itself as a political-military organization serving the Russian nation, aiming to dismantle the current political regime in the Russian Federation, with a core of fighters engaging in armed struggle. It claims leadership under the Ukrainian Military Secret Service and asserts involvement beyond defending Ukraine, including sabotage networks in Russia. - Reports describe RDK’s ideology as including esoteric nationalist elements, with public references to Hitler as a spiritual figure. A Tulefest event hosted bands such as Hitlers Hamer, Adolf-cult, and Apartheid, which Bellingcat describes as esoteric nationalism blending neo-Nazism with occult ideas. - The video notes a shift in 2023 where Dennis’s activities reportedly extended to attempting to “invade” Russia, with some weapons (including Scars) appearing with the RDK in Russia. This is used to argue that the stated aim of defending Ukraine had broadened to actions against Russia. - The central concern is whether Dutch-made Cold 7 NLD rifles, exported under Dutch defense ministry rules, ended up with the RDK or other extremist actors. The Netherlands exports large quantities of weapons, including to Ukraine, and Dutch law requires end-user declarations and possible EU/UN oversight. There is a nuance: some RDK activities are described as operating under a Ukrainian authority, which could complicate end-user controls. - The ministers and officials are pressed on why and how the Netherlands allowed a transfer of Cold 7 NLD rifles that might have landed with extremist groups. The Dutch export licensing process is explained: weapons supplied to Ukraine may be used by Ukrainian forces under international law, with end-user terms set forth in end-user declarations; transfers to other parties require Dutch government permission. - The defense ministry responds with a standard position: Netherlands supplies military materiel to Ukraine to assist against Russian aggression, with use governed by international law; the exact distribution among units or sub-units is not disclosed. The ministry refuses to confirm specific end-use details and notes that they cannot reflect on subunits that weapons may reach. - The interview includes attempts to question a former minister (Brekomans) about signing export licenses, and the current stance is that the details are handled by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the defense ministry. The current ministry of foreign affairs provides a response about broad policy and the possibility of rapid EU-wide assessments; the defense ministry declines to confirm the specific distribution of weapons to extremist groups. - The program concludes by asserting significant public interest and calls for further scrutiny of Dutch spending on Ukrainian defense—requesting readers to donate for more critical reporting. Notes on responses: - The program presents a narrative linking Dutch C7NLD rifles to the RDK and to far-right networks, while presenting official positions that emphasize general end-use rules and the broad objective of aiding Ukraine, without providing a definitive public confirmation that the weapons were used by RDK or other extremist groups. The documentary style emphasizes ongoing information requests and the lack of explicit disclosures from relevant ministries.

I want to address the figures being circulated about the financial aid Ukraine has received from the U.S. I often hear numbers like $177 billion, or even $200 billion, being cited. As the President of a nation at war, I can tell you that we've received just over $75 billion. The difference is significant. This aid isn't given as cash, but primarily as weaponry. The $75 billion covers the cost of arms, training, transportation, humanitarian programs and social support. Claims that Ukraine has received $200 billion in military aid are simply untrue, and I don't know where that money is supposedly going.

There was no policy decision to stop sending weapons to Ukraine. A review of stockpiles caused a temporary pause of certain munitions. During the review, some shipping slowed down, but didn't stop. The review has occurred, and there's been no change to the posture of providing what is available. Ukraine needs Patriot batteries, which are available in multiple European countries, including Spain and Germany. Some countries that have ordered Patriot batteries and are about to receive them could defer shipment to Ukraine instead. These are defensive weapons that would help with missile attacks, but not drone attacks.

I just signed a $200,000,000 drawdown from the Department of Defense for Ukraine. It will be coming quickly. Thank you.

Regarding military equipment, while documents show significant aid, the reality is different. Out of the supposed $183 billion from the US over three years, $67 billion arrived as weapons, checked and verified, a process shared with the American side. Additionally, $31.5 billion was direct financial support to the budget. This is all transparent, digitized, and accessible. We encourage anyone to review it. We maintain complete openness.

The Ukrainian military is reportedly selling about half of the arms received from the U.S. on international black markets, with some ending up in Latin American drug cartels. This includes dangerous conventional weapons that could threaten commercial air travel. Concerns are raised about the pathogens in biolabs in Ukraine and whether the Biden administration has a complete record of what's in those labs. There seems to be no intention to share this information with the Trump administration. The ongoing war in Ukraine is viewed as a potential source of global destabilization, raising alarms about its implications for the future.

When it comes to supporting Ukraine, we need to provide them with the weapons and training they need to win. Retired F-16 pilots are welcome to join the fight. I want Ukraine to be invited to join NATO in 2024. American weapons are being used effectively, and we hope to provide more support in the future.

We're witnessing an unprecedented influx of weapons into Ukraine, but their final destinations remain largely unknown. Despite concerns about weapons potentially falling into the wrong hands, the priority is ensuring Ukrainian forces have what they need to fight. NATO countries are on high alert, balancing support for Ukraine with preventing a broader conflict with Russia. The war in Ukraine has tapped into deep emotions, drawing in foreign volunteers. However, the rise of paramilitary units raises concerns about governmental control on the battlefield. Logistical challenges, corruption, and bureaucracy hinder the delivery of supplies to the front lines. While the US and Europe are sending aid, there's debate on whether enough oversight exists to track where the weapons end up, both now and in the future, and whether a half-way approach to the war will be effective.

We are actively discussing how to support Ukraine, having recently engaged with Ukrainian leadership, including President Zelensky. We have provided over $10 billion in aid, including military equipment like drones, armored vehicles, guns, and ammunition. We will continue to support Ukraine by purchasing necessary equipment on the international market. Our commitment to Ukraine is unwavering as we stand by our allies in the face of Russian aggression.

Up to half the weapons we send Ukraine are being sold off, often to drug cartels at our border. This isn't speculation; it's fact. Our intelligence agencies know this is happening. They, and likely the CIA, are profiting from it. Billions of dollars in aid are being stolen and sold to our enemies. Zelensky recently denied these claims, and the media reported his denial. But it's true: anyone can easily buy Ukrainian weapons online. This is a crime, and no one is talking about it.

Up to half the weapons we send Ukraine are being sold, not by guess, but by fact. A significant portion ends up in the hands of drug cartels at our border. Intelligence agencies are aware of this, and I believe they profit from it. Billions of dollars' worth of arms are being stolen and sold to our enemies. Zelensky denied these claims in an interview, and the media simply reported his denial. However, it's a fact that one can easily purchase Ukrainian weapons online. This is a crime.

The American people should be proud of their support for Ukraine. We will continue supplying Ukraine with critical weapons and equipment, including $200 million that I just approved. However, without additional funding, our ability to help Ukraine respond to urgent demands is coming to an end. We need Ukraine to fix its broken immigration system, and Congress needs to do the same at home. Holding Ukraine funding hostage to push a partisan agenda on the border is not the solution. We need real solutions.

I've asked Congress to investigate where the money sent to Ukraine has gone. The American people deserve to know, as it's our taxpayer money. There's reason to be concerned because Ukraine has been known for corruption and money laundering. It's not just a billion dollars; it's a hundred times that amount sent to one country. Zelenskyy claimed Russia fired a rocket into Poland, which would be an act of war, but it turned out the rocket came from Ukraine. If Zelenskyy is going to beg the world for more money and demand more from the US, he needs to be more careful about making global statements that could bring us to the brink of war. We can't have full faith and trust by giving a leader a hundred billion dollars when he says, "I'm not telling you where the money went."

We have concerns about accountability and the objective in Ukraine. We want to know if America is having a proxy war with Putin and Russia. House Republicans, led by Mike Garcia and Dan Crenshaw, have presented 12 critical questions for the White House to answer before providing additional support. We delivered these questions to Jake Sullivan, the international security adviser. We need to know the plan, where the money will be spent, and have auditing for the dollars already sent. These are not tough questions. We want cooperation and transparency.

We're also wondering about the money situation in Ukraine. The U.S. has given over $174 billion and has inspectors on the ground to track it. Some of that money is spent here to build weapons systems that we send over, so it's not all sitting in a bank in Ukraine. Regarding elections, every democratic state has them, even during wars. The Ukrainian constitution currently prevents them until the war ends, but they will eventually need to hold them. That doesn't mean Zelensky should leave, but the willingness to have elections, even during wartime, is a sign of a healthy democracy. Next week, we're going to the Munich Security Conference, but reports that we're presenting a peace plan are false. I did not speak with that news network. If there is a peace plan, it will be presented by the President of the United States, not myself.

The Ukrainian military is reportedly selling about half of the arms received from the U.S. on international black markets, with some ending up with drug cartels in Latin America. These weapons include dangerous systems that could threaten commercial air travel. There are concerns about the pathogens in biolabs in Ukraine, and whether the Biden administration has a complete record of what's in those labs. It appears they do not plan to share this information with the Trump administration. The situation in Ukraine is seen as potentially more destabilizing than anything in recent memory, raising significant alarm about global security.

I just signed a $200 million drawdown from the Department of Defense for Ukraine. It will be coming quickly. Thank you.

I believe the Ukrainian military is selling NATO weapons on the black market to groups like Mexican drug cartels, the Taliban, and Hamas, which is incredibly destabilizing. This isn't just suspicion; I know someone who bought some of these weapons. Ukraine is corrupt, and it's not far-fetched to think they'd sell weapons, especially facing defeat. I know this is true, even though I can't reveal my source. I'm telling you, the Ukrainian military has sold huge amounts of American and NATO-supplied weapon systems around the world, and they're being purchased by governments and armed groups. This will be documented, and I got this information directly from someone who purchased quite a few of those weapons in another country and knows a lot about this.

Okay, so sending in offensive equipment like planes and tanks would be World War III. That being said, the US will send 31 Abrams tanks to Ukraine. We have artillery, but honestly, it's not enough. We're basically out of money, so I'm sending Congress a supplemental budget request, so the Ukrainian people will be able to receive pensions and social support. This is the largest assistance package from the US to Ukraine yet: $3 billion in direct aid. The US will also send over a billion dollars in new aid, plus another $150 million in military assistance. The US locked down an additional $2 billion in military aid, and the total now stands close to $130 billion.

The United States has been sending hundreds of billions of dollars to support Ukraine's defense, with no end in sight, and with no security. Do you want to keep this going for another five years? Two thousand people, or more, are being killed every single week.

I request that we provide more reliable anti-tank weapons, as previous deliveries have often failed, causing issues for our country. We have supplied over 4,000 anti-tank weapons, with more on the way. However, we are running low on our own stock. I communicate daily with Minister Reznikov about this. Currently, we face bureaucratic challenges; there are two supply routes into the country, but the Ukrainian general staff has opted to use only one, which has slowed down the delivery of supplies to your army that urgently needs them.

I recently attended a meeting in an expensive Alpine town, overwhelmingly populated by wealthy Ukrainians spending lavishly. This is a pattern across Europe; the richest people are Ukrainian. This money, I believe, should belong to American taxpayers. Furthermore, I know that a significant portion, possibly half, of the arms we send to Ukraine are being sold, some ending up with drug cartels on our border. Our intelligence agencies are aware of this. The media reports Zelensky's denials, but the New York Times could easily order Ukrainian weapons online—this is a fact. The official death toll is likely a lie; the entire situation is a deception. Sending billions in aid without tracking its use is irresponsible, and the possibility of these weapons being used against us is terrifying. This situation mirrors the issues we faced with the Mujahideen in the 80s. The lack of transparency and accountability is appalling.