reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker believes "the powers that be" created a false emergency around SARS CoV 2 for financial gain, even though it only posed a threat to 0.1% of the population. They claim this was an opportunity to test new technology that had consistently failed, using humanity as test subjects. The speaker compares this to Mengele's experiments and calls it a breach of human rights that destroyed lives and businesses, and increased poverty. They hope history will judge those responsible as shameful.

The discussion centers on a cruise-ship hantavirus outbreak and how to interpret its significance without panicking. The speakers question what is actually known about hantavirus testing, the specific strains involved, and how reliable the tests are compared to COVID-19 PCR testing. They note hantavirus is an RNA virus and discuss the possibility of ivermectin as a therapeutic, while raising concerns about government secrecy and information control. Key points raised: - Hantavirus tests and strain identification: The panel asks how testing is done, whether tests distinguish the Andes virus involved on the ship, and how reliable the tests are. They point out that hantavirus is a rare infection in the United States and that historically the CDC used antibodies, while PCR is widely available but must be interpreted in the proper clinical context. - Transmission and mortality: It is stated that hantaviruses are not known to spread between humans, and the Andes virus is the exception with rare human-to-human transmission requiring very close contact. The speakers reference reported mortality rates for hantavirus (between 25% and 50%), and question how many people on the cruise may be affected given three deaths. - Vaccine and bioweapons concerns: There is skepticism about why a vaccine would be developed for a virus that is not readily transmissible between humans, with speculation about doomsday scenarios and potential bioweapons research. Moderna is mentioned as having announced vaccine work in 2024, and there is discussion about the stock decline related to COVID-19 vaccine uptake. - Ivermectin and treatment debates: The conversation revisits ivermectin as a potential antiviral for RNA viruses like hantavirus, noting patterns from the COVID-19 era of suppression of certain treatments and questioning the standards of evidence used to promote or censor therapies. A prior book, The War on Ivermectin, is referenced in relation to disinformation about the drug. - Media dynamics and public perception: The dialogue highlights concerns about how media coverage and social media influence public fear, including mentions of influencers and a pattern of rapid information spread. They discuss the possibility that the outbreak’s prominence could be driven by media or other non-pandemic factors, paralleling past COVID coverage. - Adverse-event chatter: There is mention of hantavirus appearing among listed possible adverse events for a COVID-19 vaccine, with questions about why such a link would be considered and the strength of that association. A colleague notes a surge of hantavirus literature around the outbreak, which they find unusual for a limited outbreak. - Long COVID and brain effects (aside from the outbreak): A NYU Langone Health study is cited, reporting that long COVID sufferers show changes in a brain region involved in cleaning brain tissue, linking chronic inflammation and spike protein exposure to potential early signs of Alzheimer’s disease, as part of a broader discussion on lingering effects of viral illnesses. Overall, the speakers emphasize asking cautious, clinically grounded questions about the outbreak, testing, transmission risk, and the broader media and political context, while warning against fearmongering and noting the possibility that the intense coverage may reflect patterns observed during the pandemic.

The speaker says their role is to present context that, in their view, the past four years involved “orchestration to assault the liberties of people” by “pretending” the situation was a public health emergency while enabling “inconceivable threat to liberties” and “violation of human rights.” They frame this as “lip service to tyrants” and as “domestic and international terrorism.” They argue that evidence begins in the UK in 1966, saying the UK’s wealth and trust decided to fund “the coronavirus as the preferred form of human manipulation” in 1966. They then claim that one year later, the United States and the UK agreed to “modify and manipulate coronavirus” to see what could be done to infect a healthy population (described as 1967). They characterize “Operation Warp Speed” as arriving after 56 years. They cite an imaged 2011 document, described as stating “antitrust collusion” involving the Wellcome Trust, the Rockefeller Foundation, the Gates Foundation, NIAID, and the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. The speaker claims this group established a mandate that “by 2020, the world would accept… a universal vaccine” by the end of 2020, and they say the group identified coronavirus as the thing nature would need for the plan to happen. The speaker then quotes a 2015 public statement: “To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis, we needed to increase the public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures such as a pan influenza or pan coronavirus vaccine.” They say that at the time, the World Health Organization had officially declared coronavirus an eradicated disease, and they ask what world would need a vaccine for an eradicated disease. They argue that media hype drives economics: “A key driver is the media, and the economics will follow the hype,” and that “We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues.” They add that investors respond if they see profit, and characterize this as treason or terrorism. They say that Peter Daszak will testify in Congress in “a few short days” that the emergence likely came from a random event in Wuhan, China, where a bat and pangolin “got together and voila” by December, calling it “conspiracy level language.” The speaker asserts this is an admission of conspiracy “to commit acts of terror.” They also cite 2016 language, claiming an announcement that the Wuhan Institute of Virology Virus 1 was “poised for human emergence,” and treat this as part of the same “conspiracy.” Next, the speaker claims evidence includes a 2002 patent filed on “synthetic primary coronavirus,” which they say was “patented to be infectious and replication protective,” calling it “weaponized.” They further claim that in 2005, a curriculum vitae indicates “synthetic coronaviruses, biohacking, biological warfare enabling technologies,” and they question the meaning of that phrase, linking it to biological weapons. They state they have U.S. credentials since 2002 as a “biological weapons inspector” and say they briefed the matter since then. Finally, they cite a WHO Global Preparedness Monitoring Board announcement in September 2019, saying that between 09/19/2019 and September 2020 there would be “our greatest… accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen,” emphasizing the word “release” as “not a leak” and suggesting no mention of accident likelihood.

There is a discussion about the control of information and how false information can be challenged. Social media platforms are urged to take responsibility and partner with scientific and health communities to provide accurate information. The idea of government enforcement against fake news is also mentioned. Shutting down information is seen as impractical, and instead, flooding accurate information and relying on trusted sources are suggested strategies. The video then shifts to a description of a past pandemic, where millions of people died, the global economy suffered, and societal impacts were long-lasting.

The speaker believes that there is a global crime being committed by those in power who are pretending that there is a serious respiratory viral health threat. They argue that the virus in Wuhan was not exaggerated and that there is no new health threat. They suggest that if there is a new virus, it is not more serious than influenza, which coincidentally disappeared at the same time. The speaker no longer believes in the existence of respiratory viruses and thinks that people still get ill with the same illnesses as before, but the cause is unknown.

Speaker 0 argues that there are no viruses jumping all over and that the root cause of the pandemic was the rollout of five G. The claim is that five G towers were first placed on top of cruise ships, then installed in hospitals and throughout cities, followed by nursing homes, leading to breathing issues. The speaker asserts that people are distracted into believing viruses, bacteria, and parasites are causing illness, whereas the reality is a change of the terrain. The message connects Raytheon to the microwave and wireless technology, claiming this technology has been making people sick since the rollout of the radio. There is a reference to the Spanish Influenza of 1919, saying it was linked to the rollout of the radio, and that a booster was presented as a solution. The speaker contends that this is a recurring playbook and that they keep doing it, but social media is now “ripping apart” the whole thing, showing the same familiar playbook. The speaker asserts that many people have woken up to the reality that all of this is a lie, and emphasizes a perception of lack of creativity in the approach.

Speaker 0 argues that the test cannot distinguish live from dead matter, only analyzes fragments and is set up to guarantee false positives, which the speaker claims was used to create case numbers for declaring a public health emergency of international concern and to enable untested drugs or vaccines to be used on people. Speaker 1 adds that the biggest lie may be that true viral isolates are unavailable, noting that the claimed genome of SARS-CoV-2 exists only in silico as a computer-programmed genome. The speaker says fear is created to control people, describing “fake mythical flying unicorns” that make us sick and asserting that disease is constructed rather than evidenced by visible agents. They claim that there is no evidence of transmission or isolations supporting the idea of a pathogen causing disease in the usual sense. The speaker references Andrew Kaufman, Doctor Cowan, Stephen Lunk, and others to support the claim that, after a year of pandemic conditions, there is no virus proven through traditional means, including in the 1918 influenza pandemic. They state that volunteers were exposed to sputum from infected individuals, or to the sputum directly, without becoming ill; some experiments involved injecting processed material, which also did not cause illness. They note that horses did not consistently transmit illness when exposed to similar materials, and conclude that influenza does not originate from a Latin term for a virus but means “influence,” suggesting historical transmission evidence is weak. The speakers discuss that we do not have approved evidence of transmission, a virus, a test, or autopsies; what exists is a syndrome of symptoms—flu-like symptoms without pathognomonic signs. They propose several alternative causes for COVID-19–like illness, including transmissibility that appears real but isn’t, radiation effects, and other non-disease explanations. Speaker 1 references Dr. Cowan’s book Contagion to illustrate how radiation exposure in mines could mimic disease transmission, where illness is not truly infectious. They argue that non-ionizing electromagnetic fields (EMF) and exposure to graphene oxide toxicity (claimed to be present in vaccines and referred to as viral-based genetic therapies by the FDA) could produce COVID-like symptoms. They also acknowledge an artificially created spike protein in a lab as a known factor. However, they reiterate that there is no evidence for the mythical SARS-CoV-2 virus as a causative agent. In summary, the dialogue challenges the existence of proven SARS-CoV-2 isolates, questions the validity of tests and transmission evidence, and proposes alternative explanations for the illness, including EMF toxicity, graphene oxide toxicity, and lab-made spike proteins, while highlighting a lack of definitive proof for traditional viral causation.

Speaker 0 asserts that the design of the molecular structures in vaccines and injections has no purpose other than to injure and kill. Drawing on 30 years of experience in rational drug design, they say every component in a vial is chosen by someone with specific objectives (e.g., how quickly absorbed, how long it lasts, where it distributes in the body) and that these components are not random or natural products. They declare the ingredients to be toxic by design and intentionally harmful. This, they claim, fits with what they call “the lie” about the pandemic, arguing there wasn’t a real pandemic. According to Speaker 0, the pandemic’s purpose was to damage the economy, train people to comply under a mock emergency, and compel people to get vaccinated. They warn that if people do nothing, speak up less, and simply follow directives, they will lose their freedom and then their lives. They allege that a self-appointed group of very rich people desires a much smaller global population than 8,000,000,000 people, and they claim to be able to deduce the script behind these events. The speaker urges listeners to start talking to anyone and everyone relentlessly, insisting that this situation is not going away. They warn that without protest and refusal, people will first lose their freedom and then their lives.

Dr. Cardcaine, an epidemiologist from the University of Michigan, is identified as the person who broke the story in February about a bird flu outbreak linked to the USDA research lab. He states that mainstream media are not reporting on this development. He also asserts that Peter Hotez will not tell the public about this information. According to the speaker, the current strain of bird flu in this outbreak was created in a lab through serial passage conducted in a U.S. government laboratory. The claim specifies that this lab-driven process enabled the virus to jump from traditional chickens to migratory waterfowl. From there, the outbreak purportedly spread to cows, marking a transition from poultry to other species in the ecosystem. The narrative presented emphasizes that the origin and progression of the outbreak are laboratory-generated, rather than arising solely from natural spillover events. The speaker highlights that the virus was manipulated via serial passage in a government lab, a technique used to adapt pathogens to new hosts or improve transmissibility. The sequence described claims a progression: initial adaptation in poultry, transmission to migratory waterfowl, and subsequent appearance in cattle. The speaker underscores two supplementary points: first, that major media outlets have not reported on this angle of the outbreak; second, that a well-known public figure in the field, Peter Hotez, is portrayed as someone who would supposedly not disclose this information. The overall message portrays a narrative of concealment and laboratory involvement in the emergence and spread of the bird flu across species, culminating in its presence in cows. In summary, the speaker attributes the outbreak to deliberate laboratory manipulation via serial passage in a U.S. government facility, tracing a path from chickens to migratory waterfowl and then to cows, while accusing mainstream media of omission and suggesting that Peter Hotez would not disclose these details.

Speaker 0 presents a skeptical perspective on common fears about pandemics, aliens, and nuclear threats. He argues that the virus narrative is overblown, stating, “the virus is gonna get you. … There’s no viruses jumping all over. There’s no bacteria, and virus is gonna get you.” He contrasts this with the term “Santa virus,” explaining, “I call it the Santa instead of the Hanta because, you know, Santa comes is gonna get you for Christmas and give you some presents. So the government might come and get you too and give you some presents, and we already know what they’re gonna try to give you, you know, which is like 64 boosters.” He ties this to economic disruption, noting that “your business is shut down.” The speaker urges listeners to realize that “a lot of this stuff is all fake,” referencing viruses, aliens, and nukes as examples, and suggests that recognizing this truth can shift one’s perception and lead to living a very different life. He asserts that fear is fomented intentionally, implying that if aliens were truly coming, people would “band together and give them more of our money,” positing the idea of an “alien tax” designed to take a portion of money to defend against aliens, whom he identifies as the government. Throughout, the speaker connects conspiracy-like ideas to a broader critique of authorities and the messaging around crises, claiming that the fear generated by these narratives serves to control or harm people financially and socially. He uses humorous contrasts (Santa vs. Hanta) to emphasize how government-triggered fear can be framed as a benevolent or protective gesture, such as giving “presents” (i.e., boosters) while simultaneously shutting down businesses. He presents a cohesive thread: many threats—viruses, aliens, nuclear weapons—are framed as manufactured to keep the public fearful and compliant, with the government profiting or expanding power under the guise of protection.

The speaker states the virus was not isolated. Live animal samples are irrelevant. The speaker suspects the origin is different than originally thought. China's government is presenting the city where the virus emerged as the city that defeated it in a new patriotic film.

The speaker says it is “really important” that “there are no viruses jumping,” “no spike proteins jumping,” “no snake venom in the water,” and “no parasites or germs jumping.” They describe this as “just technology,” and reference “before and after” as evidence, stating that the same technology was “rolled out into people’s pockets.” The speaker then claims that after it was rolled out into people’s pockets, people “started getting really, really sick.”

The speaker says they are currently in the Democratic Republic of the Congo for a couple months and claims there is no Ebola there. They state that everyone is living “the best life” and that no one is panicking. According to the speaker, Ebola is only present on social media and in international media. They conclude by urging viewers to think about this framing.

The speaker claims that COVID-19 is a hoax, along with previous viruses like HIV and Ebola. They suggest that the introduction of radio waves and Rockefeller's vaccines are the real cause of health issues. The speaker believes this is all about power, money, and the digitization of society. They argue that technology controls our lives and makes us transhuman. The speaker urges people to use their voices and votes to stop this.

The speaker suggests that there is a global crime being committed by those in power who have exaggerated the threat of a new respiratory virus. They argue that there is no real health threat and that the only moving part in this situation is the PCR test. The speaker questions the existence of respiratory viruses and believes that people still get ill with similar symptoms as before, but the cause is unknown. They conclude that these illnesses are not caused by respiratory viruses.

Neighbors spying on each other and calling the police for having more than two people in an apartment is criticized. The speaker is accused of fear mongering by warning about the government having too much power. However, the speaker argues that it is the governments themselves who are fear mongering. In Germany, there was a leaked manual that instructed how to make people adhere to COVID restrictions, even though children were not at risk. The speaker believes this is fear mongering and that the pandemic has been blown out of proportion for the benefit of pharmaceutical companies. The evidence of governments sowing fear is not limited to Germany, but seems to be a global phenomenon. The speaker finds this global coordination to be the most concerning aspect.

The speaker addresses the issue of fake news and conspiracy theories about the pandemic agreement, clarifying that the WHO does not have the power to impose lockdowns, vaccine mandates, or restrict travel. These claims are false, and the WHO is not seeking such authority.

Speaker 0 presents a series of claims linking COVID-19 to radio waves and 5G, and denying conventional ideas about viruses and contagion. The key points include: - COVID is described as radio wave sickness caused by cell phone towers and the rollout of 5G. The speaker asserts that “the COVID situation” was triggered by 5G, not a virus. - It is claimed that the loss of senses and other symptoms (loss of smell and taste, diminished ability to think, hair loss) are ("radio wave sickness"), and that this condition was diagnosed in 1919 as the Kansas flu when radio was rolled out. The speaker says, “one hundred years later, guess what they pulled? Same exact playbook.” - The so-called playbook is outlined as follows: wear your mask, get your booster, take this, inject this, stay indoors. The speaker notes a comparison to the past: “If you have a Bell radio or a Bell telephone, you could stay at home and chat with friends.” The implication is that the same approach was reused in covid times. - The speaker denies that viruses or contagion exist. They claim that coughing or sneezing does not cause illness; illness results from what a person puts into their body. Factors listed as causing illness include microwaving with radio wave signals, poisons and pesticides, negative thoughts, stress, and lack of sun. - Several book references are provided to support these views: The Invisible Rainbow; Farewell to Virology; Can You Catch a Cold?; and The Contagion Myth by Tom Cowan. The speaker also notes “10,000 studies on how viruses are fake,” suggesting a body of literature opposing mainstream virology. - Throughout, the narrative contrasts traditional germ theory with a belief that illness is driven by environmental exposure to radio frequencies, toxins, mindset, and lifestyle factors, rather than contagion from pathogens. In summary, the speaker contends that COVID-19 is a product of 5G and radio wave exposure, that the 1919 Kansas flu was similarly linked to radio rollout, and that conventional germ-based explanations are invalid. Illness is attributed to body inputs such as radiation, poisons, stress, and lack of sun, while promoting alternative literature that disputes contagion and viruses.

The speaker discusses “Santa virus,” swine flu virus, and COVID virus, claiming “viruses are fake.” The speaker then frames the 1976 swine flu campaign as an example, saying the CDC “control plan for the national vaccination campaign against the swine flu in 1976” came out of Atlanta and that “there was not a single known case of this flu in The United States” yet “it did not stop the medical monopoly from their scheme.” The speaker says swine breeders began to inject pigs and animals, after which “all of their animals began to perish,” and claims that if swine breeders would not inject toxins into animals, “Our only market is to inject it into the people.” The speaker then claims “Doctor Morris then went public with his statement” that “at no point was there a swine flu vaccine which was effective,” and says he was fired. The speaker adds that “anybody who goes against the vaccine narrative” is “removed.” Next, the speaker says that because the pigs were passing and the vaccine needed to be delivered to people, “president Ford appears on a news program to urge the American people to submit to the vaccination for the swine flu vaccine, 1976.” The speaker says it “didn’t work with the pigs” because it was killing the pigs, and claims doctors began saying “don’t do that,” leading to the president being involved. The speaker then states that insurance agencies “went public with their warning” that they would not issue insurance to the drug firm because it “can cause a lot of damages.” The speaker ties this to 2020 by saying it “Sounds a lot like 2020.” The speaker claims “it was a foil” that insurance companies warned, while Gerald Ford appealed to “the 215,000,000 Americans” to get “the booster,” “Get the injections,” and “Get your vaccines,” and that the government would provide “donuts” and “Krispy Kreme.” The speaker calls it “Murder by injection,” and says that “within a few months” claims totaling “$1,300,000,000 filed by the victims” included “paralysis from the swine flu vaccine.” The speaker then claims the “medical monopoly” changed the name to “GBS,” and that in 1986 “Reagan signed a bill to protect all vaccines from lawsuits.” The speaker concludes by saying this “sums up vaccines in a nutshell,” asserting that presidents, animals, doctors, and TV were used and that the message is “repeating it to you until you don’t.” The speaker ends with a directive, saying anyone who tells others to put vaccines “into your body” should be “beat them up or put them in a cage and beat them up,” mentioning “UFC” as an example.

Neighbors who had nothing better to do would spy on others and call the police if there were more than two people in an apartment. The speaker is accused of fear mongering, but argues that governments around the world are the ones responsible for it. In Germany, there was a leaked manual that outlined how to make people adhere to COVID restrictions, even though children were not at risk. The speaker believes the pandemic has been blown out of proportion for the benefit of pharmaceutical companies. Similar strategies of fear mongering have been documented in other countries, suggesting global coordination. This is the most concerning aspect of it all.

The speaker discusses leaked messages between Matt Hancock and Damon Poole, where they discuss using fear to control behavior and deploying a new variant. The speaker emphasizes the importance of fear and envy for the liberal agenda. They then show a video of Matt Hancock talking about the new variant and the need for people to act as if they have the virus. The speaker highlights the urgency in getting the vaccine rolled out. They conclude by stating that the virus is out of control and that people should be terrified, despite it not being as deadly as Ebola or Hanta.

In China, a strange case of atypical pneumonia is reported by an eye doctor. Within 11 days, the first PCR kits to test for the virus are shipped. The World Health Organization accepts a PCR protocol as the gold standard for testing. A study on clinical symptoms related to COVID is published, followed by a study on asymptomatic transmission. All of these developments occur within a compressed timeframe of just 26 days. The speaker argues that each step was premeditated and false.

The speaker claims that the COVID-19 pandemic was premeditated and an act of terrorism by a state. They argue that the United States and the UK, along with researchers worldwide, planned to use the virus to impose tyrannical reforms on society. They emphasize that there are many people who did not comply with these measures. Another speaker praises the evidence presented by the first speaker, stating that it is all based on published documents and facts. They encourage others to read the documents and draw their own conclusions.

The speaker discusses how quick action and isolation could have extinguished COVID-19, citing the success with SARS. They criticize political interference and the WHO for mishandling the pandemic, leading to a global crisis. Despite pointing out these failures, the speaker feels unappreciated for providing factual information.

This is not coronavirus. It is a very different virus, and it is known: hantaviruses have been around for quite a while and there is significant detail already understood about them. The situation is not SARS CoV-2 and is not the start of a COVID pandemic. It is an outbreak seen on a ship in a confined area, with five confirmed cases so far. Officials say they are providing information through a press conference to address the questions being raised, and they emphasize that this is not the same situation as one seen six years ago. They state that the virus does not spread the same way as coronaviruses. Instead, they say transmission is associated with close, intimate contact, and that most hantaviruses do not transmit between people at all. Most hantaviruses are transmitted from rodents or from rodents’ feces or saliva in their droppings to people. The exception highlighted is the Andes virus, which has been identified here. Officials say they have seen some human-to-human transmission with this particular virus. They reiterate that actions on board are precautionary to prevent any onward spread, and that many steps are being taken right now to minimize the risk further.