TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker recalls that Charlie once said, "guns save lives after school shooting" and was willing to debate and downplay the death of George Floyd in the hands of Minneapolis police, "you called him a scumbag." They note that Charlie also "downplay slavery and what black people have gone through in this country, by saying Juneteenth should never exist." The speaker counters that many claim he only wanted a civil debate, a complete rewriting of history. "Yeah, there is nothing more effed up than to completely pretend that, you know, his words and actions have not been recorded and in existence for the last decade or so."

How can you say there's no equivalence between the BLM protests and the January 6th riots? Many were killed during the BLM protests, while no one was killed by protesters on January 6th. Also, are you concerned about misinformation from The Washington Post, which initially gave the false impression that a protester was killed on January 6th? I trust credible sources like The Washington Post. There were deaths related to the Capitol defense, which is not misinformation. The BLM protests were serious and warranted accountability, but the dynamics of an attack on the government are fundamentally different. Officer Sicknick's death was linked to the stress of the riot and preexisting conditions, as determined by the medical examiner. Thank you for your questions.

Van Jones is accused of lying; speaker notes he “never said the first element… I did say the second part.” The attacker of Irina Zerutska allegedly said, “I got that white girl,” showing racialization. The media is charged with moral posturing until forced to live up to “the George Floyd standard.” The speaker calls Van Jones a “race hustler, Marxist,” and invites him on the program, declaring his tricks won’t work. The claim is that there is no evidence Derek Chauvin acted racially; Keith Ellison said no racial animus. The speaker cites a tweet: “if a random white person simply walked up to and stabbed a nice law abiding black person… it would be a huge national story.” He asks Jones to apologize for criminal justice reform that allowed “14 time criminal offenders” to walk the streets; “you are the architect and the designer” of this. Ben Shapiro is next.

I hate the Black Lives Matter movement because they rallied behind someone who abused women. Boycotting is more effective than looting. There are more pressing matters than police violence, like getting families back together and having fathers in the household. Black people need to focus on themselves and stop the hate. Even during slavery, they were loving people. I saw a Black Lives Matter rally in Beverly Hills with mostly white people, which Malcolm X and Marcus Garvey wouldn't have loved. Black lives matter, but I don't like the movement because it was funded by radical lesbians, Marxists, and George Soros, which isn't in black people's best interest.

I'm feeling great. Why do people always jump to calling you racist when you stand up for America and want to protect our borders? I'm standing here with a black man, he's my brother. How could I be racist? Why are you asking if he's racist just because he's white and standing up for America? Do you like Latin people? Do you like America? Then what's the problem? You should be out here protesting with us. You're asking that question to make him look racist on your program. Ask me if I'm racist. I love America too, and illegal aliens need to be shipped back to their country. How is that racist? You're the racist for even asking that question. You're taking advantage of all the benefits America has to offer, and you ask if he's racist? Shame on you.

The speaker argues that "The Black Lives Matter organization show up in Washington DC to protest the National Guard being in Washington DC who is currently helping police in Washington DC get crime under control and this crime being black people unalive and other black people. Majority of it that is." They claim "they believe that it is targeting black communities, threatening civil liberties even though the goal is to lower crime." The speaker repeats "Stupid is as stupid does. But are they really stupid? No. They're not stupid." They note "They're getting low on funds, and they need you to, you know, give a little bit." They warn that "If it happens again in Washington DC, then they'll blame Trump for it instead of blaming the black lives they claim to matter who actually burnt up the city." They add that "Since the National Guard has been deployed, there have been no homicides, people can safely walk down the street with ice around their neck and nice watches. Walking"

Why are you supporting these people? You're messing with our existence, and what happened on January 6th was wrong. People died. You're supporting the violence. I was in DC on January 6th, but I didn't go inside the Capitol. Political violence is always bad. You thought I was one of those people, but I stood outside the building non-violently and the FBI raided me and threw me in jail. Are you okay with that? You're aggressive, and you want attention. You're mad because of the attention, money, everything. I don't like what you represent. How do you feel about the Black Lives Matter riots? They murdered people, destroyed federal buildings. People broke windows at the Capitol, but why aren't you upset about the federal buildings that BLM burned? It was like watching 9/11 all over again.

If we are issuing pardons, President Trump should pardon Derek Chauvin from federal charges. The railroading of Chauvin was the inciting event for the BLM riots. Evidence suggests Chauvin didn't murder George Floyd, who was high on fentanyl and had a heart condition, even saying he couldn't breathe before exiting the car. Chauvin's knee was often on Floyd's shoulder or back, not his neck, and the autopsy showed no trachea damage, suggesting excited delirium as the cause of death. Despite the lack of hate crime accusations and the scanty evidence, Chauvin was convicted amidst massive pressure on the jury. He's rotting in prison because the media turned a tragic event into the cause of the 2020 election, leading to chaos and damaged race relations. President Trump should consider pardoning Chauvin on federal charges. Go to pardonderek.com and sign our petition asking President Trump to grant justice to officer Derek Chauvin.

The speaker states they disagree with the police's stance on the gang database, believing it cannot be fixed due to its origins in racism. They acknowledge differing opinions and upcoming conversations on the matter. The speaker was not planning to address it, but felt compelled to because the topic was brought up. They maintain their position that the database is fundamentally flawed and must be eliminated.

Speaker 0: There's no cameras over young white male when the young white male is the real threat to America. And it just hangs. Speaker 1: You know what? You're right. I agree. I agree. You're right about that. Because young white males are gonna be the majority with guns, and if you keep telling them that they're criminals and they should pay for people's bad decisions, you don't wanna see them angry. Tell them that they've never been angry. And I'm telling you, I'm looking at young men, and they're way way more angry than I ever was. Well, they're getting their ass kicked. If they're that angry, why they're only killing each other in their communities? When's the last time you I mean, how many let's look at recently. Speaker 0: That's good question. Why are not killing black people? Speaker 1: No. You know what? What's the point? Because they're they're they're able to understand that the ones that are not the problem. They're not listen.

You don't want riots or violence, correct? As Dr. King said, riots are the voice of the unheard. If people are oppressed, they may lash out. But do you condemn violence? I believe in self-defense. If a police officer unjustifiably kills someone, I understand why people react. So you won't condemn riots or burning buildings after police incidents? I won't condone it, but I understand the reaction. When Osama bin Laden attacked, did you suggest a peaceful response? I answered your question. People are burning businesses in New York City, and you won't answer. I don't promote it, but I won't condemn it. That's cowardly. No, you're the coward. God bless you, I'm leaving. Yeah, you are.

"They don't want Donald Trump to come in there with the National Guard because if they clean up the crime, Chicago will lose 800,000,800 million dollars in federal funding for crime programs." "It's a 100% true." "And black people are falling for it." "These liberal protesters are falling for it." "They don't even live in Chicago." "And so they're dependent on Donald Trump." "It's one big racket, bro, and it's not fair to the black people and the community members and the people that live, work, and play and have to deal with this nonsense on a regular basis." "It's so messed up, bro." "Money. I say this about everybody. Body. Follow the money. The money is gonna lead you to the reasons why."

Speaker 0 opened by saying that over the last week he has interacted with over 300,000 plus real Chicagoans who say it is hate speech to evoke the Civil War or the Confederacy, to say that law enforcement is a sickness, while the other person has over 150 sworn CPD officers on his detail. He asked what the other person would say to those people and whether he would ask his 150 sworn officers to stand down if he and his wife Stacy are ever attacked, shot at, or rammed with a protester’s vehicle. Speaker 1 responded with sarcasm about the large number, joking that the interactions had “gone down to 300,000,” and claimed he had checked the other person’s comments. He asserted that the addiction on jails and incarceration and the addiction of militarism is evil, referencing Doctor King, and said it is incumbent to ensure that “the real Chicagoans” or the real people of America receive attention, suggesting we should spend billions of dollars overseas on the people in Chicago instead. Speaker 0 pushed back, saying that the real Chicagoans he talks to, mostly Black and Brown, feel that the other person does not distinguish between illegal aliens and real Chicago citizens, and that he is siding with illegal aliens over communities. He asserted that a recent incident involved “an illegal alien from Nicaragua” who grabbed a woman on the North Side, bashed her head into the sidewalk, knocked her unconscious, and raped her. He asked whether, if that had been the other person’s wife, Stacy, he would want ICE to deport that illegal alien, and asked for a yes or no answer. Speaker 1 pressed to get a direct answer, asking for a response “as a man, not as mayor,” and repeated the question about whether ICE should deport the rapist. Speaker 0 reiterated his question and stated that the answer for real Chicagoans is the deportation of the rapist, and that was the “answer for real Chicagoans.” Speaker 1 then apologized for being late, blaming traffic, and the other person quipped about the traffic, noting, “You’re not blaming me for the traffic, are you?” and said he had been watching.

I condemn vicious racial discrimination in this country, but I refuse to engage in your divisive games. The real issue is that discrimination exists in various forms today, and the solution is simple: stop discriminating based on race. Unity can only be achieved by treating everyone equally, regardless of their background. Many people, regardless of race, are eager for a revival of unity, but your approach has only deepened national divides. Instead of playing into your narrative, we need to hold the media accountable for its role in this division. Rebuilding trust requires honesty and responsibility, and I won't participate in this flawed game.

Great teacher. Yes. What is a woman? Woman is a social construct that we've agreed upon. So I wanna thank you for proving a great point. What? You are why we should eliminate the Department of Education. Thank you very much. I could tell you're not married. Mhmm. Yeah. You're so scared to debate me. Actually, I'm not scared. You keep interrupting me. Every time I actually try to actually explain my point and have a reasonable conversation with you, you cut me off. Statistics? Where can you show me that at? Seventy percent of offenders were African Americans. I know you're you're obviously very anti trans. No. I'm pro reality.

What what I do know for sure is that, you know, Charlie was someone who once said, you know, guns save lives after school shooting. He was willing to debate and downplay the death of George Floyd in the hands of Minneapolis police. 'you called him a scumbag. Right.' There are a lot of people out there talking about him just wanting to have a civil debate, a complete rewriting of history. There is nothing more effed up than to completely pretend that, you know, his words and actions have not been recorded and in existence for the last decade or so. And there are people downplaying slavery and what black people have gone through in this country, by saying Juneteenth should never exist.

White people are every single bit justified in being racist. Every single bit justified. That's pattern recognition. That's not racism. That's pattern recognition. Aren't you people ashamed? Who's raising these fucking people? Who's raising these people? It's other black people. It's baby mamas and baby daddies. We are fucking tired of you. It's you, it's black people. We are too broke to be woke. We want our lives back. We want our cities back. The crime. It's the chaos. It's the violence. And you know what demographic is almost exclusively responsible for it? It's you, it's black people. Jason Whitlock... said that this is a demonic sentiment. Who does it benefit to make these excuses and to say it's everybody else? We are done. We want our lives back.

I refuse to pledge allegiance to the religion of wokeism and won't condemn white supremacy just to play your game. However, I do condemn racial discrimination. The best way to end discrimination is to stop discriminating based on race. We need to unite this country regardless of skin color or gender. The media's divisive tactics have caused a breakdown in trust. They need to take accountability for their failures and start rebuilding trust. I don't have time for these games until then.

When did Trump become a racist? Only when they told you so? Was he a problem when he was with the Clintons? People are upset about the ad he took out against the Central Park 5, but back then, all the news pointed to their guilt. Plus, he was a registered Democrat at the time, and the DA, police chief, and mayor were all Democrats too. Where's the outrage for corporations buying sweets at the DNC or abortion mobiles near the convention? Biden was racist, and some say he was only VP to balance the ticket. Hillary Clinton was a Goldwater girl who said, "bring them to heel" about us. Is racism only a problem with bad PR? An apology doesn't undo decades of racist policies. But Trump passed the First Step Act with Kim K. advocating for black people more than some black people are. When do we hold everyone accountable?

Patrick Crusius was white, correct? I don't know his parentage. He was white. I don't understand why you're focusing on race. Because black lives matter, sir. All lives matter, sir. Every single life matters—white, black, Asian. Professor Butler.

During my time in the military, with a background in forensics, I learned to read autopsy reports and fill out reports myself. The truth about George Floyd's death is that it was a drug overdose, not asphyxiation or strangulation by the police in Minneapolis. It's unfortunate that Keith Ellison, the prosecutor, and many Democrats knew this but still pushed the lie, resulting in the destruction of cities nationwide. Lives were lost, businesses were destroyed, and the call to defund the police spread to places like Minneapolis, Saint Paul, and Baltimore. Democrats have been damaging our country since the Civil War, yet people continue to vote for them. They don't care about you; they'd rather use someone like George Floyd to further their destructive agenda in your own community.

Speaker 0 claimed that white people make up 10% of the world's population, and that in California, the white population decreased by 71% in 73 years, which "kinda sounds like genocide." He questioned why violent crime and murder rates by race are not available from Sacramento. Speaker 1 interrupted, calling the statements racist and inappropriate for public discourse, and ended the call. Speaker 1 stated that racist tropes and stereotypes have no place in civic discourse.

Now that we know certain narratives aren't true, it's time to revisit the George Floyd story. The medical examiner found no evidence of asphyxia or strangulation, suggesting Floyd died of natural causes, exacerbated by drug use. This contradicts the widespread narrative. George Floyd is the Democratic Party's ideal black man: poor, uneducated, and dependent. Democrats want more like him because they vote Democrat. The party degrades black people to maintain control, fostering a sense of victimhood and dependence. They use groups like BLM as militias, exploiting isolated incidents to ignite division and advance their agenda. BLM doesn't stand for Black Lives Matter; it stands for burn, loot, and murder.

Speaker 1: "The narrative that they have pushed forward in the last ten years is that there is a relentless assault on against black people be on behalf of white people, and the data does not show that." Speaker 1: "White individuals are actually more likely to be attacked, especially even per capita, by black individuals in this country." Speaker 3: "it's just pure race race mongering, hate mongering. It's wrong." Speaker 3: "Where is the George Floyd policing act? It didn't pass." Speaker 0: "The media doesn't care about this, and we should start asking why." Speaker 1: "All of a sudden, when we make the left live up to their own standard of rules, there is complete silence by the entire American media."

Trump's comments were offensive, baseless, and lacked evidence. They were race-baiting and appealed to the worst in us. We need to stand up against an administration that is too male, too pale, and too stale. We won't stay silent.