TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 gave the FBI a thumb drive containing 29 minutes of high-definition video showing two men attacking a building. As of this morning, neither man has been arrested. Speaker 0 states that despite going through over 725 indictments, none of their video or even a single still picture of either man has appeared on the Internet. The FBI is allegedly refusing to take Speaker 0's calls, return emails, or accept an offer to meet. Speaker 0 believes the FBI is hiding these men. Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 to inquire about the identities of these men. Speaker 0 confirms that Ben Grundler has all this information and that they have been in contact for over a year.

In December 2020, federal agents approached Jeremy Brown to be an informant, but he exposed them instead. He later got arrested, and his legal team is presenting evidence that the grenades and national defense documents found in his home were planted by the agents. The agents turned off all recording devices during the search, and none of them had body cameras. DNA tests on the grenades did not match Jeremy's DNA, and a dog hair and carpet fiber found on the grenades did not match his dogs or carpet. Criminal counts found on a CD were proven to not be in Jeremy's possession. The government is now targeting people who were in Washington DC on January 6th. Jeremy is fighting for his freedom.

The speaker mentions that the document was redacted to protect the source. They also mention that there are 17 voice recordings, two of which involve the current president. The speaker questions why this information was redacted and not given to the House Oversight.

The speaker presents a search warrant for Mar-a-Lago, describing the property as a mansion with numerous rooms and buildings. The warrant allows for the search of various areas used by the president, first lady, and their staff, where documents could be stored. However, it excludes areas occupied by third parties. The speaker also mentions a redacted affidavit, which refers to the Espionage Act and the unauthorized communication of documents relating to national defense. They express astonishment that the president and former president are not included in the act's scope.

The Justice Department is dropping the case against me regarding the Ashley Biden diary. There will be no criminal charges. The grand jury investigation that led to the search warrant of my home and my reporters has concluded. The government is requesting the court terminate the appointment of the special master. The court is directing the government to unseal the search warrant materials, including the affidavit. We're finally going to understand the justification they had for raiding journalists' homes. Hopefully, the government will never use fear to intimidate the First Amendment again. It remains to be seen if we'll sue the people involved. The case was purely political, and the result was expected. What happened wasn't even close to a crime, especially since we didn't even publish the diary. We'll follow up when we get the affidavit.

The FBI handed over hundreds of pages of documents, but more were expected. A source revealed evidence was in the Southern District Of New York. Thousands of pages of documents arrived by the Friday deadline and are now in the FBI's possession. Director Patel will provide a detailed report explaining why these documents were withheld. The initial documents included flight logs, names, and victim names, but seemed incomplete. The newly acquired documents will be reviewed cautiously to protect Epstein's victims, of which over 254 have been identified. While protecting victims, transparency is a priority, and America has the right to know. The Biden administration allegedly did nothing with the documents, which raises questions about why they were in the Southern District Of New York. Redactions will be made for victim protection, national security, and grand jury information. Redactions will be clearly marked with explanations, unlike past practices. The speaker believes the American people have a right to know about the Epstein files, the JFK files, and the Martin Luther King files.

James O'Keefe is visiting, and I'm welcoming him into my house. It's not his first time here. I've got reporters everywhere I go. Last time one of them was wired. I was wondering if this reporter is off the record, but they are not. It's coming out later, but I was worried about saying anything that might cause issues. I mean, the New Yorker isn't exactly friendly territory. James just mentioned someone O'Keefe didn't identify as a reporter.

- it's illegal. The FBI will raid me. They've done it twice. - No. It's not secret. No. It's not on OAN and Newsmax. - Why isn't the FBI looking for two metaphysically attacked? Exclusive inside FBI fomenting insurrection. No? - Well, see, I was at the East Entrance on January 6. - I recorded two federal agents attacking the capital. - Well, federal agents came to my home and took my phones. They still have that. So, hopefully, someone will stand out. - I've given them twenty nine minutes of high definition footage of these two turds. - And to date, neither one of them has been arrested and none of their images have appeared on the internet. - They refuse to accept my offer to come in and give them a statement. - I've got them by the Cajones. - Avoid the FBI if you can.

They took Peanut, my squirrel, and cut off his head to test for rabies, despite only 10 to 20 cases a year in the country. Judge Richard Rich signed the search warrant for this. During the raid, I wasn't allowed to use the toilet without police supervision, and they even searched it. I couldn't feed my outdoor horses, which I rescued from kill pens, while they investigated. This was more than just a search for a squirrel and a raccoon; it felt like they were looking for something else. There had been no complaints about Peanut in seven years, just some anonymous tips online. If he was illegal to keep, why wasn't there any prior action taken?

You are not being honest with this committee. We asked for all memorandums from the Secret Service on July 15th, have you provided them? You are dodging important questions that the American people want answers to. We had to subpoena you to be here, and you still won't answer. These are not difficult questions.

The speaker questions the FBI's practice of tipping off the subject of a search warrant before it is executed. They inquire about the FBI's contact with the protective detail of individuals and the potential undermining of investigations. The speaker expresses frustration with the lack of answers and accuses the FBI of a cover-up. Director Wray requests a 5-minute recess. The speaker acknowledges the frustration but explains that policies prevent discussing ongoing investigations. They mention that these policies were strengthened under the previous administration. The speaker concludes by stating that there is an obligation to call out corruption.

We received a couple hundred pages of documents from the FBI, but a source indicated more evidence was in the Southern District of New York. I gave them a deadline, and thousands of pages of documents arrived. The FBI and Director Patel's team are reviewing them to determine why these documents were initially withheld. While redacting to protect victims is crucial, we aim for maximum transparency, believing Americans deserve to know the truth. The Biden administration claimed no one acted on these documents, but why were they hidden? This same principle of transparency applies to the JFK files and other cases. When we redact, we will clearly mark the specific lines and explain the reason, such as protecting a victim's identity or national security.

The speaker states the FBI handed over hundreds of pages of documents, but a source indicated more existed in the Southern District of New York. The speaker gave the FBI a deadline of Friday at 8 AM to release everything. Thousands of pages of documents arrived by the deadline and are now in the FBI's possession. Kash Patel and his team will produce a detailed report explaining why the documents were withheld. The speaker says the documents included flight logs, names, and victim names, but they are looking for the rest of the information. The speaker identified over 254 victims in phase one. The speaker says they believe in transparency and that America has the right to know. The speaker claims the Biden administration said no one did anything with the documents and questions why they were in the Southern District of New York. The speaker says national security and grand jury information may be redacted. The speaker says the public has a right to know about the JFK and Martin Luther King files as well. If something is redacted, the line will be noted, along with the reason for the redaction.

Speaker 0: I find information like this, you know, inserts for the vaccine. Paper's there, and there's nothing printed on it. I find that very interesting, disheartening, disgusting, and lots of other words, but then it gets better. It just keep wait. There's more. It just keeps happening. The CDC redacts every single word of a 148 page study on a myocarditis after COVID vaccination. So I asked research to print the study for me. 148 pages. The entire thing is redacted. What good does a study do if there's nothing there? Then I wanna know, wait, what might have been there that they needed to redact it? That's even scarier. Speaker 1: We're witnessing an active cover up of a colossal consumer product safety debacle that is is basically affecting the entire world. Mhmm. So in The United States, our CDC, National Institutes of Health, and the FDA are actively involved in a cover up. And the same is occurring in The UK with the MHRA, Europe with European medicine agencies, and Australia with the Therapeutic Goods Administration. Something is going on that's very big. Each one of these companies that puts out a product has an obligation to produce ninety days of safety monitoring after their product comes out. It's a regulatory dossier. If somebody has a problem with the new product and they call the company like Pfizer, Pfizer has to report, write down what happened, and they have to collate that in a report and produce it and make it publicly available. When it came to ninety days with Pfizer, the first vaccine that came out, remember Pfizer was approved 12/10/2020. Pfizer didn't produce the report. And then people started asking, well, what's happening with your vaccine? And Pfizer would not disclose what happened. And then it went to court. And the lawyer for the FDA stepped in and said they don't wanna release Pfizer's dossier for fifty five years. Mhmm. Oh. Fifty five years. And the the the plaintiff pushed. And finally, slowly, the Pfizer dossier came out. Pfizer recorded one thousand two hundred and twenty three deaths with their product within ninety days of release. People were calling Pfizer in desperation watching their family members die after taking the vaccine. Pfizer recorded over twelve hundred new adverse events, new problems that doctor Boden has talked to you about that we are grappling with the entire time. But the point is our FDA worked to cover this up. The FDA should be regulating this company. FDA should have been having at least monthly meetings and fully disclosing what was going on with these novel vaccines, which are a genetic transfer technology platform.

A federal judge ordered the release of a heavily redacted affidavit regarding the raid on my newsroom. The probable cause section is entirely redacted, only noting that cell phones can send emails. The document mentions charges like conspiracy and possession of stolen goods, but redacts details about the investigation, including the names of President Biden and Project Veritas. Even my birth year is redacted. The redactions conceal information about confidential FBI sources and possibly individuals who lied to the FBI. This excessive redaction is highly unusual and raises concerns about the justification for the raid's force. The FBI even referred to us as "news media" internally. This is a national disgrace, and we're suing.

Documents are being suppressed to protect individuals, and the speaker knows the names of those individuals, why they're being suppressed, and who is suppressing them. However, the speaker is bound by confidentiality from a judge and cases and cannot disclose this information. The speaker knows the names of people whose files are being suppressed for protection, which they believe is wrong. The individuals being protected are politicians and business leaders, among others.

A federal judge ordered the release of a heavily redacted affidavit related to the raid on my newsroom. Almost every detail regarding probable cause for the search has been redacted, including the names of individuals and organizations involved, even my birth year. The redactions conceal the reasons for the raid, which involved the seizure of my cell phones and the use of my biometric data to unlock them. The affidavit mentions potential crimes, like conspiracy and possession of stolen goods, accusations I vehemently deny. The excessive redactions prevent public scrutiny of the justification for this aggressive action against a news organization. This is a national disgrace, and we will be pursuing legal action.

We received a couple hundred pages of documents from the FBI, but a source told me there were more at the Southern District of New York. I gave them a deadline, and we got thousands of pages. The FBI is reviewing them, and Director Patel is preparing a detailed report on why the FBI withheld these documents. These documents include flight logs, names, and victim names, but we believe there's more. The FBI just received these thousands of pages, and protecting victims is a priority. We believe in transparency, and America has the right to know. The Biden administration claimed no one did anything with these documents, but why were they in the Southern District of New York? I want a full report. We will redact national security information and grand jury information, but the public will know why.

Hidden camera footage shows the FBI raiding the home of a Project Veritas journalist last November. This invasion of First Amendment rights is alarming for journalists nationwide. The government targeted Project Veritas, following our lawful acquisition of materials related to Ashley Biden's diary in 2020, which we chose not to publish and returned to local law enforcement. This raid is part of a broader effort to intimidate and silence journalists, but Project Veritas remains committed to defending our rights and those of all journalists. More revelations about the SDNY's attacks on journalism are forthcoming, and we will continue to fight for our First Amendment protections.

The FBI handed over hundreds of pages of documents, but a source revealed more evidence was in the Southern District of New York. Thousands of pages of documents were then received. The FBI is reviewing them, and Kash Patel will provide a detailed report on why the documents were withheld. The initial documents included flight logs, names, and victim names, but more was expected. The goal is to protect the Epstein victims, of which over 254 have been identified, while also providing transparency. The Biden administration allegedly did nothing with the documents, which raises questions. Redactions will be made to protect victims, national security, and grand jury information. The public will know what is redacted and why, unlike past practices. The speaker believes the American people have a right to know about the Epstein files, the JFK files, and the Martin Luther King files.

The officer searched my toilet for a squirrel, leaving my house in disarray. There are broken soap bottles and stains on the floor. This destruction is unacceptable. I’ve never had any legal issues, yet they only targeted my room during the raid. They tore through my belongings in search of a squirrel and a raccoon, causing significant damage. It's hard to comprehend how anyone could justify this level of devastation.

I released about 120 pages of documents that I requested upon entering office. We carefully redacted them to protect the personal information of the young female victims of sex crimes and sex trafficking. I was assured that there were no more documents, but I recently learned that the Southern District of New York is sitting on thousands of pages regarding Epstein. We will obtain everything, and redact it to protect grand jury information and confidential witnesses. The American people have a right to know, and as the most transparent president in our nation's history, I will ensure America gets the full Epstein files, as well as those pertaining to JFK and Martin Luther King.

I gave the FBI twenty nine minutes of high definition video, two men attacking the building. As of this morning, neither man has been arrested. I've been through over 725 indictments. Yeah. Their video none of my video has appeared on the Internet, not a single still picture of either one of these guys. The FBI is refusing to to take my phone call, return my emails, or even accept my offer to come in and sit down with them. Yep. They are hiding these guys. And somebody needs to say something about this. Please tell me that you will get up on the well of the senate and say, who the hell are these men, mister FBI guys? And Ben Grundler has all this information. I've been in contact with him for over a year now.

I know we don't usually read these. This one's not readable. It's completely redacted. For the most part, the first 50 pages, this is actually the search warrant that was served on James O'Keefe for a a diary that he had already given to the government two months before. And as it turns out, there were no indictments here, yet he still doesn't know why he was raided, and I think he deserves to know.