reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Trump is banned from discussing the judge's family, who are linked to Democrats. The judge's daughter is a consultant for Democrats and stands to gain financially if Trump is convicted. The judge imposed a gag order on Trump for pointing out this conflict of interest. Critics argue this violates Trump's right to defend himself. The media portrays Trump as attacking the judge's family, but supporters see it as a biased move against Trump's rights. This case highlights the abuse of power in targeting Trump.

My husband, a political prisoner, was taken by the FBI after our son reported him. He went to trial and received a seven-and-a-half-year sentence for being at the Capitol on January 6th. The government is weaponizing its power against American citizens, tearing families apart. I attend court hearings to witness the injustice and the precedents being set. They want to control us and criminalize our beliefs. We must resist and fight back. Our country is worth it. Our First Amendment rights are being taken away. My husband is serving time for exercising his right to protest. The government is using the January 6th events to target Trump and further their agenda. We stand outside the DC jail every night to support the patriots being held there.

My husband, a political prisoner, was taken in a pre-dawn raid and sentenced to seven and a half years in prison for his involvement in the events of January 6th, 2021. Our son, who had turned him in, was indoctrinated against us. The government has weaponized its power and is targeting American citizens. They are tearing families apart and labeling us as domestic terrorists. We must stay strong and vigilant. The government is criminalizing our forefathers' ideology and wants to weaken our nation. We must question their authority and obstruct their actions. Our country is worth fighting for. The mainstream media is not reporting on the trials, and the long-lasting consequences of these precedents will affect future generations. We must stand up and make our voices heard.

A high court judge has told Enoch Burke that his preferential treatment is over, and he will remain in Mount Joy Prison for Christmas and beyond until he purges his contempt. The hearing, which concluded just now, followed a judgment by Mister Justice Brian Cregan last month describing Burke as a “baleful and malign presence” at Wilson’s Hospital School and stating that he had been stalking the teachers and pupils. Burke, the former teacher, was returned to prison for contempt of court. The hearing lasted over an hour and was attended by Enoch Burke, produced in person from Mount Joy Prison, where he is detained for the fourth time. It addressed six issues, including an update on Burke’s appeal against his dismissal from Wilson’s Hospital School. Counsel for the board of management said a reconstituted disciplinary panel would convene a hearing in Lone later this month. Burke’s position, however, is that he does not want that appeal heard because he plans to appeal part of his case to the Supreme Court, specifically two judgments of the Court of Appeal, which he claims have diametrically opposed findings about why he was disciplined by Wilson’s Hospital School. The court asked Burke whether he planned to purge his contempt and undertake not to trespass at the school. Burke stated that he does not accept that he is in contempt and said he does not plan to purge it. As a consequence, he was told that he would no longer receive preferential treatment, and he would not be released from prison for Christmas, Easter, or the summer holidays until he purges his contempt. Additionally, it was conveyed to the court that the Attorney General is considering whether to bring criminal contempt proceedings against Doctor Isaac Burke, Martina Burke, Amy, and Enoch Burke due to their conduct in court, with an update expected in a fortnight. Our court’s correspondent Deborah Naylor reported on the developments.

Drysfal Nagenhove presents his case as a last-chance appeal, claiming that the Brussels regime is trying to destroy him and his movement. He identifies as a nationalist and conservative activist, noting actions against mass migration, woke degeneracy, and victories against Antifa. He describes Brussels-based headquarters as a hub where activists from across Europe cooperate, housing a recording studio and a boxing club to “strengthen the European youth,” and says it recently hosted the first remigration summit. He asserts the movement became the biggest in the country, surpassing political parties on social media, and that he was elected as an independent identitarian member of parliament. He alleges retaliation from the Brussels regime, including hiring a journalist to hack the account of a minor involved in the movement. Although the journalist found nothing illegal, the footage of supposed racist memes aired on national television was used to escalate attacks. He claims 20 members had their houses raided; some were expelled from banks and universities, others lost jobs, and he claims he himself was placed on a no-fly list. He states the police leaked his private information—years of private messages and pictures—to hostile media, which has used it against the movement. Nagenhove says that when he spoke out on social media about the regime’s terror, the situation worsened: the judge ordered another house raid on his family, and armed police dragged him from bed and jailed him. He alleges the judge blackmailed him with two conditions for release: first, signing a gag order prohibiting discussion of the attacks, and second, visiting the Holocaust Museum as a humiliation ritual. He claims the Brussels justice system is corrupt and infested with judges who hate freedom of speech, citing a judge who allegedly called him a “disgusting fascist” on her own social media. After a show trial, he says the judge ruled that memes shared in a private group chat constituted hate speech, sentencing him to one year in jail and banning him from politics for ten years. He claims fines, coupled with legal costs, amount to over €300,000, describing this as a “death sentence” for the movement because headquarters may have to be sold without support. He portrays his situation as a living nightmare for his family but vows to continue fighting, saying they want to destroy him and the movement, and that with support they will destroy them. His fate is scheduled for this Friday, May 16, at the court of appeals. He states willingness to fight from prison and even at the European Court of Human Rights, asserting that they will win and restore freedom of speech in Europe. He ends by asking for support through sharing his story and donating to his legal fund at gifts and go slash trees.

A mother, heartbroken and outraged, confronts former judge Mark Chivarella, whose actions led to her son, an all-star wrestler, taking his own life after being sent to juvenile detention for a minor drug offense. It has come to light that Chivarella accepted money to send kids to detention facilities. He was recently convicted on 12 counts, including racketeering and money laundering, but remains free while awaiting sentencing.

Families have lost everything as their loved ones are unlawfully imprisoned for minor infractions. My son was subjected to "diesel therapy," being moved from prison to prison, enduring horrific conditions, including contaminated water and constant lights. Communication with attorneys and family was severely restricted, making it nearly impossible to prepare a defense. Under the current administration, our rights have been violated, and attempts to silence dissent have escalated. Despite President Trump's recent pardon for my son, he remains incarcerated due to obstruction from the city’s mayor. Just last night, he was assaulted by guards while awaiting processing. We have already filed a lawsuit, and this incident only adds to our case.

We're at the high courts where the quest to strip Enoch Burke of his assets and salary continues due to his refusal to accept the denial of his constitutional rights. The court is discussing how to divert his salary, with much focus on technical details involving Department of Education employees. The issue began when a judgment was issued based on information not presented in court, acquired through unofficial channels. It's concerning that the judge appears to be changing the senior counsel's statements. Burke's constitutional rights, particularly freedom of conscience and religious belief, have been ignored. Burke refused to endorse transgender ideology, citing his religious belief that God created male and female. Now, the courts, government, and Department of Education are focused on stripping him of his assets and rights. His refusal to go against his conscience has led to these consequences.

The four individuals known as the Cootes Four were unjustly targeted in a political prosecution, falsely accused of involvement in an armed insurrection at the Coutts border blockade. They have been held in pretrial detention for over 800 days without visitation access or being convicted of any crime. The media initially spread false narratives about the case, but a pretrial publication ban now prevents the accused from telling their side of the story. The trial is beginning today, and it is expected that the truth will come to light, revealing the injustice they have faced at the hands of a government that disregards justice and rights. Translation: The Cootes Four were unfairly prosecuted for a political agenda, falsely accused of inciting violence at the Coutts border blockade. They have been in pretrial detention for over 800 days without being convicted of any crime. The media initially spread false narratives, but a publication ban now prevents the accused from sharing their side of the story. The trial is starting today, and it is believed that the truth will reveal the injustice they have endured due to a government that does not respect justice or rights.

Enoch Burke reports having €0 in his bank account after the courts allegedly took €40,617. He accuses Judge David Nolan, Russell Fanning, the attorney general, and the government of working together to seize his assets. Burke claims this stems from a 2022 demand by Principal Niamh McShane to promote transgenderism at Wilson's Hospital School. He states that Minister for Education Norma Foley lied about transgenderism in schools when questioned about his incarceration. He accuses current Minister for Education Helen McEntee of dealing illegally with the matter. Burke says judges avoid the issue and the government is complicit. He references Pascal Donohue's warning of a recession and accuses the government of defying God. He believes religious freedom is being taken away and criticizes the church's silence.

The speaker explains how their child's case ended up in court after a meeting with BC Children's Hospital. The hospital planned to administer cross-sex hormones to the child, but the speaker objected and halted the process. The hospital then sent a letter stating that they would proceed with the hormone injections unless the speaker took legal action within two weeks. The speaker ended up in court because they did not respond with legal action. The speaker also mentions that using the wrong pronouns for their child is considered criminal violence, and they were jailed for it. The speaker confirms that their child is now on hormone pills, as ordered by the court.

Enoch Burke reports having €0 in his bank account after the courts allegedly took €40,617. He accuses Judge David Nolan, Russell Fanning, the attorney general, and the government of working together to seize his assets. Burke claims this stems from a 2022 demand by Principal Niamh McShane to promote transgenderism at Wilson's Hospital School. He states Minister for Education Norma Foley lied about transgenderism in schools when questioned about his incarceration. He accuses current Minister for Education Helen McEntee of dealing illegally with the matter. Burke says judges avoid the issue in court and the government is complicit. He criticizes Pascal Donohue for predicting a recession and defying God, along with Meehaw Martin and Helen McEntee. He believes righteousness exalts a nation and laments the church's silence on the matter of religious freedom.

A devastated mother confronts former judge Mark Chivarella, whose actions contributed to her son, an all-star wrestler, taking his own life after being sent to juvenile detention for a minor drug offense. It has been revealed that Chivarella accepted money to send children to detention facilities. He was convicted of 12 counts, including racketeering and money laundering, but remains free while awaiting sentencing.

The speakers discuss the case of the shaman involved in the January 6th incident. They mention that he received a 31-month prison sentence, while Nancy Pelosi's daughter questions what he actually did. They suggest that the incident was a setup by the establishment to make a political movement illegal. They also mention the possibility of rigging the jury system for political purposes. Overall, they criticize the overprosecution of the protesters and highlight the hypocrisy of accusing Trump of the same actions.

At the Four Courts in Dublin, the speakers describe a controversial High Court proceeding involving Enoch Burke. They allege that Burke is being forced to abandon his Christian beliefs and conscience, and express concern that constitutional rights are being trampled. Key points: - Enoch Burke was imprisoned, with authorities indicating he would be produced in person for today’s hearing. However, Rosemary Madden, the barrister for the school, obtained an ex parte order the previous day to allow Burke to attend only by video link, without Burke’s input. The High Court, led by Mister Justice Brian Cregan, granted the order, keeping Burke in prison and attending virtually. - On the morning of the hearing, Burke’s case was listed as the first item. Judge Cregan appeared around 10:50 after a delay attributed to “technical difficulties.” Burke was not produced on the video screen, and the judge moved on to other matters. - One of Burke’s supporters publicly questioned why the ex parte order had been granted without Enoch Burke’s consultation. The judge responded that there were “technical difficulties,” then ordered that the speaker be removed from the courtroom. The speaker, along with Burke’s father and others, was removed by guards. The removal occurred without explanation or opportunity to respond, which the speakers claim violated the principle that justice is administered in public. - The speakers allege that Judge Cregan had previously delivered a judgment based on slander, asserting there were affidavits from teachers and pupils stating Burke was a danger. They contend no such affidavits existed regarding Burke or his conduct. They specifically challenge statements in the judgment that Burke was a “baleful and malign presence” and that he was “roaming the corridors” and “stalking” pupils and teachers, calling these claims baseless. They note that the principal, Noel Cunningham, stated Burke never threatened or touched anyone, and none of the purported affiants appeared in the judgment despite their relevance. - The speakers argue that the court is using slanderous language and unsupported findings to justify Burke’s continued confinement and to pressure him to abandon his religious beliefs. - They criticize the press presence, asserting that journalists from RTÉ, The Daily Mail, The Irish Independent, and others are not accurately reporting what is happening in court, contributing to a denial of justice. They remain confident that the truth will emerge. Additional context: - Burke’s supporters emphasize that the case involves defending constitutional rights, including the free exercise of religion, and condemn what they describe as an all-time low for the Irish courts in terms of fairness, openness, and the treatment of public participants in proceedings. They stress the importance of public access to justice and insist that the issues raised—ex parte orders, the basis of the judge’s findings, and the treatment of the Burke family in court—are central to the case.

A man named Jake Lang has been in jail for 3 years without a trial for his involvement in January 6th. He has spent much of that time in solitary confinement and has not even had a hearing. Despite being a controversial figure, he deserves his day in court. The media's silence on this issue is concerning.

Julian Assange, a controversial figure, exposed government secrets through WikiLeaks, angering powerful entities. He faced legal troubles, including false rape charges, and is currently imprisoned in the UK. Despite not being charged in the US, he faces extradition under the Espionage Act. The treatment he receives is seen as a form of torture to silence him.

Tommy Robinson was sentenced to 18 months in prison not for posting false information, but for ignoring a court injunction against discussing a specific incident. The judge acknowledged Robinson's work as a journalist and did not comment on the truth of his claims. Despite mainstream media narratives, multiple witnesses supported Robinson's account, while the judge dismissed their testimonies. The case involved a Syrian refugee with a troubling history, and the judge's ruling contradicted the testimonies of respected community members. The media aims to portray immigration as harmless and demonize Robinson. Viewers are encouraged to watch Robinson's film "Silence," which has garnered significant attention, to form their own opinions rather than relying on mainstream media.

The speakers frame the Burke case as systemic corruption: "This is insanity what's happening to Weanoke Burke, an upright, intelligent, kind, lover of his students, young teacher... betrayed Christ" and "they've got their 30 pieces of silver." They say the church did not stand up, and "parents... they're Judases." They describe Enoch Burke's refusal to bow to "transgenderism" and to obey principal Niamh MacShane's instruction to call a young boy "day, an abomination." The Court of Appeal reportedly recognized that "the principal's overarching complaint against Enoch Burke" and asked if "that instruction must be looked at. Was it a legitimate instruction?" They allege judge David Nolan refused to read a submission; note "not a normal court." Fines of "€225,000" and calls for Burke's return to "Mount Joy Prison" after "five hundred days." They condemn archbishop John MacDewell as a "Judas" and oppose "indoctrination center" "promotion of LGBT" in the school.

My son graduated from high school, but the judge won't let me attend. The trial is a scam and a political witch hunt. The judge won't allow me to go to the United States Supreme Court either. I can't campaign like I should be, which benefits the radical left Democrats. It's a sad situation with a conflicted judge and unnecessary trial. Thank you for your support.

At the high court in Dublin, Enoch Burke’s supporters describe today’s proceedings as a wholesale denial of the law and justice. Isaac Burke (Enoch Burke’s brother), Martina Burke, and Ami Burke claim Enoch was manhandled by three prison officers at the door of the court and then brought back to Mountjoy Prison after attempting to make a submission inside. They say Justice Brian Cregan overruled him and sent him back to the prison van, calling it a total disgrace and breakdown of order. They allege ongoing issues with the disciplinary appeal panel (the DAP) process. They state that two panel members, Sean O’Longán and Jack Cleary, resigned after swearing lies on oath, while Geraldine O’Brien (a representative of ASTI) did not resign and remains on the panel. They describe Geraldine O’Brien’s continued presence as a violation of rules governing the panel, insisting that the panel is still alive and that Cregan is pretending there is no panel and that a new panel is needed. They assert that the DAP has been proven shambolic on at least two occasions and that Enoch Burke did nothing wrong and should be teaching at Wilson’s Hospital School. Rosemary Mallon (referred to as Rosemary Mallon or Mallon) is described as a foreign presence in the room, representing the board of management and pressing arguments about a future DAP arrangement rather than addressing the current case. The speakers contend that the existing DAP remains in existence with Geraldine O’Brien on it, while a new DAB (disciplinary action body) is being urged by others. They claim the judge allowed Mallon to advance arguments about a new DAP, effectively sidelining the existing proceedings. They assert that the judge is attempting to wrap up the case and dismiss concerns, and they accuse Cregan of bigotry, arrogance, and hatred toward those who demand constitutional and legal respect. They allege that the Department of Education and the state are pushing a policy requiring the use of non-binary pronouns (the “they” pronoun), contrary to Enoch Burke’s religious beliefs, and that this constitutes a broader religious and constitutional conflict. They claim Burke’s constitutional rights are being denied and that the case reflects a broader pattern of corruption and cover-up in the judiciary. Towards the end, Enoch Burke made a formal application to refer affidavits containing alleged false statements by Sean O’Longán to the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) for possible perjury. The speakers note that the judge did not acknowledge or rule on this application. They describe Burke’s removal to the prison van, handcuffed and treated like a criminal, while a large number of guards were present, and insist Burke’s case centers on his religious beliefs and refusal to use the pronouns, rather than any criminal activity. They conclude that the DAP remains in operation, that the judge’s actions amount to corruption in their view, and that Enoch Burke’s constitutional rights have been denied.

They've lost custody of their 16-year-old daughter due to her belief that she was born in the wrong body. The parents disagreed with the school and hospital's decision to socially transition her. The child protection agency got involved, leading to a legal battle. The parents feel helpless and miss their daughter, who now lives in a government facility. They speak out to prevent other families from experiencing the same pain and emphasize the importance of parental love and support in a child's life.

The UK, the country of the Magna Carta, is allegedly sentencing people to jail for disagreeing with the government online or protesting against open border policies and mass immigration. People are reportedly being tried and jailed for months or years for disagreeing with the government. The speaker questions what options remain for UK citizens to disagree with their government without facing imprisonment. They cite the case of David Springer, a 61-year-old train driver caring for his sick wife, who was allegedly sentenced to jail for attending a protest, possibly shouting at the police. The speaker argues that the UK has a two-tiered justice system and is no longer a free nation because citizens lack democratic options to express disagreement. They cite the case of a mother of five sentenced to 26 months for throwing a can at the police and a man jailed for a Facebook post inciting racial hatred. The speaker concludes that the message is clear: disagreeing with the government results in imprisonment.

Families have lost everything as their loved ones are unlawfully imprisoned for minor infractions. One mother describes her son's experience of "diesel therapy," where he was moved between prisons, enduring terrible conditions, including contaminated water and solitary confinement. Communication with family and attorneys was severely restricted, making it nearly impossible to prepare a defense. She criticizes the current administration for violating constitutional rights and notes that her businesses faced harassment. Despite President Trump's recent pardon for her son, he remains incarcerated due to the actions of a local mayor who controls the facilities. Recently, her son was assaulted by prison staff while awaiting processing for release. A lawsuit has already been filed regarding his treatment, which continues to worsen.

Do parents in this country want their children taught that they can change their gender? A bishop was questioned about his silence on Enoch Burke, a teacher imprisoned for 500 days for refusing to use a student's preferred pronouns. Despite being close to the prison, the bishop expressed discomfort with the manner of questioning and had no response regarding Burke's situation. He focused instead on issues of religious rights for prisoners but ignored Burke's plight. This raises concerns about the church's role in addressing such matters, especially when a representative of Christ seems indifferent to a fellow Christian's suffering. The situation is troubling, particularly for Burke's family, who feel abandoned by church leaders who should be advocating for their rights and beliefs.