reSee.it - Related Video Feed

- The speaker asks Madam Secretary two questions: (1) Have you ever received an invitation like this from the FBI? (2) Do you plan on attending this meeting? The responses are: No and Yes. - The speaker notes that they’ve worked with the FBI before, citing past instances such as being swatted and white powder mailings in 2024. - They describe the current invitation as highly unusual and express concern, citing the president’s recent rhetoric about nationalizing elections.

The speaker mentions that the document was redacted to protect the source. They also mention that there are 17 voice recordings, two of which involve the current president. The speaker questions why this information was redacted and not given to the House Oversight.

Weeks of controversy over allegations of an improper romantic relationship between Fulton County District Attorney Fonny Willis and a special prosecutor in the 2020 election interference case culminated in a lengthy court filing from Willis. The filing, more than 170 pages, includes Willis’s admission of a “personal relationship” with special prosecutor Nathan Wade, but she asserts that relationship should not impact their roles in the case. In January, a defendant in the ongoing 2020 election case moved to disqualify Willis, arguing that she appointed Wade as a special prosecutor and that she financially benefited from the relationship. Willis’s latest motion disputes that portrayal. Eleven Alive previously reported that Wade paid for airline tickets for the pair to travel to San Francisco and Miami; Willis, however, writes that financial responsibility for personal travel is divided roughly evenly between the two, with all expenses paid using individual personal funds. The outlet had also reported that Wade was paid more than $500,000 more than the two other special prosecutors on the case; Willis contends Wade earned more money because he “made much more work.” Legal experts Daryl Cohen and Clark Cunningham offered differing views on how the filing might affect the case going into the February 15 hearing. Cohen suggested the judge could determine that the matter does not require disqualification but that the parties are under intense scrutiny. Cunningham anticipated the disqualification issue would not be resolved at the hearing and described the matter as very complicated. The February 15 hearing will be the first time these allegations are publicly addressed in open court. In a related matter, the US House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan released a letter indicating he subpoenaed documents from Willis. The subpoena seeks documents related to the DA’s use of federal funds after a conservative outlet published accusations that Willis fired an employee who attempted to halt the misuse of federal funds intended for youth gang prevention programs. The documents are also linked to the January 6 investigation. Atlanta News First political reporter Doug Reardon reported from outside the Fulton County Courthouse that the open records requests were issued through Georgia’s open records law. The judge, Robert McBurney, previously admonished Willis for not complying within required time frames, with the court asserting that Willis must turn over documents requested by the conservative nonprofit Judicial Watch. The judge stated that Willis had five days to produce the documents and that, according to him, the court had effectively declared a violation of the Open Records Act. Some communications, he noted, are of public interest and not protected by privilege.

"There's a there's a video there's a video that is circulating online now of the White House where a window is open to the residents upstairs, and somebody is throwing a big bag out the window." "No. That's probably AI generated." "So I actually, you can't open the windows. You know why? They're all heavily, armored and bulletproof." "So that's a fake a fake video?" "And number one, they're sealed. And number two, each window weighs about 600 pounds." "You have to be pretty strong to open them up." "Those windows are sealed. Those windows are all they're all sealed. You can't open them." "It looks like, this is on the Fifteenth Street side."

Hi, I'm James O'Keefe, an investigative reporter. I want to discuss your views on the deep state. Can you elaborate? I'm not interested in this conversation. But you've already spoken on it, and I have it recorded. What is your role at the White House? I advise on research and development policy. Are we done here? Have a nice night. You too. Have a good evening, Byron. There he goes, shuffling along.

In this video, the speaker reflects on the current state of the White House and how it is difficult to imagine two FBI agents being in the situation room. The speaker admits to sending the agents, which may not have been possible in a more organized investigation or administration. Typically, the FBI would coordinate with the White House counsel for interviews with senior officials, involving discussions and approvals. However, the speaker decided to send a couple of agents without going through the usual process, considering it was early in the investigation.

A journalist asks about a recent FBI action at the Fulton County, Georgia elections office, where twenty twenty ballots, voter rolls, and scanner images were seized. The journalist notes that the president claimed, “they got into the votes. You're going to see some interesting things happening,” and asks why the president was so involved in an FBI and DOJ raid. A spokesperson responds that the president’s statements do not imply his involvement. He emphasizes that this is a criminal grand jury investigation, and clarifies that there was a search warrant authorized by a federal judge, a magistrate judge in Atlanta, which allowed the FBI to seize the records. The spokesperson notes that the records have been seized by the FBI as part of the ongoing investigation. The journalist presses on what the investigation is about. The spokesperson reiterates that he cannot discuss specifics of any grand jury investigation, but previously stated that election integrity is of the highest importance to the American people, and that the efforts are aimed at ensuring free and fair elections for everyone in the country, Democrats and Republicans alike. The spokesperson adds that they are doing everything possible to uphold election integrity. The journalist mentions that in Georgia, claims of voter fraud related to the twenty twenty ballots have been debunked repeatedly and that there were multiple recounts. The transcript ends without further elaboration on those claims. Key points conveyed: - The FBI seized twenty twenty ballots, voter rolls, and scanner images from the Fulton County elections office. - The president suggested that “interesting things” would occur, prompting questions about his involvement. - A spokesperson denies the president’s involvement and describes the actions as part of a criminal grand jury investigation. - A federal magistrate judge in Atlanta issued the search warrant permitting the seizure; the FBI conducted the seizure. - The investigation’s specifics cannot be discussed, but officials assert a commitment to election integrity and ensuring free and fair elections for all Americans. - The dialogue references prior debunking of voter fraud claims in Georgia and multiple recounts, without presenting new specifics.

Thanks to whistleblowers within the FBI and Department of Justice, I can now share an FBI document, labeled 10/23, with the American people. This document sheds light on potential misconduct involving Vice President Biden and Hunter Biden. The FBI needs to clarify their actions regarding this matter. It's important for the American people to have access to the same information I read three months ago. It's worth noting that this document was unclassified, so there was no valid reason for it to take a year to become available to the public.

I'm at the airport, fresh from a White House meeting with President Trump, Vice President Vance, Attorney General Bondi, and FBI Director Patel. We were presented with a binder labeled "Epstein Files Phase One," meant to be transparent, per the President's order to declassify everything. Initially, Attorney General Bondi expected bombshells, the "dark stuff," but the binder wasn't what she anticipated. It felt incomplete. Then, late last night, a source from within the Southern District of New York (SDNY) contacted Bondi, revealing that the SDNY was concealing hundreds, maybe thousands, of additional Epstein-related documents from everyone, including the President.

I'm at the airport, and I want to discuss the Epstein files. I met with President Trump, Vice President Vance, Attorney General Bondi, and FBI Director Patel this morning at the White House. They presented me with a binder labeled "Epstein Files Phase One," ordered by Bondi and Patel. We were expecting bombshells, but the binder didn't contain any. Bondi mentioned that she had expected to find "juicy stuff" but didn't. Despite this, they prepared the binder for release, fulfilling the President's order for transparency. However, late last night, Bondi received a call from a source within the FBI, Southern District of New York, revealing that hundreds, if not thousands, of other documents and files were being hidden from everyone. They were hiding it from the President, the Vice President, the Attorney General, the FBI Director, and you.

Thanks to whistleblowers within the FBI and Department of Justice, I can now release an FBI document, labeled 10/23, that sheds light on potential misconduct involving Vice President Biden and Hunter Biden. It's important for the American people to have access to this information, which I read three months ago. This document is unclassified, so there was no valid reason for it to take a year to become public. Now, it's up to the FBI to disclose their actions regarding this matter.

There were multiple improbable factors that would have had to align for these bombs to be discovered at the same time on a sidewalk, prompting questions about a broader conspiracy and how such a scenario could unfold. The speakers emphasize that while they want to avoid a conspiracy path, there are many questions still open, including the handling of video footage. Regarding video records, one speaker notes that they want to review January 6 video to see if anyone returned to the locations, but that video apparently does not exist anymore. They do have January 5 video, but have been told that no one preserved January 6. This raises eyebrows as they consider whether the devices were placed by an inexperienced person who was trying to set them down quickly or whether the devices were left to be found. Mrs. Younger’s account is highlighted: she walked out her back door and did not see anything earlier in the morning, but saw the devices later, which would give a reason to believe she would have noticed them if they had been there in the morning. This observation is part of why they want to talk to her. One speaker is blown away by a point: according to the FBI, the FBI’s internal data indicate 39,000 videos showing the hoodie-clad pipe bomber—referred to as the C. Virkel bomber—movements that night, from various camera angles. Washington, DC, Capitol Hill is described as among the most surveilled areas in the world. Yet there is a claim that there is no footage from January 6 of the actual areas a person would have had to travel to place the pipe bombs. The other speaker confirms that there are cameras along some Capitol Police lines that show walking paths, including footage from Capitol Police cameras, but the angles that would show positions behind the RNC and behind the DNC do not exist today, at least not in a way that captures the relevant movements. This absence has limited the investigation into the theory that the devices could have been placed earlier and then moved or re-placed. They are now going back through Capitol Police footage, including from the Fairchild Building near the DNC, which has provided the most evidence so far. The team is reviewing hours from about 8 PM on May 5 to 1 PM on January 6 to determine whether anyone else passed by, whether there was any suspicious activity, and whether the devices were moved again. The investigators are evaluating step-by-step explanations for these anomalies, considering whether the Secret Service dog failed to detect one device or whether Mrs. Younger missed the other, whether the devices were not present at that time, or whether weather and other factors affected detections. They acknowledge that with so many circumstances, some “smoke” might indicate “fire.” They hope the FBI is reviewing cell phone data to determine if the suspected bomber returned or if a co-conspirator was involved in setting timers or re-placing devices. The transcript ends with an acknowledgment of ongoing investigation scope and questions.

Opposition research firm Marco Polo released unverified documents alleging that private attorney Nathan Wade, appointed by Fannie Willis as a special prosecutor, billed Fulton County for two meetings with the White House. Wade supposedly charged $250 per hour for his services during these meetings, one in May and another in November 2022, shortly after Donald Trump announced his presidential candidacy. This evidence suggests a conspiracy by the White House to undermine Joe Biden's primary opponent in the 2024 election. Such suspicions have been long-held in the four cases against Trump, although they have always been denied.

I've seen chatter online, especially from Kash Patel, about the delay in releasing the Epstein files. Well, I'm reporting live from outside the West Wing to show you that the wait is over. We've got the Epstein files right here. Let's make America safe again.

I never traveled to DC with Mr. Wade for personal or business reasons. We have never been in DC at the same time. I have been to DC for an interview at Howard University and the Global Summit, but not with Mr. Wade. I did not visit the White House during my trips to DC.

I'm here in front of the White House with an Epstein file binder. To be clear, the Trump administration didn't give us these files to disseminate. They indicated a press conference is coming soon where all the information in this binder will be made public. Pam Bondi mentioned some of the information is already public and might not be a "smoking gun." The main point is Pam writing to Kash Patel, requesting an investigation into why the FBI halted the release of other Epstein files. We aren't deciding what gets released; all the information in this binder will be public. Pam Bondi wants all Epstein files public, not just to select individuals. The Trump admin is pushing for transparency and welcoming independent journalists who may have faced censorship. They're allowing American citizens to directly engage with top officials, like the president and Kash Patel, about their plans for the country. A press conference is coming, and all of this information will be made public.

The speaker states their team contacted Vice President Harris' and President Trump's teams to discuss ideas. The speaker emphasizes the importance of personal life over politics. They are in Trump Tower and have just interviewed President Trump, calling it a great interview that will be posted next week.

The transcript centers on a heated discussion about President Joe Biden’s health, cognitive fitness, and who was calling the shots within the White House during his presidency. Key points and claims raised include: - The campaign and public discourse about the president’s fitness or age were prominent, with questions such as “Was the number one issue in the campaign the president's fitness or his age?” and assertions about visibility, including whether “you ever see president Biden in a wheelchair?” While some speakers note aging and physical signs—“I noticed that, you know, he shuffled more,” and “he has more stumbling over words and gasps than he did” — others maintain confidence in his capabilities, claiming he was “on top of things” and that “his mental acuity is great. It's fine. It's as good as it's been over the years.” - There are allegations of a cover-up by insiders. The narrative asserts “new information now on the people in his inner circle and how the cover up actually operated,” with “Senior aids that worked here until just a couple months ago, the beginning of this year, manipulating an ailing president for their own gain.” A figure asks, “How much were you paid for your role in the campaign in 2024?” with the response “Just a little bit short of $4,000,000.” The implication is that financial incentives influenced actions. - Internal discussions about the president’s decline and how it was handled are described as ongoing. “The official word from Biden world about all these new stories is that nothing has been revealed this week that shows that president Biden was anything but effective president.” There is mention of a senior-level discussion about whether the president should have a cognitive exam. - Testimony from Annie Thomas Seen, former senior adviser to Biden, is presented as significant. She “has now taken the fifth,” and the transcript notes “There is now a pattern of key Biden confidant seeking to shield themselves from criminal liability for this potential conspiracy.” She invokes the Fifth Amendment when asked about being told to lie about the president’s health. - There are explosive claims regarding Hunter Biden’s role. One speaker says, “Hunter was driving the decision making for the family. He was almost like a chief of staff.” There are references to an uptick in activity when Hunter Biden was around, and discussions about pardons for Hunter, with the line “Yes. Were you in favor of Hunter Biden getting a pardon?” indicating support for clemency. - The “auto pen” controversy is described. Speakers discuss whether the president’s name was “hand signed” or “auto pen” used for documents, with questions such as “Did he hand sign all executive orders?” and claims that “the auto bin” or “auto pen” was used and that some believed others may have instructed staff to use it. There is mention that some staff “did not know who was operating the Obalon/auto pen,” and that “an executive order” and “memo” details existed but were not definitively known to those questioned. - Media portrayal and public perception are addressed. Some speakers accuse the legacy media of denial about cognitive decline, while others defend the president’s sharpness, noting that this debate is framed by evolving video and audio coverage, including discussions of “cheap fakes” versus real footage. - Additional context touches on Medicare drug price negotiations as a policy objective, with a line about “the ability of Medicare to negotiate drug prices with big pharma,” and the belief that “if we finally beat Medicare” would be a significant achievement. There are repeated assertions that those who knew and understood cognitive issues took control, implying a broader conspiracy. - Throughout, witnesses emphasize that their statements are contextualized within interviews and testimony, with ongoing questions about who was directing the White House and the true state of the president’s health and decision-making.

The speaker was asked if they would get rid of the Tesla and Starlink service at the White House. The speaker responded no, stating they may move the Tesla around a little bit, but that Starlink is a good service. When asked where they would move the Tesla, the speaker said they have a lot of locations. The speaker was then asked if they ever saw Elon Musk get physical with the treasury secretary. The speaker responded no, stating they had an argument, but didn't see any physicality. The speaker was then asked about a New York Times report alleging that Elon Musk was blurring the lines between recreational use of drugs and medicinal use towards the end of his time in the White House, and whether the speaker thought Musk ever had drugs at the White House. The speaker responded that they didn't know, and hoped not, wishing Musk well and stating they had a good relationship.

The White House confirmed Letitia James and Fannie Willis visited before suing Trump. Willis appointed her alleged lover to prosecute Trump, paying him $650,000 in taxpayer money. Nathan Wade conspired with the White House, billing them for meetings. Willis also collaborated with Adam Schiff on the January 6th case. Republicans were barred from the committee, which later destroyed evidence. Is the Biden White House orchestrating Trump's prosecution? - Armstrong Williams. Translation: The White House confirmed that Letitia James and Fannie Willis visited before suing Trump. Willis appointed her alleged lover to prosecute Trump, paying him $650,000 in taxpayer money. Nathan Wade conspired with the White House, billing them for meetings. Willis also collaborated with Adam Schiff on the January 6th case. Republicans were barred from the committee, which later destroyed evidence. Is the Biden White House orchestrating Trump's prosecution? - Armstrong Williams.

We received a couple hundred pages of documents from the FBI, but a source told me there were more at the Southern District of New York. I gave them a deadline, and we got thousands of pages. The FBI is reviewing them, and Director Patel is preparing a detailed report on why the FBI withheld these documents. These documents include flight logs, names, and victim names, but we believe there's more. The FBI just received these thousands of pages, and protecting victims is a priority. We believe in transparency, and America has the right to know. The Biden administration claimed no one did anything with these documents, but why were they in the Southern District of New York? I want a full report. We will redact national security information and grand jury information, but the public will know why.

The speaker states that Pam Bondi claimed to have ten thousand hours of video. The speaker had dinner with the Vice President who told them that the video was commercial pornography. According to the Vice President, the videos do not show any powerful person in a compromising position, which is the party line. The speaker questions why Pam Bondi would call it evidence if that is the case.

In this video, the speaker gives step-by-step instructions for a meeting with wind industry executives. They mention entering the Roosevelt Room, greeting everyone, taking a seat, giving brief comments, and thanking the participants. However, these instructions were accidentally exposed when Biden flipped over the paper to look at notes on the back of the car.

The investigation centers on Thomas Escato, a current Secret Service agent on the vice president JD Vance’s security detail, who was exposed by undercover journalists from O’Keefe Media Group. The reporters met Escato via Tinder in October 2025 and documented that he was a holdover from the Biden administration, originally tasked with protecting Kamala Harris and Doug Emhoff. He is described as involved in protecting the vice president’s transportation, residence surveillance, and even Vance’s wife and children. Key revelations include Escato sharing highly sensitive, real-time and historical security information with an undercover journalist who posed as a stranger. He discussed protective formations, shift-change times, and exact travel plans, including the routes and times for the vice president’s convoy, as well as the specific vehicles involved. He sent photos with location metadata revealing convoy locations from various international and domestic contexts, including Joint Base Andrews, Munich, King Khalid International Airport, JFK, and Abu Dhabi, among others. Metadata and photos indicated where the vice president’s convoy had been and the routes used, sometimes with dates months prior to disclosure. Escato provided ongoing updates on the vice president’s movements, including the time and place of the vice president’s flights, which plane would be used, and the journalist’s implication in following the movements. He sent a selfie from inside a venue associated with the vice president, and even images from inside the Naval Observatory, where the vice president’s residence is located. He also described the journalist’s ability to “follow” the vice president’s movements and the security details surrounding transport and protection. The exchange included intimate details about the vice president’s family logistics, such as transportation of Vance’s wife and mentions of the residence and school arrangements for his children, with a recurring theme of the idea that “we call them everywhere” and that “there’s a 24/7” aspect to the protection. Escato claimed knowledge of future travel plans, including a four- to five-day stay in Ohio and a one-night visit to Florida, and he described the existence of a “cover subpoena” related to counter-surveillance duties. Escato also disclosed personal political opinions: he voted for Biden, dislikes Trump, and opposes Vance’s immigration policies, including ICE-related concerns. He described his citizenship status (citizen since 2018) and stated his tenure as a Secret Service agent as five years. He asserted it is his First Amendment right to express opinions, while acknowledging the potential implications of his disclosures, noting that he “sign paperwork” and that if he doesn’t disclose information, “I never do. Otherwise, I get in trouble.” The reporting emphasizes that such behavior inside the Secret Service is troubling, especially given prior security lapses in 2024 that led to the head of the Secret Service resigning after an incident in Butler, Pennsylvania. The piece concludes by asserting the importance of protecting the vice president’s security, hoping the story prompts reforms and accountability, and inviting readers to share tips with O’Keefe Media Group.

My team found evidence that former Vice President Biden kept classified materials after leaving office. In an audio recording, Biden told his ghostwriter he found classified documents in his home as a private citizen in Virginia.