TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

As a child, the speaker received three vaccines. By 1986, children received 11 doses of five vaccines. Now, children in states with mandates may receive 69 to 92 vaccines between conception and age 18, with varying dose requirements depending on the brand. Each vaccine is designed to permanently alter the immune system. The speaker believes this contributes to an epidemic of immune dysregulation. The speaker suggests vaccines could be a key culprit in the rise of diseases like diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, seizure disorders, ADD, ADHD, speech delay, language delay, tics, Tourette's syndrome, narcolepsy, and autism, which the speaker claims were rare in their childhood. The speaker believes this generation is damaged by these diseases.

Speaker 1 shares a heartbreaking story about their 2-month-old baby who fell unconscious and passed away after receiving vaccinations. The baby had been healthy and didn't require any medical assistance prior to this appointment. The autopsy revealed an anaphylactic adverse reaction to the vaccines. Today marks the 4th anniversary of the baby's passing. The speaker expresses gratitude for the support and aims to raise awareness about the issue. They mention having two more children who are not vaccinated and are healthy. The speaker believes that health doesn't come from vaccines and hopes that more people will realize this for the well-being of children.

The speaker asserts that the MMR and MMR V vaccines have been linked to two thousand six hundred percent more deaths than measles infection since 1995. The claim is that for the past thirty years, the MMR shots have killed far more children than measles, and that hundreds of infants and toddlers died after these shots, often from SIDS (sudden infant death syndrome), cardiac arrest, seizures, and encephalitis. The speaker emphasizes that these shots are killing some of these children, with most deaths occurring within about two weeks after the shot, and forty percent dying within one week. The speaker notes that the temporality checks out and that most of these deaths occurred at ages one to one and a half, right when they receive the MMR shots. The speaker reports that twenty-five percent of these deaths were classified as sudden infant death syndrome. The speaker describes babies dying in their sleep as a result of these shots and calls the situation absolutely disturbing and particular in terms of the causes of death. In summary, the speaker states that all of this combined in the study shows unequivocally that these shots are deadly, and concludes that the MMR and MMRV shots should not be given anymore. The suggestion is to split them up if parents still want them, rather than administering the full combination.

Speaker 0/J: The discussion centers on a study with dramatic implications, including claims that publishing such data could be career-ending, and questions about why the data would be so catastrophic. Speaker 2: The study involved eighteen thousand four hundred sixty eight subjects, of which one thousand nine hundred fifty seven were fully unvaccinated. When comparing the health outcomes of the vaccinated versus the unvaccinated, they found an increased risk in the vaccinated of several chronic health conditions. The vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis—specifically four point two nine times in the adjusted analysis—and they note there are studies showing a range from three point two six to five point six five. Speaker 1: They also found three times the risk for atopic diseases. Speaker 2: Atopic diseases are described as a subset of allergic diseases. Speaker 1: They found an almost six times risk for autoimmune disease. Speaker 3: The autoimmune diseases this paper looked at include thrombocytopenic purpura, rheumatoid arthritis, SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus, MS, multiple sclerosis, and Guillain Barre syndrome. They mention there are over 80 different autoimmune diseases, and their data showed for autoimmunity a six times increase in those who got vaccines when compared to the unvaccinated. Speaker 2: This is presented as staggering because autoimmune disorders represent significant morbidity and health costs and suffering accrued over a lifetime. Neurodevelopmental disorders are also discussed. Speaker 0: What kind numbers we talked about? Do you remember? Speaker 1: Five and a half times risk for neurodevelopmental disorders. Speaker 2: They state the immune system is intimately connected with both brain development and brain functioning, and so when the immune system gets triggered by illness, potentially by vaccination, you can get neuropsychiatric symptoms presumably related to brain inflammation and immune processes in the brain. Speaker 0: Two point nine two times the amount of motor disabilities, four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated, Speaker 3: Three times the rate of developmental delay. They found the same patterns as with allergy and autoimmunity. Also, six times more acute and chronic ear infections. Speaker 2: Interestingly, there were several health conditions where they couldn't even do this analysis because there were none in the unvaccinated group. The mathematical formulas require non-zero counts in both groups to compare risk. Speaker 1: For example, there were two sixty two children who had ADHD in the vaccinated group. Amongst the unvaccinated group, there were zero cases of ADHD. Speaker 3: These results are described as mind boggling. Conditions were not found at all in almost two thousand unvaccinated kids: zero brain dysfunction, zero diabetes, zero behavioral problems, zero learning disabilities, zero intellectual disabilities, zero tics, and zero other psychological disabilities in the unvaccinated.

In 1985, millennials received a few vaccines. Today, children may receive up to 70 shots by age 18, including 27 before age 2, and up to 6 shots in one visit. The speaker asks if these shots are producing healthier kids, and claims the data says no. The speaker suggests that asking questions about the vaccine schedule is discouraged. Some parents who question the schedule may be reported to Child Protection Services or dismissed from their pediatrician's office. The speaker asserts that parents are being held hostage and did not sign up to co-parent with the government.

The speaker discusses the timing of vaccinations and crib deaths, noting most crib deaths occur in children under one year old due to underdeveloped immune systems and CYP450 enzymes. They mention a hypothesis suggesting some children receive too many shots in their first year, without full analysis of ingredients. The speaker claims that in Japan, moving the first vaccination age to two years old led to a virtual disappearance of crib deaths and related claims. They also state that non-vaccine-associated SIDS cases cluster in the winter and fall. They recount a story about a podcaster with eight children whose unvaccinated child died of SIDS, leading to intense police scrutiny. They clarify that SIDS can occur in unvaccinated children, though it is rarer and has a different timing pattern.

Speaker 0 describes a photo sent to Laura around Christmas last year: a 12-year-old boy with more than 50 pharmaceutical bottles in front of him, representing the prescriptions he took that year. The speaker asserts that this is about money, stating that the pharmaceutical industry and doctors aim to make children customers for life, and that if they can break children early, they give them asthma, allergies, eczema, ADD, ADHD, insulin-dependent diabetes, a long list of neurological problems, and cancers from an early age; all of those pills are the reason they do this. The speaker notes a correlation with POTS (postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome) and links it to Gardasil and to the COVID shot, while saying it can be associated with other vaccines too because of Guillain-Barré syndrome. The speaker mentions that their daughter has Guillain-Barré syndrome. They reiterate that all of those pills, though not every child takes that many prescriptions, almost all have something—an inhaler, something for headaches, something for something—due to disruption of their immune system that happened when they were six, eight, or ten pounds old. The speaker emphasizes that this disruption is intentional and that this part is particularly sinister.

Jeremy, a 17-year-old boy, experienced severe health issues after receiving multiple vaccines in one day. He now struggles with seizures, rage episodes, and infections affecting his brain. His parents regret vaccinating him and feel betrayed by medical professionals. Despite the challenges, they express love and support for Jeremy. They believe his suffering could have been prevented. The family is determined to advocate for vaccine safety and support their son's recovery.

As a child, the speaker received three vaccines; by 1986, children received 11 doses of five vaccines. Now, children in states with mandates may receive 69 to 92 vaccines between conception and age 18, with varying dose requirements depending on the brand. Each vaccine is designed to permanently alter the immune system. The speaker believes this contributes to an epidemic of immune dysregulation. The speaker claims there is a rise in diseases like diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, seizure disorders, ADD, ADHD, speech delay, language delay, tics, Tourette's syndrome, narcolepsy, and autism, which they rarely saw as a child, suggesting this generation is damaged by these diseases.

According to the speaker, big pharma breaks children through routine well visits. Healthy babies receive multiple vaccines, leading to chronic ear infections and fevers, which are treated with antibiotics and Tylenol. This progresses to eczema, gut issues, and food allergies, with doctors dismissing them as normal while administering more vaccines. The child then develops asthma and ADHD, requiring steroids, Ritalin, and lifelong medication, making them a lifelong customer. The speaker claims that mothers are brainwashed into thanking the system that harmed their children, and that a healthy child isn't profitable to big pharma.

The speaker claims the six-month well baby visit is the most dangerous because babies get 10 vaccines at once. The newborn Hep B vaccine contains a dangerous form of aluminum. The one-year or 15-month visit is also risky due to the MMR vaccine's "undeniable" relationship to autism. At that visit, children may also receive chicken pox, Hep B, Prevnar, Tdap, COVID, and flu shots. The MMR and chickenpox vaccines contain four live viruses, which is a high risk for seizures. The speaker alleges vaccines load children with aluminum, creating inflammation, leaky gut, and leaky brain. Giving live viruses to children in this state causes brain inflammation and regression into autism. The vaccine schedule is a disaster and has never been studied in its entirety. Individual vaccines have not been studied with a proper placebo and only look at short-term side effects.

At the pediatric office, one twin screams while the other gets shots. The nurse accidentally gives an extra shot to the screaming twin. The next day, the baby shows signs of distress and is later diagnosed with autism. The mother feels guilty but decides not to vaccinate the other twin. Despite the challenges, she is grateful that her son is alive, but her dreams for his future seem distant.

After receiving the vaccine, the speaker experienced multiple seizures daily, followed by paralysis. Their baby also started showing abnormal behaviors like head nodding, tongue protrusion, and hand flapping. The speaker stopped vaccinating their children and focused on detoxing. Although their baby has a speech delay, they believe she will improve. The speaker experienced brain fog, difficulty with basic tasks, vertigo, and exercise intolerance. They also had trouble reading and experienced visual disturbances. The seizures eventually became controlled with medication. The speaker attributes all of these symptoms to the Pfizer vaccine.

The documentary follows a growing concern: the rise of chronic illness and neurodevelopmental disorders in American children, with speakers outlining striking statistics, personal stories, and contested science around vaccines. Key facts and patterns: - A shift from decades ago to today: more than forty percent of American children now have at least one chronic health condition; estimates cited include that over fifty-four percent of kids have a chronic disease, up from twelve point eight percent in the 1980s. One speaker emphasizes that in forty years there has been “the greatest decline in human health ever recorded.” - Autism rates have surged: just a few decades ago, one in ten thousand children had autism; today, one in thirty-one. Other listed conditions include ADD/ADHD, tics/Tourette’s, narcolepsy, sleep disorders, IBS, autoimmune diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile diabetes, lupus, Crohn’s), eczema, asthma, seizures, and various neurological issues. - The central question raised: what is causing this epidemic of chronic illness in kids? The film argues that rapid increases in incidence cannot be explained by genetic change alone, which would take generations. Story and study arc: - The narrative centers on a scientist who was willing to conduct a study into vaccine safety and vaccine injury, but who faced career-risking consequences when attempting to publish or disseminate results. - The film’s narrator and investigators say they compiled hidden-camera testimonies, interviews, and raw stories from parents whose children experienced serious adverse events after vaccines (eczema, seizures, chronic GI issues, sleep apnea, language loss, autonomic and neurological symptoms, and death in some cases). Stories include a child who lost language after vaccination, triplets who regressed into severe autism after their pneumococcal shot, and families describing chronic, ongoing medical crises following vaccines. - The film frames a broader debate: vaccines are safe and effective, with extensive global use and long-standing public health endorsement. Yet it argues that the vaccine safety narrative lacks certain types of trials, particularly double-blind placebo-controlled trials for childhood vaccines. It claims that, in some cases, no such trials exist prior to licensure, and that post-licensure safety surveillance is limited or incomplete. Vaccine safety testing and regulatory claims: - The film argues that none of the 72 vaccine doses on the childhood schedule has ever been subjected to a pre-licensure double-blind placebo-controlled trial, which is presented as the gold standard of safety testing. It asserts that safety assessments and post-licensure surveillance often rely on observational data rather than randomized trials. - A critical example is the hepatitis B vaccine (Recombivax HB): the FDA-approved trial cited shows safety monitoring for only five days after each dose, with no placebo control. The film argues this is insufficient to detect autoimmune or neurodevelopmental issues that could emerge years later. - Dr. Stanley Plotkin, a leading vaccine expert, is interviewed regarding whether five days of safety monitoring captures potential autoimmune or neurological adverse events; the dialogue suggests concern about the adequacy of such safety windows and controls. - The documentary presents the notion that the absence of a placebo-controlled vaccine safety trial is used to argue safety, while retrospective studies and unblinded cohort analyses hints at potential signals that would merit more rigorous testing. Henry Ford Health System and the “vaccinated vs unvaccinated” study: - Dell and others pursue a vaccinated-versus-unvaccinated study using Henry Ford Health System data, with the aim of comparing health outcomes in vaccinated and unvaccinated children. They argue that this kind of retrospective cohort study can reveal safety signals when randomized trials are unavailable. - The study reportedly found that vaccination exposure was associated with higher risks of several chronic conditions, including asthma, atopic diseases, autoimmune diseases (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, SLE, Guillain-Barré syndrome), and neurodevelopmental disorders. They summarize that by ten years, 57% of vaccinated children had a chronic health condition versus 17% of unvaccinated children; overall, two to four times higher risks across several categories were reported, with notable differences in neurodevelopmental outcomes. - The study reportedly found zero chronic conditions in the unvaccinated group for several categories, though the vaccinated group showed higher incidence in many categories. Autism did not reach statistical significance in this study due to small numbers. The presenters emphasize that retrospective studies have limitations (confounding, follow-up length, healthcare-seeking behavior), but argue that the signal deserves publication and replication. - The Henry Ford study reportedly faced professional and institutional barriers: a threat of defamation, failed attempts to publish, and internal resistance. The documentary showcases a dinner meeting where Dr. Marcus Zervos expresses willingness to publish but ultimately faces career risk, leading to discussions about “Galileo moments” and whether data should be released despite pushback. Industry and public health responses: - The film juxtaposes the public health consensus—vaccines save lives, the schedule is well tested, and billions of people have been studied—with dissenting voices from physicians, scientists, and parents who argue that independent, large-scale vaccinated-versus-unvaccinated analyses are necessary to truly assess safety outcomes. - It includes testimonials from doctors who faced professional pushback after expressing concerns about broader vaccine safety questions or demonstrating adverse effects in patient populations. - The documentary frames a call to replicate the retrospective study in other large health systems (e.g., Kaiser Permanente, Harvard Pilgrim, CDC’s VSD) to determine whether the Henry Ford findings hold across populations, and whether impaired health outcomes correlate with the breadth of vaccination exposure. Conclusion and call to action: - The film asserts that if the data are valid, this would constitute a sea-change in our understanding of off-target and nonspecific effects of vaccination and would necessitate reconsidering how the vaccination program is designed and implemented. - Viewers are urged to consider the evidence, demand replication, and reflect on the moral and ethical implications of vaccine safety research, balancing public health benefits with potential risks, and exploring alternate strategies to protect child health.

A child allegedly received dangerous vaccinations at age one while sick with a cold and constipation. Medical professionals reportedly did not disclose potential side effects. Shortly after the vaccinations, the child's eyes rolled back, she foamed at the mouth, and had multiple seizures at St. Vincent's Hospital in Pennsylvania. She went into cardiac arrest, and after 40 minutes of CPR, medical staff declared the baby dead. The parents claim they expected to be fully informed of any potential risks and given the choice to proceed with vaccination. They advise others to ask questions and do their own research before vaccinating their children, as medical professionals may not provide complete or accurate information.

Following the rollout of vaccination programs in the 1960s, crib death began to appear, becoming the number one cause of infant death by 1969. Doctors may have a psychology that prevents them from seeing the harms of treatments they give, believing what they are told about safety. A mother reported that her fraternal twins, Dallas and Tyson Shaw, born premature, received DPT, flu, and Hep A vaccines at 18 months old. The mother had concerns about the flu vaccine due to family history but was reassured of its safety. The next morning, the twins were limp and without energy. They were taken to the ER, where a doctor suspected a reaction to the vaccination, but they were sent home. One week later, the twins were found dead in their sleep. The mother stated that the day before their death was their best day since the vaccination. Their health status changed leading up to their death.

Our next witness is miss Polly Tommy. Miss Tommy is the director of children's health defense. My son, Billy, entered the world as a healthy, perfect baby with an Apgar score that reflected his perfection. The day he received the MMR vaccine hours after the vaccination, Billy's perfect world shattered. He became lethargic, sleeping for long stretches. My husband came home that afternoon and went to check on him, Billy was convulsing. His tiny body gripped by seizures. We rushed him to hospital desperate for answers, but the doctors, after hearing he'd had the MMR said, it's perfectly normal, it's perfectly common. Lots of children have seizures. He'll be fine. No more Pfizer sponsored science.

The child we brought home from the doctor's office is not the same that we brought to the doctor's office. Well, it means that my son was changed by the vaccine shot. The first day that we took our son Joshua to the doctor for his well baby visit, we had a healthy baby. Twenty one days after that doctor's visit, he had his first grand mal seizure. What happened is that my son developed an uncontrolled seizure disorder following that vaccination shot, and it's a seizure disorder he had for his entire life. I didn't make a conscious decision to take my son to the doctor that day for his vaccine shot. I just did what was expected of me. I put in zero research into what they were getting injected into my son that day.

We have triplets, two boys and a girl, Richie, Robbie, and Claire. Every day in our life was a party. Every single day, they were smiling and laughing and looking at each other, engaging in each other. On 06/25/2007, we brought him in for the pneumococcal shot. My daughter still has the mark on her leg from the shot. She was the first one to get it, and she screamed and never really stopped screaming after that. But we continue we didn't know. We did the boys as well. By noon, Claire shut completely off. It was as if she was blind and deaf, and all she did at that moment was stare at the ceiling fan. So that was at noon. We had the shot at 10AM. By 02:00, we watched Richie shut off. They lost all their reflexes. I'm an educational audiologist. I actually did the test for the stapedial reflex, which is a little muscle in the middle ear just to see if a muscle they can't control was still working, and it it didn't. The stapedial reflex dampens sound so your ears don't hurt from a really loud sound, and both of them had no stapedial reflex. They stopped blinking, stopped yawning, stopped coughing, stopped sneezing. The worst is when we saw the final one shut down. We were told it was genetic, and then we were told by geneticists that there's no possible way three children would shut off on the same day. So we had severe autism spectrum disorder for all three kids entering kindergarten. We have spent hundreds of thousands of dollars trying to recover them. The only person that we got back is Rich Robbie, the one that was last to shut off. Richie can only say single, maybe two words together. Claire is still completely nonverbal, not potty trained, and Robbie is approaching grade level but severe OCD. Let me tell you what a day in our life isn't. So you got, say, a six or seven or eight year old child who's not potty trained, and at two or three or 04:00 in the morning, they fill their diaper. I want you to assume that's pretty uncomfortable, so they take it off. Pretty soon pretty soon it's all over them. It's all over the bed. In short order, it's all over me. It's all over her. Mhmm. I'm snapping at her. She's snapping at me. We're both snapping at the kid who is the only innocent party in the whole scenario. And the one thing that's conspicuously absent from that scenario is is anybody who told you that shot was safe. They're all asleep in their bed. They haven't got a problem in the world. There were lines down the block everywhere we went. Look at this crowd behind me. Look at this line. It goes on and on and on. In fact, the very first day we screened at Angelica Film Center in New York, I wanted to know why there's this giant line down the block. What are these people here for? Can every parent or someone, you know, if you have a family member with autism, would you please stand up right now? Like, see. Three quarters of the room stood up. I remember feeling like the air just got sucked out of the room. I had no idea that there was this many people suffering from this issue. I ended up asking that question three screenings a day, five days a week, for an entire year. And every single time, three quarters of the room stood up. I realized I had stumbled on something absolutely massive.

A 2-month-old boy's life is described as destroyed after receiving DTaP, HIB, and polio vaccines at 4 months. The speaker states the child is frozen in time due to the shots. At a 2-month well-baby visit, a child receives DPT (3 antigens), HIB, Prevnar, Hep B, polio, and rotavirus, totaling 6 shots and 8 antigens. Some people interviewed had to remain outside the bus due to their condition. The speaker says, "We are going to stop this because this see? She knows," while addressing a child named Kelsey.

Every day was a party for our family. We brought our children in for vaccines, starting with the pneumococcal shot. After the shot, our daughter Claire shut off, becoming blind and deaf. Our son Ritchie followed suit, losing his ability to interact and thrive. They lost their reflexes and showed no response to stimuli. Rosie shut down next, leaving us devastated. Finally, Robbie had a stunned expression and acted deaf, although his hearing was normal. Three months after the shot, our children were no longer engaged, lost their smiles, and lived in their own separate worlds. They never held hands or looked at each other again.

Speaker 0 asserts that the MMR and MMR V vaccines have been linked to two thousand six hundred percent more deaths than measles infection since 1995. The speaker claims that, over the past thirty years, the MMR shots have killed far more children than measles, identifying hundreds of infants and toddlers who died after these shots, often from SIDS, sudden infant death syndrome, cardiac arrest, seizures, and encephalitis. The speaker states that most of these deaths occurred within about two weeks after the shot, with forty percent dying within one week. The deaths are described as temporally linked to the vaccination, with the majority of fatalities occurring at ages one to one and a half, which the speaker notes as the time they receive the MMR shots. The speaker claims that twenty-five percent of these deaths were classified as sudden infant death syndrome. The overall claim is that these shots are killing the babies in their sleep, described as absolutely disturbing and as part of a broader study. The speaker concludes that the shots are deadly and that the MMR and MMRV shots should not be given anymore; if parents still want them, they should be split up rather than administered as a combined dose, labeling the current approach as “the full load of garbage.”

Speaker 0 describes starting leucovirin for her five-year-old son, who is nonverbal and low-functioning autistic. She notes that he wasn’t always this way: up until about a year and a half to two years old, he knew words and could put one or two words together, though he couldn’t form sentences. She mentions an incident she cannot discuss openly due to TikTok regulations; she says they took down the video where she tried to talk about what happened. She asserts that right after that incident, her son had a steep decline in language and hadn’t spoken since. She reports that her son has been on leucovirin for less than forty-eight hours and has spoken for the first time. She emphasizes that her nonverbal son spoke for the first time in over three years. She says she has been praying daily for an answer and for her son to be healed. She states that all this time, they have had Luke Overn sitting on the shelves. She directly urges other parents of nonverbal autistic children to get their child on Luke Covrin as soon as possible, asserting that this is the answer they have all been praying for.

The speaker, recently retired from a local hospital, claims widespread disbelief in flu shots among colleagues due to data issues, stating "the efficacy and I won't give you data. You created the data. Ten percent one year, eighteen percent the next, forty percent at best." They describe the flu vaccine given to children aged two to eight for nearly four years as ineffective, with a claimed three percent efficacy at times. The speaker contrasts this with their hospital experience, where doctors, nurses, medical assistants, patient care, and lab staff did not believe in the flu shot, until mandates and recommendations arrived. They express relief at retirement, saying their soul was sick about what they witnessed, and that conflicts of interest prevented them from speaking out while employed. They recount working on high-volume ER days with about 300 flu cases daily and claim they never contracted the flu, attributing this to personal practices: washing hands, taking vitamin D, and using a berry syrup. The speaker criticizes the shift from physicians and nurses to pharmacists administering the vaccine, accuses the system of bribing people with Target gift cards and marketing the vaccine as free, and denounces scare tactics. They observe an increase in vaccination across generations, noting "some of you are my age," with their generation having seven shots, their daughter ten, her son around sixty, and their new grandson expected to receive seventy-two vaccines, expressing shock at this escalation. The speaker references Robert F. Kennedy Jr., saying he fights for them and goes to court for kids who suffered, noting that Kennedy's family started Special Olympics. They claim that in Kennedy’s view, autism linked to vaccines is evident since there were no autistic kids in the past four decades, and allege that vaccines have caused autism. They describe watching a perfectly healthy two-year-old become a "severe autistic child" after vaccination, expressing certainty that autism exists because of vaccines. They forecast their 10-year-old grandson becoming an adult who, at age 40, would be walking in the mall with a diaper and a helmet. The speaker ends by thanking studies they claim are not done and reiterates their stance against vaccines, including autism implications, as presented in the narrative.

Speaker 0 argues that adverse events from regular vaccines are far more common than people imagine, including allergies. They state their personal allergy to wheat is likely the result of an adjuvant that caused their immune system to react to something normal in their gut in a way from which they will never be free. They also point to their children: one son has significant seasonal allergies that interfere with daily life, and another son has an allergy to dairy which they believe goes back to an allergy to mother's milk, noting that he spit up regularly after breastfeeding and that this perplexed them at the time. They describe this as a huge waste of a precious resource and remark that it seems like evolution messed up, especially given that ancestors faced scarcity and would not want to surrender nutrients when food was plentiful. They now think that the dairy allergy developed very early, probably from an adjuvant in a childhood vaccine. In tying these observations together, Speaker 0 uses their education and what they describe as painful education to make a concluding point. If they could start over, they would not give any vaccines to their newborn children. They clarify that they are not claiming it is impossible that some vaccines could be more beneficial than they are harmful, but they now know that they cannot trust safety testing. Therefore, even if there were indications that something might be net beneficial, they would have to wonder what is hidden or not known. Overall, the speaker presents a personal narrative linking vaccines to the development of allergies in themselves and their children, uses this to argue a broader distrust of vaccine safety testing, and concludes that, given their current understanding, they would choose not to vaccinate newborns despite acknowledging that some vaccines might be beneficial in certain scenarios. The emphasis is on perceived higher-than-expected adverse events, potential connections to adjuvants, the impact on allergies, and a strong reevaluation of newborn vaccination decisions based on safety testing concerns.