TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker discusses the involvement of various entities in the development and distribution of mRNA vaccines, referring to them as "mRNA Franken shots." They claim that DARPA, the Pentagon, and the FDA are responsible for both creating the COVID-19 virus and the vaccines. They argue that these actions constitute murder and conspiracy to commit murder. The speaker also suggests that the goal of these actions is population control and reduction. They mention threats made to politicians who were initially interested in investigating these matters. The speaker concludes by emphasizing the importance of citizens reporting these issues to law enforcement and seeking accountability for those responsible.

All childhood vaccines will soon contain mRNA, making them gene therapies that alter genetics. The vaccines won't require reapproval or go through any additional processes. The focus is on integrating mRNA into every vaccine, which is concerning because it involves tinkering with genes. The speaker urges people to be cautious and not get any vaccines, emphasizing their strong opposition to it. The speaker believes that there is a significant amount of money involved in this shift towards gene therapies.

The speaker discusses the push for global COVID vaccination, linking the virus to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. They suggest the pandemic was caused by bioengineering and funded by various organizations. The speaker questions the delay in developing vaccines for bioweapons, theorizing that the vaccination campaign aims to justify the bioweapons industry's existence. They claim the vaccines are meant to show the industry's dual-use research and cover up its true nature. The speaker concludes that the vaccines serve as a defense to prove the industry's supposed public benefit, regardless of any negative effects.

In April 2020, BioNTech and Moderna called mRNA injections experimental gene therapy. Publicly traded pharmaceutical executives admit they deceived the public by labeling them as vaccines to increase acceptance. They suggest these injections turn people into bioweapons factories and could lead to addiction to gene editing technologies. Pseudouridine, a cancer promoter, was added to shots, potentially increasing cancer risk by 400%. The pharmaceutical industry may have a financial interest in promoting these injections. This could make people customers of an industry with a history of harming citizens since 1604.

Governments pushed mRNA vaccines despite not stopping transmission, even on pregnant women and children. The real agenda is to control the human mind by inhibiting the production of new nerve cells needed for memory and critical thinking. This manipulation of the brain with fear-based narratives can override existing memories, eroding individuality and personality. This intentional act would be incredibly evil.

Speaker says, "it's a festering wound for people" and, "we cannot sweep it under the rug." They urge action, noting, "the new administration to step up and do something" because "the next you know, they have 500 mRNA shots in the pipeline." They warn, "33 of those are self amplifying, which is just really terrifying." They ask, "What does that mean? Meaning, like, they're designed to continue to replicate indefinitely." They add, "I mean, already the ones we have, we don't have an off switch, and this is like no off switch on steroids." They claim, "They have them in Japan and India and The EU already." They conclude, "They're the one that I think is in the pipeline in The US is for the h one n one."

Every childhood vaccine will be mRNA, becoming gene therapies that alter genetics without re-approval. COVID vaccines were profitable data and experimentation tools, but the real danger is the continued genetic tinkering via mRNA integration into all vaccines. The speaker is now anti-vaxx and will not get any more vaccines for themselves or their family because all vaccines are being redesigned to include gene therapies, driven by profit.

The speaker discusses the goal of making mRNA a household word during the pandemic. They quote Peter Daszak, who stated that the media hype would be used to increase public understanding and acceptance of medical countermeasures like a universal vaccine. The speaker also mentions the Sackler family's abuse of opioids and the similarities between the opioid crisis and the COVID-19 response. They highlight the role of evangelical physicians and the funding from NIAID and DARPA. The speaker argues that the media hype is used to coerce the public into accepting these measures and that the ultimate goal is to introduce gene editing through CRISPR. They emphasize the importance of the word "hype" in Daszak's quote and its role in driving public perception.

All childhood vaccines will soon be mRNA-based gene therapies, without requiring reapproval. This means that getting any type of vaccine will alter a person's genetics. The focus is now on integrating mRNA into all vaccines, which raises concerns about tinkering with genes. The speaker strongly opposes vaccines and vows not to get any more, emphasizing the financial interests involved in this shift.

The speaker describes unbridled enthusiasm and irrational exuberance for life as sacrificing safety. They state they presented autopsy work on death after COVID-19 vaccination at the American Society of Microbiology, where thousands of microbiologists, vaccinologists, and immunologists attended. As people visited, the speaker was stunned by what they call scientific seduction by messenger RNA technology. They predict a cataclysmic recognition that mRNA platforms are unsafe, claiming there is no way to break down pseudourrogenated messenger RNA. The speaker asserts that circulating messenger RNA from Pfizer or Moderna remains in patients’ bloodstream three years after the shots, described as intact.

The speaker expresses concern about the mRNA vaccines, specifically the Pfizer and Moderna ones, stating that they believe there are deliberate toxicities built into these vaccines. They explain that normally the immune system only attacks foreign substances, but when mRNA is introduced to the body, it instructs cells to produce a foreign protein, causing the immune system to attack the cells. The speaker believes this mechanism of toxicity is intentional and points out that all four companies producing COVID-19 vaccines chose the same spike protein, which they claim is biologically active and potentially harmful. They find it unlikely that multiple companies would independently choose the same solution.

The speaker discusses how the pandemic was used to assert control, profit the pharmaceutical industry, and introduce surveillance measures. They highlight the involvement of intelligence agencies and the military in the pandemic response, with the NSA and Pentagon leading Operation Warp Speed. The speaker claims that the vaccines were developed by NIH and manufactured by military contractors, not by Moderna and Pfizer. They also mention multiple simulations of coronavirus outbreaks sponsored by the CIA over the years. The speaker questions the origins of the virus and the involvement of the Chinese CDC and CIA in suppressing the lab leak theory. They connect the history of bioweapons research to the CIA and Pentagon's interest in gain-of-function research.

My colleagues' ignorance is shocking and inexcusable. They have failed to study immunology and are complicit in mass murder. They supported the vaccination program without understanding the dangers. The ultimate goal of this corona madness is to install mRNA vaccines for all infectious diseases worldwide. The WHO aims to control health management globally, and once all countries sign on, we will be lost. These mRNA vaccines are not just for coronaviruses, but for all diseases, including the flu. They are already developed and ready to be introduced.

The speaker discusses the development of a COVID-19 vaccine in collaboration with Moderna. While some companies see it as a moneymaker, the CEO of Moderna suggests that the virus may have been manipulated in a lab. The speaker also mentions funding for gain-of-function research and the possibility of a deliberate bioterror attack. There is a dispute over whether gain-of-function research was funded, with accusations of lying to Congress. The speaker addresses conspiracy theories and emphasizes the positive impact of vaccines. They also highlight the need to be prepared for future pandemics, whether natural or intentional.

Speaker 0 expresses shock and disappointment at colleagues' ignorance regarding immunology. They are concerned that continued ignorance will lead to complicity in mass murder. Speaker 1 questions why colleagues comply, suggesting laziness, lack of knowledge, or fear. Speaker 0 believes it is primarily ignorance and urges colleagues to read textbooks for the truth. They accuse colleagues of supporting a dangerous vaccination program and reveal a hidden agenda to install mRNA vaccines for all infectious diseases worldwide. Speaker 1 seeks clarification on whether this includes coronaviruses, to which Speaker 0 confirms it applies to all diseases. mRNA vaccines for certain diseases like the flu are already developed and ready for introduction.

Every childhood vaccine will be mRNA, becoming gene therapies that alter genetics without re-approval. COVID vaccines were profitable data and experimentation tools, but the danger lies in continued genetic tinkering. mRNA is being integrated into every vaccine. Therefore, no vaccines should be taken. All vaccines are being redesigned to include gene therapies because there is so much money in it.

The speaker argues that an irrational, unbridled enthusiasm for new possibilities leads to a sacrifice of safety. This enthusiasm, in their view, has adversely affected precautionary considerations and risk assessment. They reference presenting autopsy findings related to deaths following COVID-19 vaccination at the American Society of Microbiology, an event attended by thousands of microbiologists, vaccinologists, and immunologists. In conversations with attendees, the speaker was surprised by what they describe as a scientific seduction surrounding messenger RNA technology. The core concern expressed is that this eagerness to embrace mRNA platforms is accompanied by a neglect of safety considerations. The speaker asserts that there will be a cataclysmic recognition that messenger RNA technology represents an unsafe platform. They emphasize that, as they understand it, there is no way to break down certain aspects of the technology they refer to as “pseudourogenated messenger RNA,” noting this within the context of their work in research laboratories. The statement implies a belief that the degradation or metabolic processing of this form of RNA poses unresolved issues. A central, striking claim presented is that circulating messenger RNA from Pfizer or Moderna has been found in their patients’ bloodstream three years after vaccination, and that this RNA is intact. The speaker underscores this as evidence tied to their observations and research experiences, asserting the persistence of the RNA in the circulatory system over an extended period. Overall, the message conveys a perspective that rapid adoption and optimism around mRNA vaccines and technologies have overshadowed safety considerations, and it anticipates a future realization of safety concerns associated with these platforms. The speaker ties their warnings to concrete experiences at a major scientific conference and to specific, long-term biomarkers observed in patients, presenting a narrative of ongoing research findings and anticipated paradigm shifts in how the safety of mRNA vaccines is perceived.

The speakers discuss the issue of big pharma's influence on the opioid crisis and the credibility of RFK Jr.'s claims. They mention that RFK Jr.'s statements are based on evidence that many people are unaware of. They also question the credibility of Paul Offit, who defends the mRNA vaccines, suggesting a conflict of interest. The conversation delves into the potential harm caused by the spike protein in the vaccines and the lack of targeting in mRNA technology. The speakers express confusion about why experts in the field haven't addressed these concerns. They propose inviting biologists to discuss the topic further.

Governments push mRNA vaccine on populations, including pregnant women and children, despite not stopping transmission. The goal is to conquer the human mind, undermining thinking ability by inhibiting new nerve cell production. This leads to fear-based narratives overriding existing memories, changing individuality. This intentional manipulation is considered extremely evil.

The speaker questions the theory that the origin of SARS-CoV-2 was a bat and pangolin in a Wuhan market. They mention that Moderna modified patent applications in 2019 to include the justification for a vaccine against a non-existent respiratory pathogen. The speaker emphasizes the premeditated nature of the alleged plan to create a universal vaccine template using coronavirus. They claim that this plan was discussed in September 2019 and intended to generate profit. The speaker accuses this act of being an act of domestic terrorism and biological and chemical warfare on humanity, as admitted in a 2015 National Academy of Sciences publication. The motive behind this act is said to be financial gain.

The speaker asserts that COVID-19 shots do more than affect the immune system; they can damage the brain and worsen mental health. They claim a wave of studies shows sharp increases in various strokes: ischemic strokes up to 44%, hemorrhagic strokes up to 50%, and transient ischemic attacks (mini strokes) up to 67%. They also report increases in neurological and autoimmune conditions, including myasthenia gravis up 71% and Alzheimer’s disease up 22%. Cognitive impairment is claimed to have risen by nearly 138%, while depression is up 68%, anxiety disorders up 44%, and sleep disorders up 93%. The speaker links all of these increases to “toxic spike protein accumulation and persistence in the brain.” The speaker states this is not a conspiracy theory and cites what they describe as documented peer‑reviewed research and studies by experts. They name epidemiologist Nicholas Holcher, who allegedly says that using mRNA to hijack cells in various organ systems to produce a highly toxic spike protein that persists in the body for months or years was “one of the worst ideas in medical history.” The speaker then asks, “So what can you do?” as a transition to presumably recommendations or actions, though no specific actions are listed in the provided segment.

The speaker believes mRNA shots are a "festering wound" impacting everyone that cannot be ignored. The speaker urges the new administration to address the issue, citing 500 mRNA shots in the pipeline, 33 of which are self-amplifying. Self-amplifying means they are designed to replicate indefinitely, which the speaker finds "terrifying" because current mRNA shots already lack an "off switch." The speaker claims these self-amplifying shots are already in use in Japan, India, and the EU. The speaker believes the one in the US pipeline is for H1N1, so it may not be used unless there is an issue, but they are still experimenting with it.

Peter Daszak, in a quote from 2015, emphasizes the importance of creating hype around a pandemic to raise awareness and support for medical countermeasures. He suggests that investors will be more inclined to contribute if they see potential profit. The speaker accuses the Biden administration of engaging in domestic terrorism 2.0, claiming that they could not have won the election without people being confined to their homes and glued to their TVs.

The speaker states that while messenger RNA (mRNA) can be used to produce missing proteins like insulin, using mRNA for vaccines is a failed and dangerous concept. They criticize the US government for not being honest about their involvement in mRNA research, specifically the Adept p three program, which aimed to use mRNA to end pandemics within 60 days.

In the last 3 years, there has been a rise in interests serving pharmaceutical companies with the mRNA shot. Concerns about safety and the use of scripted phrases like "build back better" are highlighted. The push for mass vaccination is questioned, with doubts about the safety of the mRNA shot. The speaker predicts that the vaccination campaign will be seen as a major medical scandal and crime against humanity.