reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The three largest asset managers in the world, BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard, control over $20 trillion of people's money without their knowledge. These firms are major shareholders in companies like Microsoft, Apple, Disney, Pepsi, and Coca Cola. This lack of competition is concerning because when both sides of the competition are controlled by the same actors, it undermines the idea of a free market economy. The reason behind this control is that institutions like CalPERS and New York State Pension Fund, which are government actors, demand that these asset managers adopt certain racial and gender ideologies and vote shares accordingly in order to manage their money. This requirement extends beyond just California's money.

BlackRock, a powerful and relatively unknown company, owns a significant portion of major media companies like Fox, CBS, and Comcast. They also have investments in tech giants like Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Twitter, as well as Disney. In fact, BlackRock essentially owns 90% of the world's media. They recently gained access to China's mutual fund industry, allowing them to invest in Chinese companies, including those blacklisted by the US. The money BlackRock uses comes from pension funds and ordinary people's bank accounts. With their vast ownership and access to personal data, BlackRock has significant influence and control. This raises concerns about privacy and the potential misuse of personal information.

BlackRock is a publicly listed company on Nasdaq, managing over $14 trillion in assets. It holds significant shares in many major U.S. companies, including Pfizer, Moderna, airlines, and social networks. This ownership influences various agendas across these companies. For instance, when checking Amazon's stock on Yahoo Finance, it's evident that Jeff Bezos is not the largest shareholder; BlackRock and Vanguard often top the list of major holders. This highlights the extent of BlackRock's influence in the corporate landscape.

Companies need to change their behaviors, and at BlackRock, they are taking action to enforce this. They are implementing measures where employees' compensation could be affected if they do not achieve the desired levels of impact. This applies to various aspects, such as gender, race, or the composition of teams. The focus is on forcing behaviors to bring about the necessary changes.

BlackRock, founded in 1988 by Larry Fink, rose to dominance after the 2008 financial crisis, advising entities like AIG and the Federal Reserve. Fink, who previously created the subprime mortgage market, was seen as a savior during the crisis. BlackRock executives have since moved into government positions, influencing policy. In 2019, BlackRock proposed a "going direct" monetary policy, bypassing traditional interest rate channels. This plan was implemented shortly after, with central banks injecting money directly into the economy. BlackRock also managed bailout programs, benefiting its own iShares ETFs. BlackRock's Aladdin software, used by numerous institutions, manages trillions in assets. The company is increasingly using AI and algorithms for investment decisions. Fink's annual letters to CEOs push the ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) agenda, influencing corporate behavior. BlackRock is leveraging its power to shape the corporate world and promote digital currencies. Some US states are divesting from BlackRock due to its ESG agenda. While protests have occurred, they often focus on greenwashing rather than the broader agenda. The question remains: who owns BlackRock?

BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard are allegedly running everything, with these three being the largest shareholders in 88% of S&P 500 companies. They heavily influence defense contracts; BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard are top shareholders in Raytheon, General Dynamics, and Boeing. The US spends $744 billion on its military, with defense spending accounting for 13% of GDP, more than the next 10 countries combined. BlackRock has $10 trillion in assets under management, more than the GDP of every country except the US and China. BlackRock influenced 31 signers to participate with ESG, totaling $70 trillion of assets under management. BlackRock and Chase are helping rebuild Ukraine with a $400 billion contract. The speaker questions how to fight this power, suggesting that these companies have enough control to fire boards and replace CEOs. With 88% of S&P 500 companies controlled, it is argued that this constitutes a monopoly, exceeding the 50% threshold. The speaker suggests that defense contractors profit from wars and people dying. They propose breaking apart these companies to foster competition, as the speaker believes Larry Fink is the real commander in chief.

We prioritize diversity and inclusion in our investment criteria at BlackRock. We are actively pushing for change by setting targets for gender and racial diversity. If these targets are not met, it can impact compensation. We are focused on not just recruiting, but also developing a diverse team. It's surprising that more progress hasn't been made, so we are committed to driving change forcefully.

BlackRock is emphasizing the need for companies to change their behaviors and increase diversity. They are taking action by hiring more women and increasing diverse employment. Internally, they are linking compensation to achieving diversity goals. BlackRock believes that if companies do not force behaviors to improve gender, race, or team composition, they will face consequences. They acknowledge that progress will take time, but they are surprised that more opportunities for diversity have not emerged.

Three initiatives from the World Economic Forum—CEI, ESG, and DEI—are driving corporations to adopt policies that may harm their businesses. These companies rely heavily on funding tied to these initiatives, leaving them no choice but to comply, even as they risk alienating their customer base. The executives making these decisions are often disconnected from the brand's roots and the values of the American public. This situation is seen as part of a broader strategy to undermine American identity and create a divide between the rich and the poor. As a result, hardworking Americans suffer the consequences, while those at the top remain insulated from the fallout. The push for these initiatives is perceived as a deliberate effort to weaken iconic American brands and foster a lower class system.

The majority of companies on the S&P 500 have State Street, BlackRock, or Vanguard as their largest shareholders. BlackRock, with a worth of $10 trillion, is only surpassed by the GDPs of the US and China. Their influence extends to defense contracts, as seen with Raytheon. This pattern is also evident in Hollywood and the pharmaceutical industry, where these companies essentially hold a monopoly. Their control is so significant that they can remove boards and replace CEOs. However, they argue that having a 50% market share does not violate monopoly laws.

ESG investment measures a company's environmental, social, and governance impact. BlackRock pressured companies to adopt certain behaviors, like sustainability, which some consider meaningless marketing. Al Gore claimed sustainability investments enhance returns, but his fund underperformed, later blaming "foolish" stock prices. Many sustainable investment funds are doing worse than the market, yet trillions flowed into them due to pressure from blue state pensions like CalPERS. Banks and BlackRock are now retreating from ESG alliances, and ESG funds are shuttering rapidly. The ESG fad has hurt companies like Intel, which cut jobs despite government funding. Intel spent $300 million on workforce representation and ESG bureaucracy, while competitors innovated. Intel's stock is down 75%, and shares are at their worst since 1974. American politicians haven't pushed ESG as much as Europe, possibly explaining the difference in stock market growth. Ford is ditching DEI policies, signaling a potential shift away from ESG.

Larry Fink, Soros, State Street, Vanguard, and BlackRock have significant influence in various industries, including defense contracts, Hollywood, and pharmaceuticals. These companies hold a monopoly-like control over 88% of the companies on the S&P 500. BlackRock alone has assets under management worth $10 trillion, which is more than the GDP of all but two countries. They have the power to shape people's lives, replace CEOs, and buy politicians. The military-industrial complex is a major concern, as defense contractors profit from wars. ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) initiatives are seen as a means of control rather than just making money. The goal seems to be about acquiring power and control rather than accumulating more wealth.

BlackRock is a top shareholder in most corporations, using funds from retirement accounts and other investments. While Larry Fink founded BlackRock, he doesn't control it. Institutional shareholders like Vanguard and State Street appear at the top of shareholder lists, but Merrill Lynch owns 45% of BlackRock and is considered an insider, so they don't appear on those lists. Merrill Lynch is a division of Bank of America, which acquired it during the 2008 financial crisis. Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway is Bank of America's top shareholder, owning 13% of its shares, worth $33 billion. Bank of America traces its roots to Amadeo Giannini, who acquired Banca de America D'Italia, later renamed Bank of America. Despite owning a large portion of BlackRock, Merrill Lynch and Bank of America have no apparent representatives on BlackRock's board of directors. The speaker is seeking information about why these major shareholders have no board representation and how they exert their influence on the company.

State Street, BlackRock, and Vanguard are the largest shareholders in 88% of companies on the S&P 500. BlackRock alone is worth $10 trillion, which is more than the GDP of all but two countries. Their influence extends to defense contracts, as seen with Raytheon. This pattern repeats in Hollywood and the pharmaceutical industry, where these companies essentially have a monopoly. They have immense control, being able to fire boards and replace CEOs. This raises concerns about monopoly laws, as even a 50% market share is considered a monopoly.

The three largest shareholders of 88% of S&P 500 companies are BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard. These companies hold significant power and influence over CEOs, who must answer their calls and hire according to their preferences. The same goes for companies in the Department of Defense, where State Street, Vanguard, and BlackRock are three out of the top four shareholders in most of these companies. This suggests that the CEOs of these investment firms hold more power than we may realize, making them the de facto commanders in chief.

BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street lost a major court ruling in Texas, where a federal judge agreed they can be sued for allegedly forming an investment cartel to control US energy markets. The lawsuit claims they bought coal companies to shut them down, forcing green energy initiatives and raising prices through ESG policies. These companies also allegedly have influence in Delaware. BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street own Tyler Technologies, which is behind corrupt reassessments, and are major shareholders in Amazon and Costco, who received tax decreases. They indirectly own Delmarva Power through Exelon, and power bills are rising due to ESG policies. They also own Ryan Homes indirectly through NVR Homes, buying residential and farmland for developments. Additionally, they have major ownership in Chesapeake Utilities, impacting overdevelopment, utility monopolies, and artesian water. The speaker alleges a profit scheme involving politicians and urges viewers to research these claims.

At BlackRock, we are emphasizing the need for companies to change their behaviors as an investment criteria. We are actively pushing for these changes and although it will take time, we are surprised by the lack of opportunities we have seen so far.

BlackRock, a powerful entity, owns a significant portion of major media companies and tech giants. Their investments in China raise concerns about data privacy and potential influence on a global scale. Ordinary individuals unknowingly contribute to BlackRock's wealth through pension funds and bank accounts. With access to vast amounts of personal data, BlackRock's impact on society is substantial and potentially concerning.

ExxonMobil is going to court to prevent shareholders from voting on climate resolutions. This highlights the control that BlackRock has over the stock market as one of the top shareholders in many companies. The power of shares lies in their voting rights, not just the money they represent. Oil companies like Shell and ExxonMobil have faced pressure from institutional investors to adopt climate resolutions. ExxonMobil is now trying to block a proposal for scope 3 commitments. The case was initially assigned to a judge with ties to ExxonMobil, but he recused himself. The oil industry's influence in Texas, where the companies are based, is a concern. While alternatives to oil exist, they also have climate issues. Capitalism, though flawed, offers opportunities for regular people to have a voice and create change.

BlackRock, the world's largest alternative investment firm, has gained significant power and influence over the global economy. Founded in 1988, BlackRock has grown to manage over $21 trillion in assets, making it a major player in the financial world. The company's proprietary software, Aladdin, is used by over 200 institutions to analyze risk and manage portfolios. BlackRock has also embraced the ESG (environmental, social, and governance) agenda, pushing for sustainable investing and decarbonization. However, there are concerns about BlackRock's influence and its potential to shape the course of civilization. Some state governments have even started divesting from BlackRock due to its ESG practices.

The conversation centers on a perceived collision of finance, politics, and ideology at the highest level, framing a looming “great reset” as a plan to control money, freedom of movement, and human existence. Tucker Carlson’s interview with Alex Jones is described as opening a door to a topic mainstream outlets avoid, with the question posed: how much time remains before the great reset becomes reality? Key claims and points discussed: - The global elite, including Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, the IMF, the World Bank, and the World Economic Forum, are portrayed as deciding in the last few years to “deal with monetary debt worldwide” through inflation, affecting corporate, governmental, and individual debt, with Trump’s stance described as accepting inflation alongside expansion of goods. - The Great Reset is depicted as a plan by leftist UN, WEF elements to implement post-industrial, carbon tax policies that will yield stagflation (high inflation with ongoing recession), described as a “perfect storm of hell on earth.” - The globalists allegedly want to create a worldwide system of “more manageable slaves” by breaking down borders, lowering all levels of economic status, and establishing small and rural city-states (reminiscent of a Hunger Games scenario) while tech and medicine are centralized above a devalued population; this is presented as the official policy for 2030. - Depopulation and resource restriction are asserted as deliberate strategies to crash the world economy, enable bank loans to fund a new cashless system, and implement a social credit system. Carbon lockdowns and 15-minute cities are described as tools for totalitarian control. - The UN’s and globalists’ aim is claimed to be feudalism or neo-feudal capitalism, a system where a few elites retain rights while others are stripped of them, an economic model presented as the oldest form of government being revived. - Elon Musk is cited as recognizing the existential threat, and the importance of mobilizing political and legislative action is emphasized. - The dialogue highlights high-level influence over policy, including John Kerry’s statements on cutting global farming, and the actions of global financial players like BlackRock. The depiction is that BlackRock’s influence over investment and ESG policies is being challenged by state-level pushback. - Recent legal and political countermeasures are noted: attorney generals winning cases in Texas and elsewhere against BlackRock’s climate and fossil-fuel initiatives; states pulling pension funds from BlackRock; public admissions from Larry Fink and shifts away from certain ESG directives in some regions. - The overarching narrative asserts that the aim is to demoralize free Western societies, to consolidate global power, and to ensure there is nowhere for free societies to escape to, thereby reinforcing a globalist control structure. Overall, the discussion portrays a globalist scheme involving monetary manipulation, demographic and political restructuring, and technological and legal controls intended to establish a new world order, with mainstream opposition framed as insufficient and the West needing to resist to preserve freedom.

Publicly traded companies like Pepsi, Nike, and Starbucks are in billions of dollars of debt. To maximize profit, CEOs take on debt to open new markets, then make more stock available to the public. Investment firms like BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street buy the stock, gaining enough ownership to influence corporate boards. Board members are aware that firms like BlackRock can replace them if they don't comply. BlackRock demands companies practice ESG, pushing climate change and social agendas. Failure to comply can result in the removal of board members and the CEO. Private companies like X and Bass Pro Shop are protected from this influence. Elon Musk made X a private company, preventing firms like BlackRock from leveraging it. Bass Pro Shop, controlled by its founder, doesn't promote social agendas. The speaker advocates supporting private companies and promotes his private homeschool community and books on topics like the Bill of Rights, free speech, and ESG.

BlackRock, the world's largest alternative investment firm, has gained significant power and influence over the global economy. Founded in 1988, BlackRock has grown to manage over $21 trillion in assets and has become a major shareholder in numerous major corporations. The company's proprietary software, Aladdin, plays a crucial role in managing and analyzing investments. BlackRock has also embraced the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) agenda, using its influence to push for sustainable investing and climate-related initiatives. However, there is growing public awareness and concern about BlackRock's control and influence, leading to protests and divestment efforts by some state governments. The future impact of BlackRock's power and agenda remains uncertain.