reSee.it - Related Video Feed

I confronted Lisa McGee from Vaxx Choice about the bio cyber interface for e-health being taught at Cambridge and other universities. I asked her to clarify its definition, location in the body, and functionality. She claimed there was no misrepresentation of Professor Akhiles' work, but I disagreed, emphasizing that it involves an injectable bio cyber interface under the skin, not a wearable device. There are honest representations of this work and misleading ones. Doctor Edward Group has shared Acuity's latest keynote and a definition of the bio cyber interface, which includes internal biosensors and wireless biomedical telemetry for e-health, enabling wireless intrabody nanocommunication. More details will follow in part 2.

In July 2024, the issue of wireless biomedical telemetry without consent is still ongoing. Sabrina Wallace, a former network engineer, has been discussing this topic. In 2012, the medical body area network was approved, leading to the deployment of a nano cyber interface for intra-body communication. The IEEE standard for internal biosensors is 802.15.4 for patient monitoring. The Internet of Bio Nanothings is our current health monitoring system. This includes telemedicine, nano routing, and nano micro interface. Doctors and nurses should have informed the public about these advancements.

German and Italian universities are seeking papers on Internet of Bio Nanothings for digital healthcare. Doctors are asked if they are prepared to use bio cyber or nano cyber interfaces to create in-body networks controlled by an external unit. The network consists of synthetic or biological sensors. Manuscript deadline is July 15, 2024.

This video explores the concepts of pervasive computing and biodigital convergence, which involve embedding computing capacity into everyday objects and integrating information and communication technologies with biological systems. It discusses topics such as wireless sensor networks, the blockchain, AI in precision medicine, and healthcare. The video also delves into the Internet of Bio Nano Things (IOBNT), molecular communication, bio nano things (BNT), and the design and implementation of these technologies. It emphasizes the importance of understanding these advancements, their implications for healthcare and society, and the need for education and awareness. The video touches on various aspects such as experimental MC test beds, new communication modalities, bio interfaces, IOBNT applications, DNA data storage, cybersecurity, DNA encryption techniques, high-speed data transfer using bacteria, security and privacy concerns, and the potential future of DNA banking. The speaker highlights the significance of genetic sequencing in different fields and the use of deep learning to detect bio cyberattacks.

The speaker explains the use of biosensors for global information connectivity and emergency broadcasts. They discuss the wireless body area network and how signals are sent to individual nodes, including the body itself. The speaker mentions the use of applied signals technology and the involvement of companies like Raytheon and L3 Harris. They also touch on software-defined networking, virtual machines, and the convergence of interconnect networks. The speaker emphasizes the tracking of the body rather than devices and the importance of health applications like telemedicine. They mention the use of metamaterials, nanotechnology, and graphene-based biosensors. The speaker concludes by discussing the routing protocols and the need for understanding these technologies.

DARPA foundries making their own molecules, peptides, amino chains. I was reading them, not comprehending. Is it transhumanism? regenerative medicine? In the second livestream, nanotechnology reproduces itself, grabs up the components of your body to do it, then after reproducing itself, creates its own neural networks, no different than your body does. It can give commands to itself, upgrading nodes and then creating its own AI internally on its own. "Every single one of you that thinks you need the five g, no. It's inside." Thus, "the foundries with DARPA ten years ago." Then: "PACS database, anybody with the DHS, the FBI, can click a button remotely." The speaker warns: "You jabbed people with nano that not only recreates itself, but makes its own neural nets and its own artificial intelligence that is specific to the human on the inside?" It's in the molecular communication routing. The talk warns this is about turning humans into something else, not arms into a fish flipper, referencing a 2020 military blog. "Our synergists know more, I think, I suspect, than your military does."

Recently, a briefing from the European Parliament discussed smart bodies for smart cities and the Internet of Bio Nano Things. On page 7, BJ Torg's work is cited, highlighting injectable nano sensor technology for seamless human body connectivity. These sensors are designed for use both on and within the human body. BJ Onutolk collaborates with Professor Ian F. Akiris from the International Telecommunications Union on this topic. The focus is on graphene-based intra-body nano sensor networks, which can sense, process, and communicate at the nanoscale. The paper introduces a concept for localizing and tracking bio-nano sensors in the bloodstream.

Speaker 0 describes a theory they’re exploring: every vaccine examined, and the patents and testimony from the Department of Energy, point to a 500,000-strong collection of bioweapons categories, including plague, HIV, anthrax. They claim all these bacteria and yeasts have been mutated and converted into a “hybrid gamma irradiated” form, advanced and radioactive, and that these are entering humanity. They say, regarding a nuclear stockpile, humanity itself becomes the host of these radioactive materials, since they are digital and can be activated to detonate a mass casualty event. Speaker 1 clarifies by restating the concern: they can create a pandemic at any moment by activating materials that have infiltrated our bodies. Speaker 0 adds that they have become involved in helping families legally; their law firm supports families because some school districts have become worse than during COVID, even though childhood vaccines are still largely recommended federally. They claim school districts and scientists are desperate to get these materials into children, with Catholic schools allegedly no longer honoring religious or medical exemptions. They describe children with severe reactions and contraindications being denied entry to schools, faced with truancy threats or expulsion. They insist there is nothing healing about these vaccines and call it an infiltration system necessary for AI to function properly. Speaker 1 mentions the U.S. allegedly cutting ties with the WHO, but says research by John Fleetwood shows the U.S. maintains relationships relating to vaccines and influenza, with substantial taxpayer funding. They assert that with a digital ID, one’s bank account can be cut off if they don’t get certain vaccines or comply to maintain the digital ID, arguing the agenda has continued and accelerated with AI. Speaker 0 adds that the WHO remains a standing organization but has been rebranded, and emphasizes that the United States is front and center in partnerships with the WHO. Speaker 1 introduces Biomems (biomedical microelectromechanical systems) as a subset of MEMS used in biomedical research and medical devices, noting that this has existed for years. They describe sensors under the skin that transmit data to pharmaceuticals or governments, not just pacemakers. They reference Albert Bourla, who stated that a pill has been designed to track compliance. Speaker 0 confirms: “They tell us what they're doing.”

The 4th industrial revolution changes us by integrating technology into our bodies through the Internet of Bodies. This ecosystem connects devices collecting health data and altering functions. Artificial intelligence automates learning and computation, impacting all aspects of life from diet to genetic health. This constant assessment raises concerns about privacy and control.

The channel discusses the U.S. Department of Defense's network-centric warfare doctrine, which utilizes body area networks and biosensors for medical monitoring. These technologies, developed since the 1990s, aim to enhance healthcare by allowing remote monitoring of patients, potentially reducing medical errors. Despite their benefits, there are concerns about privacy and security, especially regarding the tracking of individuals through vaccines and other means. The integration of biological signals with digital systems raises ethical questions about consent and surveillance. The speaker emphasizes the need for transparency and dialogue within the medical community about these technologies, which are often misunderstood or ignored. The discussion highlights the intersection of healthcare, technology, and warfare, urging a reevaluation of how these systems are perceived and managed.

Doctors and nurses missed the chance to inform the public about computer networking in the body without consent. Medical body area networks and nano sensors are used for health monitoring. A nano cyber interface sets up networks for communication, data transfer, and surveillance in humans without consent. Sabrina Wallace shared this info in a 30-page PDF. This is biodigital enslavement and technocratic totalitarianism. Download and share the PDF.

Good doctors are urged to consider sustainability goals, bio digital convergence, bioengineering, and human augmentation. Sabrina Wallace discusses smart healthcare using meta materials, graphene healthcare, and BioCyber interface. She highlights the use of technology in telemedicine, nano Mhealth, and the integration of the body with the cloud for monitoring. The speaker criticizes the lack of transparency regarding sensors, open systems architecture, and electronic disease surveillance by the military and CDC.

Falko Dresler presented nano sensor technology at the NanoCom 2021, showcasing nanomachines that can travel through the bloodstream for wireless Internet connectivity. Michael Dresler, a telecommunications expert from the Technical University Berlin, is involved in discussions about the Internet of bio-nano things, highlighted in a recent European Parliament briefing on smart bodies for smart cities. Although the presence of nano sensor technology in human blood vessels was not confirmed by medical professionals, the concept of a nano cyber interface has been introduced. Dresler also participated in NanoCom 2024 in Milan, where he discussed advancements in precision AI medicine and wireless technology in the bloodstream.

The speaker discusses body sensor networks that can be injected into the human body to monitor health, detect tumors, and fight viruses. They mention bio nanoscale machines and mRNA vaccines as examples of this technology. They aim to mimic biological processes in the body by creating artificial nano scale machines like bacteria and molecular motors. Translation: The speaker talks about using body sensor networks to monitor health by injecting them into the body. They mention bio nanoscale machines and mRNA vaccines as examples of this technology. They aim to mimic biological processes in the body by creating artificial nano scale machines like bacteria and molecular motors.

This video discusses the concept of inter biomethings, which involves using bio nano sensors to monitor diseases in the human body. The data collected by these sensors is then processed using machine learning algorithms. The video also mentions the importance of considering security and privacy issues. The project involves hardware design, integration of different components, and communication between devices. It also explores near field wireless and power transfer. In the cyber domain, computer science research is conducted to collect and aggregate data. Overall, the video highlights the closed loop system of inter biomethings.

The 4th industrial revolution is bringing about the Internet of Bodies (IOB), which involves medical implants and devices connected to the internet. These devices collect personal health data and can even alter body functions. AI plays a significant role in this revolution, automating computation and cognition. In the future, every aspect of our lives will be measured and assessed through computation, including our eating habits, relationships, online purchases, energy consumption, and vital signs. The IOB also considers genetic information and its impact on our health and aging. However, some find this concept unsettling, comparing it to an Orwellian society.

The speaker discusses the use of biosensors made from DNA and computer networking protocols to log into and monitor the human body. They explain how radio frequency and computer game theory are used to route information through the body, and how the blockchain and electromagnetic resonance are also involved. The speaker expresses frustration with the lack of transparency and gaslighting surrounding these technologies. They mention the involvement of various individuals and organizations, such as the CIA and Department of Defense, and discuss the concept of starseeds and the manipulation of bioelectric fields. The speaker emphasizes the need for awareness and accountability regarding these technologies.

In this video, we discuss the future of implants. It is predicted that within the next ten years, we will be able to implant technology into our clothing. Eventually, we may even consider implanting it into our brains or skin, leading to direct communication between our brains and the digital world. This fusion of the physical, digital, and biological realms is what we are witnessing.

The speaker asserts that everyone has had a “mark of the beast” since 2011 in relation to critical infrastructure at health level seven, specifically hospitals. They claim health and human services and CMS Medicare are handing out this mark in the form of a wearable. The speaker also describes this as interbody communication biometrics for DHS from several years ago. They state that this is not only a matter of health administration but spans business and government. They claim that Congress, throughout this year and last year, has been helping the police obtain updated drone services, with Sean Ryan bragging about them, along with others. The speaker contends that the general public is weaponized and kept uninformed about the fact that national security is under the skin and looking through people’s eyeballs in their own homes, and that it cannot be turned off and does not require a tower. The speaker explains that biosignals come from the human body, and that biophysics uses advanced signal processing to measure bioelectromagnetics, describing the measurement of signals coming off the human body in multiple ways.

The telecom and health industries are developing the Internet of bionanothinks in the cardiovascular system. This network consists of nanodevices controlled externally, containing sensors and actuators in the body.

In his keynote speech in Abu Dhabi, Ian F. Arcidi discusses the Panacea project, a nonsurgical human-machine interface utilizing injectable metamaterials and graphene-based nanomachines, nanosensors, nanoactuators, and nanoantennas. He highlights the development of biology-inspired nanomachines and the communication challenges they address. He mentions hiring Massimiliano Fravan and acknowledges Joseph Jornet, who holds a patent for a remote smart healthcare system. Arcidi also references a workshop by Massimiliano Pierre Robin at Charite Hospital in Berlin, focusing on intrabody networks, molecular computing, communication engineering, and synthetic biology within the Internet of Bio Nano Things.

Covert surveillance systems are using remote monitoring, with doctors and nurses having access. This involves computer networking through the human body without informed consent and wireless intravody nano communication. Sabrina Wallace stated that Jane Ruby "pissed all over her" because, instead of informing the public about wireless biomedical telemetry and the Internet of Bio Nanothinks, Ruby obfuscates and misleads. Ruby allegedly provides just enough information to appear as an expert, despite not being a physician. The speaker questions why Ruby doesn't discuss related activities at the University of South Florida a decade prior. The speaker recommends Nanocom 2024 in Milano, Italy, to learn about the Internet of Bio Nanothings connected to AI precision medicine.

Recently, I shared a briefing from the European Parliament discussing smart bodies for smart cities and the Internet of Bio Nano Things. On page 7, BJ Torg's work is cited, highlighting injectable nano sensor technology for seamless human body connectivity. These sensors are designed for use both on and within the human body. BJ Onutolk collaborates with Professor Ian F. Akiris from the International Telecommunications Union on this topic. The focus is on graphene-based, injectable intra-body nano sensor networks. This emerging nanotechnology allows for the creation of devices that can sense, process, and communicate at the nanoscale. The paper also presents a concept for localizing and tracking bionano sensors within the bloodstream.

We are exploring body sensor networks that can be injected into the human body to monitor health, detect tumors, and fight viruses collectively. Bio-nano scale machines, like mRNA vaccines, are being developed to mimic biological processes and communicate within the body. These artificial nano scale machines aim to replicate neurons, hormones, bacteria, and molecular motors for health monitoring and treatment.

I admire your research. Look into intravody nano network via fax, transhumanism, Internet of bodies, and its link to the new digital financial system. Self-assembling nanotech creates a carbon nanotube network in the body to connect to the Internet of Bodies.