reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 notes that the last administration was not transparent on the issue, but with the task force created, they have guided members within what they're cleared for. He asserts that they have encountered alien beings and recovered vehicles, with physical proof, and that he was partially cleared into those activities, having read intelligence reports from those programs. Speaker 1 reflects that online discourse about encounters and videos is plentiful, and asks if there is belief that the US government knows about alien beings coming to Earth. Speaker 0 responds that he doesn’t like to characterize where they came from, but they are definitely some kind of nonhuman sentience. He claims to have recovered vehicles and physical proof and says he had partial access to the data and to intelligence reports. He confirms seeing with his own eyes according to his account. Speaker 2 says NASA speaks for itself and claims transparency with data, and asks whether to believe David Crush or if he is lying, and where the evidence is. Speaker 0 asserts that members of the current administration are very aware of this reality and the current president is knowledgeable on the subject. He trusts the president’s leadership and believes the president has assembled a team; he says if Trump wants to be the greatest president and the most consequential leader in world history, he certainly has the knowledge, capabilities, and understanding of some of these sensitive government transparency issues. Speaker 3 says he has access and has had meetings with very smart people who believe there is something out there, and it makes sense there could be. He is not convinced himself. He asks if the person believes one, that he knows, and two, that he’s open to transparency on UAPs. Speaker 0 reiterates that the president is very well informed on the issue, and avoids revealing more than the president might want to reveal. He notes a role to cover this up through administrations. Speaker 1 asks about years of threat and testimony. Speaker 0 says he was physically threatened even before submitting his intelligence community inspector general report under the previous administration, and sought legal protection because of professional and personal fear. Speaker 1 asks about recovering pilots or remains and whether that was seen with his own eyes. Speaker 0 confirms there were pictures and says yes, there were remains. Speaker 1 questions whether the origin is from another planet or outer space, and if it is interdimensional, seeking clarification. Speaker 0 explains he has talked to many veterans of the program and keeps an open mind on origin. He acknowledges an extraterrestrial hypothesis but does not usually go there because he did not see the data, and he is not conversant in the high-confidence theories the US government has. He is not aware of any remains or signs of extraterrestrial beings or technology by his department. Speaker 3 says the US government knows, but asks whether other governments know. Speaker 0 says they know and have their own programs, and notes that two and a half years ago the US has been in an arms race with peer competitors like Russia and China, who have their own programs. He says he was able to view intelligence discussing adversarial programs and will leave it at that. Speaker 3 states that they’ve recovered things, and Speaker 0 confirms, noting there were bodies and physical remains. They discuss whether the motive or intent of the visitors was peaceful or not, acknowledging a mixed bag of activity and motive. They consider whether Earth’s genetic material could be a reason for visits, even jokingly proposing Jurassic Park as a tourist attraction for genetic material on Earth.

Speaker 0 describes unidentified phenomena operating in the airspace over restricted nuclear facilities, stating that these are not ours and that they are “otherworldly things” performing maneuvers that have not been seen. He asserts that he has seen with his own eyes nonhuman craft and nonhuman beings. Speaker 1 emphasizes the extraordinary secrecy surrounding the matter, noting that there have been “very few people in our entire government” who have been allowed or provided access to it. Speaker 0 adds that even presidents have been operating on a need to know basis, but argues that the system is beginning to ramp out of control. He states that it is not acceptable to have secret parts of government that no one ever sees. He says that people have been hurt protecting and hiding this information, and that some individuals claimed it would cost them their lives, yet they spoke out about these things. He further claims that there was information being locked away that could change the trajectory for a species. Speaker 0 concludes by calling the matter “the biggest discovery in human history,” underscoring the enormity of the claimed revelation and its potential implications. In sum, the speakers discuss the presence of nonhuman, apparently otherworldly craft and beings operating in restricted airspace over nuclear facilities, the extreme secrecy and unprecedented access restrictions within the government, the personal risks and sacrifices of those who spoke out, and the belief that suppressing the information has prevented potentially world- or species-changing insights, culminating in the assertion that this constitutes the biggest discovery in human history.

Speaker 0: Today we're gonna talk about the whole UFO alien thing. You see that right there? You see the German flying saucer right there? Let me read this to you. This book is a guide to the German flying discs. Yes. The flying saucers were created during World War two, in case you didn't be aware. And also, there has been no proof that there's ever been any aliens. Nope alien crashes by anyone except for inside and outside of the government. Same with Roswell. That's after they took the technology from the Germans. No alien bodies have ever been found. No culture. No alien technology has ever been uncovered by anyone except for the government. And here's Victor Schauberger's work in Austrian who worked for Germany, who created the first flying saucer right there made out of copper, and it was taken by the US military. And it's funny because even the Italians knew. Right? Old story says Italian about the flying saucers. German flying saucers. And here's just another one. German. And then the Soviets, after they got the technology, they started saying they have saucers, but it was a reality, just the Germans. So once The US Military got ahold of the technology, then they started publishing all the stuff in the tiny hat newspapers. And then next, they're gonna say there's an alien invasion. You get it?

The story focuses on a number of US scientists connected to sensitive research who have died or disappeared, with a look at possible connections. Carl Grilmar is an astrophysicist at Caltech who worked on a NASA-supported space telescope project and infrared systems. He was shot and killed at his home just two months ago. Frank Maywald was a senior scientist at NASA's Jet Propulsion Lab, focused on advanced satellite systems. He died nearly two years ago, but his cause of death has never been made public. Monica Reza is reportedly connected to a NASA Jet Propulsion Lab project. She went missing last summer while hiking in California, with no trace. William McCaslin is a retired Air Force general and former head of the Air Force Research Lab, which oversaw advanced space and surveillance programs. He has been missing since February. Reports say he once oversaw funding connected to a project that also included Monica Reza. In New Mexico, Melissa Casais has been missing since last summer. She worked at Los Alamos National Lab in an administrative role but reportedly also had security clearances. Anthony Chavez, also connected to Los Alamos, is an engineer who disappeared during a walk a few months earlier. No signs. No answers. Nuno Larrero was an MIT researcher focused on nuclear fusion and was shot and killed in his Massachusetts home last December. It was the case of the Brown Shooter. It’s a separate case with no confirmed links to the others. The key point: authorities have not connected these cases, but there is overlap in institutions involved—NASA, Air Force Research, Los Alamos Laboratory. The question remains: could they be connected, or is this something else entirely?

- Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the possibility that a friend was murdered and suggest that both victims died suddenly from fast-moving cancer, a method they say the agency uses overseas to eliminate people. Speaker 1 admits he cannot prove this but notes the sudden deaths. - The conversation asserts that the US government has technology to infect people with fast-moving cancer and to perform cognitive and directed-energy warfare. Speaker 0 states the government has the technology to infect with fast-moving cancer and to do so absolutely. - In 1997, Speaker 1 describes a hearing on asymmetric threats where he chaired the research committee and focused on four threats: drones, cyberattacks, electromagnetic pulse (EMP), and cognitive warfare. He asserts that cognitive warfare is now being labeled by some as Havana syndrome and that directed-energy weapons are the underlying technology. - Speaker 2 recounts a recent homeland security hearing about foreign adversaries using direct weapons against US citizens, enabling incapacitation. He emphasizes the chilling nature of the briefing and criticizes current domestic leadership as foolish, corrupt, incompetent, and wicked. - Speaker 3 notes that up to 40% of the Air Force equipment budget in the 1990s was classified, making much of it “black.” He emphasizes that military and security research often precedes civilian medical science, and that servicemen were used in experiments without fully informed consent, referencing NK Ultra-era disclosures of thousands of service members used as subjects. - Speaker 4 discusses MKUltra, describing a Canadian experiment involving psychic driving with massive LSD doses, eye-tracking, and memory loss, funded by MKUltra and affecting civilians. He mentions Project Midnight Climax, where Johns were observed in brothels while subjected to LSD, and notes similar experiments by the British Royal Air Force and Army. The results of Midnight Climax are unknown, with no published after-action reports. - Speaker 3 adds that Secretary of Energy O’Leary stated under Clinton that over a half a million Americans had been used in human experiments over four decades without informed consent, including mind control, with no accountability. He argues that mind-control technology has advanced, and questions who should govern its use, given the lack of legal frameworks. - The discussion covers mind-effects research and the lack of treaties governing such technologies. They reference a European Parliament security and disarmament resolution (1999) addressing mind-effects and mind-control technology, and Russian Duma resolutions (2002) seeking similar safeguards. Zabigniew Brzezinski’s Between Two Ages is cited regarding electronically stroking the ionosphere to influence behavior over geographic areas, connecting it to HARP and other electromagnetic carriers capable of mass or individual influence. - Speaker 6 explains historical demonstrations of electronic mind control, starting with Jose Delgado’s remote manipulation of a charging bull using radio energy and electrodes, and notes later work showing noninvasive techniques to influence behavior using low-power magnetic fields. Speaker 7 reiterates Delgado’s animal studies and the potential for noninvasive methods to affect emotions and memory, with broader implications for humans. - Speaker 3 discusses the progression of research funded by DARPA and others toward higher-resolution control of brain activity, enabling controlled effects that override senses and create synthetic memories, raising questions about future justice and evidence. They describe European Parliament and NATO/US military interest in mind-control technologies and the absence of robust legal protections. - Speaker 9 presents advances in AI-enabled brain-reading and memory-altering devices, including mind-reading and emotion decoding, while Speaker 10 and Speaker 12 discuss privacy concerns, brain-data privacy laws (Colorado’s law adding brain data to privacy protections), and the availability of consumer devices that decode brainwaves. They warn that brain data can be misused by insurers, law enforcement, advertisers, and governments, with private companies often sharing data without clear disclosure. - The segment concludes with a note that devices can infer attention and thoughts, and that DARPA’s N3D program aims for noninvasive neuromodulation with implantable electrodes read/write capabilities. It references 1980s–1990s discussions of RF energy as a potential nonlethal mind-control technology, and a 1993 Johns Hopkins conference listing low-frequency weapons as attractive options.

The speaker discusses “the whole ufo alien thing,” referencing a “German flying saucer” and a book described as “a guide to the german flying discs.” They state that flying saucers were created during World War II, and claim that there has been no proof of aliens or alien crashes except “inside and outside of the government.” They say the same narrative applies to Roswell, stating it occurred after the technology was taken from the Germans. They further assert that “no alien bodies have ever been found” and that “no culture, no alien technology has ever been uncovered by anyone except for the government.” The speaker highlights Victor Schauberger, an Austrian who “worked for Germany,” saying he “created the first flying saucer,” which they describe as “made out of copper,” and that it was “taken by the U.S. military.” They add that “even the Italians knew,” referencing an “old story” about flying saucers. They also mention additional German examples, then claim that after the Soviets obtained the technology, they began saying they had saucers. The speaker says that once the U.S. military had the technology, it started publishing related material in “tiny hat newspapers,” and then suggests the next step would be claims of an “alien invasion.”

The discussion centers on six American scientists working on advanced materials and plasma technology who have suddenly disappeared, with a parallel pattern of missing Chinese scientists. The speakers debate where the technology originated (with sources suggesting it came from downed UAPs/UFOs) and why these individuals are vanishing, including both U.S. and Chinese scientists who worked on similar high-end military applications. Brandon Weichert outlines a sequence of events and connections: - In mid-March 2026, three Chinese defense scientists — Zhao Jingkang (nuclear weapons expert), Wu Manching (radar and metamaterials expert), and Wei Yiyan (missile systems expert) — were quietly erased from the Chinese Academy of Engineering’s website, signaling they are no longer among the living. - A few days later, hypersonics expert Yan Hong (a key figure in plasma aerodynamics) died suddenly at 56. - Weichert pairs these five Chinese scientists with the six American scientists who were working on related technologies, noting massive overlap in their work and suggesting that the Americans’ and Chinese’ programs mirror each other in advanced plasma and weapon systems. - He concludes that there is shadowboxing between the United States and China, describing it as a shaping operation in the run-up to a potential major conflict, with both sides attempting to eliminate the other’s brainpower—the human capital essential to sustaining high-end warfare. - He recalls historical precedents where nations targeted each other’s scientists (the Americans reportedly killing Soviet scientists and vice versa; Israelis targeting Iranian scientists) and argues this is not unprecedented. - Weichert cautions that the topic is not necessarily about aliens; he suggests that the systems discussed may be advanced technologies developed in the U.S., Russia, and China for years, potentially including non-alien sources and even Nazi-era technologies that were inherited, while acknowledging that alien explanations exist in public discourse. - He notes that there is a broader geopolitical dynamic at play, including the possibility that the timing of alien-related talk may be designed to distract from conventional advances in technology and the fact that China may have caught up to or surpassed the U.S. in some conventional technologies. The conversation also addresses satellites and space warfare: - There are reports on meteors or fireballs in the sky, but the speakers believe some debris could be from satellites shot down in low Earth orbit. - SpaceX Starlinks have suffered “an explosive fragmentary event,” potentially from being hit by anti-satellite weapons; Starlinks have previously been used for protests (in Iran) and supplied to Ukraine, and the Russians have developed systems like Klinka and TOBAL to knock down Starlinks. - There is a longstanding concern that electromagnetic pulse (EMP) weapons on satellites could disrupt or destroy the U.S. electric grid, with a claim that one EMP detonated 50 miles above the continental United States could knock out 90–95% of the grid and take at least two years to restore, especially given reliance on Chinese-made restoring equipment. - The discussion returns to the importance of human capital and education, with a provocative claim that the Department of Education may be the single greatest national security threat due to its impact on human capital, alongside the national debt. The speakers acknowledge disagreement about whether the origin of the advanced plasma technology is extraterrestrial or terrestrial, emphasizing instead the strategic implications of missing scientists on both sides and the ongoing modernization and counterspace dimensions of the conflict.

Sarah’s question about ET disclosure leads to a historical arc. First, War of the Worlds, a famous book from about 1910, and then the radio broadcast that aliens were invading to scare people and see how they would react, marking the start of the phenomenon. Moving forward to the 1940s, Victor Schauberger creates the flying saucer. He shipped into America, they take his technology, they ship it back, and they off them. Then in the 1960s, three-letter agencies are creating flying saucers and flying them all over the place, starting the UFO movement. Jumping ahead to 2023 and 2024, there are many whistleblowers exposing the UFO disclosure. The belief asserted is that all of this ET reality is actually our own technology, and that this technology has been around for a long period of time. Therefore, with the whole ET disclosure, the point is to keep you consumed. The speaker concludes with a sequence of conspiratorial expectations: there are aliens coming, and they’ll implement Project Blue Beam, then they’ll say they have you as a savior. Following that would be a new world order in which people band together, pay climate taxes and carbon taxes, and then are corralled into a fifteen-minute smart city.

The conversation argues that the symptoms being discussed are “symptomatic right now,” framing them as the result of “beta tests” and “a new form of war.” It claims that the United States, the UK, Russia, China, and India all have the relevant technology. The speaker then responds to a question about whether the affected American patients share political beliefs. They say that, instead of focusing on shared politics, they are relying on a report from *Surgical Neurology International* that describes microwave frequencies being used as a weapon of war. They also reference an article they read about China turning on “six G,” stating that in 6G it has the ability to read and manipulate the human brain. The discussion further claims that if someone has nanotech “in you,” they are “no longer considered human,” and introduces a new term for the human species: “Homo Borg Genesis.” The speaker concludes by saying that if this is imposed without consent and people are no longer considered human, “the debate is gonna come at some point here.”

The speaker claims to have interviewed someone from the Chinese Space Agency who says they know the Apollo missions are fake. Allegedly, China is blackmailing NASA for secret space technology to keep quiet. The speaker suggests that if the truth were exposed, it would be damaging to NASA. This raises concerns about the government violating espionage laws.

Speaker 0 (anonymous whistleblower): Government seems to be involved. They’re definitely some kind of nonhuman sentience. We’ve recovered the vehicles and have physical proof. I was partially cleared into those activities and had access to the data, reading intelligence reports resulting from those programs. Speaker 1: And with your own eyes you’ve seen it. So when people say this is kooky, there’s nothing to back it up… Speaker 2 (NASA): NASA is open and transparent with our data. Do you believe what Mister David Crush said, or is he lying? Whatever he said, where’s the evidence? Speaker 1: What do you say? Speaker 0: Members of this administration are very aware of this reality; the current president is very knowledgeable on this subject, and I trust his leadership. I think he’s assembled a cabinet, and I believe if Trump wants to be the greatest president and the most consequential leader in world history, he certainly has the knowledge, the capabilities, and understanding of some of these sensitive government transparency issues. Speaker 3: I have access and have spoken to people about it. I’ve had meetings with very smart, solid people who believe there is something out there. It makes sense there could be, but I’ve never been convinced, despite that. It’s not my thing. Speaker 1: So you think, one, he knows, and two, he’s open to transparency on UAPs? He’s very well informed on this issue. Leave it at that. I don’t want to get ahead of what the president might want to reveal. There’s been a role to cover this up through administrations. Speaker 0: I was physically threatened even before I sent in my intelligence community inspector general report under the previous administration. I had to seek legal protection because I was fearful professionally and personally. Speaker 1: And when you mention recovering pilots or remains nonhuman, that’s something you saw in the intelligence with your eyes? Speaker 0: Yes. There were pictures. It’s uncomfortable to discuss because it’s outside a normal worldview to understand there is a biological sentience that piloted these crafts and does not necessarily look 100% like us. Speaker 1: Were there pictures? Speaker 0: There were. Speaker 1: When I said from another planet or outer space, you said you don’t know where they’re from. Is it interdimensional? What are we talking about? Speaker 0: I’ve talked to a lot of graybeards about the origin. I leave an open mind. There is an extraterrestrial hypothesis, and they could be coming from elsewhere off Earth, but I didn’t see that data. I’m not conversant in the high-confidence theories the US government had. I’m not aware of any remains the department has of extraterrestrial beings or technology. Speaker 1: Do other governments know? Do they have programs? Speaker 0: They have their own programs. Two and a half years ago we’ve been in an arms race with peer competitors—Russia and China—and they have their own programs. I viewed a body of intelligence that discussed adversarial programs. Speaker 1: We’ve recovered things—bodies and physical remains. Was there a sense of their motive or whether it’s peaceful or not? We’ve seen a mixed bag of motives. Speaker 0: Activity and motive vary; the reasons for visiting are not fully understood. Could it be because we have interesting genetic material on Earth and we’re a Jurassic Park tourist attraction? There could be a myriad of reasons. Speaker 1: For other people coming forward, what do you say about intimidation? There are reports of harassment. There’s hope. Congress values whistleblower information now, and there’s appetite to do the right thing. There are things happening behind the scenes that the administration may discuss when ready. Speaker 1: We’ll follow every element. It’s fascinating. Speaker 0: Thanks for having me. Speaker 4: Sean Hannity here. Subscribe to Fox News YouTube pay.

Speaker 0: There have been briefings to Congress that lead us to believe there is definitely an advanced technology out there that's not created by mankind. Speaker 1: About a decade ago I revealed on Joe Rogan that from my research in the Global Sun Admissions, aliens don’t come from distant star systems—they come interdimensionally. We have limited sight across our normal light spectrum and into other dimensions. I’ve spoken to high-level Pentagon people, CIA, scientists, physicists, who’ve said it’s an interdimensional invasion. The Bible and other ancient religions reference an unseen presence entering our universe, our domain, our dimension. There’s a clip of her on Fox News Friday night saying it’s interdimensional, but classified. A craft will show up 100 miles away instantly or fly Mach 20 and make a perfect turn—things that would crush solid stainless steel due to gravity. So we know they’re interdimensionally jumping. Now Trump talks about a big reveal; Obama says aliens are real. This isn’t just about UFOs—it's part of a broader awakening. It’s a distraction from Epstein, perhaps, but Trump said after reelection he’d disclose, and there’s a report due. Disclosure is happening on many fronts. We’re focused on UFOs and extraterrestrials, not taking away from exposing Epstein. There’s a lot of disclosure and crazy stuff happening on every front. Speaker 2: He (the other speaker) gave classified information and wasn’t supposed to. Speaker 1: Aliens are real? He gave classified information, whether they’re real or not. Speaker 3: Hours later, the president posted on Truth Social directing the release of government files related to alien and extraterrestrial life and UFOs. We bring in Florida Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna, chair of the Oversight Committee Task Force on declassification of federal secrets. She has said there is evidence of interdimensional beings that can operate through the time spaces we have. You told Joe Rogan you’ve viewed evidence of interdimensional beings on Earth that operate through time spaces—can you explain? Speaker 0: Yes. In classified briefings we’ve seen evidence suggesting advanced technology not created by mankind. There are videos, including one where a UAP deflects a Hellfire missile, taken from ISR footage off the coast of Yemen. Some physics defy explanation; not the only government to examine this. I view it through national security: are these technologies adversarial weapons or not? The federal government denying access to Congress is alarming in a free society. We expect the American people to decide after reviewing the evidence. Gates has said that if you’ve seen what we’ve seen, you’ll believe it too. Speaker 3: So you’re saying the Air Force has covered up UAP sightings? Is it because we or others have advanced technology, or because a foreign actor has abilities beyond our understanding? Speaker 0: Based on our interviews and testimony, we have reason to believe this tech is not created by mankind. It’s possible there are advanced US weapons denied access to the public. Unelected bureaucrats denying access to Congress is problematic, and there have been whistleblower threats and even deaths discussed in testimony. There’s bipartisan momentum toward disclosure, and we’ll continue to explore with the American people. President Obama’s remarks and Trump’s anticipated declassification are fueling this process. Speaker 1: The elite seek transcendence and to know the secrets of the universe; some are good, some bad, some mixed. Einstein and Planck suggest multiple dimensions; top scientists and billionaires are now speaking of a false hologram, artificial constraints, and gravity bleeding into this universe, with dark matter as a sign of something deeper. Some say we’re in a computer-generated projection, a thought or dream in a programmer’s mind. There’s talk of a sub-transmission zone below the third dimension fighting to ascend. Some believe humanity is at a fifth or sixth dimension intellectually, while a war rages to determine whether humanity will advance or be controlled by a breakaway civilization merging with machines. Google and others allegedly contemplated building a giant artificial system—a hive-mind AI connected to billions of people—that could predict and influence the future, potentially erasing individual free will. A counterstrike is underway to block such systems and promote genuine debate about humanity’s path, including addressing alleged pedophiles and “psychic vampires” in control of AI before humanity is harmed. The interdimensional force behind these developments is said to grant advanced knowledge to certain groups, sometimes described in religious terms as Satan. There’s more to come as disclosures unfold, including anticipated declassification next week when Trump allegedly releases UFO files. Speaker 3: We’ll be watching and covering it next week as disclosure unfolds.

The speaker proposes a scenario in which the “old world” is still present beneath or within modern structures and institutions. They argue that an advanced civilization built major monuments worldwide—specifically citing the Milan Cathedral, Cologne Cathedral, the Parliament Building in Budapest, and the United States Capitol Building—and that much of this civilization was wiped out by a powerful event within the last four to five hundred years, leaving leaders who survived in “catacombs” and “necropolises.” They claim surviving leaders are the ones who prepared for the event, and that certain large underground spaces, including a ballroom described as a protective shield, extend “about six stories deep,” implying unusual construction for a ballroom. They connect this hypothesis to UFO/UAP narratives, stating that beings described as coming from far-away galaxies may instead be from here, potentially having been present before humans. They contend that modern explanations are supported by “dumbest narratives” and lack documentation. They also claim advanced technology was “dripping… back to us over the past two hundred years,” pointing to the car, plane, train, phone, internet, computers, and AI, arguing that society is not evolving or advancing but receiving previously existing technology. The speaker links ongoing destruction and restoration of historic structures to covert activity, citing plastic covering (as seen in France) and questioning why restoration would involve fires and unexplained causes. They say fires appear repeatedly and they are “never given a cause,” raising the possibility of attempts to restore systems that are not properly understood. They reference events in space policy history by recounting a meeting with Dr. Werner von Braun (introduced in 1974 by “Dr. Carolin”), who allegedly warned about lies surrounding the weaponization of space, describing a sequence of supposed threats (“the evil empire,” “Russians,” “terrorists,” “third world countries,” “rogue nations,” “asteroids,” and finally an “extraterrestrial threat”). The speaker claims von Braun also discussed suitcase bombs and chemical, viral, bacterial, and biological warfare as part of the deception framework, using this to support the idea that “there is something going on” beyond stated reasons. They argue that UAP origins may be tied to the Book of Enoch, interpreting it as describing the fall of angels, a precursor to early civilization, and technology given to mankind. They state that these beings allegedly do not follow scientific laws “as measured by people,” and that evidence suggests they are “under the ocean and under the ground.” A recurring theme is sanitation and architectural planning: the speaker claims many monumental buildings were not built with toilets, citing “episode one hundred and twenty-six,” and argues this suggests either the old world did not need toilets or had sanitation methods misunderstood today. They claim the absence of toilets from blueprints was deliberate and that waste disposal stories do not align with advanced construction capabilities. They also discuss resonance, stating they believe the “organ in these cathedrals” resonates with bones below floors. They further argue that “FL Ames” (or “Flames”) could not have built such palaces, and that the scale and skill imply an advanced civilization. They mention the Department of War’s 2021 UAP file releases (described as “May eighth, two thousand twenty-six”) and claim the ongoing disclosures have multiple meanings. They question where technology comes from, contrasting “space aliens” with the idea that “Johnny from Walmart” could not figure out complex chips, and claiming current production on mass scale raises questions about sources of innovation. The speaker frames modern UAP disclosure as possibly involving survivors rather than new visitors from space: survivors from the same cities now called home, who never left, are familiar with Earth, and may be controlling or influencing the timeline. They conclude that the old world—an advanced group—has been present continuously, is still here, and is connected to technology being returned to society.

UFO sightings are predominantly reported in the United States, leading to skepticism about their credibility. There's speculation that some phenomena might be linked to altered states of consciousness, possibly during psychedelic experiences. Additionally, the conversation shifts to a Chinese scientist, Dr. Ning Li, who worked on anti-gravity technology and vanished, likely returning to China. Her groundbreaking research attracted attention and funding, but after starting her own company, she stopped publishing results. An obituary later surfaced, raising questions about her fate. It’s suggested that if she made significant advancements, the government may have isolated her to prevent information leaks, especially given her background. Concerns about espionage and the potential military implications of her work are discussed, highlighting the delicate balance between innovation and national security.

An Intel source mentioned that a Chinese satellite, visible to the naked eye, went down. Reports indicated it burned up, but this source claimed it was taken down by the US government. This satellite was reportedly a command and control unit for drones. The implication was that the Chinese government was signaling its intentions regarding Taiwan and possibly other actions, suggesting that the US could not intervene.

The speakers discuss ancient-looking arcs (arks) whose technology is far more advanced than current human tech, despite being hundreds of thousands of years old. They note that throughout history there are cultures with remarkable, precise stone work (pyramids, temples carved with laser-like precision, Machu Picchu, Stonehenge, ruins in Portugal, Giza), suggesting these arcs fit into a broader pattern of ancient, advanced capabilities. Speaker 1 describes experiences from being inside an arc: the memory of the experience is intermittent, not entirely wiped, but certain techniques make memories hard to retain. The smell upon entering the arc is described as similar to hay from a farm, with a mix of algae and vanilla, giving a feeling that the ship is alive, with a heartbeat and a presence—“the most beautiful feeling you ever feel.” The ships are suggested to be conscious or possess a form of consciousness; these ships are described as a type of old-school consciousness, and the idea is proposed that current AI and modern technologies may be influenced by ancient AI glimpsed through these encounters. They discuss technological leaps that appear after sightings, such as post-Roswell advances (Velcro, computers, transformers), implying a connection between encounters and rapid tech progress. The mission at the arc was “to activate certain things,” specifically to enable communication with the beings or entities in charge of these crafts; Speaker 1 indicates that the Nordic ETs are in charge of it now. Speaker 0 notes that this is now part of congressional testimony, referencing Nordic and multiple alien races as being on the congressional record from military whistleblowers. The idea is that the speaker has a green light to discuss this, under whistleblower protection, and that others have reported similar sightings. The discussion confirms that there are multiple arcs, including one in the Pacific near Hawaii and another off the coast of California, with the concentration that these arcs exist and are part of a broader pattern discussed in testimony. Overall, the dialogue centers on ancient yet advanced arcs, their seemingly alive consciousness, memory-erosion techniques, a mission related to communicating with the controlling beings (the Nordics), the congressional acknowledgment of such reports, and the existence of multiple arcs in the Pacific region.

Speaker 0 describes a 1947-era origins of a technology called the guardians of the looking glass, a device that would give operators a huge advantage by viewing timelines within a stream or field of awareness. He notes the whistleblower Dan Bourish and asserts the technology began after World War II with contact with certain ETs, crashes, and captures of craft and pilots, leading to the formation of a breakaway civilization and Majestic Twelve. He claims that looking glass material and time travel were back-engineered, with area S-4/Area 51 housing the programs. Speaker 1 explains Area S-4’s three projects: Project Galileo (gravity propulsion), Project Sidekick (a beam weapon with a neutron source focused by a gravity lens), and Project Looking Glass (the physics of seeing back in time). Speaker 2 asserts the ETs encountered were not truly ETs but humans from the future (J Rods), referencing John Erwin’s account in his book and likening the concept to a spinning device like in Contact that could access different dimensions. He says a few of these devices existed, and one was controlled by someone in power. Speaker 5 publicly presents Project Looking Glass: a large underground device with rotating rings that shield a water chamber; the water flips into time-space, capturing argon gas and visual images. He states Project Looking Glass can reveal timelines. He adds that in this timeline, Donald Trump will be the 45th president and will try to save the world from the globalist by saving America, while “the forces of dark” will turn against him, but he and Junior will prevail, with a Great Awakening to begin many years from now in 2024 for Junior to reveal himself and right historical wrongs. He asserts humanity will defeat the great reset and that “one, you call it whatever you want” and “I wanna tell you, they lied.” He mentions no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and questions what artifacts were retrieved. Speaker 7 and Speaker 4 discuss Iraq artifacts, suggesting the artifacts were sought and retrieved, including Ark-like items, and note uncertainty about their destinations. Speaker 9 explains J Rods come from Zeta Reticuli and that P52s (fifty-two thousand years in the future) and P45s (forty-five thousand years in the future) are two types of beings; the P52s teach that consciousness can affect timelines and cosmic events. They describe three timelines: one where humanity awakens and another where a nuclear war occurs; in the positive timeline, a guiding event could be transformed into a beneficial future. Speaker 10 compares the global situation to a chess match: two master players know the game is effectively over, and only a few moves remain; the good side appears to win, with limited remaining options. Speaker 8 recounts a vision of a future where Canada merges with the United States, the Mexican border shifts to the Yucatan Peninsula, Alaska returns to Russia, and a demilitarized zone 60 miles wide forms in California, Arizona, and New Mexico as a no-man’s-land. He notes this aligns with the notion of a single North America and questions the necessity and cost of such border measures. Speaker 0 reiterates two primary looking-glass timelines: one in which a catastrophic event like a pole shift is avoided and humanity awakens toward a benevolent future, and another in which the current order persists, leading to a negative outcome; guardians hope to influence the former by elevating collective consciousness and reaching an optimum human potential.

If Russia owned it, the conflict in Ukraine wouldn't exist, as Putin's ego would prevent it. If China had control, they would dominate us even more than they do now. This leads back to my main point: it could either be extraterrestrial or technology we are reverse engineering from our own secret projects.

Speaker 0 discusses Wernher von Braun’s warning about a potential hoaxed alien attack on the planet. He says the idea is “it will trick and fool almost everyone,” and that those with certain technologies could stage it, fooling the public for decades. He notes that people have long been misled into thinking alien events are real, while military or covert aerospace programs are behind what’s observed. Speaker 1 asks what the goal would be in staging a false alien attack on the world. He inquires what would be accomplished by such an act. Speaker 0 explains the objective: to unite the world around a military junta and a totalitarian system. He asks how to get a single race, ethnicity, or nation to stop fighting each other, suggesting that creating a larger external threat would unify everyone against a common enemy. He asserts that such unity could allow the imposition of totalitarian controls during a supposed world war rather than in peacetime. He cites a seventy-year plan and claims to have a CIA document from 1953 or 1954 stating that the UFO issue can be used “to great advantage for its quote psychological warfare value.” He says that after mastering the technology in the mid-1950s, there has been a long-term program to brainwash the public into believing there’s a threat from space. The discussion then shifts to whether this brainwashing could also affect political leaders, including President Trump, noting there are “devils on these deep state operations around the president giving him the opposite perspective.” Speaker 0 continues by describing the tension between true narratives and false flag narratives, and notes that with a very busy president who receives a one-sheet summary amid many duties, it would be easy for bad actors within the system to influence him, portraying them as “foxes in the hen house.” The overall claim is that there is an ongoing, deliberate manipulation of public perception regarding extraterrestrial threats, with the potential to steer political decisions by presenting a false flag scenario as real.

The speaker states they came into contact with industry leaders, technical scientists, active duty and retired military personnel, intelligence officers, generals, admirals, and colonels who directed intelligence at the DIA and CIA. These individuals reached out to the speaker to conduct foreign UAP intelligence analysis and assessment. Based on exposure to classified information, the speaker claims definitively that UAPs are real. The speaker alleges that major world governments, including the United States, China, and Russia, have recovered UAP craft that have landed, crashed, or been found in or outside their territories. These recovered materials have been taken to highly sensitive programs, even more secretive than the Manhattan Project or the modern nuclear weapons industry.

The segment compiles a series of high-profile disappearances and deaths connected to prominent scientists and military-related figures from July 2023 through the present, noting that some cases remain unexplained or lack full public detail while others appear sudden with few answers. The overarching implication presented is that these cases involve individuals tied to advanced national security work, prompting calls for heightened inquiry. Most recently, retired Air Force General William McCaslin vanished in February. He walked out of his Albuquerque home, leaving behind his phone, after having previously overseen some of the Pentagon’s most advanced aerospace programs. In the same month, astrophysicist Carl Grillmeier—who worked closely on NASA missions—was killed outside his home; a suspect has been arrested in that case. Eight months prior to these events, US rocket scientist Monica Reza disappeared while hiking in California’s Angeles National Forest; records indicate she worked on advanced aerospace materials. The report notes that Congress is weighing an FBI involvement: Congressman Eric Burleson is calling for an FBI investigation, underscoring the perceived severity of the cases and the potential implications for national security. In supporting remarks, a statement attributed to Burleson emphasizes the unusual nature of the individuals involved and the seriousness of the situations. Speaker 1 (the reporter’s interlocutor) adds context by describing these victims as not ordinary citizens but “some of the most advanced scientists that are working on our some of our most critical, nation’s secrets.” The speaker frames the situation as having “all of the hallmarks of a foreign operation,” signaling a belief that foreign involvement could be a factor, and stresses the need for investigation. The report notes that, to date, no local authority has publicly connected these mysterious deaths and disappearances. When the inquiry was directed to the FBI, they declined to comment. The segment closes with a follow-up acknowledgment from the host that these cases have heightened curiosity and understanding but remain unresolved in many aspects. Overall, the compilation highlights a pattern involving high-profile scientists and aerospace professionals with missing or violent end-points, the call for federal scrutiny, and the lack of publicly disclosed connections by local authorities, while the FBI maintains silence on the matter.

Perspective is important. Are there reports about advanced technology in aircraft? If we could access this energy, would it benefit or harm humanity? It would save money on projects like Artemis and is a national security concern. Other countries may also have access to this technology, and we need to be prepared to avoid being caught off guard by technological advancements.