TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker discusses the upcoming May 7th state election board hearing regarding the investigation into the 2020 election count in Fulton County, Georgia. They touch on the board's authority to investigate the secretary of state and express a desire to meet with Gabriel Sterling to discuss recount errors. The speaker emphasizes the need for transparency and accountability in election processes.

The speaker questions the evidence presented by elections officials, stating that it has been repeatedly debunked. They suggest inviting the officials back in to provide further evidence. Senator Tillery agrees with the suggestion.

The speaker states they are investigating dangerous and negative consequences with the "best of the best." They claim electronic voting systems have been vulnerable to hackers for a long time and open to exploitation, allowing manipulation of vote results. This vulnerability purportedly reinforces the need for paper ballots nationwide, so voters can have faith in election integrity.

To lower tensions and unite the country, we must investigate election irregularities. Allegations include ballots being backdated in Detroit, late unsealed ballots counted for Democrats, and deceased individuals voting. Whistleblowers in Nevada reported witnessing voter fraud. An election official in Georgia admitted to finding illegal and double voters on the rolls. False claims of fraud are harmful, so we must approach this issue carefully and responsibly.

The speaker discusses the legality of town clerks investigating elections in Michigan and hiring outside parties for investigations. They mention reports from experts that confirm their claims. They accuse the secretary of state and attorney general of Michigan of trying to shut down the investigation and implicate themselves. The speaker explains how Stephanie, funded by the America Project, fought in court to keep the attorney general from taking over the case. They criticize the attorney general for wanting to bring charges against those involved in examining election machines and thumb drives, despite previously instructing to erase the data. The speaker defends the use of expert witnesses and mentions their role as a consultant to the project.

The speaker emphasizes the need to investigate the legitimacy of the election and understand what happened. They express a willingness to work with anyone, regardless of party, to uncover the truth and make improvements. They mention the importance of knowing what laws need to be changed but acknowledge the lack of knowledge about the situation. The speaker concludes by thanking the chairman and Senator Heath.

The speaker believes the Palm Beach Authority should not cede all power to the federal government and that the governor of Florida should exert coequal control, as the event happened in Florida's territory. The speaker claims the federal government is incapable of unbiased investigations. The speaker suggests the state government should back the local government and demand coequal information, and not turn the individual over to the Feds until thoroughly investigated by state and local authorities. The host mentions previous guests from the task force investigating the Butler shooting claimed all evidence was scrubbed, the body cremated, and they were handed an empty bag by the FBI. The speaker agrees, stating the state government doesn't have to turn anything over to the Feds. They can copy everything, such as phone data, vehicle registration, DNA, and run a fully coequal, transparent investigation.

The speaker discussed the upcoming May 7th state election board hearing regarding the investigation into the 2020 election count discrepancies in Georgia. There were discussions about the board's authority to investigate the secretary of state, Brad Raffensperger, and his support staff, including Gabriel Sterling. The speaker expressed a desire to meet with Sterling to address errors in the recount efforts. The investigation's importance and ongoing developments were highlighted.

The speaker asserts that the investigation was conducted properly and according to protocol. They claim that regardless of high-level decisions regarding public statements, the investigative work itself was done correctly by the men and women involved. The speaker encourages listeners to be assured that both investigations followed proper procedure.

The speaker discusses the SEB 2023-025 investigation in Georgia, which was delayed but may now proceed due to a new subpoena. There is also mention of ongoing debates regarding the board's authority to investigate the secretary of state. Additionally, the speaker expresses a desire to meet with Gabriel Sterling to discuss election errors. The conversation ends with anticipation for the upcoming May 7th meeting.

A group of state legislators from across the United States is addressing the citizens regarding the 2020 presidential election. They emphasize their constitutional authority to oversee presidential elections and highlight findings from a forensic audit of 2.1 million ballots in Arizona, which they claim reveal significant corruption. They reference sworn affidavits from various states that detail issues of fraud and mismanagement in the election process. Multiple audits and legal challenges have raised concerns about the validity of election results. The legislators assert that all 50 states should undergo forensic audits and thorough canvassing of voters to ensure the integrity of future elections.

A journalist asks about a recent FBI action at the Fulton County, Georgia elections office, where twenty twenty ballots, voter rolls, and scanner images were seized. The journalist notes that the president claimed, “they got into the votes. You're going to see some interesting things happening,” and asks why the president was so involved in an FBI and DOJ raid. A spokesperson responds that the president’s statements do not imply his involvement. He emphasizes that this is a criminal grand jury investigation, and clarifies that there was a search warrant authorized by a federal judge, a magistrate judge in Atlanta, which allowed the FBI to seize the records. The spokesperson notes that the records have been seized by the FBI as part of the ongoing investigation. The journalist presses on what the investigation is about. The spokesperson reiterates that he cannot discuss specifics of any grand jury investigation, but previously stated that election integrity is of the highest importance to the American people, and that the efforts are aimed at ensuring free and fair elections for everyone in the country, Democrats and Republicans alike. The spokesperson adds that they are doing everything possible to uphold election integrity. The journalist mentions that in Georgia, claims of voter fraud related to the twenty twenty ballots have been debunked repeatedly and that there were multiple recounts. The transcript ends without further elaboration on those claims. Key points conveyed: - The FBI seized twenty twenty ballots, voter rolls, and scanner images from the Fulton County elections office. - The president suggested that “interesting things” would occur, prompting questions about his involvement. - A spokesperson denies the president’s involvement and describes the actions as part of a criminal grand jury investigation. - A federal magistrate judge in Atlanta issued the search warrant permitting the seizure; the FBI conducted the seizure. - The investigation’s specifics cannot be discussed, but officials assert a commitment to election integrity and ensuring free and fair elections for all Americans. - The dialogue references prior debunking of voter fraud claims in Georgia and multiple recounts, without presenting new specifics.

In this video, a speaker from Cairo, Georgia addresses the state election board. They mention that in Grady County, they grow cotton, peanuts, and pine trees, which can be used to make paper ballots. The speaker expresses concern about the lack of results from investigations and recommendations regarding election complaints since the 2020 general election. They highlight an incident where Fulton County's vote totals were lower than reported on election night, and recounting did not confirm the original totals. The speaker urges the board to conduct an independent investigation of the Georgia secretary of state to restore confidence in the election process.

The speaker questions whether purging the 2020 election database in February is a standard practice for all elections. The response is uncertain, but they promise to provide an answer. The speaker further asks why data from previous elections was still present on the databases. Again, there is no clear answer, but they assure the congressman that they will find out. The chairman mentions limited server space as a reason for making room for new election data. The speaker raises concerns about the credibility of the recorder, who had criticized Adrian Fontes, the person in charge of the 2020 election. The speaker clarifies that they had a bipartisan board overseeing the election to ensure fairness.

A memo for record, a letter from state legislators to the American people, references the 2020 presidential election. State legislators claim they are vested with the plenary power by the US Constitution to oversee the election of the president. They state that an audit of 2.1 million ballots in Arizona, complemented by an in-depth canvas of votes, along with multiple data reviews by independent experts, shows that the representative republic suffered a corrupted 2020 election. Sworn affidavits have accumulated from many states detailing rampant corruption and mismanagement in the election process. They claim fraud and inaccuracies have been shown through multiple audits and canvases in multiple states, as well as through lawsuits challenging the validity of election results in several counties in multiple states. They conclude that all 50 states need to be forensically audited and scrubbed with a canvas of the voters.

Governor mentioned concerns about the upcoming election and what would make him not accept the results. He stated that if the secretary of state conducts an illegal election, that would be an issue. He hopes that won't happen.

The discussion centers on completing an audit of ballots to obtain a count and address concerns about the precinct. The participants emphasize that without counts, they cannot move forward. They insist that the audit piece must be completed first, not an investigation, so that a number of ballots can be established and the overall tally can proceed. Key points raised: - The need to finish the audit to determine how many ballots are in the ballot can, and to move forward with the numbers. “We need to move forward with the audit so we can get the numbers, so we can see how many ballots are here.” - A concern has been raised about the precinct, including the issue of multiple ballots with the very same signature. The team discusses handling this by counting the ballots and later addressing the concern, rather than delaying the process. “we will separate out and count those and add those in. We're there going to be an asterisk saying these ballots have the same.” - There is tension between continuing the presidential race audit and addressing potential irregularities. The instruction given is to complete the audit portion first and then review any issues. “the process right now is for you to put them in the piles where they belong and for the presidential vote and count the presidential votes… finish the presidential race audit, not separate them out, and then we'll move forward from there.” - The officials acknowledge the underlying concern about the precinct and previous issues with county ballots, but reiterate that, at this moment, the priority is to obtain a count and finish the audit. “We understand that there may be possibly an issue with this precinct. We understand that. But what I need for you to do right now is to finish the audit process.” - They clarify that the current activity is not an investigation, and that the aim is to produce a number for how many ballots were in the can when counting began, enabling progress based on the audit results. “This is not an investigation right now… not an investigation, not counting… what I need you to do is complete the audit so we can get a number.” In sum, the participants are focused on completing the ballot-count audit to establish a definitive tally, while acknowledging concerns about signatures and precinct irregularities, and planning to address those concerns after the audit yields a numeric result for the presidential ballots. The priority repeatedly stated is to finish the audit to obtain a count, then proceed with any further review.

A key priority is ensuring election integrity, which is crucial for many constituents. I am advocating for a comprehensive audit of Maricopa County's election system by a reputable firm. Recently, I participated in a conference call with the senate president, the speaker of the house of Arizona, and the Florida secretary of state to discuss the differences in our election systems and explore potential improvements.

The speaker announced a state-level investigation into potential violations of state law, despite federal involvement. The speaker believes it's necessary to ensure the truth emerges credibly. The speaker expressed concern that the same federal agencies prosecuting Trump are now investigating this matter, suggesting this may not be ideal for the country. However, the speaker acknowledged the federal prerogative while asserting the state's prerogative to conduct its own investigation. Further announcements regarding the state investigation will be made in the coming days.

The speaker states that the best investigators are pursuing election integrity. They claim there is evidence that electronic voting systems have been vulnerable to hackers for a long time and can be exploited to manipulate vote results. This vulnerability allegedly drives the mandate to implement paper ballots across the country, so voters can have faith in election integrity.

The director is awaiting clarification on a reported human error from the state board of elections. Concerns about a flash drive with votes are raised, but the director is unsure if it was read multiple times. Despite past issues, the director defends their oversight of elections. The state board is investigating discrepancies in election results, with canvassing ongoing for provisional and mail-in ballots.

The Governor mentioned concerns about the upcoming November election and what would need to happen for the speaker not to accept the results. The speaker stated that if the secretary of state conducts an illegal election again, that would be an issue, and they hope it won't happen.

I called for a signature audit, but the Secretary of State has not ordered it yet. I believe it should be done, especially considering what we witnessed today. Transparency is crucial, and I urge for it. Hopefully, in the next 24 hours, we will learn more from the legislative hearings and determine the next course of action. The ongoing recount in the state allows for a thorough examination of these matters.

The speaker states that the "best of the best" are investigating election integrity. They claim there is evidence that electronic voting systems have been vulnerable to hackers and exploitation, allowing for the manipulation of vote results. This allegedly supports the mandate to implement paper ballots nationwide, with the goal of restoring voters' faith in election integrity.

We counted Georgia's election ballots three times, confirming no consequential fraud. Despite issues with ballot images and scanning errors, the recount showed similar results to the original count. Doubts remain about double scanning and counting of votes, suggesting potential fraud. The Secretary of State's office conducted an exhaustive investigation, but concerns persist about the accuracy of the results. The Georgia State Election Board is commended for their diligence and transparency in addressing election issues.