reSee.it - Related Video Feed

As a child, the speaker received three vaccines. By 1986, children received 11 doses of five vaccines. Now, children in states with mandates may receive 69 to 92 vaccines between conception and age 18, with varying dose requirements depending on the brand. Each vaccine is designed to permanently alter the immune system. The speaker believes this contributes to an epidemic of immune dysregulation. The speaker suggests vaccines could be a key culprit in the rise of diseases like diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, seizure disorders, ADD, ADHD, speech delay, language delay, tics, Tourette's syndrome, narcolepsy, and autism, which the speaker claims were rare in their childhood. The speaker believes this generation is damaged by these diseases.

The speaker claims that the flu vaccine's purpose has shifted from preventing the flu to only lessening symptoms. A Cleveland Clinic study allegedly found the flu vaccine had a negative efficacy of 26.9% last winter. According to the speaker, this means that individuals who received the flu vaccine were 26.9% more likely to contract influenza. The speaker notes the study doesn't detail the pharmaceutical industry's profits from the vaccine or list its side effects. They state the side effects would be less than an mRNA vaccine, as it is a dead virus vaccine. The speaker reiterates that taking the flu shot allegedly makes one almost 27% more likely to get sick than not taking it.

The speaker discusses their personal experience with patients developing kidney failure after vaccination and how they started noticing a pattern of vaccines being given to very ill patients. They question the belief that polio disappeared solely because of the vaccine and present data showing that the majority of people infected with poliovirus have no symptoms or only minor symptoms. They suggest that vaccinating every child is unnecessary and question the official history of polio vaccines. They also discuss the use of DDT and arsenic during the time of polio outbreaks and how changes in diagnostic criteria and vaccine formulations contributed to the decline in reported polio cases. They highlight the increase in cases of acute flaccid paralysis and question the effectiveness and safety of polio vaccines.

The speaker believes all vaccines are suspect. As an emergency medicine physician, the speaker thought vaccines only contained a dead or attenuated virus and saline. In September 2000, after reading a package insert and researching vaccines, the speaker was mortified to learn that a child receiving all scheduled vaccines gets almost 13,000 micrograms of aluminum, almost 600 micrograms of mercury, and over 200 chemicals. The speaker states that this is why vaccines have never been proven safe, and vaccination is like injecting foreign matter into a baby.

The transcript discusses the book Vaccinations Do Not Protect by Eleanor McBean, claiming that vaccination goes against the constitution to take this “garbage.” It asserts that most people don’t know that doctors do not take the shots themselves or give them to their own children, yet they administer them to other people’s children because they receive a commission. It notes that certain physicians have observed patterns such as paralysis within twenty-four hours after the injection, up to six months after, cancer near the injection area, and diseases such as TB within twenty years. The speaker claims that Edward Jenner, the father of vaccination, noticed a similar pattern in 1796, describing it as poisoning the people. The question is posed: why do they do this? The answer given is that vaccination is a big business, and that it is protected by the government. The speaker asserts that vaccination was protected by the government in 1986 so that people cannot sue. It is stated as part of the argument that vaccination is the leading cause of why children die under the age of 15.

The speaker, a former pharmaceutical sales rep, shares their disillusionment with the industry after discovering corruption and falsified safety data. They recount their experience with vaccines and their concerns about the lack of rigorous safety studies and the toxic additives, such as aluminum, in childhood vaccines. The speaker highlights the high rates of illness in American children compared to other developed countries and attributes it to the profit-driven nature of the pharmaceutical industry. They discuss the influence of pharmaceutical companies on the media and the lack of liability for vaccine manufacturers. The speaker emphasizes the need for more research and information before mandating vaccines, citing the potential risks involved.

The speaker believes cooperation with companies developing vaccine technology should be outlawed due to "nefarious intent" and financial incentives. They claim the pharmaceutical industry profits from vaccine-induced adverse outcomes, leading to costly medical treatments and prescriptions. Vaccines are described as an "economic loss leader" for the medical-industrial complex. Healthy, unvaccinated children don't generate revenue, while vaccines can lead to health issues like asthma, allergies, ADD/ADHD, diabetes, and cancer. The speaker compares vaccines to a free gift that lures people into purchasing more expensive products or services. They argue that "free" vaccines can cost individuals their health, citing potential side effects like Guillain-Barré syndrome, transverse myelitis, encephalitis, and neurological issues, as well as turbo cancers, respiratory problems, and myocarditis. A forthcoming study will allegedly reveal a significant number of deaths from chronic renal disease linked to vaccines. The speaker concludes that the pharmaceutical industry fiercely defends the vaccine schedule because it drives their profits, especially with the advent of mRNA technology.

In 1985, millennials received a few vaccines. Today, children may receive up to 70 shots by age 18, including 27 before age 2, and up to 6 shots in one visit. The speaker asks if these shots are producing healthier kids, and claims the data says no. The speaker suggests that asking questions about the vaccine schedule is discouraged. Some parents who question the schedule may be reported to Child Protection Services or dismissed from their pediatrician's office. The speaker asserts that parents are being held hostage and did not sign up to co-parent with the government.

Speaker 0 frames the issue as 'the corruption of science' and the 'capture of the agencies' by pharmaceutical industries, stating the goal is to restore integrity and credibility to science. Speaker 1 cites a CDC internal study: 'black boys who got the vaccine on time had a two hundred and sixty percent greater chance of getting an autism diagnosis than children who waited.' He adds that 'The chief chief scientist on that, Doctor. William Thompson, the senior said vaccine safety science at CDC, was ordered to destroy that data. And then they published it without that fact.' Finally, he asserts, 'So, you know that story. And you know of hundreds of stories like that. It happens all the time. We are being lied to by these agencies, and we're gonna change that right now.'

- The meteoric rise in autism is among the most alarming public health developments in history. There's never been anything like this. - And now it's one in thirty one, but in some areas, it's much worse than that, if you can believe it. One in thirty one. - For boys, it's one in twelve. - And by the way, I think I can say that there are certain groups of people that don't take vaccines and don't take any pills that have no autism, that have no autism. - They're pumping it looks like they're pumping into a horse. - You have a little child, little fragile child, and he get a a vat of 80 different vaccines, I guess. - 80 different blends, and they pump it in.

The speaker claims that vaccines are not safe or effective, particularly the COVID-19 jab. They believe that those who promote and administer vaccines should be imprisoned, and parents who allow their children to be vaccinated should have their children taken away. They argue that COVID-19 was created to make the flu seem more dangerous, even though flu statistics show it can be deadlier. The speaker also suggests that the COVID-19 jab weakens the immune system, affects DNA, and can cause cancer. They criticize doctors for administering the vaccine to various groups, including toddlers, patients, school children, and pilots. Lastly, they believe that getting the COVID-19 vaccine is either suicide or murder.

As a child, the speaker received three vaccines; by 1986, children received 11 doses of five vaccines. Now, children in states with mandates may receive 69 to 92 vaccines between conception and age 18, with varying dose requirements depending on the brand. Each vaccine is designed to permanently alter the immune system. The speaker believes this contributes to an epidemic of immune dysregulation. The speaker claims there is a rise in diseases like diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, seizure disorders, ADD, ADHD, speech delay, language delay, tics, Tourette's syndrome, narcolepsy, and autism, which they rarely saw as a child, suggesting this generation is damaged by these diseases.

The speaker expresses feeling disconnected from their profession and society due to corruption. They criticize the belief that vaccines have saved lives, arguing that highly vaccinated countries had high fatality rates. They highlight concerns about underreporting vaccine injuries and criticize public health leaders for dismissing the connection between deaths and vaccines. The speaker mentions the strict actions taken for other products causing harm, contrasting it with the lack of action regarding vaccine-related deaths. They also mention a rise in autism, which they believe is linked to the vaccine schedule. The speaker dismisses claims that there is no evidence of a vaccine-autism link.

The speaker claims the medical landscape is dominated by COVID vaccine injuries, disabilities, and deaths, and that they submit multiple entries daily to VAERS, facing scrutiny and potential penalties for falsification. They state they diagnosed an executive in her late thirties with Guillain Barre syndrome from COVID-19 vaccination. The speaker estimates that only 1% of manuscripts on COVID vaccine injuries are being published, suggesting a tremendous bias, and that there are about 4,000 papers on the vaccine debacle, which is about 1% of reality. They claim to have never seen myocarditis, heart failure, or blood clots from eating frosted flakes, but are seeing people devastated by the shots. The speaker advocates for removing COVID-19 vaccines from the market, a critical reevaluation of the vaccine schedule, dropping all vaccine mandates, and rescinding the 1986 Vaccine Injury Compensation Act.

World governments have harmed millions without apology. The speaker believes vaccines cause autism, but mainstream media won't discuss it. They gathered data from 10,000 parents showing a link between vaccines and autism, ADHD, and other health issues. More shots lead to poorer health in children.

The speaker claims colored vaccines are dangerous, with no clinical benefit and over 10,000,000 deaths worldwide. They suggest avoiding vaccination altogether, citing studies showing unvaccinated kids are healthier. They criticize censorship by the government and medical boards, leading to job loss and license revocation for speaking out against the narrative. The medical journals are also deemed corrupt. Speaker 1 mentions not every batch causes harm, as they themselves took a few shots without issue.

The speaker discusses “Santa virus,” swine flu virus, and COVID virus, claiming “viruses are fake.” The speaker then frames the 1976 swine flu campaign as an example, saying the CDC “control plan for the national vaccination campaign against the swine flu in 1976” came out of Atlanta and that “there was not a single known case of this flu in The United States” yet “it did not stop the medical monopoly from their scheme.” The speaker says swine breeders began to inject pigs and animals, after which “all of their animals began to perish,” and claims that if swine breeders would not inject toxins into animals, “Our only market is to inject it into the people.” The speaker then claims “Doctor Morris then went public with his statement” that “at no point was there a swine flu vaccine which was effective,” and says he was fired. The speaker adds that “anybody who goes against the vaccine narrative” is “removed.” Next, the speaker says that because the pigs were passing and the vaccine needed to be delivered to people, “president Ford appears on a news program to urge the American people to submit to the vaccination for the swine flu vaccine, 1976.” The speaker says it “didn’t work with the pigs” because it was killing the pigs, and claims doctors began saying “don’t do that,” leading to the president being involved. The speaker then states that insurance agencies “went public with their warning” that they would not issue insurance to the drug firm because it “can cause a lot of damages.” The speaker ties this to 2020 by saying it “Sounds a lot like 2020.” The speaker claims “it was a foil” that insurance companies warned, while Gerald Ford appealed to “the 215,000,000 Americans” to get “the booster,” “Get the injections,” and “Get your vaccines,” and that the government would provide “donuts” and “Krispy Kreme.” The speaker calls it “Murder by injection,” and says that “within a few months” claims totaling “$1,300,000,000 filed by the victims” included “paralysis from the swine flu vaccine.” The speaker then claims the “medical monopoly” changed the name to “GBS,” and that in 1986 “Reagan signed a bill to protect all vaccines from lawsuits.” The speaker concludes by saying this “sums up vaccines in a nutshell,” asserting that presidents, animals, doctors, and TV were used and that the message is “repeating it to you until you don’t.” The speaker ends with a directive, saying anyone who tells others to put vaccines “into your body” should be “beat them up or put them in a cage and beat them up,” mentioning “UFC” as an example.

The speaker questions the safety and effectiveness of vaccines, particularly in relation to autism. They criticize the lack of long-term, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies on vaccines and highlight the conflict of interest between vaccine manufacturers and regulatory bodies. The speaker also discusses the high number of lawsuits against pharmaceutical companies and the exorbitant markups on popular drugs. They argue that the current scientific evidence does not support the trust placed in vaccines and advocate for freedom of choice in healthcare decisions. The speaker claims to have a comprehensive review of the safety and efficacy of flu vaccines and mentions dissenting opinions on the connection between vaccines and autism.

There is a discussion about how public trust in vaccination has changed since the pandemic. The speaker notes that years ago there were “five people in the world who were prepared to talk about the thorny issue of vaccination.” Post COVID, however, “half the adult population of the world are now saying, hold on, we don't trust you. You lied to us. It's not what you told us, safe and effective.” This skepticism extends to vaccines given to children, with the question, “Does this apply to all the other vaccines you're putting into my kids?” The speaker then asserts that “safety studies haven't been done,” suggesting that important research behind vaccines is incomplete or lacking. This leads to the claim that “they've created this mess for themselves.” Despite the frustration, the speaker emphasizes the moral weight of deception, stating, “it's really tough to lie. I mean, lying gets you into real trouble.”

The speaker feels estranged from their profession and a society corrupted by unseen forces, where people are misled by sources like the New York Times. They claim that assertions of vaccines saving a million lives are "utter and complete nonsense," arguing vaccines saved no one and highly vaccinated countries had the worst fatality rates. They allege significant underreporting of vaccine injuries and criticize public health leaders for dismissing reported deaths as unrelated, contrasting this with reactions to baby formula deaths or faulty car mufflers. The speaker expresses terror, citing a coincident explosion in autism cases alongside the vaccine schedule. They anticipate colleagues will deny any link between vaccines and autism, but the speaker insists this denial is "nonsense."

The speaker addresses the issue of vaccines, claiming the FDA has lost the trust of Americans. Autism rates are cited, stating that in the 1980s, it was 1 in 10,000, but a recent Children's Health Defense study indicates it's now 1 in 33 among children ages 5 to 8. Parents are said to point to vaccines as a cause, but are dismissed. The speaker criticizes the emergency use authorization of COVID vaccines, alleging the process took only days compared to the typical 10-15 years for vaccine development. VAERS reports are referenced, citing 1,662,426 reports, including 38,541 deaths, 220,494 hospitalizations, and other adverse events. The speaker contrasts this with the alleged dismissal of Ivermectin as "horse paste," despite its effectiveness against COVID. The speaker asks if the addressee objected to the removal of Doctors Gruber and Krausz for opposing mandated booster shots, to which the addressee said no. The speaker claims vaccinated and boosted individuals keep getting and spreading COVID-19, while those with natural immunity do not.

The transcript references the book Vaccinations Do Not Protect by Eleanor McBean and presents several assertions about vaccines and the vaccination system. It claims that the book argues taking vaccines is unconstitutional and labels vaccines as “garbage,” suggesting that vaccination is a large, protected industry. It asserts that doctors do not take the shots themselves, do not give them to their own children, but administer them to other people’s children because they receive a commission. The speaker states that some physicians have noticed patterns associated with vaccines, including paralysis within twenty-four hours after an injection, paralysis up to six months after an injection, cancer near the injection site, and diseases such as tuberculosis within twenty years. The speaker also notes that Edward Jenner, the father of vaccination, noticed a similar pattern of “poisoning the people” in 1796. The transcript emphasizes that vaccination is a big business and claims it is protected by the government. It references 1986 as a key date when vaccination was protected by the government so that people cannot sue. The speaker concludes by asserting that vaccination is the leading cause of death among children under the age of 15. Throughout, the claims are presented as facts or observations within the book and its interpretation, with emphasis on alleged patterns, motivations, and systemic protections surrounding vaccination.

The speaker finds it difficult to find someone who hasn't been damaged by the vaccine, and even senior consultant colleagues haven't connected their ailments to the vaccine. The speaker claims the vaccine causes autoimmune diseases, of which there are 131 types, all reportedly linked to the vaccine. Individually, these appear as coincidences, but collectively, a high percentage of vaccinated people suffer from one or more autoimmune conditions. The speaker is annoyed by their GP practice constantly pushing boosters, even knowing their views, suggesting they are incentivized by payment. The speaker believes that if the practice adhered to "first do no harm," they would refuse to administer the vaccines.

Speaker 0 initially considered people like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. "crazy anti-vaxxers." Invited to a church event in Murrieta, California, to hear Kennedy speak, the speaker admitted to Kennedy that they were trying to determine if he was "a crazy anti vaxxer." After listening to Kennedy's presentation on vaccines and injuries, the speaker felt regret for having fully vaccinated their children. This experience led the speaker to begin reading vaccine package inserts, something they had never done before due to their complexity. Upon examining these inserts and the studies included, the speaker concluded that the studies were flawed and the benefits of the products were minimal. The speaker claims this applies to both vaccines and drugs.

The speaker expresses a nuanced view on vaccines, stating a belief in their importance while opposing mandatory vaccination for all vaccines. They highlight the polio vaccine as amazing and credited with wiping out the disease, illustrating support for vaccines in general but not for compulsory mandates. They point out that there are about 88 vaccines, suggesting that some could be cut back or administered in smaller quantities. The speaker contrasts the high number with examples from other countries, noting Denmark and others have significantly fewer vaccines (12, 14, or up to 17). They emphasize their own preference for reducing the vaccine load. A vivid image is used: babies receiving “a vat” or “a big glass of stuff pumped into their bodies,” which the speaker characterizes as a negative thing. This leads to the expressed desire for a different approach, namely much smaller shots and fewer visits to the doctor. The speaker proposes that with fewer vaccinations and fewer medical visits, outcomes could be improved. They specifically mention four doctor visits as a desired target, implying that this reduction could lead to better health results. Finally, the speaker links this approach to autism, stating the belief that the proposed changes—smaller shots and fewer visits—would yield a much better result with autism. The remarks indicate a direct connection between the vaccination approach described and autism outcomes, presented as a conclusion of their viewpoint. Overall, the transcript captures a stance that supports vaccines in principle and acknowledges their success (polio), but argues against mandatory universal vaccination and for a substantially reduced vaccine schedule and medical visits, with an asserted positive impact on autism outcomes. The speaker compares U.S. vaccination totals to those of Denmark and other countries to underscore the perceived excess, advocating for smaller, fewer-dose regimens administered over fewer clinical visits.