TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Kamala Harris, then VP-elect, was secretly in the DNC building on January 6th, but kept it hidden until recently. The Secret Service, responsible for her protection, showed bizarre behavior when a pipe bomb was discovered near their vehicles. They did not react or evacuate the area, even allowing children to walk near the bomb. The timing of the bomb's discovery coincided with the initial breach on the Capitol by the Peace Monument. This suggests coordination and raises questions about the true intentions behind the pipe bomb incident. The full truth is yet to be revealed, but it is clear that there is a cover-up and efforts to control the narrative. The story is expected to unravel in the coming months, possibly with the help of whistleblowers.

What needs to be established is whether the FBI and government agents used undercover operatives on January 6th. If evidence shows they had informants, it undermines the insurrection narrative. There’s reasonable suspicion of federal involvement, especially with video evidence of a person directing people into the building and the case of Ray Epps, who was briefly on the FBI's most wanted list. Two significant points support this: Epps’ sudden removal from the list suggests he may have been an informant, and FBI official Jill Sanborn's refusal to answer whether federal agents were involved indicates possible involvement. Her silence implies that confirming their presence could compromise ongoing operations.

Over the past 3 years, Representative questioned FBI Director Wray and Attorney General Garland about federal assets at the Capitol on January 6th, but received no answers. The Inspector General announced a review of the DOJ response in 2021, paused it due to ongoing criminal cases, and reinitiated it last year. The report will include information on the number of confidential human sources operating on Capitol grounds on January 6th, but the exact number is not available yet due to the draft form and classification review. The report's release is not expected before the election, and possibly not before the next inauguration. The report will expose the presence of confidential human sources at the Capitol, and whether DOJ CHS protocols were followed. Representative inquired about the failed FBI investigation of the January 6th pipe bomb, citing lost information, deleted Secret Service texts, and corrupted cell phone data. The FBI allegedly lacks video footage of the DNC from January 6th. The Inspector General couldn't rule out the involvement of confidential human sources in the pipe bomb incident.

Democrats say we need to find out exactly what happened on January 6, and actually we strongly agree with that. Thomas Massey of Kentucky confronted Merrick Garland with footage of a man called Ray Epps, who apparently lives in Arizona. Epps was in Washington the night before, January 5, encouraging Trump supporters to enter the Capitol Building illegally. "Here's a guy telling Trump supporters they need to break the law and go into the capital. That's real video." "And then they accuse him of being an undercover federal agent. That's pretty interesting." Massey asked, "Has he been indicted? Who or where is he exactly?" Garland refused to answer, saying he would not comment on an ongoing investigation or "how many federal operatives were there in the crowd that day." We don't know whether this Epps guy was working with the federal government. A Revolver News piece notes the FBI removed a photo of Epps from its most wanted page after their reporting; it says "Ray Epps is everywhere" on Jan 6, and "twenty seconds before the very first breach" he whispers. The FBI scrubbed Epps' face a day after Revolver reported on Rhodes; the host calls it "awfully weird" and invites Epps to appear.

A recent House report on the January 6th pipe bomber claims the FBI has engaged in a cover-up, halting its investigation in 2021 and refusing to cooperate with Congress. A whistleblower indicated that law enforcement was instructed to stand down just two days after the bombs were discovered at the RNC and DNC. Despite initial investigative efforts, the FBI has not identified the bomber nearly four years later. Conflicting information has emerged regarding whether the FBI received corrupted cell data from major carriers, with a former FBI official suggesting it might contain the bomber's identity. However, the carriers denied providing any corrupted data. The report highlights ongoing concerns about the FBI's handling of the investigation, which remains unresolved.

I met with Capitol Police today and learned some startling information regarding the January 6th investigation. The so-called "backpack guy," who I was told was a plainclothes police officer, was the one who discovered the pipe bomb. This revelation heightens my concerns about the timeline of events, especially regarding the Secret Service and Metro Police response. The timing of the pipe bomb discoveries is also suspicious. The first bomb at the Capitol Hill Club (mistakenly called the RNC bomb), was found just five minutes before the breach of the Capitol perimeter. Then, a second bomb was found only fifteen minutes after securing the first location. It seems incredibly coincidental that these events happened in such close proximity to each other.

I met with Capitol Police and learned that the individual who discovered the pipe bomb on January 6th was an undercover officer. This raises concerns about the response time of the Secret Service and Metro Police, who took four minutes to act. The timing of the bomb discoveries coincided with the Capitol breach, which may have distracted law enforcement. The investigation into the bombs is ongoing, but there are questions about their operability and the involvement of the FBI. The January 6th committee report suggests that the discovery of the bombs prevented reinforcements from arriving at the Capitol, potentially facilitating the breach. There are ongoing discussions about accountability for those involved in the events of that day.

The speaker discusses the FBI's ongoing investigation into the January 6th Capitol riot and the arrest of Trump supporters who were present. They highlight the FBI's inability to find information about the individuals responsible for planting pipe bombs outside the RNC and DNC headquarters the night before the riot. The speaker then analyzes a recently released video showing the moment one of the bombs was discovered, raising questions about the authorities' lack of concern and the involvement of the Secret Service. They also mention the failure of the media to cover this story and the suspicious actions of Vice President-elect Kamala Harris. The transcript ends with an update revealing that the person who alerted the police about the bomb was a plainclothes officer with the Capitol Police.

- "Do you know who Ray Epps is, and where is he? And, is he sitting behind bars like some of these other, protesters who've been sitting there without bail for so long?" - "And what we need to know is whether or not that cooperation existed on January 5 and January 6 to get people to do things that they might otherwise not do, like enter the capital." - "We already know as a consequence of reporting in revolver.news and in re really, that was confirmed by the New York Times that there were people texting their handlers from the crowd in January 5 and January 6." - "Now we just need to know whether the folks being controlled by the federal government were, in fact, the very people that were doing the worst things on January 6."

The speaker discusses the FBI's "failed investigation" of the January 6th pipe bomb, alleging the FBI has no leads or suspects, has lost information and evidence, and that the Secret Service deleted all texts from January 6th. The speaker claims Steve D'Antuono said cell phone data that could have been used to find the bomber was corrupted. The speaker states that the FBI does not have video footage of the DNC from January 6th. The speaker asks if confidential human sources were involved in the pipe bomb incident. The other speaker responded they would have to refresh themselves on the information gathered to date. The speaker suggests getting the information public before the election.

The speaker discusses the lack of evidence sharing within the FBI and contradicts Christopher Wray's testimony. They believe history has been misrepresented, citing the FBI's knowledge of the pipe bomber and the January 6th committee's failure to question certain witnesses. They claim that the committee hired Hollywood producers and mainstream media to shape their narrative. The speaker also expresses concerns about the release of tapes, fearing that it could lead to more arrests and mistreatment of individuals in jail. They hope for the truth to come out and do not want to see anyone suffer unjustly.

It's our constitutional duty to do oversight. He asks, "how many agents or assets of the government were present on January 5 and January 6 and agitating in the crowd to go into the capital and how many went into the capital. Can you answer that now?" Speaker 1 replies, "I don't know the answer to that question." The exchange continues: "I don't know the answer to either of those questions. If there were any, I don't know how many." "You've had two years to find out." The discussion mentions Ray Epps: "yesterday, you indicted him. Isn't that a wonderful coincidence on a misdemeanor?" and says, "you're sending grandmas to prison." It references a video claim: "the guy on video who's saying go into the capital," noting "10 videos, and it's an indictment for a misdemeanor?" In discovery, "the Justice Department prosecutors provided whatever information they had about the question that you're asking." "With respect to mister Epps, the FBI has said that he was not an employee or informant of the FBI." "Mister Epps has been charged, and there's a proceeding, I believe, going on today on that subject." "The charge is a joke."

There were multiple improbable factors that would have had to align for these bombs to be discovered at the same time on a sidewalk, prompting questions about a broader conspiracy and how such a scenario could unfold. The speakers emphasize that while they want to avoid a conspiracy path, there are many questions still open, including the handling of video footage. Regarding video records, one speaker notes that they want to review January 6 video to see if anyone returned to the locations, but that video apparently does not exist anymore. They do have January 5 video, but have been told that no one preserved January 6. This raises eyebrows as they consider whether the devices were placed by an inexperienced person who was trying to set them down quickly or whether the devices were left to be found. Mrs. Younger’s account is highlighted: she walked out her back door and did not see anything earlier in the morning, but saw the devices later, which would give a reason to believe she would have noticed them if they had been there in the morning. This observation is part of why they want to talk to her. One speaker is blown away by a point: according to the FBI, the FBI’s internal data indicate 39,000 videos showing the hoodie-clad pipe bomber—referred to as the C. Virkel bomber—movements that night, from various camera angles. Washington, DC, Capitol Hill is described as among the most surveilled areas in the world. Yet there is a claim that there is no footage from January 6 of the actual areas a person would have had to travel to place the pipe bombs. The other speaker confirms that there are cameras along some Capitol Police lines that show walking paths, including footage from Capitol Police cameras, but the angles that would show positions behind the RNC and behind the DNC do not exist today, at least not in a way that captures the relevant movements. This absence has limited the investigation into the theory that the devices could have been placed earlier and then moved or re-placed. They are now going back through Capitol Police footage, including from the Fairchild Building near the DNC, which has provided the most evidence so far. The team is reviewing hours from about 8 PM on May 5 to 1 PM on January 6 to determine whether anyone else passed by, whether there was any suspicious activity, and whether the devices were moved again. The investigators are evaluating step-by-step explanations for these anomalies, considering whether the Secret Service dog failed to detect one device or whether Mrs. Younger missed the other, whether the devices were not present at that time, or whether weather and other factors affected detections. They acknowledge that with so many circumstances, some “smoke” might indicate “fire.” They hope the FBI is reviewing cell phone data to determine if the suspected bomber returned or if a co-conspirator was involved in setting timers or re-placing devices. The transcript ends with an acknowledgment of ongoing investigation scope and questions.

During a congressional hearing, DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz admitted the FBI had confidential human sources (CHS) embedded in the January 6th Capitol crowd. GOP Rep. Thomas Massie questioned why it's taken almost 4 years to reveal the number of informants involved, but Horowitz declined to provide a specific number, promising a future report. Massie inquired if informants who entered the Capitol would be prosecuted like other J6 participants and if any were compensated for travel. Fox News suggested the presence of FBI informants was a significant development. Stephen Dantuono, former head of the FBI's Washington DC field office, previously stated the field office had CHS embedded in the J6 crowd and that informants from other field offices were also present. Rep. Clay Higgins claimed busloads of FBI moles were sent to DC on January 6th. The J6 pipe bomb suspect may also have been a federal government asset.

The DNC pipe bomb was planted on January 6th at 7:52 PM, according to the FBI. They released two clips from different security cameras. The first camera shows the suspect arriving at 7:42 PM, sitting on bench 1, then leaving. Ten minutes later, he returns and sits on bench 2. At 7:52 PM, the second camera captures him planting the bomb next to the bush, but the view is obstructed. The first camera has a clearer shot of both benches, yet the FBI has not released the full footage from it. This raises questions about transparency, especially since there is a $100,000 reward for information leading to the suspect's capture.

Speaker 0: "What I'm saying is a reasonable suspicion is that there were agents. There's a video showing a guy with an earpiece pulling people into the building. Alright? Mhmm. You combine that with the evidence of Ray Epps, and it looks like you have a preponderance of evidence suggesting there may have been federal law enforcement involved in making that thing happen." Speaker 1: "I'll get you beyond a reasonable doubt. Two pieces of information. Ray Epps was on FBI's most wanted list one day, and the next day, he was off of the FBI's most wanted list. There are only two ways that happens. You die or your informant." Speaker 1: "Put that aside. Under congressional testimony, Jill Sanborn, who I used to work with, the head of the FBI counterintelligence division in charge of all these investigations, testified under oath when senator Cruz asked her, flat out, were there federal agents involved with January 6? And she said, quote, senator, I can't answer that at this time." Speaker 1: "The reason she said I can't answer that is because of the same stonewalling they gave us during Russergate with Christopher Steelehauper and everybody else. It's the same narrative, and and I'm telling you they were there." Speaker 0: "You're so you're saying that she said I can't answer that because the answer is yes Yeah. And that would compromise whatever their operation was. Exactly."

The transcript centers on a report from NBC News about the man charged with planting two pipe bombs near the Democratic and Republican party headquarters on the eve of the January 6th attack. The speaker cites NBC’s article, which states that the suspect told the FBI he believed conspiracy theories about the 2020 election, according to two people familiar with the matter. The speaker notes that NBC provides no direct quote or further context beyond that single claim. The speaker asserts that their own sources indicate the word used by the suspect, Brian Cole Jr., in his FBI interview was that he believed the 2020 election was stolen. However, the speaker claims there is a widespread belief within the FBI that this comment was a legal maneuver rather than a genuine belief. According to the speaker, the FBI allegedly thinks the statement was coached by Cole’s lawyer to secure a pardon from President Trump, specifically a retroactive pardon because Trump had issued a pardon for individuals convicted of January 6–related crimes. The speaker emphasizes that there is no additional evidence in Cole Jr.’s background, as far as their sources can determine, indicating he is a Trump supporter. They remark that NBC is one of the few outlets making this claim, noting that the article contains several paragraphs but only repeats the initial sentence without further detail. The speaker suggests that even within liberal media, there is a belief that the comment was a legal maneuver rather than a reflection of genuine political conviction, and argues that NBC’s reporting is selectively presented to push a particular narrative. Throughout, the speaker contrasts this with a broader media portrayal, arguing that while Brian Cole Jr. did make the comment about the 2020 election being stolen, the context is missing, and the media narrative is being shaped by selective reporting. The speaker frames the situation as an instance of media cherry-picking intended to influence perceptions about the suspect’s political affiliations and the nature of his statements to the FBI, rather than providing a complete account.

A recent meeting with Capitol Police revealed that the person who found the pipe bomb on January 6th was an undercover Capitol Police officer. This raises concerns about the response time of other law enforcement agencies. The timing of the bomb's discovery, just minutes before the breach of the Capitol perimeter, seems suspicious. The ATF director refused to comment on whether the bombs were operable, suggesting a cover-up. The bombs were sent to Quantico for inspection, not to the ATF. The discovery of the bombs also prevented reinforcements in the form of bike racks from reaching the Capitol, potentially making it easier to breach. The motive behind planting the bombs remains unknown.

The speaker discusses the FBI's ongoing investigation into the January 6th Capitol riot and the arrest of Trump supporters. They highlight the FBI's inability to find information about the person or people who planted pipe bombs outside the RNC and DNC headquarters the night before the riot. The speaker then introduces new surveillance footage released by Capitol Police, showing the moment one of the bombs was discovered. They describe the video, pointing out the lack of concern from law enforcement and the Secret Service, as well as the proximity of the bomb to VP-elect Kamala Harris. The speaker raises questions about the identity of the person who alerted authorities to the bomb and the subsequent cover-up.

Vice President Kamala Harris was allegedly targeted by a pipe bomb at the Democratic National Committee headquarters on January 6, 2021. The FBI is urging people to report any suspicious activity, offering a $500,000 reward for information leading to the arrest of the suspect. However, the person in charge of the FBI investigation now claims that Harris was never in danger and the bomb couldn't have detonated while she was there. The incident is not mentioned in a special January 6th report. Questions arise about why Nancy Pelosi and Mitch McConnell denied National Guard assistance prior to the Capitol riot. A newly released video shows Capitol Police and Secret Service officers seemingly relaxed near the bomb. The FBI released video footage of the suspect, but the cell phone data was corrupted, leaving unanswered questions.

We had cooperation from the Capitol Police and the speaker's office, but we couldn't show that FBI agents were in the crowd, which they admitted. Ray Epps was not just a civilian; he encouraged violence, yet the January 6th committee defended him. There were clear signs of federal involvement, but I didn't want to wrongly accuse anyone. The recent Proud Boys trial revealed an FBI agent lied and hid evidence, raising questions about their role. We need to crowdsource the footage, as it's publicly owned. The claims about January 6th being a violent insurrection are misleading; it was a political demonstration among many that year. Intelligence about potential violence was withheld from Capitol Police, suggesting a deliberate attempt to create chaos and discredit a political party.

John Nance and Hogan DeGidley discuss a recent FBI case and press conference. Patel’s FBI has been extremely transparent, and that transparency will continue to reassure the American people that information regarding this subject will flow as appropriate without jeopardizing the prosecution of the case. A key takeaway is the suggestion that forensic evidence could be the linchpin to identifying the suspect, despite millions of data lines to review; pieces such as DNA or a fingerprint related to the pipe bombs themselves may have been the actual “smoking gun.” There is emphasis on teamwork and the idea that information had been left to collect dust rather than being newly uncovered. AG Merrick Garland’s remarks are cited, highlighting that the evidence leading to the arrest had been sitting at the FBI for years. The FBI, along with US Attorney Piro and prosecutors, worked tirelessly for months sifting through evidence that had been at the FBI with the Biden administration for four years. The point is made that there was no new tip or new witness, just diligent police work and prosecutorial effort. Hogan DeGidley asks why the case wasn’t cracked during President Biden’s four years in office. The response suggests that it either couldn’t be done or wouldn’t be done, and that the American people suffered as a result. It is stated that this did not come from new evidence but from information already in the bureau and departments being sifted through. The discussion frames the case as a win for the administration, the FBI, and the DOJ, and a step toward transparency, accountability, and justice. They note that the attackers placed pipe bombs at both the RNC and DNC locations; the motives remain unknown, and questions about a possible Antifa link or other theories are mentioned as preliminary. Cash Patel is quoted as saying the FBI has committed to being the most transparent law enforcement operation in U.S. history while ensuring accountability in the courts with U.S. Attorneys and prosecutors. The aim is to divulge information when prudent and constitutionally permissible, safeguarding the case, to secure the nation’s capital and allow Americans to live in safe, secure neighborhoods. This is attributed to leadership from the FBI Washington Field Office. John Nance comments that Patel is doing a very good job and that the director’s social-media transparency is notable. He expresses encouragement about the FBI’s reform efforts and notes that the White House press narrative around January 6 is seen as misaligned with the pipe-bomb case. The arrest took place in Woodbridge, Virginia, a wealthy DMV suburb, prompting remarks about why the dots weren’t connected sooner.