reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker claims that President Obama and top members of his administration interfered in the 2016 and 2020 elections. They allege that 50 intelligence officials were influenced by the former Secretary of State to falsely claim the Hunter Biden laptop had earmarks of a Russian information campaign, despite the FBI knowing it was genuine. The speaker demands the press be honest and Pulitzer Prizes be returned, claiming they were either duped or complicit in pushing a false narrative that put America in political turmoil. They assert this was a Hillary Clinton dirty trick involving the Steele dossier, which was used to instigate the Mueller investigation and impeachment. The speaker believes this election interference is worse than anything Russia or China could achieve and was orchestrated by President Obama, President Biden, James Brett, John Brennan, and others. They state the American people should have known this, but it was not covered by the legacy media.

The transcript alleges that 51 former intelligence officials, including active CIA contractors, colluded with the Biden campaign to discredit the Hunter Biden laptop story as Russian disinformation and rig the 2020 election. According to the transcript, Anthony Blinken initiated the effort by contacting Michael Morell, a CIA contractor, to create talking points for Biden. The report claims that CIA officials, including then-Director Gina Haspel, were aware of the statement prior to its publication and that the CIA's internal review board approved it. The transcript asserts that Morell and David Buckley, another signatory, were active CIA contractors at the time, earning taxpayer money while engaging in political activities. The report suggests that the signatories leveraged their intelligence titles to lend legitimacy to their claims. The speaker concludes that the CIA paid, housed, and approved the letter, interfering in the electoral system.

The office of the director of National Intelligence would have only participated in election security briefings with private companies like Twitter, YouTube, Microsoft, and state election officials. These meetings did not involve content moderation or the Biden laptop as Russian disinformation. Therefore, there was no authority or reason for anyone in the intelligence community to say otherwise.

Mike Morell, former CIA director, emailed John Brennan, Obama's CIA director, just before a debate between Trump and Biden regarding the Hunter Biden laptop. Morell asked Brennan to sign a letter because he was, quote, "trying to give the campaign, particularly during the debate on Thursday, a talking point to push back on Trump on this issue." The letter in question is the one from 51 intelligence professionals that claimed the Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation. Morell, according to the speaker, knew he wasn't creating an intelligence product, but rather a political moment. The speaker claims this email is proof that the letter was a political dirty trick coordinated with the Biden campaign.

Former CIA director Mike Morell and 50 other former intelligence officials signed a letter in October 2020, falsely suggesting that a laptop was Russian disinformation. In sworn testimony to the house judiciary committee, Morell revealed that Secretary of State Anthony Blinken played a significant role in the creation of the now debunked letter. At the time, Blinken was working as a senior adviser to Biden.

According to the speaker, 53% of people aware of the Hunter Biden laptop story would have changed their vote, including 61% of Democrats. The speaker claims this constitutes election meddling by the FBI on behalf of Democrats, funded by US taxpayers. The speaker characterizes this as collusion, corruption, and unconstitutional.

The former acting CIA director coordinated with the Biden campaign to release a letter from 51 intelligence analysts, which has since been disproven. It has now been revealed that some of the signatories were active CIA contractors at the time. The Trump CIA leadership knew about the letter beforehand but did not intervene. This information is currently being reported on justinews.com.

In October 2020, with Joe Biden "in trouble" regarding his laptop, Anthony Blinken, Biden's campaign aide, allegedly told Michael Morrell to "round them up." Subsequently, 51 intelligence authorities swore the laptop had "all the hallmarks of Russian information." During the debate, when Trump attacked Biden about the laptop, Biden responded that 51 intelligence authorities swore it was a product of Russian espionage. A poll later indicated that if people had known the laptop was authenticated, it would have changed their vote. The laptop was in the FBI's possession and deemed authentic, but Christopher Wray's FBI was partnering with Twitter and Facebook to suppress the story.

Last night, it was revealed that Tony Blinken played a significant role in orchestrating a plan involving 51 intelligence operatives. Their objective was to discredit a laptop that is widely known to be genuine. All evidence points to Blinken as the mastermind behind this scheme. It is crucial that he is questioned and held accountable for his actions.

The revelation shows that 51 intelligence officials, who claimed Hunter Biden's laptop was Russian disinformation, were actually coordinated by the Biden campaign. This corruption involved Biden, Secretary of State Blinken, and partisan intelligence officials, aiming to hide the truth about the Biden family's influence peddling and corruption. During the debate, Joe Biden lied about this scandal, which is considered the biggest in American history. This cheating and election interference is a disgrace to our country, causing us to be mocked worldwide. The American people will not tolerate this any longer.

News alert discusses Tulsi Gabbard releasing a report alleging a conspiracy by a sitting president, Barack Obama, and U.S. intel agencies to undermine Donald Trump’s presidency and the 2016 election. The report claims there is irrefutable evidence that Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment they knew was false, promoting a narrative that Russia interfered in 2016 to help Trump win. Gabbard says she obtained a House Intelligence Committee report that had been locked away in a CIA vault for nearly a decade, and investigators spent over two thousand hours interviewing 20 CIA and FBI officials. The assertion is that the Obama administration doctored intelligence to imply Putin and Trump colluded to steal the election, with a highly unusual, rush-developed assessment produced a month after Trump’s victory. John Brennan allegedly handpicked five CIA analysts to write the assessment, who were siloed and not aware of each other’s work, with only one analyst in charge of drafting. The process was described as a rush job with no coordination with other intelligence agencies, essentially “home cooking” for Obama. The four key elements repeated in the assessment, forming the basis of the Russia hoax and the Mueller investigation, are: 1) that Vladimir Putin wanted Trump to win; 2) Putin took actions to help Trump win; 3) the Russians had blackmail on Trump (the Steele dossier); and 4) that the Russians tried colluding with the Trump campaign. The claim is that none of these were true, and there was no reliable intelligence to support them. Senior CIA officials allegedly refused to propagate these allegations, but were overruled by CIA Director Brennan and FBI Director Comey, who pressed for them despite lacking verifiable evidence. The report alleges the Obama administration cherry-picked intelligence, misquoted sources, did not corroborate claims, suppressed counter-evidence, and even used anonymous internet postings. Rank-and-file CIA personnel allegedly admitted that these actions violated tradecraft standards, with a pressure campaign emanating from political appointees, the CIA director, and Obama himself. Speaker 1 asserts that Donald Trump knows Russia helped him win in 2016. Speaker 2 suggests Putin’s preference for Trump came from his dislike of Hillary Clinton, who was running, while Speaker 3 states Russia sought to interfere systematically to advance Trump’s prospects. The conversation notes that at one point, 60% of Democrats believed Russia hacked voting machines to aid Trump, yet the report contends Russians aimed to create chaos and undermine faith in democracy, with solid intelligence indicating Putin had no clear preference between Clinton and Trump but had dirt on Clinton that was not released. The discussion questions why the dirt from the DNC emails and claims about Clinton’s health, including tranquilizers, were not leaked to aid Trump, and whether the information about Clinton’s health is credible. The panel suggests that if Russia sought to influence the election, more damning information would have been released. The speakers claim Obama and top intelligence leaders mischaracterized intelligence and relied on dubious sources to craft a narrative of Putin’s preference for Trump. They contend Obama continued pushing the hoax after the election, describing it as undermining democracy. Towards the end, there is mention of potential criminal implications, with references to referrals to the Department of Justice and FBI for investigation, including possible liability for Obama. A tester voices that Brennan may have committed perjury before Congress. A final note asserts that the CIA did not rely on the Steele dossier for the intelligence community assessment, countering a claim made in the discussion. The segment closes with a call for accountability.

Voters in America should decide the president, not Vladimir Putin. The Russians offered, the campaign accepted, and the president used their help. The allegation is that they colluded. Putin doesn't want me to be president. Russia, China, and Iran have been involved in this election. 17 intelligence agencies confirmed it. Fifty former national security officials said Trump is unfit to be commander in chief. The smear on Joe Biden comes from the Kremlin. Trump is unwilling to confront Putin, who put bounties on American soldiers in Afghanistan. The confidence in this judgment is low to moderate due to various factors.

Speaker 0 says that over the last several weeks they declassified and released documents exposing that President Obama and leaders in the intelligence community knowingly manufactured a false intelligence document after the 2016 election. The document alleged that Russia aspired to help President Trump win the election with the aim of undermining his presidency and usurping the will and the voices of the American people who sent Trump to the White House.

Adam Schiff, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, claimed that the Intelligence Community believes Hunter Biden's laptop and its emails are part of a Russian disinformation campaign. However, the Director of National Intelligence stated that there is no intelligence supporting this claim and no evidence has been shared with Schiff or any other member of Congress. The Director emphasized that using the intelligence community to push a political narrative is unacceptable. He made it clear that Hunter Biden's laptop is not involved in any Russian disinformation campaign, and he believes the American people are aware of this.

The investigation found no evidence of President Biden violating laws on classified materials. The Espionage Act was analyzed, but exoneration was not confirmed. The discussion was cut short due to time constraints. Translation: The investigation cleared President Biden of any wrongdoing regarding classified materials under the Espionage Act, but the discussion was stopped due to time constraints.

There is irrefutable evidence that detail how president Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false. The Obama administration doctored the intelligence to make it look like Putin and Trump stole the election. A month after Trump beat Hillary, Barack Obama wasn't satisfied with his intelligence reporting and ordered his CIA director to create a new assessment of how Russia interfered with the election. John Brennan handpicked five CIA analysts to write the assessment, and they were siloed. None of them knew what the other was doing, and only one analyst was in charge of drafting this report. There was a massive pressure campaign that came right from the top. Obama and his spy chiefs knew that Putin didn't prefer Trump over Hillary, but they cooked the intelligence to make it look like he did.

Speaker 0 asks how the speaker plans to convince Americans who are upset about Hunter Biden's laptop that he is fighting for them. Speaker 1 dismisses the laptop allegations as a smear, stating that every serious investigator has debunked them. He mentions previous similar allegations and points to overwhelming evidence from the intelligence community that the Russians are involved. Speaker 1 defends his son's integrity and highlights that during the impeachment, all major Trump officials testified under oath that Biden did his job and broke no laws. He criticizes the president for contributing to the crass and dirty state of politics. Speaker 0 asks one more question.

In October before the 2020 election, I signed an open letter saying emails about Hunter Biden had Russian info operation signs. We didn't confirm it was Russian. Media amplified it. Biden used it in the debate. I don't regret the letter. Nuance was lost, affecting the dynamic. Media should show nuance instead of sound bites. We wanted to point out Russian info campaign signs, not confirm it was Russian disinformation. It's not my fault if people don't look up definitions.

Fifty former national intelligence officials, including former heads of the CIA from both parties, have stated that the accusations against me are unfounded and part of a Russian disinformation campaign. With just four days left in the campaign, the emergence of this laptop story seems like a desperate attempt to smear me and my family. The intelligence community has overwhelming evidence of Russian involvement, and I believe the stories about my son are also linked to this. The majority of intelligence experts agree that there is no basis for these claims.

Speaker 0 asks how to convince Americans who are focused on Hunter Biden's laptop that the speaker is fighting for them. Speaker 1 dismisses the laptop issue as a smear, stating that reputable sources have debunked it. They mention that similar allegations were made months ago. Speaker 1 also highlights intelligence community evidence of Russian involvement. They defend their son's integrity.

50 former national intelligence officials, including the heads of the CIA from both parties, have dismissed the accusations against me as a Russian plot. They argue that the cyber attacks targeting our elections originate from the highest levels of the Kremlin. This is deeply concerning. Despite this, there are those who fail to comprehend this reality, whether it's Russia, China, or any other country. I have faith in the 17 intelligence agencies of our nation, and I trust the military and civilian intelligence professionals who are dedicated to our protection.

During a 4-hour interview, it was revealed that Tony Blinken contacted Mike Morell about the laptop issue. Later that day, Blinken sent Morell a USA Today article, which was included in a letter signed by John Brennan, Morell, and 49 other former intelligence officials. They signed the letter using their titles, not just as private citizens. This was seen as using their influence to sway the election. The goal was to provide Joe Biden with a talking point for the final debate with President Trump. After the debate, Morell received praise from the Biden campaign.

The transcript discusses a set of emails and intelligence claims regarding the 2016 U.S. election and the narratives surrounding Russia, Hillary Clinton, and the Trump campaign. It states that documents contain emails allegedly from the senior vice president of the George Soros Open Society Foundation. One email quotes a Clinton campaign adviser saying, “it will be a long term affair” and to “demonize Putin and Trump,” and adds that, “later, the FBI will put more oil into the fire.” Other emails are said to reveal that Hillary Clinton approved the idea of tying Trump and Russia to election interference, describing it as a scheme hoping the allegations would distract people from her own email scandal. The documents are presented as providing clear evidence that Hillary Clinton’s campaign was behind the Russia hoax, and that the FBI knew what the Clinton team was up to, acknowledging that the information they were receiving about the Trump campaign may have come from the Clinton camp. Despite these claims, the transcript asserts that the Obama-era intelligence community proceeded with a 2017 assessment concluding that Russia aspired to help Trump win the election.

"We look at where we are now over the last several weeks. We've declassified and released documents that exposed how president Obama and leaders in the intelligence community knowingly manufactured a false intelligence document after the twenty sixteen election was done, after the American people said, no, we want Donald Trump to go and be our commander in chief, not Hillary Clinton." "And this manufactured document alleged that Russia aspired to help president Trump win the election with the aim of undermining his presidency and usurping the will and the voices of the American people who sent Trump to the White House."

Jessa News obtained an email between former CIA director Mike Morell and John Brennan. It concerns "the 51 intelligence professionals who tried to fake you into thinking that the Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation when it wasn't." Morell tells Brennan to "sign this letter because I'm, quote, trying to give the campaign, particularly during the debate on Thursday, a talking point to push back on Trump on this issue." The speaker notes "A man with a security clearance, a man with the title of CIA director knew that he wasn't creating an intelligence product, American civic duty with 51 people." He says this was to create "a political moment." "Damning evidence." "It is the ultimate proof that what went out on that letter was a political dirty trick coordinated with the Biden campaign."