reSee.it - Related Video Feed

You think anyone can come to the U.S.? If you visit the Statue of Liberty, it seems welcoming. I picked up three guys from Honduras at Home Depot; they have nowhere to go. Hector needs medication twice a day, and they all need to use the bathroom. Can they stay here? No, why not? You support them coming to the country but not into your home? Come on, that's hypocritical. Let’s go, guys. Sorry, man.

We received kind treatment from Russia. There wasn't much in return. I hope this marks the start of a relationship that can end the war.

President Putin deserves credit for providing refuge to individuals with nowhere else to turn due to Interpol arrest warrants. These people may only be sharing the truth about Ukraine, including the presence of neo-Nazis and Azov battalions in Donbas. Western media suppresses this information, demonetizing and harassing independent journalists who report on it. Residents of Donbas appreciate Russian protection, which is not reflected in the media.

Good morning, everyone. I have some news for those who may not know yet. If you are a Ukrainian citizen and the police stop you, they will send you back to Ukraine. This has been officially announced. People have already started receiving letters at home about this. It seems that the first ones to be affected are those who were protesting in the center. They are being called heroes for standing up for Ukraine. The situation is escalating, and the authorities are determined to send everyone back, even those in remote areas.

The U.S. will allow Ukrainians who fled the war to stay in the United States until the war ends in Ukraine. The U.S. is working with the Ukrainians who have come to the country.

Jose, it's shocking that Kristi Noem, Donald Trump's homeland security secretary, referred to Venezuelans in the U.S. as "dirt bags." These individuals fled Maduro's oppressive regime, and such an insult is truly breathtaking.

I met Venezuelan migrants in the US who transitioned for free after crossing the border. They were able to choose their gender identity upon arrival.

John Featherson, a former migrant shelter director in Massachusetts, is interviewed in a setting at what is described as a Holiday Inn facility connected to Elliot Human Services. The interaction begins with the interviewer being told to stop recording or leave, on private property and trespassing grounds. Featherson makes a series of allegations about the operations and costs associated with migrant shelters and related services: - He asserts that “everything is free” for the migrants, contrasting it with the assumption that they pay for amenities. He notes that migrants have access to doctors’ appointments in Boston or immigration hearings in New Hampshire, and questions whether they use their own cars, suggesting instead that they request Uber or Lyft rides. - He claims the amount spent on Uber and Lyft for transportation is “well in excess of $100,000 a month.” - He describes a logistics operation akin to Amazon, stating that “every day I would order tens of thousands of dollars worth of product from Amazon every single day, seven days a week,” including diapers, formula, toothbrushes, hair dryers, combs, and strollers, delivered as needed. - He notes the presence of free on-site daycare at the shelter, countering any idea that children are transported daily to external facilities, with the daycare provided “on-site there.” - He mentions a school bus used for this purpose as part of the on-site arrangements. - He explains that as the hotel became overwhelmed with migrant families, there were fights over washers and dryers. He states that “the state contracted this company to come in five days a week and do everybody's laundry,” with a process of dropping off laundry by 07:00 and having it back by 17:00, folded and provided at no cost to the taxpayers of Massachusetts. - He addresses media portrayals of migrants by asserting what he says migrants claim about why they came, juxtaposing it with a narrative about past displacement from Haiti. He recounts a story: migrants claim they came because of promises of “everything was free” under a new administration. - He recounts a succession of migration routes and destinations: from Haiti to Chile for ten years after an earthquake, then to Brazil, and finally to America, with his interpretation that their reason for coming is tied to the claim that “Joe Biden told us everything was free.” Throughout, Featherson emphasizes the scale and variety of services he claims were provided to migrants and questions the underlying motivations and narratives surrounding their presence in the facilities.

Chef Jose Andres, known for his humanitarian work with World Central Kitchen, was in Ukraine during the war. The speaker suggests that someone wanting to assassinate Andres also wanted a picture with him while advocating for increased American involvement in Ukraine. Andres recently cooked for Kamala Harris and spoke at the Clinton Global Initiative meeting. World Central Kitchen feeds people in third-world countries and may soon need to do so in America.

Hello everyone! We're joined by Ben Swann today to discuss a critical issue concerning free speech. Ben shared an open letter to President Trump regarding the sanctions against RT, TV Novosti, and Sputnik. These sanctions prevent American journalists from working for RT, even when the content is aimed at international audiences. This move is unprecedented, as the U.S. government has never before sanctioned a news entity in this way. We believe that this action is an oversight and are hopeful that President Trump will remove these sanctions, upholding the principles of free speech and the right to consume diverse media. It's about defending the right to a counterpoint of view and preventing our government from controlling media narratives. You can help by sharing Ben's letter on X, tagging Elon Musk to draw more attention to this important cause.

In the transcript, Speaker 0 asserts that the surge from Mexico during the Biden administration occurred due to two explicit actions. First, after Joe Biden won in November 2024, AMLO, the president of Mexico, convened Mexican legislators and enacted legislation that they knew would radically encourage mass migration to the United States, specifically acknowledging that this would be the effect they sought. Second, governments in Nicaragua under Daniel Ortega allegedly responded by allowing anyone from anywhere in the world to obtain a visa if they fly to Nicaragua, and then they would be taken to the border to head north toward the United States. According to the speaker, millions of people from Africa, Latin America, and Asia flew to Nicaragua on chartered planes and then proceeded toward the U.S. border. The speaker characterizes these developments as intentional and directed.

Speaker 1 described learning the news 'just about an hour or two ago' and said they 'cheered up' and felt joyful, then spoke with RT. They 'fell in love with Russia so much' and now wanna stay, applying for Russian citizenship after I had asylum for two years, before this was granted. They credited editor in chief Margarita Cemignon and Maria Butina and Margarita Simignon for guiding them to asylum, while noting they were 'under threat by the US government, by the Biden regime' and that their life was threatened. 'Congressman Matt Gates told me that I was safer to stay here in in Russia,' and they continued their work with RT. Thanks to that guidance they rebuilt my life, despite facing possible prison in the US for sanctions related to being on channel one and working for RT. They are proud to work for Russia today; the Biden administration didn't appreciate that.

The speaker questions George Soros's authority to dictate public policy and impose his agenda. They express gratitude that Salvadorans are now immune to Soros's influence and that no one there believes his lies anymore.

"Please explain to me the difference between Putin's invasion of Ukraine and our invasion of Iraq." "Somebody tell me what was different." "Why was ours considered okay and Russia's not?" "The only they're for the same thing, regime change." "Same thing." "We wanna change who is governing Iraq." "Putin wanted to change who is governing Ukraine." "Now don't get me wrong." "I didn't support either war." "They both suck." "But everybody you notice our national media doesn't bring that up at all, do they?" "And you notice they brought up now the Fed or the international courts have made it so Putin can't travel now because he's considered a war criminal." "Let's not forget the international courts did the same thing with Bush and Cheney after the invasion of Iraq." "Why do you think George Bush can't leave The US?"

Putin enacted a law rehabilitating all minorities deported from Crimea, granting them rights and compensation. The global outcry was significant.

Anyone can come to the US, like going to New York and seeing the Statue of Liberty. The speaker picked up three guys from Honduras who were at Home Depot and had nowhere to go. One of them, Hector, needs medication twice a day and they all need to use the bathroom. The speaker called to ask if they can stay, but the person on the other end said no because they don't know them. The speaker calls them a hypocrite and tells the guys to leave.

- The discussion begins with observations about Venezuela: the country has banned pornography, abortion, gay marriage, sex changes, and usury. The speaker notes that in Venezuela you don’t have credit cards with 40% interest. - Ben Shapiro’s response is referenced. Tucker Carlson is said to have argued that Maduro is culturally conservative. The speaker questions this framing, saying, “Who gives a shit? The guy's a communist dictator. Everyone in his country's eating dog. He's shipping fentanyl to The United States to kill Americans.” The speaker insists that the issue isn’t Maduro’s cultural stance but his overall dictatorship and the actions attributed to him. - The speaker emphasizes a personal stake: “Why do I give a shit whether he's anti LGBTQ rights? I do. I do. I'm not moving to Venezuela.” He states he is not pro-M Maduro but personally cares about Maduro’s stance on LGBT rights, citing concerns as a parent. - The speaker expresses a personal stance against abortion, describing it as unpopular but clear: “For sure, I'm against abortion.” He says he would personally become poorer to end abortion in the United States, even if that means sacrificing wealth, although he acknowledges that isn’t a choice most people can or would make. He notes that many people share this concern. - The speaker comments on pornography, saying he doesn’t think pornography is good and that it hurts people. - He also mentions beliefs about gender, stating he doesn’t think pretending that the sexes are the same is good. He references a claim he made earlier about not caring, followed by reiterating his concern, “I don’t give a shit,” in connection with Maduro’s positions. - The final point raised is Maduro’s stance on Israel, with the speaker indicating that Maduro is against Israel. - Throughout, the speaker contrasts personal, moral concerns (abortion, pornography, gender issues) with geopolitical considerations (Maduro’s dictatorship, drug trafficking, and attitudes toward Israel), asserting that the personal stakes—especially as a parent and as someone who would sacrifice wealth to end abortion—drive his emphasis on these issues.

I want to express my gratitude to the Russian government and people for welcoming me. This opportunity is vital for my family's safety and future. I feel honored to be here and see this as a new beginning, akin to a marriage with Russia. I look forward to building a life here. I also want to thank President Putin for making Russia a supportive environment for families in today's world.

The speaker asks, why are we doing this and why are we so opposed to Nicolas Maduro. On the street, most people would say they don’t know who Nicolas Maduro is. But in places like South Florida, where people recognize Maduro and can identify Venezuela on a map, the typical answer shifts: because he’s a communist or a socialist. The speaker asserts that this is true: Nicolas Maduro and his government are very left wing on economics. The speaker notes an interesting distinction: this left-wing stance is economic, not social. In Venezuela, gay marriage is banned, abortion is banned, and sex changes for transgender individuals are banned. The speaker describes Venezuela as one of the very few countries in the entire hemisphere with those social policies, emphasizing that these policies are conservative socially. The speaker adds that Venezuela is one of the very few nations in the region with those social policies, specifying that it is on social policy, not defending the regime. The speaker mentions that only El Salvador comes close in conservatism, though El Salvador is much smaller. Additionally, the speaker brings up a political point: the US-backed opposition leader who would take Maduro’s place, if Maduro were removed, is described as eager to implement gay marriage in Venezuela. This is presented as a counterpoint to the idea that the opposition is globally liberal or that the regime is uniquely opposed to liberal social policies. The speaker references the notion of a “global homo” project and implies that the reality is different from that belief, labeling the project as not crazy after all. The overall argument ties Maduro’s economic leftism to social policy conservatism, and contrasts Venezuelan social policy with potential shifts under the opposition, while noting public recognition differences about Maduro.

Canada no longer feels safe due to left-wing ideologies and LGBTQ teachings. Russia offers better economic opportunities, strength against western pressures, and a similar climate. The government is supportive of Western farmers.

The speaker discusses the situation with Mr. Navalny, stating that they have no direct involvement in the matter. They believe that the Americans scared the world with their actions and that Mr. Navalny ended up in their transit zone. They mention that Russia is not a country that extradites people and that they have provided him with asylum. The speaker questions how Mr. Navalny will live in the future and mentions that he has not revealed any secrets. They conclude by saying that he only publishes information through a channel known only to him.

In 2016, President Assad told me they changed citizenship laws due to children of Syrian women impregnated by terrorists. The new law allowed these children to have Syrian citizenship instead of being sent to their ISIS fathers. This highlights the cruelty of war and the inhumanity imposed on people for political gain, like overthrowing governments or seizing resources. This policy is evident in the current administration's stance against Russia.

You just think that anyone can come to The US, like Absolutely. If you go to the go to New York, go to the Statue Of Liberty, what to say, all is welcome. I just happened to pick up, three guys from Honduras. They're they're from Honduras, and they have nowhere to go. So this just works out perfect. Look. Hector takes medication twice a day. And right now, they gotta use the bathroom. All three of them going to shit. Is it cool if they stay here? No. Won't. Why not? I won't stay here. No. Won't. Do you mean? I don't know them. You called it. They won't leave you any deal. Alright. So they can't stay here then? You get it's cool if they come to the country, just not your fucking house? No.

Speaker 0: Happy memories are the ones where protocol didn't matter, like Cuba watching faster. Speaker 1: He's in power because of his incredible charisma.

The speaker states they are not happy with Putin, who is killing many people. The speaker says they have known Putin a long time and always gotten along with him, but now Putin is shooting rockets into cities and killing people. The speaker expresses surprise at Putin's actions. When asked what they are going to do about it, the speaker doesn't say, and then accuses the questioner of being fake news. The speaker reiterates they do not like what Putin is doing, that he is killing people, and that something has happened to him.