reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker discusses the Biden family's alleged scheme of dispersing money to other family members to make their numbers appear lower. They claim that there were at least 12 family members involved in this influence peddling scheme, with no legitimate business dealings found on the Biden end. The speaker suggests that there may be more laws broken than just tax evasion and questions whether Hunter Biden and other family members will be indicted. They also mention the six decisions made by Biden that allegedly helped China and express concerns about his soft stance on China. The speaker wonders if Biden is compromised due to the millions of dollars his family has received from the Chinese Communist Party.

James O'Keefe has revealed that 60% of the ActBlue donations investigated are allegedly from China. This suggests that the Chinese Communist Party is financially supporting the Democratic Party and impacting American elections. There are calls for arrests and congressional hearings regarding this issue.

The speaker claims to have seen suspicious activity reports suggesting that the Biden family received over $50 million in payments. It is not just Joe Biden, but also his son Hunter Biden, brother James Biden, and even their grandchildren who allegedly received money from Communist China.

The speaker believes Kamala Harris is like a marionette controlled by over 100 "puppet masters," many of whom the speaker claims to know. The speaker would like to see a matchup of the top 100 puppet masters and the Epstein client list, believing there would be strong overlap. The speaker finds it mind-blowing that no one on the Epstein client list has been prosecuted, while many January 6th protesters have been imprisoned. The speaker thinks part of the reason Kamala Harris is getting so much support is that some billionaires are terrified that the Epstein client list will become public if Trump wins. The speaker believes people like Reid Hoffman and Bill Gates are nervous about this possibility. The speaker notes that Reid Hoffman was his vice president of business development at PayPal 24 years ago.

The speaker claims the U.S. has given close to $5 billion to the Taliban via NGOs, and this continues. They allege this money cycles back to Washington, with a paper trail that Elon Musk has alluded to. The speaker believes USAID money goes "almost a %" right back to Democrat campaign coffers, with some Republicans also possibly benefiting. They state that Republican leadership is upset about these claims but acknowledges their truth. The speaker also questions how Joe Biden could have reviewed 8,000 pardon files, suggesting "payola" and shadiness in Washington D.C., particularly across various departments.

The speaker argues that there are fake NGOs functioning as fake charities and that arrests should be made in relation to them. The claim is that these organizations are predominantly operated by Democrats, with occasional involvement by Republicans who are supposedly kept quiet by those false charitable activities. The speaker describes this pattern as evidence of a broader “uniparty” dynamic, suggesting that both major parties are involved in a system designed to influence politics. According to the speaker, the majority of the money flows to Democrats through these NGOs. They assert that billions of dollars are given to NGOs run by Democrats, and these organizations then channel funds through a large network of additional non-governmental organizations. This network allegedly creates a “giant money laundering scheme,” to the point where the speaker states that the words NGO and money laundering are almost synonymous. Key claims highlighted include: - Existence of fake NGOs that operate as fake charities. - A call for arrests related to these fake NGOs. - Predominant involvement of Democrats in running these NGOs, with occasional Republican involvement used to quiet concerns. - A description of a uniparty dynamic, implying bipartisan collusion or alignment in this activity. - Large-scale funding (billions of dollars) flowing to NGOs run by Democrats. - A subsequent cascade through a network of additional NGOs, forming a vast money laundering scheme. - The assertion that NGO activity and money laundering are nearly interchangeable in this context. The speaker emphasizes that the overall operation constitutes a substantial financial mechanism linked to political influence, portraying the NGO network as a conduit for laundering money rather than purely charitable activity. The overall framing is that the integrity of NGOs involved in political funding is compromised by this alleged system, tying NGO activity directly to money laundering in a way that equates the two terms in the speaker’s characterization.

The speaker strongly believes that there is evidence of public bribery of a US official, based on recent screenshots of checks. They mention federal code 18 US 201, which prohibits public bribery, and suggest that Joe Biden is in trouble. Another speaker argues that it was just a loan and accuses Biden of being a loan shark. The first speaker disagrees, stating that large sums of money require an alibi, and claims that Biden's loans and payments came from the Communist Chinese Party. The committee is obtaining a decade's worth of complex bank records involving multiple LLCs and family members. The first speaker predicts a vote on impeachment against Biden in the next year. The timeframe for this is uncertain.

The speaker reveals shocking findings from a review of financial records in the treasury. There is evidence of an extensive network involving Joe Biden and multiple family members, as well as others. Numerous shell companies were used to funnel money from foreign countries like China and Ukraine. The speaker mentions the possibility of human trafficking, with involvement from prostitutes in the US, Russia, and Ukraine. The oversight committee now has a larger investigation ahead, delving into corruption and fake companies that funneled money into the personal bank accounts of the Biden family. The speaker emphasizes the importance of revealing this information to the American people and promises further investigation.

The speaker believes Kamala Harris is a "marionette" controlled by over 100 "puppet masters." The speaker claims to know most of them and suggests a strong overlap between these individuals and the Epstein client list. The speaker is surprised that no one on the Epstein client list has been prosecuted, while many January 6th protesters have been imprisoned. The speaker believes a reason for Kamala Harris's support is that if Trump wins, the Epstein client list will become public, which terrifies some billionaires backing Harris. The speaker specifically names Reid Hoffman and Bill Gates as potentially nervous individuals, noting Hoffman was the speaker's VP of business development at PayPal 24 years ago.

There is a lot of money pouring into Kamala Harris' campaign, with a Swiss billionaire named Hans Georg Weiss contributing $20 million through 1.6 million individual donations from 400,000 donors. Allegations of fraud are now surfacing due to the scale of these donations.

A new report alleges that the House and Senate are investigating whether foreign adversaries illegally funneled money into Democratic campaigns. Letters were sent to the Treasury Department, FBI, and the Director of National Intelligence, claiming China, Iran, Venezuela, and Russia funneled money through ActBlue. According to one speaker, 19 state attorneys general, Senator Ron Johnson, and House Administration Committee Chairman Brian Pfau are also investigating. Congressional officials are requesting Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs). Congress suspects foreign money is being routed to Democratic coffers. The speaker claims that obtaining SARs was key to substantiating the Hunter Biden story by tracing foreign funds. If Trump wins the election, the speaker predicts the Justice Department will launch a major criminal investigation in 2025.

James O'Keefe claims 60% of ActBlue donations are from China, suggesting Chinese Communist Party funds Democrats, impacting US elections. Calls for arrests and congressional action.

The speaker discusses allegations of payments made by an undisclosed country to the Biden family. They mention that the family created shell companies while Joe Biden was vice president to profit from his position. The speaker questions if Biden's compromised position affects his decision-making as president. They claim to have evidence of $10 million received by the family and suggest it could be between $15 and $30 million in total. The speaker highlights that the countries involved, including China, are not reputable and even major companies avoid doing business with them. They emphasize the need for Biden to explain why his family received money. The speaker expresses frustration with the lack of media coverage and promises to continue investigating and revealing the truth to the American people.

The speaker discusses a chart showing donations made by various individuals and organizations. They highlight the significant donations made by Maritza, totaling $8 million since 2020, to Biden-related PACs. The speaker also mentions criminal allegations against Sequoia's principal and the involvement of Kirk Campbell from the National Security Council. They suggest that Biden received donations while the Department of Justice possessed criminal allegations against Sequoia. Additionally, they mention the flow of money from war profiteers back into Democratic Party causes through non-profit organizations. The speaker also raises concerns about Sequoia's ownership of TikTok and potential election interference. They question why the house investigation was halted after donations from Leone, why the CCP congressional committee doesn't include Sequoia, and why McCarthy isn't pursuing the Biden administration for allegedly covering up crimes.

A new report alleges that the House and Senate are investigating whether foreign adversaries illegally funneled money into Democratic campaigns. Letters were sent to the Treasury Department, FBI, and Director of National Intelligence alleging that China, Iran, Venezuela, and Russia funneled money through the ActBlue online donation portal. According to one speaker, 19 state attorneys general, Senator Ron Johnson, and House Administration Committee Chairman Brian Pfau are also investigating. Congressional officials are seeking Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs). Private briefings from financial institutions have led Congress to believe that foreign money is being routed to Democratic coffers. The speaker claims that obtaining SARs allowed the Hunter Biden story to go from fiction to fact. If Trump wins the election, the speaker predicts the Justice Department will conduct a major criminal investigation in 2025.

The speaker was asked if there is evidence that Maxine Waters, Adam Schiff, and Chuck Schumer have received money directly from USAID. The speaker responded that taxpayer money is sent to government organizations, then to NGOs, which are government-funded but not governed by U.S. laws. Money is sent overseas to NGOs and the speaker is confident that some of it returns to the U.S. and ends up with the aforementioned politicians. The speaker states that it's not a direct route, but that some members of Congress are strangely wealthy, accumulating millions while earning significantly less annually, which is unexplainable. The speaker says they are going to try to figure it out and stop it from happening.

The speaker discusses the Biden family's alleged involvement in an influence peddling scheme, suggesting that they were dispersing money to other family members to make it appear as though their numbers were lower. They claim to have found no legitimate business dealings on the Biden end, only influence peddling. The speaker questions whether Hunter Biden and other family members will be indicted and speculates on the challenges the Department of Justice may face in doing so. They mention that there are six decisions made by Biden that allegedly helped China and state that they will provide more information on this later. The speaker also criticizes Biden's soft stance on China and suggests that he may be compromised due to his family's financial ties to the Chinese Communist Party.

The speaker claims that an analysis of political donations from the State Department, USAID, and the National Endowment for Democracy reveals that 94-98% of donations went to the left. This pattern allegedly extends to international NGOs and contractors, including World Vision and Catholic Relief Services, with over 90% of political donations favoring the left. The speaker suggests these organizations' boards consist of highly paid, prominent individuals. The speaker alleges the left is misusing USAID and taxpayer money across the federal government as a slush fund to finance their own people, creating a one-sided apparatus that funds only one side of the political equation.

James O'Keefe claims that 60% of the ActBlue donations he investigated originate from China, suggesting that the Chinese Communist Party is financially supporting the Democratic Party and influencing U.S. elections. This raises questions about accountability, including the need for arrests and congressional hearings.

A six-page letter was sent to Sequoia Capital, initiating an investigation into their funding practices, particularly regarding weapons in China. Mike Gallagher, a member of a bipartisan committee, is questioning Sequoia's ties to the Chinese Communist Party and the implications for American security. The investigation could reveal a scandal involving both parties, as many politicians have accepted donations from Sequoia while ignoring potential threats. Gallagher's letter highlights connections to key figures in the Biden administration and raises concerns about investments in companies like TikTok, which could influence elections. The discussion emphasizes the need for transparency and accountability in government dealings with foreign investors.

The speaker was asked if there is evidence that Maxine Waters, Adam Schiff, and Chuck Schumer have received money directly from USAID. The speaker responded that taxpayer money is sent to government organizations, then to NGOs, which are government-funded but not governed by U.S. laws. Money is sent overseas to NGOs and the speaker is confident that some of it returns to the U.S. and ends up with the aforementioned politicians. The speaker states that it's not a direct route, but that some members of Congress are strangely wealthy, accumulating millions while earning salaries of only around $200,000 per year. The speaker says they are going to try to figure it out and stop it from happening.

TikTok banned my account for pointing out that Joe Biden has received a significant amount of money from pro-Israel PACs throughout his career. There are also connections between Biden and an individual who was allegedly an Assad agent working on behalf of Israel. This person's wife is one of the highest recipients of Israeli money in history. Additionally, there are questionable relationships and actions involving Biden's son, Hunter. It is suggested that Israel may be using these connections to influence powerful individuals. The speaker questions why those who were previously critical of Biden are now supportive of him despite these revelations. The speaker also highlights Hunter Biden's troubled past and questionable behavior.

James O'Keefe has claimed that 60% of the ActBlue donations investigated are from China, suggesting that the Chinese Communist Party is financially supporting the Democratic Party and impacting American elections. This raises questions about accountability, including the need for arrests and congressional hearings.

James O’Keefe and OMG report on FEC data indicating some senior citizens in the U.S. have donated large volumes of money, with examples of individuals attached to as much as $217,000 in contributions across 12,000 payments over three years, sometimes under variations of names and addresses. The team says the data, drawn from FEC and state records and organized by a group called election watch in Maryland, shows many contributions processed through ActBlue and groups related to political causes. In Annapolis, Maryland, O’Keefe notes the data and asks whether these donors are victims of or participants in a money-laundering scheme, or if they actually engaged in the activity—suggesting actions such as making phone calls or door-knocking to investigate. He describes the process as easy for citizen reporters: bring a microphone and camera (even an iPhone), knock on doors, and call donors to verify. He demonstrates by showing a chart of committees earmarked to receive donations via ActBlue and questions whether the donors are being duped or complicit. During on-camera interactions, he and his team cite a donor with 3,000 contributions totaling $32,000 at a given address, asking the person if she’s aware of such activity. The individual responds that they donated occasionally and not at the stated levels. They also reference the FEC record indicating donations to ActBlue and Biden for President, and question the accuracy of the donor’s claimed totals, while the donor denies making such large-scale contributions and expresses confusion over the situation. One profile highlighted is Cindy Ngo of Annapolis, Maryland, claimed to have contributed over 1,000 times in 2022 for $18,849.77 to ActBlue, which would require daily donations, a claim the interviewee disputes. The donor states they donate occasionally, around $5 at a time, and says they do not believe such frequent contributions were made from her address. The team remarks that the pattern is inconsistent with the donor’s response, noting that the frequency implied by the data does not match the donor’s account. Another profile discussed is Garland Riggs, described as an elderly donor with 31,073 individual contributions under his address, totaling about $230,000. When contacted, Riggs denies donating to ActBlue; he suggests his wife may have donated, but says the amounts are nowhere near the figures alleged. O’Keefe explains he will email the donor the information, including the FEC records, and asks whether Riggs believes someone else might be using his name. The report outlines a method for field inquiries: identify a target by name, confirm whether donations were made in their name and how many times, then ask follow-up questions such as whether they donated 3,000 times. The team emphasizes obtaining comment before publication and notes they have dozens of other homes in Maryland and hundreds nationwide matching the profile. They announce plans to continue calling and visiting more individuals. O’Keefe closes by noting the data came from election watch in Maryland, Gibson Group, and Maryland Twenty Twenty Watch, which have submitted a lawsuit to the U.S. District Court of Maryland regarding the grievance, and invites others to participate as citizen journalists. He directs viewers to okeefmediagroup.com for information on how to pursue similar stories.

I'm definitely not buying Mark Zuckerberg's supposed MAGA conversion. After I posted a Twitter thread linking a group he donated to with organizations that are actively sabotaging Trump's agenda, Meta ran to the New York Times to smear me. Their defense was basically, "We gave money, but don't know what they did with it." Digging deeper, I found over a dozen organizations funded by Zuckerberg that are suing Trump and organizing protests against his policies. Zuckerberg hasn't publicly stated any intention to withdraw funds from these groups. He issued a letter apologizing for their impact on the 2020 election, but provided no evidence. The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative website, which previously listed thousands of grants to left-wing organizations, now only shows grants from 2024 onward, conveniently erasing the record of election interference.