reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker questions why the press is not covering the fact that a senior scientist at the CDC, Dr. Bill Thompson, has claimed that the CDC lied about their science. They challenge the credibility of doctors and organizations that support vaccine safety, stating that real science is found in published research papers. The speaker offers a $100,000 reward to anyone who can provide a study supporting the safety of vaccines. They compare the situation to the Catholic Church's handling of the pedophile scandal, emphasizing the importance of looking at the science and being skeptical of those in power.

The speaker expresses frustration with people who blindly follow vaccine recommendations without questioning their safety. They claim that the Canadian government lied about the long-term effects and efficacy of the Pfizer vaccine, citing a contract that acknowledges the unknowns and potential adverse effects. The speaker shares a personal experience of someone who initially dismissed their concerns but later suffered a vaccine injury. They vow to hold the Canadian government accountable and predict a rising wave of angry parents and individuals who will resist the World Health Organization's influence in Canada. The speaker concludes by asking if the audience is also fed up with the situation.

The speaker, a former pharmaceutical sales rep, shares their disillusionment with the industry after discovering corruption and falsified safety data. They recount their experience with vaccines and their concerns about the lack of rigorous safety studies and the toxic additives, such as aluminum, in childhood vaccines. The speaker highlights the high rates of illness in American children compared to other developed countries and attributes it to the profit-driven nature of the pharmaceutical industry. They discuss the influence of pharmaceutical companies on the media and the lack of liability for vaccine manufacturers. The speaker emphasizes the need for more research and information before mandating vaccines, citing the potential risks involved.

The exemption for pharmaceutical companies from liability for vaccine injuries is alarming. Many people have experienced severe side effects, yet discussing these issues is often taboo. One individual shared that their worst illness in 15 years followed taking the vaccine, despite having had COVID multiple times. There’s a reluctance, especially among those on the left, to acknowledge vaccine injuries due to fear of being labeled anti-vaccine. Some public figures have suffered serious side effects but choose to remain silent. Others, like a colleague, worry about lasting effects such as dizziness and balance issues. This reluctance to discuss vaccine-related health concerns highlights a broader issue of censorship around the topic.

In the video, the speaker discusses the lack of accountability for vaccine manufacturers. They explain that in the 1980s, there were only three routine childhood vaccines, but now there are 17, with 14 being routine. The speaker highlights that the manufacturers convinced Congress to grant them immunity for any harm caused by their vaccines, leading to the National Childhood Vaccines Act in 1986. This immunity extends to future vaccines added to the childhood schedule. The speaker emphasizes that this level of immunity is not seen in other consumer products, which hold manufacturers accountable for any harm caused. They also mention that emergency youth vaccines, like the COVID-19 vaccine, have separate immunity under the PrEP Act. The speaker argues that this lack of liability disincentivizes safety and affects the conduct of clinical trials and post-market actions by pharmaceutical companies.

Speaker 0 argues that because it’s classified as a vaccine, they don’t have to worry about being sued. Speaker 1 counters that there is immunity from liability dependent on there having been no fraud, and asserts that there clearly was fraud, so in light of that... Speaker 0 expresses surprise at known caveats to liability. Speaker 1 confirms the caveats and says it makes the situation more interesting. Speaker 0 asks how fraud is defined in this context, noting that drugs were sold with many studies but only one was good. Speaker 1 responds, “Let's try this one,” and discusses safety testing: the insufficient amount of safety testing before release was done with mRNA vaccines produced in a process that did not involve DNA. The product injected into billions of people involved DNA plasmids, with massive contamination in the shots actually delivered, including the SV40 promoter (simian virus 40). The point is that safety testing was performed on one process, but people were injected with something different that had other components not tested, which Speaker 1 calls fraudulent. Speaker 0 asks for an explanation of the SV40 issue. Speaker 1 explains production methods: techniques to generate product using a plasmid, a circular piece of DNA, allowing vats to grow the product before coating in lipid nanoparticle, with bacteria doing the work. There is a requirement to purify DNA and set standards for residual DNA contamination. In this case, not only was quality control poor, but there was a much more painstaking way to produce the same product that did not involve DNA plasmids at all. As a result, vials given to Kevin McKernan, containing material actually injected into people, showed DNA contamination across the board. Speaker 1 states that leftover DNA includes the SV40 promoter, a genetic trigger from simian virus 40, which is carcinogenic. This promoter is left over in vials from shots actually injected into people, implying that the claims about the potential for mRNA shots to integrate into the genome were incorrect. Speaker 1 asserts that there is DNA in the vials, not just some old DNA, and that it includes the SV40 promoter, a genetic engineering tool with carcinogenic potential. Therefore, Speaker 1 concludes, this seems to be clear fraud: you can’t inject a different product into the public on the basis of safety testing conducted with a product produced by a different process.

The speaker claims Pfizer committed the greatest crime against humanity in recorded history due to the scale and foreknowledge of harm. She states Pfizer knew within a month of the vaccine rollout in November 2020 that it didn't work to stop COVID, referring to internal language describing "vaccine failure" and "failure of efficacy." She claims the 3rd most common side effect in the documents is COVID. According to the speaker, mandates, job losses, family separations, deaths, injuries, and sterilizations were based on a lie. The speaker asserts that society was destroyed, children's education was ruined, depression and suicide levels increased, and businesses were destroyed, all based on a lie, resulting in a massive transfer of wealth.

Speaker 0 frames the issue as 'the corruption of science' and the 'capture of the agencies' by pharmaceutical industries, stating the goal is to restore integrity and credibility to science. Speaker 1 cites a CDC internal study: 'black boys who got the vaccine on time had a two hundred and sixty percent greater chance of getting an autism diagnosis than children who waited.' He adds that 'The chief chief scientist on that, Doctor. William Thompson, the senior said vaccine safety science at CDC, was ordered to destroy that data. And then they published it without that fact.' Finally, he asserts, 'So, you know that story. And you know of hundreds of stories like that. It happens all the time. We are being lied to by these agencies, and we're gonna change that right now.'

A Michigan jury awarded a woman $1 million for being fired over vaccine refusal, highlighting a need for accountability in vaccine manufacturing. It's concerning that vaccine makers have blanket immunity from lawsuits, unlike other businesses. This immunity, granted by Congress in 1986, shields pharmaceutical companies from liability, which is unjust. Everyone else faces risks in their professions, yet these companies operate without accountability. Transparency in government and vaccine trials is crucial to restore trust and eliminate corruption. If information is being withheld, it likely indicates wrongdoing.

The video discusses the development of the COVID vaccine through Operation Warp Speed and the issue of vaccine liability. The program protected drug companies from lawsuits over vaccine injuries, which critics argue creates a bureaucratic compensation system. The speaker believes that the special lobbying protection for vaccine manufacturers should be repealed, as it prevents accountability for those harmed by vaccines. They also emphasize the importance of free speech during emergencies and advocate for a separation between capitalism and democracy to end crony capitalism. The speaker calls for an end to government officials joining the boards of companies they previously dealt with and highlights the need to address corruption in government. The video ends with a statement about Alabama and a final question about the vaccine.

The speaker claims there is a connection between autism and government-promoted vaccines, which constitutes a tort, implying many people were injured. They ask how these injured parties can be made whole. Another speaker explains that the 1986 National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program Vaccine Act gave vaccine companies immunity from liability, regardless of recklessness, toxicity, or injury severity. This immunity prevents lawsuits against vaccine companies and is presented as a reason for the increase in vaccinations.

The speaker questions why the press is not covering the fact that a senior scientist at the CDC, Dr. Bill Thompson, has claimed that the CDC lied about their science. They challenge the organizations that claim vaccines are safe to provide scientific evidence to support their claims. The speaker believes that doctors are not scientists and argues that science is based on published research papers. They compare the situation to the Catholic Church's pedophile scandal, where the institution was prioritized over protecting children. The speaker offers $100,000 to anyone who can provide a study supporting the safety of vaccines. They emphasize the importance of skepticism and the need to question those in power.

Joe Biden announced funding for a new vaccine, urging everyone to get it. Concerns have been raised about vaccine injuries, with reports of myocarditis, blood clots, and heart attacks. The pharmaceutical companies have not released their data on side effects. The speaker asks if the vaccine companies will be required to make this data public. The response is that they should, as transparency is important. The speaker emphasizes the need for facts to be made public immediately. They mention the unexpected nature of the pandemic and the devastating impact it has had globally. The conversation then shifts to President Biden's announcement of a new vaccine. The speaker questions whether the previous vaccine was ineffective and discusses the liability protection for pharmaceutical companies, which expires in December. They stress the importance of honesty and transparency from the companies regarding vaccine injuries. The speaker concludes by expressing the desperation of some people for the president's support in this matter.

In the video, the speaker discusses the lack of accountability for vaccine manufacturers. They explain that in the 1980s, there were only three routine childhood vaccines, but now there are 17, with 14 being routine. The speaker highlights that the manufacturers convinced Congress to grant them immunity for any harm caused by their vaccines, leading to the National Childhood Vaccines Act in 1986. This immunity extends to future vaccines added to the childhood schedule. The speaker emphasizes that this level of immunity is not seen in other consumer products, which holds manufacturers accountable for any harm caused. They also mention that emergency youth vaccines, like the COVID-19 vaccine, have separate immunity under the PrEP Act. The speaker argues that this lack of liability disincentivizes safety and affects the conduct of clinical trials and post-market actions by pharmaceutical companies.

Over 100 million Americans were required to get vaccinated due to job mandates. The government claimed vaccines were safe and effective, but data showed vaccinated people could still carry the virus. Despite promises of freedom, there have been 1 million adverse events reported from COVID-19 vaccines, with only 11 compensated cases. Big Pharma has immunity from liability for vaccine injuries.

The speaker discusses the layers of liability protection surrounding COVID-19 vaccines and questions the need for such protection if the vaccines are safe and effective. They mention a case against EcoHealth Alliance and the Wuhan lab, suggesting that the US government may have been involved in the creation of the virus. The speaker presents evidence, including military medical records, to support their claims. They also mention Pfizer documents discussing shedding and a study protocol related to gene therapy. The speaker emphasizes the importance of asking real questions and investigating the true history of COVID-19.

There has been a lack of transparency regarding the potential side effects of vaccines, with some downplaying these effects to encourage vaccination. Mandating vaccines was a significant mistake; vaccination should have been a personal choice. Vaccines do not prevent infection and can have severe side effects. The FDA's decision to withhold safety data until 2026 undermines public trust in health agencies and vaccination efforts. There is a call for cooperation in issuing subpoenas to obtain unredacted information, as the public deserves access to the data they fund. The cover-up of various issues, including the origin story, raises concerns about accountability and transparency in public health.

The Trump administration's Operation Warp Speed developed a COVID vaccine quickly, but critics argue that the program protected drug companies from liability for vaccine injuries. The government's compensation program for harm caused by vaccines has been criticized for being bureaucratic, with only 8 payouts out of 12,000 claims filed. The issue of liability for vaccine manufacturers has been a topic of debate since Reagan's presidency. Some argue that those harmed by vaccines deserve accountability and that free speech is crucial in discussing the merits of vaccines. There is a call to end crony capitalism and lobbying in government, with a focus on preventing government officials from joining companies they previously dealt with. The government's actions during the COVID-19 pandemic, including vaccine mandates and the approval of mRNA shots for young babies, are seen as problematic. There is a desire for accountability and a promise to clean house in agencies like the CDC, NIH, and FDA to prevent similar situations in the future.

There is a discussion about how public trust in vaccination has changed since the pandemic. The speaker notes that years ago there were “five people in the world who were prepared to talk about the thorny issue of vaccination.” Post COVID, however, “half the adult population of the world are now saying, hold on, we don't trust you. You lied to us. It's not what you told us, safe and effective.” This skepticism extends to vaccines given to children, with the question, “Does this apply to all the other vaccines you're putting into my kids?” The speaker then asserts that “safety studies haven't been done,” suggesting that important research behind vaccines is incomplete or lacking. This leads to the claim that “they've created this mess for themselves.” Despite the frustration, the speaker emphasizes the moral weight of deception, stating, “it's really tough to lie. I mean, lying gets you into real trouble.”

Joe Biden's Health and Human Services has extended the liability shield for COVID vaccine manufacturers until 2029, raising questions about the safety of these vaccines. The vaccine injury compensation program does not cover COVID vaccine injuries, and only a small fraction of claims have been compensated. Congressman Rich McCormack highlights the lack of accountability for vaccine manufacturers, contrasting it with how other industries are held responsible for harm. He emphasizes the need for transparency and accountability in government spending, particularly regarding COVID-related funds. McCormack believes that significant legislative work lies ahead, and there's hope for change if they can act decisively. He also expresses strong opposition to mandates, stating he would rather be jobless than be forced to take the vaccine again.

The video discusses the development of the COVID vaccine through Operation Warp Speed and the issue of liability for vaccine injuries. The program protected drug companies from lawsuits, but critics argue that the compensation program is bureaucratic and lacks accountability. The speaker believes that the special protection for vaccine manufacturers should be repealed, along with other forms of crony capitalism. They emphasize the importance of free speech and open debate in making decisions about vaccines. The speaker also calls for an end to government officials joining the boards of companies they have dealt with. They highlight the need to address corruption in government to prevent exemptions and ensure accountability. The video ends with a mention of Alabama and a final question about the vaccine.

The pharmaceutical industry is seen as untrustworthy, being compared to a criminal cartel due to the large penalties they have paid for their other products. Vaccines, however, are exempt from liability, meaning companies cannot be sued no matter how negligent or reckless they are. This lack of accountability may lead to a lack of caution in product development.

The video discusses the development of the COVID vaccine through Operation Warp Speed and the issue of liability for vaccine injuries. The program protected drug companies from lawsuits, but critics argue that the compensation program is bureaucratic and lacks accountability. The speaker believes that the special protection for vaccine manufacturers should be repealed, along with other forms of crony capitalism. They emphasize the importance of free speech and open debate in making decisions about vaccines. The speaker also calls for an end to government officials joining the boards of companies they previously dealt with. They highlight the need to address corruption in government to ensure accountability. The video ends with a mention of Alabama and a final question about vaccines.

The video discusses the issue of vaccine liability and the need for accountability. It mentions Operation Warp Speed, which developed a COVID vaccine in record time but protected drug companies from lawsuits. Critics argue that the government's compensation program for vaccine injuries is bureaucratic and lacks transparency. The speaker expresses the need to repeal the protection for vaccine manufacturers and emphasizes the importance of free speech and open debate on vaccine mandates. They also criticize crony capitalism and call for an end to corruption in government, including restrictions on lobbying and joining company boards after serving in government positions. The video ends with a question to Governor Christie about vaccines.

Speaker 1 explains their decision not to take the vaccine, citing concerns about its rushed development and safety. They express a desire to set an example for their children and stand by their convictions, even at the cost of losing money. Speaker 0 acknowledges that standing by one's convictions is typically seen as heroic, but Speaker 1 faced criticism instead. Speaker 1 clarifies that they never publicly discouraged vaccination and preferred to keep their decision private. They mention knowing someone who was injured by the vaccine and emphasize the importance of speaking up about such experiences. Speaker 0 agrees that telling the truth often leads to trouble, highlighting a perceived lack of consequences for lying.