reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Who determined the number 420,987,987 regarding failed signatures from the 2020 election? That figure comes from analyzing a quarter of the 1,900,000 mail-in ballots in Maricopa County. We had 150 trained workers review the envelopes based on the secretary of state's guidelines, examining each voter record individually. After analyzing 25% of the ballots, we extrapolated the data to arrive at the final number. It's important to note that this analysis only pertains to Maricopa County, which had over 2 million ballots in total, with around 1.9 million being mail-in votes. Yes, that is correct. Thank you. Proceed.

When I started recording ballot numbers and names from mail-in ballots, I noticed they were in sequence, which is unusual. The envelopes had no date, just "November 0-2020." When I questioned this, I was told not to interfere. The ballots were all from the same street in Detroit, with similar signatures and no date stamp. They weren't in the system and were being entered manually. It seemed suspicious.

We have a problem with the election due to the influx of mail-in ballots. Trump was initially winning in Pima County, but more ballots were suddenly poured in. The issue lies in the fact that some mail-in ballots lack signatures, indicating a broken system. Regardless of who wins, we need to ensure a fair election. Election officials were rewriting rules instead of following the legislature's authority. We don't trust the media, as they have their own agenda. People witnessed irregularities during the election and want a fair vote. We can provide a forensic audit report for further information. The deletion of a million files before the audit was debunked.

Expert testifies that the signature verification process in Maricopa County is flawed. The workers are unable to properly review signatures due to technical limitations. The log data reveals that a large number of ballots were approved in less than 3 seconds each, with one worker approving all signatures at this speed. Eleven workers approved 170,000 signatures in less than 3 seconds with a high approval rate. This process does not constitute a thorough signature review. Maricopa County was aware of these issues and could monitor their workers.

Do you believe votes were manipulated electronically in favor of Joe Biden? Yes, I do. I saw reports of votes switching from Trump to Biden—around 12,000 and 20,000 votes in two instances, with Trump's numbers decreasing exactly as Biden's increased. I suspected something was wrong, especially with claims of intelligence involvement. The Dominion Company, a Canadian firm, stored its records in Germany and Spain, raising concerns about foreign interference. It seems there may have been CIA involvement, as U.S. forces seized servers in Germany, which were linked to CIA operations. Now, those servers are with the FBI, which makes me uneasy, but at least they are in American hands.

I found that there were approximately 25,000 ballots in Maricopa County that were not printed from the official Dominion PDF ballot. These ballots had imperfections in the lines and circles, unlike the perfect PDF printing. The imperfections were consistent across all the ballots, suggesting they were not genuine. These 25,000 questionable ballots alone exceed Joe Biden's margin of victory by over double.

The speaker, Jordan Conrad, questions Miss Hobbs about authorizing additional testing and the signatures on mail-in ballot updates. He accuses her of being unaware that the signatures do not match those of the voters. Miss Hobbs, as the secretary of state, oversaw elections in Maricopa County and Arizona. The conversation becomes heated, with the speaker using profanity and asking if Miss Hobbs said something disrespectful.

During the Arizona audit, Maricopa County made it clear that signature verification was off-limits. However, it's easy to understand why they didn't want us to examine the signatures because, in reality, they don't match.

There have been mistakes in your office that have harmed voter confidence, such as sending mailers to 30,000 noncitizens inviting them to register in 2022, and using the ballot tracking system to send voting reminders to individuals who had already voted, which caused confusion. Now, there’s also a leak of voting system passwords. Given these repeated errors, will you resign? Absolutely not. You are mischaracterizing the situation and omitting crucial information.

Is it standard practice to delete files off a server after an election? I hope not. So, you admit Maricopa County deleted files after the election? Those files were archived. The auditors initially didn’t have access to those archived files, correct? They did not subpoena those, that's right. You didn’t feel obligated to turn them over? We responded to the subpoena. It’s laughable to suggest a county could delete files in response to a subpoena. Your Twitter mentions purging the 2020 election database in February as standard practice. Can you confirm that’s done for all elections? I cannot confirm that today, but we’ll get you an answer. Why was data from prior elections still present? I don’t have an answer now, but we will provide one. The recorder will answer questions in a timely fashion, but he previously criticized Adrian Fontes, who ran the 2020 election. Yes, we had oversight from both parties during the election.

Jordan Conrad from Gateway Plumbing questions Miss Hobbs about the secret testing on election machines in Maricopa County, Arizona. He asks about discrepancies in signatures on mail-in ballots. Miss Hobbs, as secretary of state, oversaw elections in the area. Jordan expresses frustration and asks for a break while at the gym.

Signature verification has been a controversial topic in Maricopa County, often avoided in discussions. This was evident during the Arizona audit, where the county firmly opposed any scrutiny of signatures. The reluctance to examine these signatures suggests that there are discrepancies, as they do not match.

Jordan Conrad from Gateway Plumbing questions Miss Hobbs about the election in Arizona, specifically mentioning secret machine testing in Maricopa County and discrepancies in mailing ballot signatures. He asks if she authorized the testing and if she is aware of the signature issues. Jordan criticizes Miss Hobbs for overseeing elections in Maricopa County and Arizona.

Is it standard practice to delete files off a server after an election? I hope not. So, you admit Maricopa County deleted files after the election? Those files were archived. Initially, auditors didn’t have access to those archived files, correct? They did not subpoena those, that’s correct. It’s laughable to suggest that a county can delete files in response to a subpoena while claiming they are archived. Your Twitter mentions purging the 2020 election database in February; is that standard for all elections? I can’t confirm that today, but we’ll get you an answer. Why was data from prior elections still present? I don’t have an answer now, but we’ll provide one. The recorder will answer questions timely. You hired someone to oversee the 2020 election due to concerns about Adrian Fontes, correct? We took back responsibility for election operations to ensure oversight.

Maricopa County has been resistant to discussing signature verification during the Arizona audit because the signatures don't match.

The speaker questions Miss Hobbs about the alleged intentional failures during the election that caused disenfranchisement of Republican voters. They mention ongoing lawsuits and express concern about her decision-making on Arizona's water future. Another person brings up the issue of signature verification in the 2022 election, where employees were allegedly clicking through signatures too quickly. Miss Hobbs states that she doesn't have a comment on it as it's not under her jurisdiction. The speaker insists that she should answer election questions since a majority of Arizonans believe the election was unfair. Miss Hobbs is reminded that she is not a reporter.

I observed a senior law enforcement officer entering the voting area with USBs, which he inserted into the machines. This occurred over 24 times, and multiple witnesses, including Democrat poll watchers, corroborated this. Despite claims that leaving USBs in machines is standard, I found out that having more than two is unusual. Currently, 47 USB cards are missing, and I demanded immediate updates on the vote count, which showed 50,000 votes. I urged law enforcement to collect forensic evidence from the machines, but this was never done. Recently, I learned that all chain of custody records in Delaware County are missing, and efforts to recreate them have failed. This raises serious concerns about 100,000 to 120,000 questionable ballots, with no remedy available for the presidential election, making it impossible to certify the vote with good conscience.

Kari Lake has been fighting to have the Arizona election case reviewed on its merits. The Supreme Court sent the case back to the trial court to investigate the issue of signature matching. Maricopa County officials, who have been accused of being biased against Lake and other MAGA candidates, are refusing to cooperate. The bigger issue is that on election day, the tabulators broke down during crucial voting hours, potentially disrupting the Republican vote. An expert witness suggests that intentional changes were made to the printers, affecting the ballots. Lake is confident that she will prevail if there is an honest accounting of the signatures. She is determined to fight for the governor's office, believing she was denied the position through fraud. Maricopa County delegates signature verification to a third-party company with low standards. Lake demands a proper legal remedy.

I have some questions about the election in Arizona, specifically Maricopa County. I'm asking about the secret testing done on the machines. As Secretary of State, you're supposed to oversee election procedures and conduct additional testing. Did you authorize this? And what about the signatures on the mail-in ballot updates? Are you aware that they don't match the voter signatures? As Secretary of State, you oversaw elections in Maricopa County, so are those elections the best?

- "The electoral systems of The United States can be manipulated by foreign agents or third parties." - "Are you in danger, physical danger, if your true identity is known?" - "Yes." - "We configured the transmission systems and the tally systems." - "I was the national coordinator for voting machines." - "You examined the forensic image of the election management server, that was used in the Mesa County twenty twenty election." - "In the case of Mesa, Colorado, all evidence, all log, all of that was deleted." - "We saw both images, the old one and the new one." - "And the structure changed, the structure of the program changed as compared to the version 5.5." - "Whoever gave the authorization for the system to be updated would be the person responsible for all the files that were deleted." - "It's easy to rig an election with it, and it's hard to audit."

I was surprised to learn that there was no signature verification done for the ballots. I questioned how ballots without signatures were handled, and the response was they were just sent back out. This made me uncomfortable certifying the results.

Speaker 0, Jordan Conrad from the Gateway Funded, asks Miss Hobbs about the secret testing and additional testing on the James in Maricopa County, Arizona. He questions whether she authorized it and if she is aware of the discrepancies in the signatures on the mail-in ballot updates. Miss Hobbs, as secretary of state, oversaw the elections in Maricopa County and Arizona. Jordan persists, but Miss Hobbs tells him to give it a rest as she is at the gym.

The speaker discusses issues with the SOS LNA test and shares their familiarity with reports from other state secretary of states. They mention signing and denying certification due to problems and irregularities observed during the test. A second LNA test is conducted by Maricopa County election staff, but no issues arise this time. The speaker denies certification again for the same reasons and mentions having copies of all the ballots found. They express concerns about flaws in the Dominion software, the computer system being turned off and reset, and the lack of visibility into the software during the second test.

In discussing the 2020 election, the speaker notes that a magistrate judge issued a warrant based on probable cause after evidence was submitted, emphasizing that the process involves a magistrate judge, not a Trump-appointed judge, and that this reflects how the law enforcement process works in America. The speaker then questions the characterization of 2020 as “perfect,” arguing that several irregularities were present in Georgia. - Drop boxes: Claimed to be “invented out of thin air” and not envisioned in Georgia law. - Mobile voting units: Reported to have moved through Fulton County to 80% (81% precisely) Democrat precincts, with the assertion that this was not envisioned in Georgia law. - Absentee ballots: Alleged that 6,800,000 absentee ballot request forms with a first-class stamp were sent to every registered voter in Georgia, a practice the speaker says was not envisioned in Georgia law. - Ballot counting and recount: A recount occurred, with 3,930 double-scanned ballots in Fulton County alone; thousands of those were confirmed by the state election board. Governor Kemp raised concerns about the Rossi report; even after double scanning, the numbers still did not match on the second recount, being off by 850 ballots. The speaker states that no one can answer how that happened. - Ballot images and test ballots: The speaker asserts that ballot images were deleted and test ballots were included in the recount process, with this confirmed. The speaker then discusses responses to legitimate questions about the 2020 election. A former constituent, Derek Summerville, a former FBI agent, worked with Mark Davis on data analysis of the 6,800,000 absentee ballot request forms (sent with first-class stamps). They identified reasonable cause to question the validity of 39,141 of those ballots that were cast. The speaker asserts that 160 people were registered to vote from a single UPS store, 2,138 from one church in Fulton County, and 1,391 from a shuttered 1,000-square-foot building in Fulton County. The claim is made that Fulton County has a messy voter roll, with thousands registered at UPS stores, storage units, pack mails, and homeless shelters that had not been open for over five years. When Summerville and Davis filed objections to these voters, Democrats responded by litigation: Stacey Abrams sued them in federal court, and they won—though the speaker clarifies it was Summerville and Davis who won, not Stacey Abrams. Judge Jones ruled in their favor. Regarding the 39,141 voters deemed questionable, the speaker asserts that twelve zero of them were removed from the voter rolls, and that 9,500 had updated addresses outside Fulton County, corroborating that those voters were ineligible. Ultimately, the speaker claims that 84% of the eligibility challenges made by Summerville and Davis were proven to involve invalid voters in the 2020 election. The remark concludes by urging an end to the narrative of the most perfect, most secure election in history and calls for Fulton County to clean up its voter rolls ahead of future elections.

Excuse me, how many ballots are you turning in? You're only supposed to submit one ballot per person. Do you have an affidavit for all those? It's with the post office. That seems suspicious. There's someone in Northampton County dropping off an excessive number of ballots right at the deadline after the office has closed.