reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Former vice president of Pfizer, Speaker 1, shares his insights on the events of early 2020. He noticed inconsistencies in statements made by colleagues and realized something was amiss. The simultaneous lockdowns across multiple countries convinced him that this was a coordinated effort beyond the local level. Speaker 1 accuses those in power of lying and implementing ineffective measures. He believes that the vaccines being administered are intentionally harmful, based on his extensive experience in drug design. He is unafraid of legal action and challenges them to sue him, confident that he would win.

On October 6, 2021, I met with my manager, Conwell Gill, a principal scientist at Pfizer. We discussed the ethics of giving people experimental booster shots for money. mRNA vaccines have been around for 50 years but never made it to clinical use due to side effects. Pfizer and Moderna used the emergency of the pandemic to push through their vaccines. Pfizer collaborated with Beyond Tech on mRNA technology for COVID-19. Everything was new and rushed due to the pandemic. There was no time to think, only to act.

Pfizer has had a terrible year, with its stock price cut in half and poor earnings. The big investors are selling millions of shares, indicating their lack of confidence. The CEO may not receive his bonus, but he still made $33 million last year. The interesting part is the connections between Pfizer's board members and other companies. One board member used to be the CEO of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, while another was the former commissioner of the FDA. There is also a new company, Resilient, founded in 2020, with two Pfizer board members, the former FDA commissioner, and the CEO of In Q Tel. This raises suspicions, especially when combined with the struggling pharmaceutical industry. The speaker is curious if anyone else has investigated this matter.

The speaker, who is the vice president of Pfizer and a board member, addresses someone named Josh and asks if Jordan Tristan Walker still works at Pfizer. The speaker mentions that someone was unhappy to see them. They express their happiness to see the person they are speaking to and state that the issue being discussed is one of the biggest public health concerns in US history. The speaker also questions why most of the board agreed with someone named Dan.

The speaker brings up the fact that the pandemic created many new billionaires in the pharmaceutical industry. They mention that pharmaceutical companies funded the 2020 election and made huge profits, with Pfizer alone making $100 billion. They also highlight that the public funded the development of vaccines but did not benefit from the profits. The speaker questions the economic system where companies benefit from crises, leading to perpetual crises that serve the interests of the elite rather than ordinary people.

The pandemic created at least 40 new big pharma billionaires. Pharmaceutical corporations like Moderna and Pfizer made a $1,000 of profit every second from the COVID-19 vaccine. More than 2/3 of Congress received campaign funding from pharmaceutical companies in the 2020 election. Pfizer chairman Albert Bourla told Time Magazine in July 2020 that his company was developing a COVID vaccine for the good of humanity, not for money; Pfizer made $100 billion in profit in 2022. The American public funded the development of the Pfizer vaccine, and the German public funded the BioNTech vaccine. It is possible that these reading capitalists made a lot of money, and also there are a lot of people who did need the vaccine and would be dead without it. If you have an economic system in which pharmaceutical companies benefit hugely from medical emergencies, where a military industrial complex benefits from war, where energy companies benefit from energy crisis, you are going to generate states of perpetual crisis for the interest of ordinary people, separate from the interest of the elite.

Speaker 1, a former vice president of Pfizer, discusses his experience in the pharmaceutical industry and his concerns about the COVID-19 pandemic. He claims that global lockdowns indicate a supranational operation orchestrated by organizations like the WHO or the World Economic Forum. He accuses public figures of lying about the virus and asserts that the vaccines are intentionally harmful. Despite facing censorship and defamation, he remains convinced that the injections were designed to cause harm and even death. He expresses worry and believes that his knowledge and experience in drug development support his claims.

Speaker 1 questions the trustworthiness of Pfizer due to their history of criminal fines and unethical practices. They ask how it is considered anti-science to question a company that has been caught bribing physicians and manipulating test results, resulting in a $2.3 billion fine. Speaker 0 acknowledges the comment but asks to continue the presentation before addressing the questions. Speaker 1 insists that their questions won't be answered and mentions having four questions. Speaker 0 tries to locate a lost ring. The transcript ends abruptly.

This week’s media blackout focused on the intense confirmation hearings for President Trump's nominees, particularly RFK Jr. The questioning was often aggressive and nonsensical, preventing nominees from providing clear answers. Many senators attacking RFK had significant financial ties to Big Pharma, raising concerns about conflicts of interest. Despite the barrage of accusations, RFK maintained his stance on vaccine safety and transparency. The hearings highlighted the broader issues of corruption and the influence of money in politics. Larry Sharp emphasized the need for genuine change and transparency in government, noting that both RFK and Trump persist in challenging the status quo. The discussion underscored the public's desire for accountability and reform in a system perceived as broken. This week’s media blackout focused on the intense confirmation hearings for President Trump's nominees, particularly RFK Jr. The questioning was often aggressive and nonsensical, preventing nominees from providing clear answers. Many senators attacking RFK had significant financial ties to Big Pharma, raising concerns about conflicts of interest. Despite the barrage of accusations, RFK maintained his stance on vaccine safety and transparency. The hearings highlighted the broader issues of corruption and the influence of money in politics. Larry Sharp emphasized the need for genuine change and transparency in government, noting that both RFK and Trump persist in challenging the status quo. The discussion underscored the public's desire for accountability and reform in a system perceived as broken.

I recently heard stories of people losing their children to Pfizer injections, some experiencing immediate or gruesome deaths. The FDA knew about potential risks like cancer from as far back as 2013, but suddenly in 2020, these concerns were ignored. This seems like a premeditated crime, with regulators aware of the dangers. Military involvement in pushing these products is suspicious.

Pfizer has had a rough year, with its stock price dropping by more than half and poor earnings. The big investors in Pfizer are selling millions of shares, indicating their lack of confidence. The CEO may not receive his bonus, but he still made $33 million last year. The speaker discovered some interesting connections within Pfizer's board of directors, including former CEOs of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the FDA. They are also involved in a new company called Resilient, which focuses on fast-tracking medical technology. The CEO of In Q Tel, a significant company, is also on Resilient's board. The speaker finds these connections suspicious, especially considering the current state of the pharmaceutical industry. They are curious if anyone else has investigated this matter.

Today, many people are concerned about the Pfizer vaccine and its connection to the Communist Party. I want to explain why this vaccine, produced by Pfizer, is seen as another disaster caused by the dark forces and the Communist Party working together. It is clear from the beginning that this vaccine is a deliberate poisoning by the Communist Party.

The recent confirmation hearings have sparked intense engagement, particularly regarding nominees like RFK Jr., Tulsi Gabbard, and Kash Patel. Senators aggressively questioned them, often interrupting their responses, which undermines the purpose of the hearings. Many attacks on RFK Jr. stem from significant financial ties senators have with the pharmaceutical industry, raising concerns about conflicts of interest. Despite claims that RFK caused a measles outbreak, the reality points to deeper issues within the vaccine system. Senators like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, who have received substantial pharma donations, have been particularly hostile. The hearings reveal a broader struggle against entrenched interests, with RFK Jr. advocating for transparency and accountability in health policies. The ongoing resistance to change reflects a system that prioritizes control and profit over public health.

Key points discuss alleged vaccine safety concerns and political influence. An anecdote describes a two-year-old who “went to have the vaccine and came back and a week later got a tremendous fever, got very, very sick, now is autistic.” “President-elect Trump was very thoughtful on the issue. He asked the chair commission on vaccine safety.” “Vaccine safety.” The plan was to “chair and to assemble a vaccine safety committee that would look at the safety of the various vaccinations.” In March 2017, there was talk in the White House about whether “vaccines weren't a bad thing” with Robert Kennedy Jr. advising against it, to which the speaker replied, “no. That's a dead end. That would be a bad thing. Don't do that.” Finally, it is claimed Trump took “a million dollar contribution for his inaugural party from Pfizer” and appointed “Alex Azar and Scott Utley,” “Pfizer's handpicked candidates,” who “killed the vaccine safety commission.”

The speaker discusses the reaction to RFK and the controversy surrounding vaccines. They mention a book called "The Real Anthony Fauci" and express anger towards regulators and those involved in unethical vaccine experiments. They question the honesty of vaccine manufacturers and express concerns about the lack of safety trials for mandated vaccines. The speaker also criticizes Mark Cuban's stance on vaccines and suggests he has a vested interest. They conclude by stating that the Left may find Cuban to be a suitable candidate.

The speakers discuss the issue of big pharma's influence on the opioid crisis and the credibility of RFK Jr.'s claims. They mention that RFK Jr.'s statements are based on evidence that many people are unaware of. They also question the credibility of Paul Offit, who defends the mRNA vaccines, suggesting a conflict of interest. The conversation delves into the potential harm caused by the spike protein in the vaccines and the lack of targeting in mRNA technology. The speakers express confusion about why experts in the field haven't addressed these concerns. They propose inviting biologists to discuss the topic further.

The speaker discusses COVID booster shots and vaccine mandates, expressing support for vaccines but opposing mandates. They highlight their role in vaccine development and criticize the current administration's handling of the pandemic. The speaker emphasizes the importance of transparency from pharmaceutical companies and vows to resist COVID-related restrictions.

The speaker claims that those who oppose the pharmaceutical industry are punished, while those who support it, like Anthony Fauci, rise to the top. Fauci, who has been in his position for 50 years, is highly paid and serves the agency's ambition. The speaker accuses the National Institutes of Health (NIH) of abandoning its mission to understand why Americans are sick and instead focusing on developing drugs for profit. The NIH earns billions of dollars from the Moderna vaccine, with Fauci's employees benefiting from patents and royalties. The speaker suggests that the agency's commercial interests have overshadowed its regulatory responsibilities.

The speaker brings up the fact that the pandemic created many new billionaires in the pharmaceutical industry. They mention that pharmaceutical companies funded the 2020 election and made huge profits, with Pfizer alone making $100 billion. They also highlight that the public funded the development of vaccines but didn't receive the profits. The speaker questions the economic system where companies benefit from crises, leading to perpetual crises that serve the interests of the elite rather than ordinary people.

I support discussing issues like obesity and overmedicating children. Bobby Kennedy is fighting against the incentive for pharma to profit from sick children, and he's supporting efforts to remove soda from SNAP. The problem is that organizations like Merck don't have children's best interests at heart, considering their history of criminal penalties for misleading information. When the data isn't on their side, RFK Jr. and personal injury lawyers attack the person. My Merck chair is defined by Penn, and there's no quid pro quo. The science continually proves RFK Jr. wrong about vaccines.

The speaker brings up the fact that the pandemic created many new billionaires in the pharmaceutical industry. They mention that pharmaceutical companies funded the 2020 election and made huge profits, with Pfizer alone making $100 billion. They also highlight that the public funded the development of vaccines but didn't benefit from the profits. The speaker questions the economic system where companies benefit from crises, suggesting it perpetuates a divide between the interests of ordinary people and the elite.

Pfizer is being sued for defrauding the government, but they claim they did not commit fraud. They argue they provided what the government requested, even if it was a faulty product distributed worldwide. This information is crucial and not widely known.

We're hoping Bobby Kennedy and others can help push back against the nonsense we've been dealing with. He's a man on a mission, standing up for important things, even when it hurts him. I used to think he was a kook. I bought into the propaganda, thinking he was anti-science and a conspiracy theorist. Then I read his book and realized it was legitimate. Why wasn't he being sued if he was lying, especially about Anthony Fauci during the AIDS crisis? Fauci pushed AZT, a toxic and ineffective drug, and it killed people I knew. He did some extraordinarily evil stuff. He was basically the villain in Dallas Buyers Club, pushing AZT. Magic Johnson was on AZT and it was killing him, but he got off it and is still alive today. It's a shame someone like Fauci had so much power for so long and was such a monster.

The pandemic created 40 new big pharma billionaires. Companies like Moderna and Pfizer profited $1,000 per second from the COVID vaccine. Over 2/3 of congress received campaign funding from pharmaceutical companies in 2020. Pfizer's chairman mentioned developing the vaccine for humanity, not money, but the company made $100 billion in profit. The public funded the vaccine development, but companies took the profits. The system benefits from crises like medical emergencies, war, and energy crises, leading to perpetual crises for ordinary people's interests. Industries profit from these crises, like the COVID testing industry.