TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

They mock the Federal Reserve, sparking a war. Soldiers get shots, told to take aspirin. Doctors smoke, spray pesticides. Blame sickness on viruses to push vaccines. Control through money and power. Spread illness in Mexico. Fauci and Big Pharma gain power. Bill Gates' dad advises him to be a philanthropist. Manipulate decisions overseas. People fear infection, accept illusions. Toxic terrain causes illness. Government lies, hypnotizes. We clap hands together.

The speaker argues that to understand the current situation, one must zoom out to see a pattern that is larger than any single federal health agency or the COVID narrative. The pattern, he says, reveals that “they are hiding everything” and that public truth-seeking institutions are under simultaneous attack and in a state of collapse. He asserts that every body of experts fails utterly, and that those who resist or attempt to restore sanity are coerced, marginalized, or forced out. Those outside institutions who seek truth or build new truth-seeking organizations face merciless attacks on integrity and expertise, often by the very institutions whose mission they refuse to abandon. The speaker invokes a military adage: “once is a mistake, twice is a coincidence, three times is enemy action,” and contends that given an hour, panel members could point to a hundred examples of the pattern, with few exceptions. He describes a fool’s paradise where research universities spend public money to reach preordained conclusions, professors teach lessons aligned with popular ideologies (even if these contradict foundational principles), and major newspapers report important stories only after they have become common knowledge. He claims that morticians must raise alarms about patterns missed by medical examiners. Regarding the CDC, the speaker states it has become “an excellent guide to protecting your health, but only for people who realize you should do the opposite of whatever it advises.” He asserts that courts are used as a coercive weapon by elites against those who threaten them. He claims the Department of Homeland Security attempted to set up a truth ministry and declare accurate critique of government as a form of terrorism. He appeals to fellow patriots in the West, saying the pattern is unmistakable, and that while he cannot identify who the actors are or their aims, the remaining truth-seekers are being systematically denied the tools of enlightenment and the constitutional rights guaranteed to them. The speaker urges those devoted to Western values to fight the battle courageously and to win, warning that failure to stem the tide will result in a dark age, one distinguished from previous dark ages mainly by the power and sophistication of the coercive instruments used by those who would rule.

The speaker discusses how CNN portrayed them as taking horse medication, specifically Ivermectin, which is actually a medication used more commonly in humans. They mention that Ivermectin has been prescribed to billions of people and even won a Nobel Prize for its efficacy in humans. The speaker believes that Ivermectin had to be discredited because of a federal law that states emergency use authorization for vaccines cannot be issued if there is an existing medication proven effective against the target illness. They argue that acknowledging the effectiveness of Ivermectin would have jeopardized the multi-billion dollar vaccine industry.

We've experienced a fifth-generation propaganda war orchestrated by the US security state, which took control of the pandemic response and defied established public health protocols. Despite prior knowledge, the public health infrastructure was terrorized into implementing policies like lockdowns and mask mandates, which were previously deemed ineffective. This propaganda war targeted not only the public but also the public health establishment itself. People like Rochelle Walensky were threatened into compliance. The motivations behind this were to cover up the US's role in creating the virus, shift blame to China, and promote large pharmaceutical companies. Irrational policies were implemented despite easily observable evidence, such as the disproportionate risk to older individuals. The pandemic response became a scam propagated through the public health establishment through manipulation and threats.

The speaker criticizes the suppression of published treatment options and suggests that it may be a tactic to justify emergency medical countermeasures. They find it ironic that Johns Hopkins University, named after the person who popularized Hydroxychloroquine for malaria treatment, now claims it is dangerous. The speaker also mentions the CDC's previous advocacy for Hydroxychloroquine distribution. They emphasize the audacity of the alleged crime and express surprise at the public's blindness to the information presented.

Speaker 0 summarizes a view that public health has been militarized and the military repurposed as a public health front. The term “kill box” is used to describe a geographic or three-dimensional area established for military attacks; the speaker asserts the DOD and WHO aim to render the entire world as their terrain, with the population as all people and the campaign as permanent. Weapons in this campaign are described as informational (propaganda and censorship), psychological (fear and obedience to government), and chemical/biological/radiological/nuclear (referred to as pharmaceuticals, vaccines, but claimed to be toxins and pathogens). The speaker contends this project has centuries-long roots in globalist banking and military interests, intensifying in 1913 with the Federal Reserve Act and in the 1930s–40s with public health. By the mid-1960s, they claim, poisons were fraudulently labeled as medicines or vaccines to induce civic duty, citing COVID as an example of coercion (do this or you’ll kill your grandma). The pharmaceutical method is described as enabling plausible deniability and legal impunity, allowing mass harm with less traceable fingerprints. Coercion is described as cascading from the Bank for International Settlements to other federal central banks, then down through state, national, local governments, school districts, hospitals, and beyond. Compliance with masking, testing, isolation, and injections purportedly grants financial access, while noncompliance cuts such access. Legally, the speaker traces a framework beginning in 1969 with a U.S. law to set up chemical and biological warfare programs (50 USC Chapter 32) and the key terms “protective,” “prophylactic,” and “defensive,” used to justify research while arguing that all biologically active products are inherently toxic. The 1983 Public Health Service Act amendment created the Public Health Emergencies Program and a $30 million “slush fund” (still funded under later acts). The 1986 National Vaccine Program and the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act established a liability exemption for manufacturers and a compensation program for injuries, later modeled by the countermeasures injury compensation program post-COVID. Internationally, the World Health Organization is described as a military arm of a one-world government, with International Health Regulations amended in 2005 to 2007 to push national systems toward surveillance, detention, quarantine, and forced treatment during international outbreaks. The real aim is shifting sovereignty from nation-states to WHO and BIS upon a public health emergency of international concern. Key years cited include 1997–1998 (Emergency Use Authorization and rehoming CBRN stockpiles), 2000–2002 (Public Health Threats and Emergencies Act, AUMF), and post-9/11 legislation (Patriot Act, Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness, Homeland Security Act), expanding a permanent state of global conflict. From 2003–2009, executive orders, funding, and agency guidance integrated DHS, DOJ, HHS, and DoD, enabling experimental products like vaccines and gene therapies. The Pfizer matter is cited to claim DoD prototypes bypass standard trials and FDA authorization, with government support for early termination of normal processes. Since 2020, the speaker links the WHO declaration of Public Health Emergency of International Concern with domestic PREP Act declarations and subsequent acts (Defense Production Act, Stafford Act, National Emergencies Act) to build a funding stream for military-led bioweapons research and use, while shielding participants from liability and enabling state sovereignty pushback through Article 10 of the Constitution. The speaker argues that these developments threaten constitutions and state protections, calling for increased state authority, and predicts a tipping point with criminal prosecutions, asserting that the actions constitute war crimes.

Speaker 0: They use them for to amplify fear, to boost compliance, and, of course, push those vaccines. Well, joining me now is primary care physician and author of unavoidably unsafe childhood Reconsidered. Doctor Jeff Barky is with us. Doc, it's great to have you back on. Speaker 1: Hey, Grant. Thanks for having me. Great to be with you. Speaker 0: Alright. I know this comes as no surprise, this number, that only fourteen percent of the PCR positive turned out to be COVID in Germany. I would imagine it translates to The United States. But your reaction and now seeing this done by real scientists, real doctors in a real journal of medicine. Speaker 1: Well, there's no surprise by this study. We knew it all along. The PCR test was never designed to detect infection. What it detects is miniscule particles of the RNA virus, and then they would crank up the cycle threshold. They would amplify the test to create positivity. And so the problem is that you could test the side of a table and get a positive result, let alone that we were actually going to treat based on a test result. I was always taught in medical school, we don't treat test results, we treat patients. And that's what I tried to do. And then the government went out of its way to suppress effective repurposed medication, like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. This was a money game. This was a scam. This was all based on fear. No surprise out of Germany. Speaker 0: You know, I I believe it. And let's not forget because we always talk about the money and the vaccines and big pharma and their ties to government, and I know that was a lot. But let's not forget too. This was weaponized to keep people home so they wouldn't vote for president Trump during during that twenty twenty election. It was all part of the big steal. Speaker 1: These positives, they wanted lots of positives. They didn't want negatives. They wanted positives. Didn't they, doc? Speaker 0: They absolutely did for a variety of reasons. The more you can keep people in fear, the more likely it is they're gonna follow your directive. We've never seen anything like this before. The government imposing its will upon free citizens. They closed churches. They closed mom and pop stores. They forced healthy people to stay indoors, and they closed down hospitals and told sick people to stay away. I've never seen anything like that happen before. The sad part here, Grant, is I'm not clear that the American people learned their lesson. And when the government comes around and does this again, I just hope enough of us will stand up this time and say, hell no. Well

During the pandemic, fear and politics took over, leading to social distancing and mask mandates. The predictions of physicist Niall Ferguson and Imperial College London were highly exaggerated and flawed. Elderly individuals were hit the hardest, with many dying in care homes due to the use of the sedative midazolam. The government implemented policies to protect the NHS, but it was actually a cover for a euthanasia program. Face masks were ineffective against the virus, as admitted by experts like Dr. Fauci. The pandemic was a behavioral experiment to manipulate and control people's behavior.

Doctors were aware that hydroxychloroquine was safe until the media suggested otherwise. They claimed it was both safe and effective, but when the narrative shifted to it being unsafe, despite its 70-year history and a government database showing it to be safer than Tylenol, it raised concerns. The assertion of its lack of safety felt like a significant deception.

The speaker claims that the pandemic response was a propaganda war orchestrated by the US security state. They argue that the public health protocols for managing a respiratory virus pandemic were ignored, and individuals in positions of power were coerced into implementing policies contrary to scientific knowledge. The motivations behind this propaganda war are suggested to be covering up the US's role in creating the virus, diverting blame to China, and benefiting pharmaceutical companies. The speaker highlights irrational decisions, such as vaccinating everyone despite knowing that older individuals with chronic conditions were at higher risk. They argue that the public health establishment was manipulated, threatened, or propagandized into spreading lies. The speaker concludes that the pandemic response has been a scam imposed on the American public and possibly the world.

Manufacturers of nasal products were allegedly warned against promoting or researching their products for COVID-19. One company was allegedly denied FDA permission to study its product's effect on COVID-19. Another company, COFIX Rx, allegedly received warnings to stop promoting its product for COVID-19. The speaker claims anything that worked for COVID-19 faced strict government opposition, including hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, and virucidal nasal sprays. Higher dose corticosteroids, zinc, vitamin D, vitamin C, quercetin, over-the-counter famotidine, and colchicine were also allegedly effective treatments. A high-quality trial allegedly showed colchicine reduced hospitalization and death, but the federal government never mentioned it. Aspirin and blood thinners were allegedly not mentioned for blood clot prevention. The speaker asserts the only advice given was to fear the virus, lockdown, social distance, wear masks, use hand sanitizer (none of which allegedly work), and repeatedly get vaccinated. The speaker concludes the COVID-19 response was allegedly about mandating vaccines.

In 2008, the US government combined public health, law enforcement, judiciary, and corrections. Hospital patients with negative COVID tests are retested with a higher cycle rate until positive. They are then given my Dazolam, which tranquilizes the lungs, reducing oxygen absorption to 70%. Patients are moved to the ICU where remdesivir is added to the IV bag, leading to ventilator use. Ventilators operate on a 60 GHz signal, separating oxygen from nitrogen, ultimately leading to death. Translation: In 2008, the US government merged public health, law enforcement, judiciary, and corrections. Hospital patients with negative COVID tests are retested until positive. They are then given my Dazolam, reducing oxygen absorption to 70%. Patients are moved to the ICU with remdesivir added to the IV bag, leading to ventilator use. Ventilators operate on a 60 GHz signal, separating oxygen from nitrogen, ultimately leading to death.

The speaker argues that to understand the pattern we are gathered to explore, we must zoom out because the pattern is larger than federal health agencies and the COVID cartel. If we ask what they are hiding, the answer is obvious and disturbing: they are hiding everything. The speaker asserts they have tested the idea and are as certain of it as anything, claiming we are being systematically blinded, the only explanation that describes the present and predicts the future with near-perfect accuracy. The pattern is simple and testable: every institution dedicated to public truth seeking is under simultaneous attack; they are all in a state of collapse. Individual experts who resist or seek to restore sanity are coerced into submission; those who won’t buckle are marginalized or forced out. Those outside institutions who pursue truth or build new truth-seeking institutions face merciless attacks on integrity and expertise, often by the very institutions whose mission they refuse to abandon. The speaker cites a military saying—“once is a mistake, twice is a coincidence, three times is enemy action”—and suggests hundreds of examples could be pointed to, with few exceptions. We are left in a fool’s paradise. Research universities spend vast public funds to reach preordained conclusions. Professors teach lessons that align with what students have picked up on TikTok, even when these lessons contradict foundational principles of their disciplines. Newspapers like The New York Times and The Washington Post reportedly only report important stories after they have become common knowledge. Morticians are said to raise alarms over patterns missed by medical examiners. The CDC is described as an excellent guide to protecting health, but only for people who realize you should do the opposite of whatever it advises. The courts are described as a coercive weapon of elites against those who threaten them. The Department of Homeland Security is accused of attempting to set up a truth ministry and to declare accurate critique of government a form of terrorism. To Western patriots, the pattern is unmistakable. The speaker claims they cannot tell who “they” are or what they hope to accomplish, but asserts that we are being systematically denied the tools of enlightenment and the rights guaranteed in the constitution. The call is for those dedicated to Western values to fight this battle courageously and win, warning that failure to stem the tide will lead to a dark age, distinguished from previous dark ages only by the power and sophistication of the coercive instruments that will rule us.

Monoclonal antibodies worked very well and quickly, and were initially readily available. The speaker believes the government intentionally made them harder to get to encourage people to take the COVID shot. The speaker didn't use ivermectin until the government took over distribution of monoclonal antibodies. In March, the government put out information on why people should not take ivermectin for COVID on the FDA's website. At the same time, they launched COVID-nineteen Community Core on 04/01/2021, an $11,500,000,000 slush fund to feed out propaganda.

This wasn't spontaneous; it was planned in plain sight, a war footing. A Marshall Plan-like approach could rapidly stimulate change. The science was bought, controlled via philanthrocapitalism to mandate vaccines globally. A worldwide lockstep approach amplified the alleged danger of a new virus through mainstream media, using horrific images. USAID manipulates news economics to enforce censorship. They own the science and expect platforms to comply. These actors can be prosecuted for fraud and racketeering. Withholding scientific data is fraud, but the mouthpieces spewed talking points like "nobody will be safe until everybody is safe". Departments rewrote rules, governors washed away rights, and politicians passed laws restricting freedoms. The vaccines aren't working, and should not be forced.

- The discussion opens with a critique of how public health authorities in the United States and much of the media discouraged experimentation with COVID-19 treatments, instead pushing vaccination and portraying other approaches as dangerous. The hosts ask why treatments were sidelined and treated as heretical to question. - Speaker 1 explains that the core idea was to stamp out “vaccine hesitation,” which he frames not as a purely scientific issue but as a form of heresy. He notes a broad literature on vaccine hesitancy and contrasts it with the perception of the vaccine as a liberating savior. He points to a Vatican €20 silver coin (2022) commemorating the COVID-19 vaccine, described by Vatican catalogs as “a boy prepares to receive the Eucharist,” which the speakers interpret as an overlay of religious iconography with vaccination imagery. They also reference Diego Rivera’s mural in Detroit, interpreted as depicting the vaccine as a Eucharist, and a South African church banner reading “even the blood of Christ cannot protect you, get vaccinated,” highlighting what they see as provocative uses of religious symbolism to promote vaccination. - They claim that the Biden administration’s COVID Vaccine Corps distributed billions of dollars to major sports leagues (NFL, MLB) and that many mainline churches reportedly received money to push vaccination, with many clergy not opposing the push. The implication is that monetary incentives influenced public figures and organizations to advocate for vaccines, contributing to a climate in which questioning orthodoxy was difficult. - The speakers discuss the social dynamics around vaccine “heresy,” using Aaron Rodgers’ experience with isolation and shaming in the NFL and Novak Djokovic’s experiences in Australia to illustrate how prominent individuals who questioned or fell outside the orthodoxy faced punitive pressure. They compare this to a Reformation-era conflict over doctrinal correctness and describe a psychology of stigmatizing dissent as a tool to enforce conformity. - They argue the imperative driving institutions was the belief that the vaccine was the central, non-negotiable public-health objective, seemingly above other medical considerations. The central question they raise is why vaccines became the sole priority, seemingly overriding a broader, more nuanced evaluation of medical options and individual risk. - The conversation shifts to epistemology and the nature of science. Speaker 1 suggests medicine often relies on orthodoxies and presuppositions, rather than purely empirical processes. He recounts a Kantian view that interpretation depends on preexisting categories, and he uses this to argue that medical decision-making can be constrained by established doctrines, which may obscure questions about optimization and safety. - They recount the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act and discuss Sara Sotomayor’s dissent, which argued that liability exposure is a key incentive for safety and improvement in vaccine development. They argue that the current system creates minimal liability for manufacturers, reducing the incentive to optimize safety, and they use this to question how the system encourages continuous safety improvements. - The hosts recount the early-treatment movement led by Peter McCullough and others, including a Senate hearing organized by Ron Johnson in November 2020 to discuss early-treatment options with FDA-approved drugs like hydroxychloroquine. They criticize what they describe as aggressive pushback against such approaches, noting that McCullough faced professional sanctions and lawsuits despite presenting peer-reviewed literature. - They return to the concept of orthodoxy and dogma, arguing that the medical establishment often suppresses dissent, citing YouTube removing a McCullough interview and the broader pattern of silencing challenge to the vaccine narrative. They stress that the social and institutional systems prize conformity and punish those who deviate, creating a climate of distrust toward official health bodies. - The discussion broadens into metaphysical and philosophical territory, with references to the Grand Inquisitor from Dostoevsky’s The Brothers Karamazov. They propose that elites—whether religious, political, or scientific—tend to prefer “taking care” of people through control rather than preserving individual responsibility and free will. The Grand Inquisitor tale is used to illustrate a recurring human temptation: to replace personal liberty with a protected, paternalistic order. - They discuss messenger RNA (mRNA) technology as a central manifestation of Promethean or Luciferian intellect—humans attempting to “read and write in the language of God.” They describe the scientific arc from transcription and translation to mRNA vaccines, noting Francis Collins’s The Language of God and the idea of humans “coding life.” They caution that mRNA vaccines involve injecting genetic material and point to the symbolic and ritual power of vaccination as a form of modern sacrament. - The speakers emphasize that the mRNA approach represents both a profound scientific achievement and a source of deep concern. They discuss fertility signals and potential adverse effects, including myocarditis in young people, and cite the July 2021 NEJM case study as highlighting safety concerns for myocarditis in adolescent males. They reference the FDA deliberative-committee discussions, noting that some influential voices publicly questioned the risk-benefit calculus for young people, yet faced pressure or dismissal within the orthodox framework. - They describe post-hoc investigations and testimonies suggesting that adverse events (like myocarditis) might have been downplayed or obscured, and they assert that public trust in health institutions has eroded as a result. They mention ongoing debates about whether vaccine-induced changes might affect future generations, referencing studies about transcripts of mRNA in cancer cells and liver cells, and they stress the need for independent scrutiny by scientists not “entranced” by the vaccine program. - The dialogue returns to the broader human condition: a tension between curiosity and restraint, knowledge and humility. They return to Dostoevsky’s moral questions about free will, responsibility, and the limits of human knowledge, concluding that scientific hubris can lead to dangerous consequences when it overrides open inquiry and accountability. - In closing, while the guests reflect on past missteps and the need for integrity in medicine, they underscore the ongoing questions about how evidence is interpreted, how dissent is treated, and how society balances scientific progress with humility, transparency, and respect for individual judgment.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss criticisms of the COVID-19 response, focusing on diagnostic testing, treatment, and government actions. Speaker 0 notes that only fourteen percent of PCR-positive cases turned out to be COVID in Germany, and suggests this is a global pattern, including the United States. Speaker 1 responds that there is no surprise, stating that the PCR test was never designed to detect infection. He explains that it detects miniscule particles of the RNA virus and that cycle threshold was cranked up to create positivity. He emphasizes that tests should not dictate treatment and that, in his view, doctors treat patients, not test results. He accuses the government of suppressing effective repurposed medications such as hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, calling the approach a money-driven scam based on fear, and asserts this was no surprise from Germany. Speaker 0 adds that, beyond money and vaccines, the response was weaponized to keep people at home to influence political outcomes, suggesting it was part of efforts related to the 2020 election. He claims the positives were valued over negatives and asserts that the goal was to keep people in fear to ensure compliance with directives. Speaker 1 agrees, arguing that fear increases compliance with directives. He says he has never seen anything like the government imposing its will on free citizens, including closing churches and mom-and-pop stores, forcing healthy people to stay indoors, closing hospitals, and telling sick people to stay away. He expresses concern about whether the American people learned their lesson and hopes that, if the government acts similarly again, enough people will stand up and say, “hell no.”

Neighbors who had nothing better to do would spy on others and call the police if there were more than two people in an apartment. The speaker is accused of fear mongering, but argues that governments around the world are the ones responsible for it. In Germany, there was a leaked manual that outlined how to make people adhere to COVID restrictions, even though children were not at risk. The speaker believes the pandemic has been blown out of proportion for the benefit of pharmaceutical companies. Similar strategies of fear mongering have been documented in other countries, suggesting global coordination. This is the most concerning aspect of it all.

The speaker discusses the suppression of published treatment options and the promotion of emergency medical countermeasures. They highlight the irony of Johns Hopkins University, named after the person who popularized hydroxychloroquine, now claiming it is dangerous. The CDC used to advocate for hydroxychloroquine distribution, but now there is a blind acceptance of fear-based narratives. The speaker questions the effectiveness of hiding under desks during a nuclear attack and suggests that fear is used to manipulate people into following authority. They argue that if society stops living in fear, the manipulation will cease.

Monoclonal antibodies worked very well and quickly, and were initially readily available. The speaker believes the government intentionally made them harder to get to encourage people to take the COVID shot. The speaker started using ivermectin when monoclonal antibodies became difficult to obtain. In March, the government put out information on the FDA's website about why people should not take ivermectin for COVID. Simultaneously, the government launched COVID-nineteen Community Core on 04/01/2021, an $11,500,000,000 slush fund for propaganda.

The speaker discusses the control and influence of organizations like the World Health Organization (WHO) and the CDC, particularly by entities like the Gates Foundation. They highlight the coercion and manipulation surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to a loss of trust and a sense of betrayal. The speaker also delves into the history of these organizations, such as the Rockefeller Foundation and the Wellcome Trust, and their involvement in shaping allopathic medicine and promoting vaccines. They argue that these organizations operate as criminal conspiracies, with a focus on population control and the suppression of alternative healing methods. The speaker emphasizes the need for individuals to stand up against this agenda and for justice to prevail through non-compliance and legal action.

Scientists and the general public initially followed the guidance of Fauci and the NIH without question, while demonizing those who suggested the Lab Leak theory. However, now the theory is widely accepted, along with many other previously censored conspiracies. People believed they were doing the right thing by following guidelines to stop the spread of the virus, but we need to remember what happened. The speaker emphasizes the importance of not forgetting this playbook for future situations. They mention Bill Gates' actions and how he withdrew his investment in a company and started downplaying the vaccine's effectiveness. They also note the disappearance of the flu and warn against forgetting these events.

During COVID, some people saw the actions of figures like Dr. Fauci, Bill Gates, the WHO, and Klaus Schwab, and wondered why more people didn't notice. This narrative has been ongoing since at least 1910, aiming to discredit chiropractors, naturopaths, nutritionists, and functional medicine doctors. Pharmaceutical companies pay doctors kickbacks and fund the schools that educate them. These doctors often sit on government boards, creating a system that protects its members and exploits vulnerable, sick individuals. Pharmaceutical companies, which educate doctors, prioritize profit over people's well-being, and are unconcerned about the millions of deaths they may have caused as long as they profit.

Selfish leaders of the 21st century are destroying themselves and the world. Secret societies are behind deliberate evil actions. Titles like prime minister, president, king, or church leader mean nothing. Lockdowns are seen as slavery, and the coronavirus can be easily treated with proven medications, not experimental vaccines. Bill Gates, Rockefeller, and Rothschild are called out. People should not be forced to take vaccinations for safety measures. PCR testing kits and statistics are labeled as frauds. The World Health Organization, NIH, and Anthony Fauci are also called frauds. The speaker questions if anyone has the courage to speak the truth and not be blinded by money.

The speaker discusses internal resistance to RFK Jr.’s policies and the idea that “deep staters” have been entrenched in government. They mention being forwarded an anecdote from a “good career employee.” They point to the FDA, noting that when Marty Makary came in, he had only about 10 political appointees he could choose. Jay Bhattacharya at the NIH allegedly had one political appointee. The speaker claims that every government employee is a “deep stater” who has been there a long time and that an email from a good employee circulates a CIA manual called How to Be a Bad Bureaucrat and Subvert an Institution from Within. The email supposedly asserts that 90% of employees at HHS, which has 70,000 employees, are talking in lunchrooms about the manual and telling each other that their job is to save America and save science from the agenda of President Trump and RFK Jr. The speaker asserts this reflects how people think across major departments and asks how to get rid of them, suggesting firing them as a solution, and mentions SIOP in this context. The CDC is presented as a case study of failure, described as a public health disaster in its COVID-19 response. The speaker alleges that the CDC’s guidance on school lockdowns copied directly from a teacher union document with which they were aligned, reproducing paragraphs from the teacher’s union advocating for two years of school shutdowns. It is claimed that the CDC also said that cloth masks were fine. The speaker says the CDC led the response and that the NIH funded the entire pandemic, including gain-of-function research, asserting that this constitutes “the creation of the pandemic.” In contrast, RFK Jr. is said to have fired three employees, and this action is described as national news. The overall narrative emphasizes a view of pervasive internal opposition within federal agencies, a controversial and sweeping critique of the CDC, NIH, and HHS responses to the pandemic, and a framing of RFK Jr.’s personnel decisions as transformative and newsworthy.