reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The discussion centers on U.S. involvement in biological research in Ukraine amidst accusations from Russia. A U.S. official claimed that any biological or chemical weapon incidents would be attributed to Russia, which has been accused of using disinformation tactics. The conversation reveals that the U.S. has funded biological laboratories in Ukraine, which study dangerous pathogens. Despite denials from U.S. officials about developing biological weapons, there are concerns about the security of these materials in a conflict zone. The Chinese government has called for inspections of these facilities, highlighting international concerns about biological safety. The need for transparency and accountability regarding U.S. actions in Ukraine is emphasized, as the situation remains precarious.

In Ukraine, there were military biological programs experimenting with deadly pathogens like coronavirus, anthrax, cholera, and African pig plague. They are now trying to hide the evidence, but we believe they were creating components for a biological weapon. This poses a direct threat to Russia's safety. Ukraine and their US supporters rejected these claims, but their actions were bold and brazen.

Speaker 0 argues that anyone can file a complaint with a law enforcement authority for murder conspiracy and demand arrests and prosecutions. He points to a 2013 press release claiming that DARPA awarded Moderna Therapeutics up to $25,000,000 to develop messenger RNA therapeutics, noting that DARPA is the Pentagon and claiming the Pentagon bought, paid for, and envisioned these mRNA shots. He contends Fort Detrick was involved in developing COVID-19 at the UNC BSL-3 and asserts the Pentagon is on both sides of the argument, developing the weapon and the alleged vaccines. Speaker 1 asks whether there is any liability shield for deploying a biowarfare weapon and whether the narrative about congressional liability for Pfizer is a SIOP. Speaker 0 agrees that civil liability is separate from criminal liability, stating in his book Resisting Medical Tyranny that executives at companies developing these mRNA shots are guilty of murder and conspiracy to commit murder. He cites a Portugal report claiming that upwards of 300,000 Americans had been murdered by the mRNA Franken shots and invokes the JAB resolution, describing it as a Nuremberg crime against humanity and a violation of the Nuremberg Code. He defines a Nuremberg crime against humanity as murder, extermination, and other inhumane acts committed against civilians. Speaker 1 asks about liability for government officials who approved the vaccines. Speaker 0 says FDA officials who approved the shots could be indicted for murder and conspiracy to commit murder, noting the FDA’s involvement in developing COVID-19 as an offensive biological warfare weapon at UNC BSL-3, including a cited contract listing National Center for Toxicological Research and FDA as contributors. He claims the FDA, which approves the vaccines, was involved in this development. Speaker 1 questions the CDC and media accountability, noting the CDC’s recommendation of the vaccines and media promotion of boosters. Speaker 0 says the CDC, including Director Milensky (appointed by Biden, from Harvard Medical School), is complicit, and claims the CDC has a history dating back to the Reagan administration of handling offensive biological warfare projects, including shipping weaponized agents to Saddam Hussein with implications for U.S. troops after Gulf War I. Speaker 1 asks whether there are lawmakers with intel on gain-of-function biowarfare. Speaker 0 mentions Senator Rand Paul as having a strong understanding, but asserts that some lawmakers were threatened and obstructed after consulting him, recounting an experience with Walter Jones of the House Armed Services Committee who briefly engaged but then did not follow up, implying threats prevented action. Speaker 1 asks how citizens should respond, and Speaker 0 advocates reporting to sheriffs, district attorneys, and state attorneys, noting progress with a Collier County health freedom declaration. They discuss enforcement mechanisms, seizure, and incineration of stockpiles, and trial and sentencing for those responsible. Speaker 0 condemns China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology as a bioweapons lab, alleging it was a Chinese counterpart to Fort Detrick, with the Chinese president seeking his own BSL-4 program and an offensive biowarfare arsenal. Speaker 1 notes U.S. funding and international bioweapons labs, including Ukraine and Taiwan, and ends by referencing Lindsey Graham and a speaker labeled as a professor Boyle.

This video reveals banned information about the connection between Ukrainian biolabs funded by NATO and Australian organizations. Russian military captured documents that show a Ukrainian organization linked to the Ukrainian government and these biolabs sending suspicious materials, possibly human blood samples, to the Victorian infectious Reference laboratory in Melbourne. The video highlights the illegal nature of the experiments conducted in these biolabs and raises questions about why these samples are being exported from Ukraine. The receiver of these samples is also mentioned.

The speaker discusses bioweapons, stating they have been researching the topic for two and a half years. They claim that hundreds of millions of dollars have been invested in developing ethnically targeted microbes, and that the Chinese have done the same. The speaker argues that COVID-19 may be ethnically targeted, noting its disproportionate impact on certain races. They state that Caucasians and Black people are more susceptible due to the structure of their ACE2 receptors, while Ashkenazi Jews and Chinese people are more immune. While it's unknown if this was deliberate, papers show the racial and ethnic differential impact. The speaker asserts that the Chinese are spending hundreds of millions of dollars developing ethnic bioweapons. They claim that labs in Ukraine are collecting Russian and Chinese DNA for targeting purposes.

Over a year ago, we knew about the biolabs, their experiments, and related documents. It started in 2005 with the Defense Intelligence Agency, which created the Global Viral Forecasting Institute with Nathaniel Wolf, later Meta Biota. Rosemont Fonseca, an investment firm headed by Hunter Biden, Christopher Hines, and Paul Pelosi Jr., funded Meta Biota. This is a corrupt operation developed over the last decade to generate biological warfare against the Russians. They've been collecting DNA from Slavic people. General Igor Krylyov exposed this as a war crime because it violates the biological weapons agreement. America's 30 biolabs in Ukraine experimented on animal-to-human transmission, which is the origin of COVID-19. The research conducted in Ukraine will be directly connected to COVID-19. The United States created and opened this Pandora's box.

Four days ago, I wouldn't have believed the Biden administration was funding secret biolabs in Ukraine, but Under Secretary of State Nuland confirmed their existence during a Senate hearing. Despite fact-checks dismissing it as Russian disinformation, these labs are real, and Nuland expressed concern about their contents falling into Russian hands. The Russian Defense Ministry claimed the labs were developing military biological programs with US funding, possibly involving deadly pathogens like plague and anthrax. The US embassy in Ukraine has a web page explaining that American and Ukrainian scientists have worked on a whole bunch of different experiments like this. The US government is downplaying the situation, with the Pentagon calling Russian accusations "absurd."

I hide my face due to my job. For almost a year, my team has gathered evidence on secret US labs in Ukraine, suspected by the Russian interior ministry of testing biological weapons. When the Ukrainian army retreated, we tried but failed to remove all materials. Investigators found evidence of deadly viruses and patient test paperwork in the abandoned lab. We don't know how many centers have been established in Ukraine over the past eight years, but the Russian military has found signs of them in most liberated major settlements. Many people worldwide are trying to find out who created this bioweapons factory network, how long it has operated, where, and how many deaths it's responsible for.

We need to discuss bioweapons. I've spent over two years researching them for a book and the technology to develop these microbes is rapidly advancing. Hundreds of millions have been invested in ethnically targeted microbes, and China is doing the same. There's an argument that COVID-19 was ethnically targeted, disproportionately impacting certain races. The genetic structure of ACE2 receptors varies among races, making some more immune than others. COVID-19 seems to target Caucasians and Black people, while Ashkenazi Jews and Chinese individuals appear more immune. Whether this was deliberate is unknown, but research shows the racial and ethnic impact differential. China and the U.S. are developing ethnic bioweapons, which explains those labs in Ukraine that collect Russian and Chinese DNA for targeting purposes.

The speaker states they have been researching bioweapons for two and a half years. They claim the US has invested hundreds of millions of dollars into developing ethnically targeted microbes, and that China has done the same. The speaker suggests COVID-19 may be ethnically targeted, noting it disproportionately attacks certain races. They state that Caucasians and Black people are more susceptible, while Chinese people are more immune due to genetic differences in ACE2 receptors. The speaker says it is unknown if this was deliberate. The speaker asserts that China and the US are developing ethnic bioweapons, and that US labs in Ukraine are collecting Russian and Chinese DNA for targeting purposes.

We need to discuss bioweapons, particularly the advancements in ethnically targeted microbes. Significant investments have been made by various countries, including China, in developing these technologies. There's speculation that COVID-19 may have been engineered to target specific ethnic groups, with evidence suggesting it affects Caucasians and Black individuals more severely, while Jews and Chinese may have greater immunity. The Chinese are reportedly investing heavily in ethnic bioweapons, and similar efforts are underway elsewhere, including labs in Ukraine that are collecting DNA samples from different ethnicities to potentially target populations by race.

The speakers discuss the possibility of the COVID-19 virus originating from a lab leak rather than bats. Speaker 1 brings up American labs in Ukraine and questions their purpose. Speaker 2 mentions that Ukraine has biological research facilities, which they are concerned about falling into the hands of Russian forces. Speaker 1 suggests that the existence of these labs was buried and wonders if they were involved in creating anthrax or other unknown substances. Speaker 0 admits to not having knowledge about this topic.

Rachel Ortiz presents evidence of a biological weapon delivery system disguised as a random outbreak by the CDC and Canadian public health agency. She alleges treason under the US Constitution and suppression of information by authorities. Ortiz implicates various individuals and organizations in trafficking and money laundering activities. She urges action to address these issues. Another speaker expresses sympathy for Ortiz's experiences and offers to discuss further. They emphasize the need to prevent similar incidents in the future.

The speaker claims the U.S. has invested hundreds of millions of dollars into ethnically targeted microbes, and that China has done the same. They suggest COVID-19 may be ethnically targeted, disproportionately affecting certain races due to genetic differences in ACE2 receptors. Specifically, COVID-19 is said to target Caucasians and Black people, while Ashkenazi Jews and Chinese people are supposedly more immune. The speaker states it's unknown if this was deliberate. The speaker alleges China is developing bioweapons and the U.S. is developing ethnic bioweapons, and that the labs in Ukraine are collecting Russian and Chinese DNA for this purpose. They assert that people can be targeted by race.

The U.S. intelligence community has officially opened an investigation into more than 120 U.S. taxpayer-funded biological laboratories operating overseas, including 40 in Ukraine. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard says the probe aims to identify where the labs are located, what pathogens they contain, and what research is being conducted. Gabbard has previously accused officials of misleading the public about the existence and scope of U.S.-backed bio labs overseas, including claims tying the issue to the Biden administration and figures such as Anthony Fauci. The discussion references claims made during the Biden administration by Victoria Nuland, who admitted bio labs are in Ukraine and funded by the United States but said they were only for defensive research, while dismissing accusations as Russian disinformation. Questions are raised about claims of Russian findings, including reported COVID vaccine samples in labs during Russia’s takeover of territory, and claims of AIDS research on Ukrainian military personnel. Senator asks Ukraine-specific questions about chemical or biological weapons and whether there is doubt that any biological or chemical incident in Ukraine would be carried out by Russians. Ukraine is described as having biological research facilities, with concern that Russian troops may seek control of research materials, and statements that efforts are underway with Ukrainians to prevent research materials from falling into Russian hands. The exchange asserts that Russian propaganda blames Ukrainians for plots involving biological weapons and coordination with NATO, and that it is “classic Russian technique to blame on the other guy what they’re planning to do themselves.” Doctor Merrill Nass, a biological warfare epidemiologist and author, says it is notable that the government acknowledges such facilities, including about 40 in Ukraine and over 100 elsewhere, and adds that many countries have studied biological weapons agents, treatments, and vaccines since at least World War II. Nass argues that the law prohibits developing biological weapons and references the Biological Weapons Convention, noting that the treaty has no enforcement mechanism, and that there is no way to send teams to investigate other countries’ labs. He suggests there have been roadblocks to obtaining details, and that labs outside the United States reduce oversight. The conversation also discusses the idea of incentives and loopholes: Nass states that the U.S. has no legal control over private labs and that, in the U.S., it is possible to build high-containment laboratories and have scientists create whatever they like without a prohibition. Nass describes historical U.S. development and stockpiling of biological weapons agents, mentions evasion of antibiotics and vaccines, and argues that international restrictions do not prevent potential development efforts elsewhere. Nass says that specific biological weapon use is not known to have occurred within the United States except that “the potential exception of COVID,” asserting the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine should never have been developed “the way it was developed for COVID” because it included “the most toxic, problematic parts” of the virus. He also recalls work as a consultant to the Cuban Ministry of Health in 1993 regarding illness attributed to cyanide poisoning, describes reports that the CIA sent African swine fever virus to Cuba through Panama to dissidents, and notes that Cuba reportedly had to kill half a million pigs due to that outbreak. When asked whether researchers can be controlled and whether answers will emerge about roughly 120 labs, Nass says accountability and oversight are limited, citing a senate hearing where senators said the intelligence community is not under anyone’s control and is not accountable. He adds that if answers cannot be obtained in the U.S., they would not likely be obtained in other countries. Nass argues that lab-produced viruses could be distinguished from naturally occurring ones by analyzing genomes, describing prior work on reconstructing an epidemic and claiming that attention to whether viral genomes are natural or unnatural will enable future differentiation. He notes that he believes the risk of severe consequences reduces the likelihood of use. The segment ends with plans to bring Nass back as the investigation unfolds.

Ukraine has biological research facilities that they are concerned Russian forces may try to gain control of. They are working with Ukraine to prevent any research materials from falling into Russian hands. Russian propaganda groups are spreading information about a Ukrainian plot to release biological weapons, but there is no doubt in the speaker's mind that if there is an incident, it would be the Russians behind it. The Russians have a history of blaming others for their own plans.

The speaker discusses the lack of transparency and safety concerns surrounding the operation of a biological laboratory in Ukraine, which is reportedly funded by the US Department of Defense. The speaker highlights the previous outbreaks caused by similar US military overseas biological experiments, leading to protests and suspicions from multiple countries. The international community is deeply concerned about this laboratory, and questions remain about the true intentions and detailed information of these projects. The speaker urges the US to be transparent, responsible, and address the concerns of the international community by fulfilling its obligations under the biological weapons convention and providing comprehensive explanations regarding the military activities involving biological agents both inside and outside its borders.

The Defense Ministry has validated initial allegations with undeniable proof. Over 2,000 documents were analyzed during a Special Military Operation, confirming military biological projects in Ukraine. Officials involved in organizing military biological research in the United States and Ukraine were identified.

The discussion centers on long-simmering claims about CIA programs from the mid-20th century and how those programs may have evolved into present-day operations, with a focus on secrecy, biowarfare, mind-control concepts, and weather- or environment-related tech. The participants reference recently republished unclassified CIA documents on Project Artichoke, described as a Cold War-era mind-control operation that involved injecting and using various drugs to control individuals. They connect Artichoke and MKUltra to a broader history of behavioral science programs, suggesting that the CIA has pursued mind-control and related technologies since its inception in 1947-1948, often under plausible deniability and without public accountability. The conversation broadens to contemporary concerns, notably CIA-linked biolabs in Ukraine. The speakers note that, during the Ukraine conflict, there were “CIA collaborative bioweapons labs scattered across Ukraine,” and that Victoria Nuland testified before Congress about such labs, implying that their existence is not new but ongoing. They recount an NBC News on-camera moment in Kyiv that was later understood to involve burning documents at a lab, rather than a Russian attack, as evidence of covert activity. The implication is that clandestine programs persist and have become more sophisticated than the original Artichoke/MKUltra programs. Dr. Merrill Nass describes the historical development of these programs, linking them to the post-World War II Paperclip era and the involvement of German scientists who worked on chemical warfare and mind control. He references attempts to create Manchurian candidates, multiple personality experimental concepts, and drug testing in various settings, including “safe houses” for blackmail and testing under extreme conditions. Nass also discusses Project SHAD (shipboard exposure of naval personnel to biological and chemical agents) and Operation White Coat (the Vietnam-era program using Seventh-day Adventists as human guinea pigs for chemical and biological testing). He notes the ethical and legal questions surrounding these programs, including cases where vaccines or illnesses were used in non-soldier populations and the long-term health effects. Kevin Ship, a CIA whistleblower who spent 17 years at the agency, emphasizes that the CIA has not changed its core goals or organizational behavior. He argues the CIA remains a “global juggernaut” with “billions of dollars” in off-the-books programs, continuing mind-control and behavioral science efforts, now employing more advanced technologies such as directed energy weapons and potentially telecommunication-like mechanisms (including insinuations about nanotech-based or electromagnetic methods). He maintains that the agency’s secrecy is so profound that it can operate independently of Congressional oversight or presidential intercession, with “upper level compartments” or an supra group within the CIA that conducts programs unknown to the President or Congress. The speakers discuss the possibility of modern-day applications, including “graphene oxide” or nanotech-based methods that could enable clandestine communication or “telepathy” for intelligence purposes, and weather-modification or geoengineering as a tool of strategic influence. They reference public figures such as John Brennan discussing strategic aerosol injection and geoengineering, which they present as evidence of the CIA’s ongoing interest in manipulating the environment for national security and warfare aims. The broader theme is that clandestine, off-the-books programs persist, adapt, and may operate under layers of compartmentalization that obscure their existence from public scrutiny. Towards the end, Nass highlights broader existential concerns beyond bioweapons, such as ecological disruptions, pollinator declines, insect and bird losses, and potential impacts on food security. He connects these concerns to possible geoengineering and electromagnetic field applications, suggesting that the combination of environmental manipulation and surveillance technologies could have far-reaching, harmful consequences for society. The conversation closes with references to the authors’ and speakers’ work: Nass’s Substack, Doortofreedom.org, and sofaf.org; Ship’s Twilight of the Shadow Government and his X (formerly Twitter) presence for ongoing updates.

The Chinese and us are both developing ethnic bioweapons, with labs in Ukraine collecting Russian and Chinese DNA to target people by race.

Join us as we discuss a significant story involving U.S. government disinformation regarding biological labs in Ukraine. Victoria Nuland's Senate testimony raised concerns about dangerous labs in Ukraine, contradicting the narrative that these claims are false. Journalists often rely on government denials without investigating the truth, which undermines credible reporting. The government has a history of misleading the public, as seen with the anthrax attacks and the manipulation of the coronavirus. The choice of Ukraine for such research raises questions, especially given its medical infrastructure and the U.S.'s long-standing involvement in the region. This situation warrants scrutiny regarding U.S. intentions and actions in Ukraine. Thank you for joining the conversation.

The segment argues that many past ten-year conspiracy theories have proven true, focusing on Ukrainian bio labs that were denied existence as recently as prior years. It cites reports from four years ago claiming new, exclusive information about Ukraine’s bio labs, suggesting the labs studied viruses or diseases and ran underground genetics projects, with staff receiving diplomatic immunity and nearby residents suffering illnesses like cholera and swine flu. The narrative links these labs to broader political events, including the overthrow of Ukraine’s government, noting Hunter Biden’s company Rosemont Seneca invested half a million dollars in a San Francisco pathogen research company, Metabiota. It states that Hunter Biden introduced Metabiota to Barisma officials to negotiate the establishment of bio labs in Ukraine, and that Metabiota later received $24,000,000 in Department of Defense funding for Ukraine research projects. The piece asserts that despite public denial by the US government and media that Ukrainian bio labs were a Russian fabrication, Pentagon and other officials later admitted that 46 neutral Ukrainian laboratories exist in the country. It claims Epstein’s emails show heavy involvement in Ukrainian bio labs, discussing do-it-yourself genetic experiments, including embryo implantation, sperm modification, and biohacking with scientists, with questions about the purpose of sperm modification. It highlights a separate email describing a designer baby project with detailed funding needs and development strategies, aiming to move from garage biology to the first live birth of a genetically designed human or even a human clone within five years. It asks why this research was happening in Ukraine, noting it is illegal in the United States and most Western countries, and that it occurred under secrecy, citing another email about ensuring participants could remain anonymous to avoid reputational damage. The transcript recalls a sworn statement by Victoria Nuland, then Undersecretary of State, asking, “Does Ukraine have chemical or biological weapons?” It notes that questions about secret biolab activity were dismissed as Russian disinformation at the time, but now, in light of Epstein’s documented interest in genetic experimentation and his use of bio labs in Ukraine to carry it out, this is no longer considered a conspiracy. The narrator emphasizes that Epstein’s involvement suggests ambitions beyond merely running a criminal pedophile network, pointing to radical human genetic experiments with global implications conducted through Ukrainian bio labs and funded or supported by particular backers.

Ukraine has biological research facilities that they are concerned Russian forces may try to gain control of. They are working with Ukraine to prevent any research materials from falling into Russian hands. Russian propaganda groups are spreading information about a Ukrainian plot to release biological weapons, but there is no doubt in the speaker's mind that if there is an incident or attack, it would be the Russians behind it. The speaker believes it is a classic Russian technique to blame others for what they plan to do themselves.

Metabiotas founder Nathan Wolf has affiliations with EcoHealth Alliance and DARPA's Defense Science Research Council. He has been associated with individuals like Jeffrey Epstein and Boris Nikolic, who was Epstein's successor executor. Claims have been made by Russia about the Pentagon having over 30 biolabs in Ukraine, while China claims to operate 336 biolabs in 30 countries. Some members of the US government dismiss these claims as a Russian conspiracy and anticipate a false flag attack from Russia. When asked about the possibility of a biological or chemical attack in Ukraine, it is believed by one speaker that the Russians would be responsible.

The Zelensky regime is reportedly targeting Russian military officials and whistleblowers revealing alleged U.S. biolabs and child trafficking networks in Ukraine. As the conflict escalates, figures like Lieutenant General Igor Kirillov, who exposed these crimes, have been assassinated. Kirillov's 2,000-page report implicated prominent Western leaders in a conspiracy linked to the COVID-19 pandemic and bioweapons development. Despite evidence, mainstream media has downplayed these issues. The report also highlights a disturbing adrenochrome industry, where children are allegedly trafficked and exploited. The global elite, fearing exposure, are attempting to silence dissent. As the situation unfolds, there is a push for accountability and transparency regarding these heinous activities. The video encourages viewers to join a community dedicated to uncovering these truths.