reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In this video, the speaker discusses a recent report about voter fraud in Michigan. In October 2020, several women brought in 8,000 to 10,000 voter registrations to the city clerk's office. The registrations had the same handwriting, raising red flags. The state police were contacted and an investigation began. The police raided the offices of the women involved and found weapons, cash cards, and burner phones. The organization responsible for the registrations, GBI Strategies, is linked to other Democrat organizations and had offices in other swing states. The speaker believes that bloated voter rolls are necessary for cheating and stealing in elections. The speaker also mentions the importance of phony registrations as a predicate for mail-in ballot fraud. The police are concerned about the large number of registrations being dropped off.

The speaker discusses the requirement to respond to ballot applications within 24 hours in Michigan. They mention seeing applications from June, July, and August being processed in September, estimating about 100,000 false documents were created over 10 days. The supervisor would announce the date to be used for processing publicly.

**Spanish Summary:** Un grupo está registrando votantes hispanos en Phoenix. Una señora ya está registrada por su trabajo. Otra persona puso que quería votar en una aplicación, pero está esperando la residencia. Planea votar por Kamala Harris y nació en Cuba. Otra persona es residente y ya está registrada para votar por su trabajo. Otra persona no es ciudadana y ya llenó la registración. Alguien dice que el primer día van a empezar a sacar gente. **English Translation:** A group is registering Hispanic voters in Phoenix. One woman is already registered through her job. Another person indicated they wanted to vote on an application but is waiting for residency. They plan to vote for Kamala Harris and were born in Cuba. Another person is a resident and is already registered to vote through their job. Another person is not a citizen and has already filled out the registration. Someone says that on the first day, they will start removing people.

In this video, the speaker discusses allegations of voter fraud in Michigan during the 2020 elections. They claim that fraudulent voter registrations were dumped in a small city in Western Michigan, which led to an investigation. The investigation revealed that a woman working for a group called GBI Strategies was dropping off completed voter registration forms that had the same handwriting, fake addresses, and phone numbers. The group was funded by a dark money super PAC called Blackpac. When the police investigated the old eyeglass store where the group operated, they found prepaid cash cards, rental cars, burner phones, and guns, including semi-automatic rifles and customized pistols. The speaker suggests that this is evidence of organized voter fraud by the Democratic Party on a national scale.

The speaker states that around 80 coworkers were present at the election headquarters. All workers were allegedly instructed to falsify documents when preparing ballot packages. The date on the ballot package would be entered into QVF as the ballot mailing date. Starting September 22nd, a different date was given each day to backdate the application, though sometimes the same date was used on consecutive days. The date was never the correct date, meaning it was never the same day the package was prepared. The speaker claims the date used was always prior to the preparation date. Multiple supervisors allegedly instructed them to backdate the documents every day.

The video highlights instances of possible voter fraud in Harris County, Texas. It mentions cases of deceased individuals, such as Tommy Bookman and Kathleen Hui, being listed as active registered voters and even applying for mail-in ballots. Sworn affidavits suggest that the signatures on these applications were not genuine. The video also mentions a convicted forger, Gloria Palmer, who allegedly mailed in suspect applications for deceased individuals. It is revealed that Harris County has been breaking the law by not regularly updating the voter rolls with the national change of address database. The video concludes by emphasizing the need for accurate voter registration rolls to prevent voter fraud and maintain trust in elections.

The speakers tour sites in Atlanta that they say show problems with voter registration and housing. They point to 477 P Street Northeast, where they state that, according to Georgia registration rolls updated less than two weeks ago, over 70 people are actively registered to vote from that location, even though the Peachtree Pine homeless shelter behind them was closed in 2017. They question why those former residents remain on the rolls and propose that there should be automatic purges when a shelter closes. They note the property is private, boarded up, with danger and no trespassing signs, and they attempt to enter entrances but are blocked. They compare the 70-some registrations at that site to the expectation that USPS would drop off mail or voter information for residents, and they express skepticism about how such registrations could occur. They also highlight a UPS store at 2625 Piedmont Road Northeast, where they say 96 people are still registered to vote from that address, again asserting this is a violation of Georgia law because a UPS store, PO box, or virtual mailbox cannot be a place of residence. They say the law specifies that where you vote from is where you live and rest, and they emphasize that this is a clear violation. The discussion shifts to the idea that, in addition to homelessness and voting, welfare fraud could be connected to these registrations. They claim that some churches act with advocacy groups to sign up homeless people for benefits and that this could involve checks sent to addresses used for registration. They allege that an outreach program at services and mail lines at a neighboring center, the central outreach and advocacy center, handles housing needs and mail for thousands of people. They report that the organization took in almost $700,000, with a government grant of $25,000 for homeless activities and a private contractor paid $50,000 to write grant proposals to the government, implying that the county maintains a surplus in election budgets and disperses funds to such groups. The speakers assert that the county is not cleaning voter rolls, thereby inflating the number of registered voters. They speculate that if there were many such sites—perhaps hundreds—with around 100 voters each, it would be easy to influence elections, noting that Georgia uses voter ID while contrasting with states like California. They also reference the 2020 election, suggesting that in Georgia, the state was won by a narrow margin and that widespread irregularities in Fulton County could have impacted the result. They discuss potential political leanings, claiming that donations and grants to these groups likely go to Democrats, and that the same organizations could be targeting homeless people to register them to vote and to receive government assistance. The presenters visit another church area at 201 Washington Street Southwest, identifying two lines: one for services and one for mail, implying that the church’s outreach program is involved in registering people for voting and distributing mail to many individuals. They reiterate their belief that the operation is funded by state and federal grants and private donations, and they reiterate that the aggregate registrations at two churches total over a thousand. They propose a broader pattern of “targeting” vulnerable populations for political and financial gain, suggesting potential corruption and kickbacks linked to government funds and political support. They conclude with a strong assertion that the described situation constitutes corruption.

District Attorney Heather Adams announced an investigation into potentially fraudulent voter registration applications. The investigation began after the Elections Office received approximately 2,500 applications at or near the registration deadline. Staff noticed similar handwriting, same-day completion, unknown signatures, and signature mismatches with previously registered voters. Detectives found fraudulent applications with inaccurate addresses, false personal identification, and false names. Some applications had correct personal information, but individuals stated they didn't request or complete the forms and the signatures were not theirs. The fraudulent registrations are believed to be connected to large-scale canvassing operations dating back to June, with most applications dated August 15th or later. Canvassers were paid to obtain voter registration applications from residents across Lancaster County. Canvassing took place at shopping centers, parking lots, sidewalks, and parks. Some applications were verified as legitimate. Of the investigations completed, 60% have been determined to be fraudulent. At least two other counties received similar applications. Violations of crimes code and elections code have been confirmed.

The Georgia nerds, a group of data analysts, expose election fraud in Georgia by analyzing voter rolls and election files. They uncover crimes like duplicate IDs leading to double voting and machine errors inserting fake votes. They call for Governor Kemp to address the fraud and demand the resignation of Secretary of State Raffensperger. The group urges for a criminal investigation into the election crimes and emphasizes the urgent need to protect the integrity of Georgia's elections. Follow them on Twitter for evidence of the fraud.

Excuse me, how many ballots are you turning in? You're only allowed to submit one ballot per person. Do you have an affidavit for all those? It's the post office. That seems suspicious. Someone is dropping off a large number of ballots in Northampton County right after the office has closed.

An individual states that around 80 coworkers were instructed to falsify documents at the election headquarters. They claim that when preparing ballot packages, a false date was deliberately placed on them, which would then be entered into the QVF as the ballot mailing date. The individual says that starting September 22nd, they were given different dates to backdate the applications, though sometimes the same date was used for consecutive days. They assert that the date was never the correct date and was always prior to the day the package was prepared, constituting a false statement. They claim that multiple supervisors instructed them to backdate the documents every day.

They go to the New York City Board of Elections office at 200 Varick Street, 10th Floor, in New York, NY, planning to pose as a non-citizen, Canadian green card holder to see how far they can get in the voter registration process. They note that a clerk initially says you must be a citizen to fill out the registration, but another clerk claims they “accept anything that comes over the counter” and that there are people who have legal situations and registered when they weren’t a citizen. The first clerk’s behavior raises concern: he does not tell them it would be illegal to complete the application as a noncitizen, only that he wouldn’t recommend it. The participants press for clarity. The first clerk admits that “we can’t stop you from submitting the application and if it goes through, but most likely because they don’t do like a full background check,” and adds that “once in a while, you know, we have people who come in here and they have legal situations and they registered, they weren’t a citizen, boom, boom, boom.” The participants quote that as a direct admission that non-citizens are in fact registering to vote. One participant asks if they can fill out the form, and the clerk responds: “Up to you. That’s right. I can’t tell you what to do. You wanna fill that, fill it out. But everything is clear clearly stated, especially at this bottom, it says American citizens.” The participant asks if the clerk would report them; the clerk says “No. No. No. I’m not, no. I’m not that’s not my job to report anyone. My job is just to collect the application and put it and submit it to the department.” The clerk adds that they “accept anything that comes over the counter, you know.” Under New York election law, section 17-106, it is stated that “any election officer who willfully violates any provision of the election law relative to the registration of electors is guilty of a felony.” The participants note it would be a criminal offense for the worker to process their voter registration after admitting to being a noncitizen. They ask if they can take materials with them and the clerk confirms they can “take one of these.” The participants are told that they can fill out the form, and if it comes back or doesn’t, they will submit it; the clerk reiterates that they “can’t do our background check on you. We just collect it.” On leaving, they decide not to submit any application, since doing so would be illegal. They later return to gather more information, but the worker becomes suspicious, consults a coworker, and then changes his stance and refuses to accept the application. They observe that at these centers, there is no requirement to show ID, Social Security, or any proof of identification; all you have to do is sign an affidavit stating you are an American citizen. They describe this as a potential threat to the integrity of the U.S. electoral system. They conclude with the implication that non-citizen registrations have occurred and question how many such forms have been processed.

In this video, the speakers discuss the findings related to voting irregularities in Georgia. They mention the use of various databases, such as the electronic registration and information center, the national change of address database, and the DPS database, to identify problems. They highlight that there are approximately 66,247 mail-in ballots cast by underage voters and 2,506 registered felons who voted. Additionally, they mention cases where individuals were registered to vote in another state but still voted in Georgia. These findings raise concerns about the integrity of the voting process.

In this video, the speaker refers to declarations from signature verification workers in 2022. One worker named Andrew mentions that the numbers on the whiteboard for the ballots to be verified didn't add up. They were processing around 60,000 signatures a day, but only receiving about 1,000 envelopes for review the next day, instead of the expected 12,000 to 15,000. The rejection rates were consistent at 20% to 30%, but the math didn't seem to match the actual numbers.

The video documents an undercover-style investigation at the New York City Board of Elections on the 10th Floor at 200 Varick Street, focusing on whether noncitizens can register to vote. Speaker 0 plans to pose as a noncitizen Canadian green-card holder and attempts to engage a staffer about voter registration. In the first encounter, Speaker 2 tells Speaker 1 that “Everything you fill out, you’re swearing an affidavit that everything you’re putting down is true,” and notes that “you gotta be a citizen to fill it out.” Speaker 1 identifies as “a green card holder from Canada.” The staffer initially signals uncertainty about whether to fill out the form, saying, “I wouldn’t fill it out,” but also suggests the possibility that noncitizens have previously registered. Speaker 0 observes that the staffer does not state it would be illegal to complete the application as a noncitizen, only that the staffer “doesn’t recommend it.” The conversation reveals that the staffer acknowledges noncitizens have registered before: “We have people who come in here and they have legal situations and they registered, they weren’t a citizen, boom boom boom.” The staffer also admits that they “can’t stop you from submitting the application,” and that there is generally no full background check; “we can’t do our background check on you. We just collect it. That’s it.” Speaker 2 reinforces that the staff’s role is to collect and submit, not to verify citizenship, stating, “we accept anything that comes over the counter,” and reiterating that “if it comes back to you, it comes back to… If it doesn’t, it doesn’t.” When Speaker 1 asks if they will report the noncitizen, the staffer responds, “No. No. No. I’m not… that’s not my job to report anyone. My job is just to collect the application and put it and submit it to the department.” Speaker 0 cites New York election law—“Under New York election law, section seventeen one zero six, any election officer who willfully violates any provision of the election law relative to the registration of electors is guilty of a felony”—to argue that processing a noncitizen registration would be a criminal offense. After leaving the office, the pair return to request more information, but the staffer becomes suspicious, consults a coworker, and then refuses to accept their application. The video notes that, according to the staff, “we get registrations come to the mail. We, you know, we whatever comes through, we accept and then it’s submitted,” and emphasizes the absence of ID or proof of citizenship requirements at registration, solely requiring an affidavit asserting citizenship. The segment concludes by highlighting concerns about potential threats to electoral integrity, asserting that there is no requirement to show ID or documentation to register, and that all that is required is signing an affidavit claiming American citizenship.

In this video, footage analyzed by Gateway Pundit reveals suspicious activity during the ballot counting process. Poll workers, including Ruby Freeman and her daughter Wondreya Moss, were caught on camera scanning the same stack of ballots multiple times after GOP observers and reporters had left the room. They continued counting uninterrupted for over 3 hours. It is highly illegal to scan the same batch of ballots repeatedly, and this was all captured on tape. Georgia officials have dismissed the evidence, but no explanation has been given for Freeman's actions or why they remained behind while the building was evacuated. Lawyers find it unusual to store briefcases full of ballots under tablecloths, and it is unclear when they were delivered or why they were retrieved after the GOP observers left. Experts suggest that this activity could explain the sudden increase in votes for Joe Biden.

In the video, the speaker describes their observations during a ballot verification process. They noticed a yellow banner indicating "low confidence" on some ballots, but the signatures being compared were illegible and didn't match. The speaker asked about it, but was told not to worry as it was a new program being tested. Later, there was a server outage, but the lights were still on. When the computers came back up, a person who previously had a yellow banner now had a green one indicating "high confidence." The speaker observed conversations among the screeners and heard one person say they were now working on high confidence instead of low confidence.

I ripped up Republican voter registrations, not recording it. I got 3 in a row. No problem with Democrats. I didn't talk to Max from Project Veritas. If they were Democratic, no issues. No problem with Republicans.

The speaker describes observing absentee/mail-in ballots and recording details from the ballots. They wrote down the ballot numbers and the last names of the person named on each ballot. The ballots appeared to be in sequence, which, according to the speaker, should not happen with mail-in ballots, since mail-in ballots come in at different times and numbers. The speaker recalls that when they noticed the numbers were almost next to each other—one in the middle, then another—they became suspicious. The speaker asked the supervisor about this, noting there was not even a date on the envelopes. The envelopes were marked November 2020, but there was no second number or other identifying date visible. When the speaker inquired about the date on a specific envelope, the response was hostile: the supervisors became angry and told them they were not letting them do their job and that the speaker was disturbing them. To avoid being kicked out, the speaker and the others in the room chose not to challenge the process further, since they did not want to be removed and there were only a few people present. The speaker also observed that the sequence of ballot numbers all originated from the same area—Guarded Street in Downtown Detroit. The ballots’ signatures looked alike, and none of the envelopes had dates stamped on them. The envelopes appeared to be missing a second or third date, or any date, and none of the ballots were appearing in the voting system. Additionally, the speaker notes that these ballots were being entered manually, and they asserted that none of these details would be present in the poll book or the system. The overall implication is that there was irregularity in the handling of these absentee ballots, with sequential numbers, indistinct dates, signatures resembling each other, and manual entry outside the expected process, raising concerns about whether the ballots were being processed consistent with standard procedures.

Good morning. On Tuesday, I was informed by Krista Miller about potentially fraudulent voter registration applications. The Elections Office received around 2,500 applications close to the registration deadline, many showing the same handwriting and mismatched signatures. Investigations revealed inaccuracies in addresses and personal information, with individuals stating they did not complete these forms. The fraudulent registrations are linked to a large-scale canvassing operation that began in June, primarily in Lancaster City, but also in other areas. Preliminary findings indicate that about 60% of the applications reviewed so far are fraudulent. The investigation is ongoing, and we are coordinating with local police departments as needed.

The election supervisor wants to vote for Jason Shaw. During adjudication, the supervisor states they want to vote for Biden, overriding the original marks on a ballot. The supervisor decides someone "don't deserve no votes" and chooses not to count votes on that ballot. The supervisor then declares another ballot should be blank. The supervisor admits to scanning the same batches of ballots repeatedly.

An SUV arrives, and a "mule" exits with ballots to deposit in a drop box. It is claimed that this person is one of 2,000 that have been profiled. The individual is said to have so many ballots that they struggle to fit them into the slot, inserting them one by one. It is stated that turning in more than one ballot is illegal in Georgia, unless the person is a close relative. It is asserted that everything past the first ballot was illegal. It's mentioned that the person could have been an assistor, which would require a signed envelope. Open records allegedly confirmed that Gwinnett County had no assistors.

We work for a company registering Hispanic voters. Visited a Georgia complex, found 14% noncitizens registered to vote. Georgia has 339,000 noncitizens, potentially 47,000 registered. Biden won by 12,000 votes. 2024 election at risk.

Fight Voter Fraud, active in 49 states, provides free data on double-registered voters, some of whom have voted in multiple states. Voter rolls are described as a mess, with examples cited, including one individual who allegedly voted three times in North Carolina and Florida. The speaker advocates for law enforcement to prosecute egregious cases of double voting. The organization claims to have perfected methods for identifying double-registered voters, double voters, and instances of deceased individuals voting. They also address the issue of "illegals" voting. The speaker highlights a situation in Georgia where election board members verified ballot reconciliation, a process of matching voters to ballots. Democrats are allegedly suing these individuals, and the speaker suggests this is because the reconciliation rule prevents them from cheating.

Good morning. On Tuesday, I was informed by Chief Clerk Krista Miller about potentially fraudulent voter registration applications. The Elections Office received around 2,500 applications close to the registration deadline, with many showing the same handwriting, unknown signatures, and discrepancies with previously registered voters' signatures. Lancaster County detectives began investigating and found indicators of fraud, including incorrect addresses and false identification. Some individuals listed on the applications denied completing them. The fraudulent registrations appear linked to a large-scale canvassing operation dating back to June, primarily in Lancaster City and surrounding areas. Preliminary findings indicate that 60% of the applications reviewed are fraudulent. The investigation is ongoing, and we are coordinating with other counties facing similar issues. We are committed to ensuring the validity of these applications and will seek additional local police assistance if necessary.