reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In March, I researched and wrote a protocol with hydroxychloroquine, which was quickly approved by the FDA. However, political pressure led to its rejection in favor of more expensive options. Bill Gates even inquired about my protocol, hinting at potential investment. Despite setbacks, I eventually proposed a study comparing vitamins to hydroxychloroquine, revealing political interference in drug approval processes.

I found over 100 scientific papers showing Ivermectin's potential against cancer, primarily from preclinical studies. Researchers are puzzled by how this anti-parasitic drug, which has been effective for decades, can also treat cancer. Ivermectin is off patent, meaning there's little financial incentive for big pharma to invest in its research. Notably, Ivermectin can kill cancer stem cells, reverse chemotherapy resistance, and enhance the effectiveness of both chemotherapy and radiation. Patients combining Ivermectin with these treatments have shown remarkable results, including significant tumor reductions. After two years of research, I now treat over 1,000 cancer patients with Ivermectin and other anti-parasitic drugs. The recent mention by Mel Gibson about friends curing stage 4 cancer with these treatments highlights the growing awareness of this approach.

I have three friends who had stage 4 cancer, and now they are cancer-free. They used treatments like Ivermectin, Fenbendazole, and methylene blue, which was originally a textile dye but has shown significant benefits for mitochondria. It's surprising to see effective treatments being overlooked, raising questions about the medical industry's priorities. Why are cures that aren't profitable often ignored or demonized? This situation highlights a failure in our medical institutions to promote genuinely effective solutions.

A study claimed chloroquine does not inhibit SARS CoV 2 in tissue culture. The speaker examined the study, noting it used CaLU3 lung cells. The speaker contacted the author, stating the study showed chloroquine allows the virus to attack a cancer cell, while protecting a normal cell. The speaker believes the study authors misinterpreted the data and hid the fact that they used KLU3 lung cells, which was found in the appendix. The speaker accuses them of a disinformation campaign, claiming they misrepresented the study's findings to suggest chloroquine is unlikely to work against SARS CoV 2. The speaker believes the study actually proved chloroquine is effective because it allows viruses to attack cancer cells, but not normal cells.

Fenbendazole is an overlooked cancer drug with at least 12 proven anti-cancer mechanisms. It disrupts microtubule polymerization, induces cell cycle arrest, blocks glucose transport, increases tumor suppressor levels, inhibits cancer cell viability, migration, and invasion, induces apoptosis, autophagy, and necrosis, and inhibits angiogenesis and drug resistance. Mebendazole, a similar drug, is already approved by the FDA and in clinical trials for brain and colon cancers. However, there are no Fenbendazole clinical trials for cancer, likely because it is cheap, safe, and effective. Big pharma may not see a profit margin in it, which raises concerns about their motives. This highlights the issue of a society designed to make people sick, with pharmaceutical companies profiting from remedies.

Parasites and cancer have been overlooked, with numerous studies on Ivermectin and cancer conducted by the NIH. Videos from doctors worldwide show that cancer cells resemble parasite egg sacks under a microscope. A chiropractor named Brian Artis discussed this with a parasitologist friend, who revealed that oncologists rarely make the connection between cancer and parasites, despite it being a common topic in parasitology circles. The reason for this silence is likely the fear of losing funding.

Fenbezodizole, a potential miracle drug for cancer, has at least 12 proven anti-cancer mechanisms of action. It is speculated that big pharma fears it due to its low cost. The speaker hopes that Flint is aware of this and examines it. There has been some reaction to this discovery, and it is revealed that a similar drug in the same family, menbendazole, has already been approved by the FDA and is in clinical trials for brain and colon cancers. The lack of clinical trials for Fenbezodizole is attributed to its low cost, safety, and effectiveness. Big pharma's lack of interest in it is seen as an obstacle to people accessing potentially life-saving treatments. The speaker suggests that society is designed to make people sick, allowing big pharma to profit from their remedies.

I have three friends who had stage 4 cancer, and now they are cancer-free. They used treatments like Ivermectin, Fenbendazole, and methylene blue, which was originally a fabric dye but is now known to have significant effects on mitochondria. It's surprising to discover that many effective treatments are overlooked or demonized, raising questions about the motives behind our medical institutions. Why are these cures not promoted when they are not profitable?

The speaker discusses promising results for high dose vitamin C in cancer treatment. A recent study on high dose vitamin C shows so much promise, and there have already been human trials underway in which patients who received high dose vitamin C did have drastically improved outcomes: they lived longer and they had less symptoms from the chemo. Mechanistically, the vitamin C literally wipes out the cancer cells via, like, four distinct very strong mechanisms. The speaker also notes that it is very safe as well. In addition, the speaker mentions other natural cancer therapies: ivermectin, fenbendazole, and now dandelion root extract, stating that all of these show extreme promise for natural cancer treatments.

A recent study claimed that the malaria drug Chloroquine does not inhibit SARS CoV 2. However, upon closer examination, it was found that the drug does work in kidney cells but not in lung cells. The study used a lung cancer cell line called KLU three, which led to the misunderstanding that Chloroquine allows the virus to attack cancer cells but not normal cells. This misinterpretation was deliberately hidden in the appendix of the study, contributing to a disinformation campaign. In reality, Chloroquine is a highly effective drug that can protect normal cells from the virus.

A recent study claimed that the malaria drug chloroquine doesn't inhibit SARS-CoV-2, but the study used KLU-3 lung cells. After looking at the study, I realized KLU-3 cells are lung cancer cells. I contacted the author, pointing out that the study inadvertently demonstrated that chloroquine allows viruses to attack cancer cells while protecting normal cells because cancer cells are de-differentiated with different receptors. The author misinterpreted the data. The fact that they used KLU-3 lung cells was hidden in the appendix. This is disinformation. They're saying chloroquine is unlikely to work against SARS-CoV-2. On the contrary, this proves that chloroquine is incredibly smart because it lets viruses attack cancer cells, not normal cells.

Oncologist Dr. Tullio Simancini wrote the book "Cancer is a Fungus" and discovered that all his tested patients had Candida in their bodies. He achieved a 90% success rate by injecting sodium bicarbonate, an alkaline mix, directly into the cancerous area. Cancer cannot survive in an alkaline environment. A friend of mine, Dr. Emma Fields, took a patient to him in Italy, but he was under investigation and later jailed for manslaughter. My husband believes that if he had used chemotherapy instead, he wouldn't be in jail. Is it possible that some patients came to him in advanced stages and would have passed away regardless?

In 2020, there was a disinformation campaign against Hydroxychloroquine, a generic drug. The pharmaceutical industry opposes generic drugs as they reduce profits. They conducted trials with toxic doses of Hydroxychloroquine, causing increased deaths. On the other hand, Ivermectin is beneficial when given in higher doses. The spike protein in COVID-19 causes clotting issues and suppresses interferon, a chemical that helps fight infections and cancer. Medicines like Ivermectin and others can boost interferon levels and prevent clotting by binding to receptors. Some patients given high doses of Ivermectin have shown remarkable recovery, as it competes with the spike protein for binding sites and prevents clot formation.

By 2018, the speaker concluded that chemotherapy causes suffering and America has trained the world about it along with big pharma because it's profitable. The first chemotherapy, nitrogen mustard, was invented in 1946 from World War I and II nitrogen gas and became the nucleus of Sloan Kettering. Humans have T-cells and natural killer cells, the latter discovered in the 1970s and around for 450 million years. To design chemicals, the National Cancer Institute invented the nude mouse, lacking T-cells and natural killer cells, to test human tissue. Taxol, developed by Bristol Myers and the International Cancer Institute, is dissolved in castor oil, which can cause fatal anaphylactic shock. Chemotherapy wipes out natural killer cells and T-cells, making one susceptible to infection and cancer. The natural killer cell is essential for survival and prevents cancer.

A nurse's mother initially hesitated to take Fenbendazole for her cancer, dismissing it as a dog dewormer. However, after months of persuasion, she started the treatment and experienced remarkable results. The golf ball-sized tumors in her brain, lungs, liver, and kidneys disappeared, impressing her doctors. Unfortunately, when she informed her new doctor about the Fenbendazole, he refused to treat her if she continued taking it. She stopped the treatment and passed away three months later. A subsequent MRI revealed a tumor in her brain that had rapidly grown since she stopped taking Fenbendazole. The speaker believes that Fenbendazole is effective and recommends it for cancer patients.

A veteran physician, Dr. Karen Ruthman, was found dead after allegedly discovering a link between parasites and cancer and a suppressed cure: ivermectin. Dr. Ruthman observed that many patients with chronic illnesses and cancers had parasites. Her research indicated parasites trigger cancer, and ivermectin could treat it. Threatened after planning to reveal her findings, she died in a house fire deemed a "freak accident," though some suspect a cover-up. Experts claim the NIH is aware of the parasite-cancer connection, with studies on ivermectin and cancer. Some researchers claim cancer tumors resemble parasite egg sacs. Big Pharma profits from chronic disease and suppresses cures. Ivermectin, smeared during the COVID-19 pandemic, is a safe, Nobel Prize-winning drug that threatens their profits. Pfizer invested heavily in cancer treatments as mRNA vaccines, potentially linked to "turbo cancers," were rolled out. Experts suggest cancer is linked to parasites, mold, toxic metals, and viruses. The media allegedly altered footage to discredit ivermectin. Federal law prohibits emergency use authorization for vaccines if an existing effective treatment exists, so ivermectin had to be discredited to protect the vaccine enterprise. The World Economic Forum has warned of new injectables for various ailments, including cancers potentially caused by mRNA injections.

The speaker claims there is active suppression of positive vitamin D news and research because it competes with top-selling drugs. The speaker presented data to top vitamin D researchers and faced vicious attacks, with researchers claiming vitamin D doesn't do what the data suggested. The speaker stated they were only presenting assembled data. The speaker was told they were jeopardizing careers of researchers who had spent their lives studying vitamin D, because they never conceived the presented data could be true.

Chemotherapy is claimed to be a hoax and scam by big pharma to profit from suffering people. It allegedly prolongs life by only two to three months and may reduce life expectancy for some cancers like gastric cancer. Chemotherapy is also said to help cancer spread and activate cancer stem cells. Chemotherapy drugs can cost patients over $100,000 a year, leading to financial problems for 50-60% of patients. Ivermectin combined with mebendazole or fenbendazole is suggested as a potentially effective first-line therapy for cancer. Testing over-the-counter medications and cheap prescriptions is recommended as well.

The speaker made chemotherapy breakthroughs in 2008 using a vitamin A compound and excitedly shared the discovery. The speaker's mentor predicted it would take 25 years to implement, but it never happened. A pharmaceutical company held a broad patent on vitamin A compounds as chemotherapeutic agents. The speaker contacted the company, but after answering questions about cancer types, treatment duration, and apoptosis, the call abruptly ended. The company became unresponsive. The speaker's mentor revealed the patent was a "blocking patent" designed to suppress the discovery rather than generate profit.

In 2008, I made a breakthrough in chemotherapy with a vitamin A compound. Excited, I shared with colleagues, but realized a pharmaceutical company had patented it broadly. When I called them, they dismissed me. My mentor explained it was a blocking patent for profit, not to benefit patients.

Ivermectin, a Nobel Prize-winning anti-parasitic drug, has been vilified. Merck, who held the patent until 1996, claims it doesn't work for COVID-19. However, Merck has a 50/50 partnership with Moderna on mRNA cancer vaccines. Because Merck will make billions on mRNA cancer vaccines, they have no interest in investigating ivermectin for cancer. There is evidence that high-dose ivermectin is effective in treating many types of cancers.

I have three friends who had stage 4 cancer, and now they are cancer-free. They used treatments like ivermectin, fenbendazole, and methylene blue, which was originally a textile dye but is now found to have significant effects on mitochondria. It's surprising how many effective treatments are overlooked or demonized, often due to profit motives. Many beneficial substances, such as vitamin D, K2, magnesium, zinc, and quercetin, are not promoted because they lack patent protection and cannot be controlled by pharmaceutical companies.

A recent study found that the malaria drug Chloroquine does not inhibit SARS CoV 2 in lung cells, although it may work in kidney cells. The speaker, who has experience in ocular oncology, contacted the author of the study and pointed out that the lung cells used in the study were actually cancer cells. This means that Chloroquine allows the virus to attack cancer cells but not normal cells. The speaker believes that this is a misinterpretation of the data and accuses the study of being part of a disinformation campaign. They argue that Chloroquine is actually a very effective drug.

Fenbendazole, a potential cancer drug, has at least 12 proven anti-cancer mechanisms. It disrupts microtubule polymerization, induces cell cycle arrest, blocks glucose transport, increases tumor suppressor levels, inhibits cancer cell viability and migration, induces apoptosis and autophagy, inhibits angiogenesis and drug resistance, and sensitizes cells to chemo and radiation therapy. Mebendazole, a similar drug, is already in clinical trials for brain and colon cancers. However, there are no clinical trials for Fenbendazole, possibly because it is cheap, safe, and effective. Big pharma may not see a profit in it. This raises concerns about withholding information and preventing people from using potentially beneficial treatments. The current society seems to promote sickness, allowing big pharma to profit from remedies.

There is a flood of research on what vitamin D can do for cancer, and it helps in many different ways. Research that shows vitamin D doesn't help is influenced by big pharma. Studies that don't show a favorable outcome use tiny amounts of vitamin D, which is why they don't create the desired effects.