reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Josh Shapiro has released a letter to the people of Pennsylvania, but it’s filled with falsehoods regarding the counting of legal ballots in the collar counties, including Montgomery, Philadelphia, Bucks, and Center County. He claims there was a mix-up and a lack of clarity, but the real issue is his fear to enforce the law against his own party, which is violating it. Shapiro is not standing up to Democrats who are breaking the law, and he appears frightened about his political future. His prospects for 2028 are looking grim, and he might want to reach out to Tim Waltz, as his situation could mirror Shapiro's impending challenges.

Former state senator Nancy Schafer and her husband Bruce were found dead today. The Department of Child Protective Services is under scrutiny as it is believed to be an empire built on separating families and taking children. The deaths of the Schafers are being investigated as a possible murder-suicide. There is a concern that the destruction of families is necessary for the development of a one-world government. Some suggest that the only solution is to completely close down Child Protective Services and start anew with a pro-family approach.

John Barnett's family friend is certain he did not commit suicide, believing someone wanted to silence him due to his whistleblowing against Boeing. Barnett, a quality manager, had filed a complaint against the company for unsafe practices. Despite his death, his attorneys are ready to proceed with the trial.

Samantha Wolff, a synagogue president from Detroit, was found stabbed to death outside her home. An arrest was made in November, but a recent report reveals a different suspect. The new suspect, Michael Jackson Bolonis, was allegedly breaking into cars in the area and was inside Samantha's home when she arrived. A confrontation occurred, leading to her stabbing. Initially, her death was treated as a domestic dispute, but the first suspect was released. The current suspect's arrest raises questions about how he gained entry without signs of forced entry and why nothing was stolen. The case's handling suggests an attempt to make it go away, which may attract attention.

A federal whistleblower and former Pennsylvania state police employee filed a criminal complaint alleging Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro's involvement in an assassination attempt against President Trump. The complaint claims Shapiro conspired with others, planning and facilitating the attempt to advance his political career. The whistleblower contacted the Secret Service in July 2024, but their tip was allegedly blocked by the Biden administration. Further attempts to report the crime to the FBI were also allegedly blocked. The whistleblower claims former FBI Director Christopher Wray conspired with the Biden administration to conceal these reports. With Wray's resignation, the complaint demands investigation. This is a major story with potential far-reaching consequences. The upcoming arrival of Kash Patel is also mentioned.

Former state senator Nancy Schaefer and her husband Bruce were found dead today. Parents across this country need to be warned of the dangers of child protective services nationwide. The Department of Child Protective Services has become a protected empire built on taking children and separating families. What led to the sudden and violent deaths of Ms. Schaefer and her husband? The family is going to have to be destroyed in order for the one world government to completely develop. Preliminarily, it looks to be a murder-suicide. Children are being taken away from their parents in a ruthless kind of behavior. How do you obtain child protective services? It may be only by closing it completely and starting over at the beginning with pro-family values.

Investigations revealed a conspiracy to obstruct federal investigations into election fraud in 2020, involving key officials like Bill Barr. Formal charges were filed against Governor Shapiro and others for obstruction and collusion in election fraud. The Pennsylvania attorney general must investigate these charges. The evidence is strong, and prison sentences are expected for those involved. Accountability is crucial to prevent future election fraud.

A forensic pathologist in Alberta, Dr. Adeagbo, faces allegations of inconsistent credentials, impacting thousands of autopsies. Concerns arose after discrepancies in his academic qualifications were revealed, casting doubt on his expertise. His role as an expert witness in homicide cases and his conclusions on deaths have raised questions about the justice system's oversight. The resignation of Alberta's chief medical examiner in 2014 due to alleged political interference adds to the suspicion of systematic issues within government ministries. The public is left questioning the trustworthiness of his autopsies and the potential influence on judicial decisions. Further investigation is needed to address these concerns.

John and Mario discuss the breadth and implications of the Epstein files, asserting that Epstein was an access agent connected to Mossad and deeply embedded with various intelligence actors. - Epstein as Mossad access agent and broader intelligence ties: - John asserts that Epstein’s status as a Mossad access agent is correct and that Epstein sought contact with the CIA, the FBI, the National Security Council, MI5, MI6, and even Russia’s Putin. He notes emails from Epstein’s side asking for private meetings with Putin, which were granted in a restricted form, while Epstein’s attorneys reportedly filed FOIA requests with the CIA and NSC about any association with them. - The conversation expands to consider broader pressure on the DOJ and the Trump administration to redact or withhold documents, with Congresswoman May mentioned as observing DOJ monitoring of her and colleagues. - The two discuss the idea that the “movers and shakers” in American culture and the billionaire/political class are driving the cover-up, with the implication that releases mandated by law have not been fully honored. - Death of Epstein and questions about the death/mortality: - Both speakers repeatedly state “Epstein did not kill himself,” noting the belief that he was murdered and cremated, preventing body examination. - They list several anomalies surrounding Epstein’s death: attempted suicide on July 23 with deleted footage, six days of suicide watch followed by removal from watch contrary to protocol, guards’ missed rounds, an empty cell with a removed cellmate who had been violent, an unmonitored call the day before death, and camera malfunctions on the day of death. - They discuss a decoy body used in the autopsy process and discrepancies in the autopsy report (ear shape, nose, and penis appearance) and a DOJ report dated a day earlier than publicized. The discussion includes the possibility of a decoy body to mislead reporters. - A forensic expert is cited, noting that the autopsy description described a normal penis, conflicting with accounts from a victim about a deformed penis. - Redactions, sources, and the release of documents: - They argue the released files overwhelm audiences and muddy facts, with millions of documents, of which only a fraction has been released; the rest remain redacted. - John explains FOIA processes and redaction rules (sources/methods, unindicted co-conspirators, victims’ privacy), emphasizing that there is little justification to redact content about Epstein himself since he is deceased. - They compare the redaction situation to the torture report, where redacted material obscures critical findings, and point out inconsistencies in what names are redacted (e.g., Les Wexner redacted as “Les” but not his full surname). - Libyan assets, Ukraine, and other financial angles: - A memo shows Epstein plotting to loot Libya’s frozen assets, with Greg Brown (former MI6 and Mossad connections mentioned) proposing to identify recovered assets and take 5–10% as compensation, with Libya’s reconstruction spending potentially exceeding $100 billion. - The discussion notes that the U.S. Treasury rewards those who facilitate repatriation of unfrozen assets, creating incentives for private actors with intelligence ties to pursue such recoveries. - A separate thread cites a 2014 Ukraine-related discussion where Epstein allegedly said the upheaval could provide opportunities; the Rothschilds are reported to have emailed Epstein about Ukraine and asset management strategies, implying Epstein represented the Rothschilds in asset opportunities. - They discuss the possibility that events like regime changes could be exploited for personal gain, with Epstein’s reputation management and potential money-motivated exploitation of geopolitical upheavals. - Honeypots, blackmail, and sex as an intelligence instrument: - The discussion covers claims of victims receiving death threats in Hebrew, and whether this indicates Mossad involvement or a private group using Hebrew phrasing to threaten. They argue Mossad has historically used threats and spying, and Epstein’s network could include others who leveraged sexual exploits for leverage. - They examine emails describing sexual activity in a transactional manner, with grainy surveillance footage capturing some redacted sexual content, suggesting a blackmail operation rather than simple perversion alone. - They consider whether Epstein’s sex life served as a bargaining chip for intelligence services, with Epstein’s protection and coercion potentially enabling illicit activity to be used for intelligence purposes. - Notable connections and individuals: - Fergie (Sarah, Duchess of York) is discussed as having close ties to Epstein, including emails referencing “marry me” and a period after his conviction; Prince Andrew is noted as heavily implicated in the broader Epstein network. - Howard Lutnick’s name appears in the documents; his denial of involvement with Epstein is highlighted as a potential discrepancy given the surrounding evidence. - The possibility that redacted materials could still reveal high-level connections or be weaponized against political figures is considered, with the overarching view that information could resurface or be released later to influence politics. - Final stance and ongoing investigation: - John maintains that Epstein’s role as an intelligence asset is supported by the files released to date and that more documents remain to be disclosed. He emphasizes that the situation involves intersecting intelligence communities, financial opportunism, and political exposure, with ongoing questions about the true extent of who knew what and who protected whom. The conversation closes with an acknowledgment that more files will likely be released, more information will emerge, and expert analysis will continue to evolve.

The discussion centers on serious allegations involving a programmer who accused OpenAI of stealing people’s work and not paying them. The group notes that this programmer was murdered, with several participants presenting conflicting views on his death. Speaker 1 states that it was a great tragedy and that the programmer committed suicide, expressing a strong belief that it was suicide. In contrast, Speaker 0 describes the situation as clearly a murder, citing multiple troubling details and offering their personal conclusion that the programmer was killed. There is also any emphasis on the programmer’s public exposure. Speaker 2 notes that the programmer had been named four days earlier in the New York Times lawsuit and had just done an expose for the New York Times on how copyright issues with OpenAI were involved, specifically on the twenty-sixth, highlighting timing as very odd. The conversation touches on surveillance and investigative details. Speaker 3 claims there were multiple investigations and two police reports, but asserts that only one police report has been seen, alleging that in the first report the writer changed it, and that this is the second report; they claim the only one seen is the second report. The narrative then returns to the stated belief that the programmer was murdered. Speaker 0 lists signs of foul play: a struggle, surveillance camera footage, and wires cut. They detail that the programmer had just ordered takeout, had returned from a vacation with friends on Catalina Island, and that there was no indication of suicide. They note there was no note and no observed behavior suggesting suicide, and that the programmer was found dead with blood in multiple rooms, arguing that these factors make murder seem obvious. The question of whether authorities have been consulted is raised, with Speaker 0 asking if the authorities have been talked to about it. Throughout, Speaker 1 reiterates their belief in suicide by asking, “Do you think he committed suicide? I really do,” maintaining that position even after the murder narrative is presented. Speaker 1 confirms they have not discussed the matter with the authorities.

A programmer claimed OpenAI was stealing people’s stuff and not paying them, and then he was murdered. One speaker says, “I really do” think it was suicide and notes it as a tragedy; he knew the person. The other insists it looked like murder, pointing to a gun purchase, a medical record, and argues there was a sign of a struggle. They discuss the slain man’s activities—he had just ordered takeout, returned from a Catalina Island vacation, and there was blood in two rooms with no suicide note. The mother claims he was murdered on your orders. They ask why authorities in San Francisco haven’t fully investigated beyond calling it a suicide and mention contacting Ro Khanna, with no result. The second set of details cites how the bullet entered him, a path through the room, a wig in the room that wasn’t his, and a DoorDash order, challenging the suicide claim.

The discussion highlights inconsistencies at Amy’s scene: she was right-handed, but the gun was found on the left side of her body. Confidential sources spoke on the record to other journalists, noting heavy intelligence involvement on the scene. No coroner report or autopsy has been released yet, though it’s expected to be explored during the forthcoming investigation. As Amy’s story gained public attention, Daily Mail headlines were described as misleading, contributing to a broader media spread that included CNN and Fox News. A set of texts from a man named Sam, which have since been erased, are introduced for context. One post from Sam presenting Amy’s messages describes death threats Amy had received daily for her recent work, claiming surveillance after she “crossed some line” with her independently developed theory. She mentions leaving a voice note on a hacked phone about “super, heedy shit” she had figured out, followed by ongoing “daily death threats.” She asserts she did not kill herself, telling people close to her over the past few days that it is “simply impossible to take them all out,” and asks what can be told about Sam and these texts, noting there are more. Speaker 0 explains that Sam Reid was Amy’s business partner in the Geometric Energy Corporation (GEC), formed with Sam and Chantel, and that Sam was a very close friend of Amy. The texts indicate Amy was updating him about what happened to him as well; reading the streams reveals Sam and Amy were both affected. Sam is portrayed as someone Amy relied on and trusted as a best friend, with whom she shared substantial history and company involvement. Following this, it’s noted that Sam removed the tweets, leading to questions about possible consequences for him. The speaker reflects on misleading headlines, citing an example that stated, “eleventh scientists found dead,” which mischaracterizes the situation since Amy died four years ago. The speaker refrains from speculating on Sam Reid’s motives for deleting the texts, stating they do not know him personally and that it wouldn’t be fair to speculate about his motivations. The core point remains: Sam deleted the texts, which is considered noteworthy. Fact of the matter remains that Sam erased the texts, and this action is highlighted within the discussion.

Josh Shapiro's administration settled a sexual harassment claim against a top aide for $295,000. The aide resigned 3 weeks later. This raises questions about Shapiro's commitment to sexual abuse survivors, especially since he is being considered for VP. The situation is seen as hypocritical. Share your thoughts in the comments.

Former state senator Nancy Schafer and her husband were found dead. She believed child protective services nationwide are dangerous and need to be reformed. The Department of Child Protective Services is accused of tearing families apart. The deaths are suspected to be a murder-suicide. Schafer advocated for starting over with Pro Family Values to address the issue.

Former state senator Nancy Schafer and her husband Bruce were found dead, raising concerns about the dangers posed by child protective services (CPS) across the nation. Investigators are at their northeast Georgia home searching for clues regarding their sudden deaths, which appear to be a murder-suicide. Schafer expressed strong beliefs that CPS operates as a protective empire focused on separating families, suggesting that the destruction of the family unit is part of a larger agenda. She argued that the only solution may be to completely dismantle CPS and rebuild it with pro-family values.

My name is Hadassah Feinberg, and I've filed a private criminal complaint against Pennsylvania Governor Joshua Shapiro for the attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump on July 13, 2024. I charge Governor Shapiro with murder and attempted murder, alleging he conspired with others to carry out this assassination due to his belief that President Biden would lose to Trump. This alleged conspiracy involved abuse of power, failure to protect Trump at the rally, and collaboration with law enforcement officials and individuals like George Soros. Governor Shapiro is also implicated in widespread public corruption, including tax fraud and witness suppression, as detailed in a RICO lawsuit. I contacted the Secret Service and FBI, but my reports haven't been fully investigated. I'm requesting charges against Shapiro and his co-conspirators for these crimes and his immediate removal from office.

A federal whistleblower and former Pennsylvania state police employee filed a criminal complaint on February 7, 2025, alleging a link between Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro and an assassination attempt against former President Donald Trump. The complaint claims Shapiro conspired with others to carry out the attempt and that the Biden administration blocked the Secret Service and FBI investigations. The whistleblower alleges that the Philadelphia FBI covered up the crime and that former FBI Director Christopher Wray was involved in concealing reports. The whistleblower believes this is a massive story, pointing to similar alleged cover-ups by Alan Greenberg. They anticipate that Kash Patel's involvement will lead to further investigation. This is a huge, potentially history-making development.

The image being highlighted is a set of 36 blacked-out documents, referred to as “kuro-nuri so-ryo” (blackened documents). Of these, eight-tenths are blacked out. The relatives who received these documents are introduced: a woman in her 40s living in Sapporo, Hokkaido, who is the wife of the deceased; she had heard that her husband was a tutor at a cram school. He died at home, and the police prohibited a full investigation, so she wanted to know the cause of death and went to Northern Hokkaido to see the autopsy results. The narrative then shifts to the sequence of events for a different case: a 42-year-old man who died six days after vaccination. The wife wanted to know the details of her husband’s death. The husband received the first Pfizer vaccine on October 15, 2021. Soon after the vaccination, he developed a reaction: arm pain, fever up to 38.5°C, and a fever that lasted about three days, during which his wife acknowledges the fever was present but notes he did not usually discuss symptoms beyond that. Six days after vaccination, around 2:30 a.m., the wife heard noises on the first floor and came down; the husband had collapsed, coughing up white foam, with blood in his mouth and difficulty breathing. He then fell into cardiopulmonary arrest and died. Medical professionals were asked to comment on the cause of death. They stated that the exact cause is not clearly known; it could be the vaccine, but there is no evidence to confirm this, so they could not definitively say it was the vaccine. They described the death as an acute circulatory system disease and mentioned possibilities such as vascular issues, heart or blood vessel abnormalities, and conditions like myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, or aneurysm, but could not specify. One doctor suggested that the death might be attributed to an acute circulatory system disease, while another indicated that the precise cause remains uncertain. The wife wanted the autopsy results from the police to understand why her husband died, and she expressed that she regrets not having had an autopsy performed. When asked about performing an autopsy after national guidelines advised against it, officials reportedly suggested that delaying the man’s return home would be problematic, and thus the autopsy was not performed. The speaker notes that in other cases they have covered, some relatives feel that an autopsy would have helped them understand the death, while others question whether an autopsy would have changed anything. The report concludes that the death is suspected to be due to an acute circulatory system disease, but the pathway to that conclusion remains unclear because much of the evidence is redacted. The speaker emphasizes that if autopsies had been pursued more actively, such cases in Sapporo might be less common.

The conversation centers on a highly unusual interview in which Tucker discusses a whistleblower connected to a major AI company and his reported death. The participants note that the whistleblower, identified by name as Jamie, allegedly committed suicide, but there are strong indications that some people believe he was murdered. Sam Altman is specifically addressed in the exchange, with Tucker asking if Altman is being accused; Altman responds, and the discussion emphasizes that the speakers think someone killed him rather than it being a straightforward suicide. Key points raised include: - The case has striking inconsistencies: no suicide note has been found, and Jamie’s parents believe he was murdered. - Investigative details mentioned as evidence of foul play include blood in two rooms, wires to a security camera that were cut, and someone’s wig found in the room. - There is also mention that Jamie ordered DoorDash right before the alleged suicide, which the speakers view as unusual and suggestive of a rapid change in mindset. - The discussion notes that the parents have publicly stated their belief in homicide and have urged a proper investigation rather than a drop of the case. - The possibility of an investigation is framed as necessary, with questions about why a proper inquiry should not be pursued given the alleged signs. - The exchange questions Altman’s reaction to the murder accusation, suggesting his response appeared bizarre or unconvincing to some listeners; one speaker posits Altman might simply be socially awkward, while others feel he would be more plainly irate and insistent on a thorough investigation if he were not connected to the case. - It is stated that Jamie’s family has sued the building’s landlord, alleging a cover-up related to his death. Reported details include packages disappearing from the San Francisco building and claimed safeguarding failures by the landlord and management. - Additional context acknowledges the emotional toll on Jamie’s parents, noting their grief and the potential impact on their beliefs about what happened. Overall, the discussion presents a narrative of a whistleblower’s controversial death with multiple seemingly contradictory clues (no suicide note, blood in two rooms, a cut security camera wire, a wig, and a late-night DoorDash order) and a call for a proper investigation, while also touching on the emotional strain experienced by the family and the implications of the landlord-related lawsuit.

In 2020, there was a conspiracy to obstruct investigations into election fraud involving Bill Barr and others. Formal charges have been filed against Governor Shapiro and others for obstruction and collusion in election fraud. Michelle Henry, the Pennsylvania attorney general, must investigate these charges. The evidence incriminates many officials. Eventually, those involved will face prison sentences and be held accountable for election fraud.

George Webb is in San Francisco with the parents of Sichir Balaji, who was murdered. They visited the crime scene, noting signs of a struggle, including blood by the sink and evidence that he was attacked from behind while using earbuds. It appears he tried to escape, crawling toward the door for help. His belongings were scattered, suggesting someone searched for a thumb drive he owned. The parents are awaiting access to his phone and laptop for evidence. They plan to geofence the area for IP addresses related to the crime. Despite presenting evidence, authorities are labeling it a suicide and withholding police and autopsy reports. The parents seek justice for their son.