TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

In May 2024, 194 WHO member states will vote on international agreements for pandemic prevention behind closed doors. These agreements give the WHO leadership in health matters related to pandemics, but the process is not widely reported or discussed in the media, parliaments, universities, or society.

WHO did not impose lockdowns, mask mandates, or vaccine mandates during the COVID-19 pandemic. Their role is to provide guidance and support to governments. The pandemic agreement was created by countries for countries, affirming national sovereignty and responsibility. WHO is not a party to the agreement, which focuses on countries working together to prevent pandemics.

The WHO is set to have a final vote on two international agreements involving pandemic prevention and preparedness. This process is conducted privately and is not widely reported or discussed in the media, national parliaments, universities, or society. The WHO asserts its unquestionable leadership in all health matters through these legal instruments.

The ongoing negotiations on the pandemic accord and amendments to international health regulations provide a unique opportunity for us to learn from the COVID-19 response. It is crucial that we seize this generational opportunity and make necessary changes to protect future generations. These processes are negotiated by member states and will be implemented in accordance with their own national laws, ensuring each country's sovereignty over domestic health policies. Claims that the accord or amended regulations will give WHO power to override domestic decisions are false. It is important for journalists to follow the facts and dispel myths to support the commitment of all 194 WHO member states towards their populations.

We are facing a soft coup where new laws are being created under the guise of pandemic preparedness, stripping away human rights protections. The WHO is pushing for a pandemic treaty that would enforce surveillance, censorship, and limit freedom of speech. Vaccines could be developed in just 100 days. These changes would give the WHO power to dictate which drugs countries can use during a pandemic. The concept of One Health would allow the WHO to control everything globally, with a belief that humans are no more valuable than animals.

The WHO is portrayed as a lobby organization funded by pharmaceutical companies and influenced by billionaires. It is claimed the WHO is not interested in public health. Governments are said to relinquish power to the WHO to avoid electoral repercussions for unpopular decisions. Politicians can then blame the WHO for policies like lockdowns and school closures, claiming they had no choice. This arrangement allegedly shields politicians from accountability.

WHO cannot order lockdowns or mask mandates, countries decide based on their own assessment. Negotiating countries added a statement saying WHO and the director general will not have this power, ensuring sovereignty is not affected. This agreement clarifies the truth.

Hello, I'm Dr. Tess Lawrie. The World Health Organization's pandemic agreement is set to be finalized by November 11 and adopted in December. However, the WHO has failed its mission to ensure health for all, and its authority is questionable due to its COVID policies. Consider the WHO as a gang imposing rules on us, demanding compliance and silencing dissent. We have options: comply, plead for change, escape, or confront them. Negotiating with such entities is unlikely to succeed. It's time to inform the WHO that their agreements are irrelevant to us, the people. Thank you.

The WHO states it did not impose lockdowns, mask mandates, or vaccine mandates during the COVID-19 pandemic, clarifying it lacks such power and does not seek it. The WHO asserts its role is to support governments with evidence-based guidance, advice, and supplies to help them protect their people.

The speaker discusses the new pandemic treaty and amendments to the international health regulations proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO). They express concern over the potential impact on countries' sovereignty and people's self-determination. The speaker highlights that these changes will affect everyone and reduce democratic participation. They mention the WHO's claim to absolute leadership in health measures and the power to impose restrictions, lockdowns, and experimental treatments. The speaker also emphasizes the WHO's control over information and the lack of mechanisms to challenge their assessments. They argue that without open debate and different opinions, there can be no science or democracy. The speaker calls for the negotiations to be stopped and urges citizens to pressure their political representatives.

The HHS Secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., is addressing controversial WHO amendments to international health regulations (IHR) that establish a framework for managing global public health events. The US is rejecting these amendments due to concerns about national sovereignty, as the regulations could grant an unelected international organization power over health emergencies, potentially leading to lockdowns and travel restrictions. The agreement bypasses the US Senate and employs broad language, enabling the WHO to implement unified public messaging, raising fears of censorship. Provisions regarding health IDs, vaccine passports, and a centralized medical database could lead to global medical surveillance. The WHO's failures during COVID, including its handling of China's actions, further fuel concerns. Rejecting the amendments aims to strengthen national autonomy and prevent a technocratic control system that uses health risks to curtail freedoms. While the regulations may have been written with good intentions, they represent a step in the wrong direction. This rejection is not a rejection of international cooperation, but a commitment to protecting civil liberties, the Constitution, and American sovereignty.

The WHO Pandemic Preparedness Treaty gives the WHO excessive power, potentially undermining America's interests. We must prevent President Biden from signing it to protect our constitution and sovereignty. Research this issue and stand against international bureaucrats and their Davos allies. We, the people, still hold the power to resist.

The WHO was selected to execute a "soft coup bloodlessly" through amendments that change international health regulations and a new pandemic treaty (aka pandemic accord/instrument). The new version removes language from the current health regulations that ensures implementation respects dignity, human rights, and fundamental freedoms. The IHRs are changing from recommendations to binding enforcements, requiring countries to create enforcement mechanisms. This includes enforced surveillance of people and microorganisms, enforced censorship, a single narrative, and harmonization of vaccine and drug regulation. Liability for these products will allegedly be eliminated. These documents come into force when the WHO director general declares a public health emergency of international concern, or even a risk of one, and his powers can continue after the emergency is contained.

The speaker addresses the issue of fake news and conspiracy theories about the pandemic agreement, clarifying that the WHO does not have the power to impose lockdowns, vaccine mandates, or restrict travel. These claims are false, and the WHO is not seeking such authority.

WHO did not impose lockdowns, mask mandates, or vaccine mandates during the pandemic. Our role is to provide guidance and support to governments. The pandemic agreement is written by countries for countries, affirming national sovereignty and responsibility. WHO is not a party to the agreement, only governments are. The agreement emphasizes working together to keep each other safe from pandemics.

WHO did not impose lockdowns, mask mandates, or vaccine mandates during COVID-19. Their role is to provide guidance and support to governments, not to make decisions for them. The pandemic agreement is written by countries for countries, affirming national sovereignty and responsibility. WHO is not a party to the agreement; only governments are. The agreement emphasizes countries working together to keep each other safe from pandemics. Translation: WHO no impuso bloqueos, mandatos de mascarillas o vacunas durante COVID-19. Su papel es brindar orientación y apoyo a los gobiernos, no tomar decisiones por ellos. El acuerdo pandémico es redactado por países para países, afirmando la soberanía y responsabilidad nacional. WHO no es parte del acuerdo; solo los gobiernos lo son. El acuerdo enfatiza que los países trabajen juntos para mantenerse seguros de las pandemias.

The WHO has announced a global police force to control and censor opposition. They plan to use medical tyranny to take over and are pushing for a world treaty. The head of WHO, Tedros, openly talks about using disease x for total control. However, people are waking up to their agenda. It is important to expose this for our own survival. On the other hand, Speaker 1 discusses the need for a pandemic agreement to better prepare for future outbreaks. They emphasize the importance of a shared response and hope that member states will deliver this agreement by May 2024. Speaker 2 promotes Infowars as a source of truthful information.

If the final products of the pandemic agreement and International Health Regulations (IHR) do not bring about change and ensure collective security and equity, then the opportunity to make history will be missed. The IMB and the IHR working group are facing challenges from fake news, lies, and conspiracy theories. Some claim that the agreement will give the World Health Organization (WHO) the power to impose lockdowns or vaccine mandates, but these claims are false. The speaker emphasizes the importance of not allowing lies to sabotage this historic agreement. Another speaker questions the purpose of the pandemic treaty and criticizes the WHO's authority and intentions. Doctor Peter McCullough shares concerns about the treaty and advises pulling out of the WHO. The speakers discuss the WHO's alleged plan to take over global healthcare guidance and use tax dollars for their own agenda. They express distrust in the WHO and doubt the enforceability of their actions. The obsession with global force and coercion is attributed to perceived global threats, but the need for healthy debate on these threats is emphasized. The gratitude for the doctor's voice and his efforts to speak out against the WHO and the COVID narrative is expressed.

The World Health Organization Treaty and pandemic planning aim to maintain lockdown powers until vaccination is widespread. The treaty is being revised to hide concerning provisions, but the ultimate goal remains global compliance with lockdowns, vaccination, track and trace, and health passports. Rejecting the treaty is the solution, despite attempts to downplay its impact.

WHO did not impose any measures during the COVID-19 pandemic, such as lockdowns, mask mandates, or vaccine mandates. The organization lacks the authority to enforce such actions and does not seek that power. Its role is to provide governments with evidence-based guidance, advice, and necessary supplies to help protect their populations.

As president, it is your duty to protect the health, freedom, and sovereignty of the people. If you want more information on why many people, including myself, have been against the power grabs by the WHO, feel free to reach out to us. Look into the World Council for Health's policy rejecting a monopoly over global public health and the work done by Children's Health Defense. It is important to exercise the right to referendum, otherwise politicians may become irrelevant, not just through the WHO, but also the United Nations. These organizations are seeking authority over global emergency shocks. Politicians need to prioritize the interests and self-determination of the people to maintain their relevance in a democratic country.

It's easy to blame those who believe or spread mis/disinformation. Governments, internet, and social media companies have a responsibility to prevent the spread of harmful lies and promote access to accurate health information. The WHO is working with partners, companies, and researchers to understand how misinformation and disinformation spreads, who is targeted, how they are influenced, and what can be done to counter this problem.

I expressed skepticism towards the World Health Organization's ability to handle a global pandemic due to past errors and conflicts of interest. While we can assist other countries, we must not give up our sovereignty or agree to a lockdown charter. In emergencies, governments may feel pressured to make harmful decisions. Therefore, I believe that no pandemic treaty is preferable to a flawed one.

The speaker expresses concern over the World Health Organization's (WHO) proposed new pandemic treaty and amendments to the International Health Regulations. They argue that these changes will diminish countries' sovereignty and individuals' rights, erode democratic participation, and grant the WHO excessive power. The speaker highlights the lack of transparency and public debate surrounding these negotiations. They emphasize that the WHO will have authority over health matters, including imposing restrictions, lockdowns, and experimental treatments. The speaker also criticizes the WHO's control over information and the absence of mechanisms to challenge their decisions. They conclude by urging citizens to pressure their political representatives to halt these negotiations.

Thomas Binder argues that there has never been a pandemic of a killer virus, but there has been a pandemic of cowards. He claims doctors observe a pandemic of severe illnesses and sudden unexpected deaths from heart attack, myocarditis, aortic dissection, stroke, pulmonary embolism, thrombosis and inflammation of other organs, disseminated intravascular coagulation, increased infections including COVID, cancer, autoimmune diseases, infertility, miscarriage, and many more. He asserts that the modified RNA vaccine platform represents the greatest medical crime in human history and a humanitarian disaster of unprecedented proportions. He states that the pharmaceutical industry is moving all vaccinations to the modified RNA vaccine platform. Binder argues that the modified RNA vaccine platform is nonsensical and life threatening, identifying two fundamental flaws: first, injecting the construction plan for a protein foreign to the body without any control over which body cells will produce it, in what dose, and for how long; second, the cells coerced to produce the foreign protein and present it on the surface will be mistakenly recognized by the immune system as foreign, leading to destruction much like the rejection of a foreign organ. He contends the alleged modified RNA vaccination coerces the body to produce a toxin in an unknown dose and for an unknown period, and literally transforms parts of the body into an alien. Therefore, he asserts, the entire modified RNA vaccine platform must be banned immediately. Binder claims that governments are negotiating a plandemic treaty with the WHO, and if signed, the WHO will be placed above the constitution of the country, resulting in loss of freedom of choice for citizens, governments, and parliaments. He states that “who controls the who controls the world.” He proclaims that the only reasonable, 100% effective and safe prevention of another criminal pandemic is the immediate smashing of the WHO into a thousand pieces. Addressing those who have been injected, or experienced side effects, he encourages hope that more responsible doctors and scientists are researching ways to treat even the most complex side effects. He likens the situation to smoking: it is almost never too late to quit and live healthier. Regardless of injection status, he urges listeners to wake up, stand up, and tell manufacturers, alleged experts, government, parliament, generals, and authorities who have failed in the Covid scandal that enough is enough. He calls for stepping back and standing in courts, arguing this for the sake of a future worth living for children and grandchildren.