reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In this video, the speaker shows two different batches of votes with identical markings. They point out a little tail and the word "Republican" written on both. They mention that there are a total of 62 images in the batch, but they didn't go through all of them. The speaker doesn't remember the exact numbers, but they mention that the batches were fairly close. They highlight one image with a little bubble and mention that it matches another image with the same batch number. The conclusion is that there are duplicate ballots in the entire batch that were scanned multiple times.

In this video, the speaker discusses the potential illegal votes in the 2020 election. They highlight that there were a staggering 461,349 potential illegal votes. They also compare the number of mail-in ballots in different years, emphasizing that there were 5 to 6 times more mail-in ballots in the 2020 election. However, they point out that only 4,400 out of 1,000,768 mailed-out ballots were rejected, indicating a very low rejection rate of 0.34%. In contrast, in 2018, with fewer ballots, there was a rejection rate of 3.36%. These numbers suggest a significant issue with the checking process for the legitimacy of the ballots.

Who determined the number 420,987,987 regarding failed signatures from the 2020 election? That figure comes from analyzing a quarter of the 1,900,000 mail-in ballots in Maricopa County. We had 150 trained workers review the envelopes based on the secretary of state's guidelines, examining each voter record individually. After analyzing 25% of the ballots, we extrapolated the data to arrive at the final number. It's important to note that this analysis only pertains to Maricopa County, which had over 2 million ballots in total, with around 1.9 million being mail-in votes. Yes, that is correct. Thank you. Proceed.

The speaker discusses the issue of inspecting ballots for signatures. They mention that the Voter Privacy Act prohibits inspectors from looking through a ballot to verify a signature. They also point out that many ballots have two different patterns of the letter "s" written for the signature, even though some of them don't even have an "s" in the voter's name. They state that out of the 104,820 ballots reviewed, 20,232 had mismatched signatures, which accounts for 20% of the total.

Expert testifies that the signature verification process in Maricopa County is flawed. The workers are unable to properly review signatures due to technical limitations. The log data reveals that a large number of ballots were approved in less than 3 seconds each, with one worker approving all signatures at this speed. Eleven workers approved 170,000 signatures in less than 3 seconds with a high approval rate. This process does not constitute a thorough signature review. Maricopa County was aware of these issues and could monitor their workers.

In this video, the speaker shows two different batches of votes with identical markings. They point out a little tail that appears on both batches, as well as the word "Republican" written in the same way. The speaker mentions that there are a total of 62 images in the batch, but they didn't have time to go through all of them. They highlight one specific image with a little bubble and mention the batch numbers that match. The conclusion is that there are duplicate ballots in the entire batch that have been scanned multiple times.

The speakers discuss voter fraud and irregularities in Maricopa County. They mention that the county recorder, a former cartel attorney, allowed ballots to be restored and duplicated in a way that changed the intended votes. They also highlight issues with unsecured voting computers and the hand delivery of card readers for tabulation. They point out a significant difference in votes between the Republican governor and the Democrat senator, suggesting irregularities. They mention that races were called in favor of Republicans before being overturned during the recount. Additionally, they mention emergency polling places and door hangers without ID requirements in Democrat areas.

The speaker asks who determined the number of failed signatures in the 2020 election. Speaker 1 explains that their organization reviewed a quarter of the 1,900,000 envelopes from the election using 150 trained workers. They followed the guidelines in the secretary of state manual and analyzed each voter record individually. The statistics from the first 25% of the ballots were extrapolated to determine the final number, which is specific to Maricopa County. Speaker 0 acknowledges that Maricopa County alone had over 2 million ballots, with about 1.9 million of them being mail-in ballots. Speaker 1 confirms this and the conversation continues.

In the video, the speaker highlights several concerning issues related to the recent election. They mention the deletion of security logs, thousands of voters registering and voting after the deadline, individuals voting who were not on the voter rolls, and ballots being sent without evidence. The speaker also mentions a memo from Maricopa County instructing the use of Sharpies on election day, which raises concerns about ballot validity. They suggest that Republicans who waited to vote on election day may have been affected by this. Overall, the speaker raises questions about the integrity of the election process.

In this video, the speaker shows two batches of votes with identical markings. They point out a little tail and the word "Republican" written on both. They mention that there are 62 images in total, but they only highlight a few. The speaker doesn't remember the exact numbers, but they mention that the batches were fairly close. They also mention specific image numbers that match in both batches. The conclusion is that there are duplicate ballots and the entire batch has been scanned multiple times.

In 2022, the speaker presents data on the Maricopa County elections. They show a slide with the names of polling centers and dots representing tabulators. None of the 446 tabulators in the county were compliant with the Election Assistance Corporation regulations. The error rate was significantly higher, with some tabulators failing at a rate of 95%. Despite these failures, they were still used to process 5,000 ballots.

The number of 420,987 failed signatures in the 2020 election was determined by reviewing a quarter of the 1,900,000 envelopes in Maricopa County. Trained workers followed guidelines to analyze each voter record individually, leading to the extrapolation of the final number. This analysis focused solely on Maricopa County's ballots.

Signature verification has been a controversial topic in Maricopa County, often avoided in discussions. This was evident during the Arizona audit, where the county firmly opposed any scrutiny of signatures. The reluctance to examine these signatures suggests that there are discrepancies, as they do not match.

Out of the 1.9 million ballot envelopes, around 10% were mismatched according to one calculation, while another calculation showed a 12.7% mismatch. This means there were more than 236,763 mismatched signatures on ballot envelopes and over 163,458 mismatches on early votes. Taking the smallest number, 127,186, which is more than 7 times the margin of victory in the governor's race, it is projected that there were more than 7 times the margin of victory in mismatched signatures in 2022. Besides signature mismatches, there were other failures in Maricopa County in 2020. This is summarized from Ms. Bush's presentation and Dr. Daugherty's declaration.

In this video, the speaker refers to declarations from signature verification workers in 2022. One worker named Andrew mentions that the numbers on the whiteboard for the ballots to be verified didn't add up. They were processing around 60,000 signatures a day, but only receiving about 1,000 envelopes for review the next day, instead of the expected 12,000 to 15,000. The rejection rates were consistent at 20% to 30%, but the math didn't seem to match the actual numbers.

In this video, the speaker presents an example comparing two signatures. On the left is the signature on a valid envelope, while on the right is the signature on a voter registration card. The speaker points out that the signature on the envelope was accepted without being verified. Then, the speaker asks the audience to determine whether the signatures pass or fail.

In the video, the speaker discusses discrepancies in the ballot recount process. They mention that while 782 ballots were initially counted, only 1,401 were recounted using machines. The speaker questions the disappearance of over 300 ballots between the counts. They also mention that military ballots are separated and not required to be mailed in, with 93% of them being submitted electronically. The speaker expresses concerns about verifying signatures on electronic and email ballots, as well as the lack of evidence linking military ballots to the individuals who cast them. They find it troubling that a majority of these military ballots went to Biden.

The video discusses the 2022 general election in Maricopa County, Arizona, which saw record-breaking turnout and a close race for governor. Controversy arose when candidate Katie Hobbs refused to debate her opponent, Carrie Lake. Issues with tabulators and printers caused delays in counting the ballots, leading to an undecided governor's race one week after election day. Despite claims of voter fraud, the election was deemed secure. Concerns were raised about the accuracy of the tabulation process due to incorrectly printed ballot images. The trial between Lake and Hobbs focused on allegations of misconduct with ballot printers and handling. The video highlights the need for transparency, hand counting at the precinct level, and restoring faith in the electoral system. Viewers are urged to take action to demand change.

Maricopa County has been resistant to discussing signature verification during the Arizona audit because the signatures don't match.

Speaker 0 presents a sequence of figures regarding Maricopa County’s 2020 election and asserts inconsistency between tallies and ballots. He begins: there were 2,595,272 registered voters; 2,089,512 voted at the close of business through election night and all counting; yet there were only 1,923,693 ballots existing. He notes, “They called the election at 2,089,512 votes,” but emphasizes that the closing canvas shows a different number, counting the actual codes on paper rather than pieces of paper, yielding 1,923,693 numbers that show up. After post-adjudication, he lists key observations. By the time voting closed, 165,819 ballots were missing, which he states is 7.94% of the votes in 2020, and they could not explain where they were. However, about a month later in Arizona, a new total was produced: 2,086,959, still leaving 2,553 ballots missing as of that adjustment. He notes that Biden was said to have won by 10,500 votes. He then describes a process he calls the “time hack,” alleged to have been used to gain extra counting time—a practice he claims is new to 2020 and has continued in subsequent elections. He asserts that they “picked up, i.e., manufactured 163,266 ballots that never existed.” He questions how ballots could enter the system after the fact if they did not exist beforehand, asserting this as evidence of manipulation. To support the claim, he cites machine outputs: “Maricopa printed 04/7968 ballots for Maricopa,” while there were only 2,595,272 registered voters, yet 4,027,968 ballots printed. He states these numbers come directly from the machines and argues that no one scrutinizes them deeply enough. He asks why Maricopa would print 1,432,696 overprints, suggesting that to fabricate missing numbers, “backwards ballots” are needed to fill those gaps during the time hack. The argument continues that ballots must be suspended from hitting the bottom line—“don’t let them hit the bottom line”—and, once the numbers are known, could be replaced with whatever is needed. He implies that such suspended ballots are not present in either the pre- or post-audit tallies. Finally, he asserts that a proper audit would have all numbers cross-referencing across every manifestation; otherwise, the cross-referencing would reveal the inconsistencies. The overall gist is a claim of missing ballots, late adjustments, a large number of overprints, and a so-called time hack used to manipulate counts, with an emphasis on the need for cross-referenced auditing.

The video discusses issues with the Fulton County case, specifically regarding the lack of signature verification. It highlights discrepancies in the handling of ballots and equipment purchases that were not utilized. The speakers express disbelief at the inefficiencies and potential fraud in the election process. The transcript emphasizes the need for proper verification procedures and questions the validity of the Georgia election certification.

In this video, the speaker discusses the potential illegal votes in the 2020 election. They highlight the significant increase in mail-in ballots compared to previous years. They point out that only a small percentage of these ballots were rejected, suggesting a lack of proper verification. The speaker emphasizes the scale of the issue and expresses concern over the negligence in checking the legitimacy of the ballots.

The speaker asks who determined the number of failed signatures in the 2020 election. Speaker 1 explains that their organization reviewed 25% of the 1,900,000 envelopes from the election and analyzed each voter record individually. They extrapolated the statistics from the first 25% to determine the final number, which is specific to Maricopa County. Speaker 0 points out that Maricopa County alone had over 2 million ballots, and their group analyzed 25% of the mail-in ballots to arrive at the 420,987 failed signature verification number. Speaker 1 confirms this.

The video highlights instances of ballot irregularities in the 2020 election. It shows examples where ballots were not filled out correctly, yet still counted for Joe Biden. It also mentions a ballot that was thrown out, which had votes for Donald Trump and other Republican candidates. According to Just the News, many adjudicated ballots had marks removed next to Trump's name, allowing for additional marks next to Biden's name. In total, 1,341 marks were removed, which accounts for over 11% of the votes in a race decided by 11,779 votes. The video suggests that this is just one type of fraud.

The video provides an overview of the controversies surrounding the 2022 general election in Arizona, specifically in Maricopa County. It mentions the high voter turnout and the closely contested race for governor. Concerns are raised about candidates avoiding debates and the security and accuracy of the election process. Issues with tabulators, printers, and signature verification are highlighted, along with unauthorized testing of machines and the discovery of fit-to-page ballots. The trial of an election lawsuit is discussed, alleging misconduct with ballot printers and handling. The video raises questions about transparency and the integrity of the election system. The speakers emphasize the need for hand counting ballots at the precinct level to ensure accuracy and restore trust in the election system, urging viewers to take action and demand changes to prevent future election fraud.