reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 questions the president's actions: "You're gonna honor first responders today, but you pardon hundreds of people who assaulted first responders. Why did you do that?" He also says, "Yeah. But you pardoned people who assaulted first responders." Speaker 1 replies: "No. I pardoned people that were assaulted themselves. They were assaulted by our government. I fired I pardoned j six people who were assaulted by our government. That's who assaulted, and they were treated unfairly." He continues: "There's never been a group of people in this country outside of maybe one instance that I can think of, but I won't get into it, that were treated more horribly than the people of J Six. So, no. I didn't assault. They didn't assault. They were assaulted." "And what I did was a great thing for humanity. They were treated very, very unfairly. There's never been an incident like it."

Community organizers highlighted the guilt and distress of an active duty air force member, questioning if his actions are less valid because of it.

I pulled you over for going 70 in a 55. Do you have your license and registration? I was coming from church and my mom's cemetery. I want you to know that I'm a January 6th defendant waiting on a pardon and I can't afford this ticket. Also, I'm driving without a license right now. You're getting off with a warning for the speeding, but you're a habitual traffic violator. That means you're facing a felony for driving while suspended, so you're coming with me. I can't go to jail for this. It's a felony, so there's nothing I can do. I understand your circumstances, but you can't drive.

Speaker 0 discusses suing the federal government over taxes and questions whether it is fair to ask the American people to pay for that. He says, “Anything I win, I’m gonna give a 100% to charity,” but adds that it still takes money from the American people. He argues that Americans already give money to charity, stating, “They give away $40,000,000,000 a year to charity, our government.” He emphasizes that anything he wins from that would go to charity, while claiming that the release of one’s tax returns is “totally illegal,” noting that people go to jail for that and that a person has already been found who did it. He mentions that “based upon that and other things we did, and we did sue.” He reiterates that any winnings would be given “100% to charity,” describing the charities as “really good, very, very good and respected charities,” and ends with asking whether the listener will decide if he wins.

An officer processes a truck driver's ticket, saying: "This one right here is the one that you're paying. We have thirty days to take care of it." He scans documents—driver's license, truck registration, and BOLs—and says, "This is the one that you'll take care of within thirty days" and "choose one of those options right there." He adds, "Drive safely. Alright? Thank you, Have a good one. Sorry, sir. This is my first time." The driver replies, "No worries. I I I feel bad being the first guy to write you a ticket, but Yeah. You know, I try to help." The driver asks about "my more license in the ticket?... how many year?" The response: "Don't" then, "quote me on this. I think a a ticket will stay anywhere from five to seven years depending on what state you're from anywhere for that long."

I served in Vietnam, but upon returning home, there was no gratitude. Someone covered one lie with another. If he lied about Vietnam, what else is he lying about? This forced Blumenthal, the five-term state attorney general, to address the issue at the debate. I'm proud of my military service, but on a few occasions, out of hundreds, when I commented on it, I described it inaccurately. I want to say that I am sorry, particularly to our veterans and most especially to the veterans of Vietnam.

"So the judge would have sex with inmates from the jail?" "Yes." "I was part of it. I was one of them. Not just from being in jail, coming in off the street and seeing them. Yeah." "Wasn't a secret." "Because he's the one with the power. He holds my entire life in his hands. He's the one that makes the decisions over whether I get to keep my children or not. He's the one that makes the decisions on whether I go to jail." "Did anything ever happen to you in the jail?" "Yeah." "You come you come see me three times, and we'll take care of this if it's a ticket or something, you know, or you get some minor charge, some petty charge. Come visit me a few times. We'll we'll take care of it." "Mhmm. Absolutely." "Total over the years, hundreds." "And not just for the women who had charges. Like, if your man or somebody or your child is in there, then you could go see him for that too."

President Trump, it's an honor to be here with you. Thank you for your sacrifice and for standing up for the people of this country. You had a comfortable life, but you chose to fight for us. It's not fair, but it's still ongoing.

The speaker mentions their uncle who won the Purple Heart in the Battle of Belgium. Their father approached them after they became a senator, asking if they could find out why their uncle never received the Purple Heart. The speaker, being a senator, obtained a personal Purple Heart for their uncle and brought it home to the family. When asked why their father didn't want to deal with it, he simply replied, "The others died."

Speaker 0 discusses paying a fine and mentions that it will be dismissed in three months, allowing them to continue serving their district. Speaker 1 clarifies if the dismissal means it will be expunged from their record, to which Speaker 0 confirms. Speaker 1 confirms if this is the deal with the capital police, and Speaker 0 mentions the involvement of the DCAG.

Speaker 1 expresses gratitude to the court and offers condolences to the Floyd family. Due to ongoing legal matters, they are unable to provide a full statement but mention that there will be future information of interest. The speaker hopes this will bring some peace of mind. Speaker 0 acknowledges reading the speaker's comments in the presentence investigation. The court then announces a 15-minute recess to finalize the sentencing order.

Today, the speaker expresses their disappointment in the government as they turn in their gear after four years of active duty with the army. They were ordered to leave expensive gear in Afghanistan two years ago, but now they are being charged $500 to $1,000 for it. The speaker criticizes the government for prioritizing other expenses, such as giving money to the Taliban, Ukraine, and student debt relief, while neglecting their own soldiers. They express their excitement to separate from the army and start serving their country. Another person in the video shares the amount they are being charged upon leaving service and mentions their Venmo for anyone willing to help.

Today, the speaker expresses their disappointment with the government as they turn in their gear after four years of active duty with the army. They were ordered to leave expensive gear in Afghanistan two years ago and are now being charged $500 to $1,000 for it. The speaker criticizes the government for prioritizing funding for the Taliban, Ukraine, student debt relief, and stimulus checks over covering their gear expenses. They feel that the government's priorities are backwards and that soldiers are their last concern. Despite feeling bittersweet about leaving, the speaker is excited to serve their country outside of the government. Another person in the video shares that they are being charged $3,501 upon leaving service and mentions their Venmo for anyone willing to help.

Today was great, and I decided last minute to come here and support these boys. We need to put pressure on the judiciary system to get them out of jail. I believe all these prosecutions are politically motivated. A recent federal court ruling gives me hope for a positive impact on our cases. I really hope these guys can be released soon. Thank you for your time.

Speaker 0 challenges Speaker 1 about serving a restraining order against a newsroom, asking if they’ve ever done so against a journalist. Speaker 1 responds that he isn’t sure, and notes he may have served someone without knowing their occupation. Speaker 0 emphasizes the newsroom’s First Amendment rights, saying it prohibits restraining orders against reporting what people say, calling it a fundamental constitutional right. Speaker 1 explains the document is “a court order signed by a judge Mhmm. Out of Miami. All we're doing is serving to you.” Speaker 0 pushes back, implying the situation is serious and indicating they want to speak with the judge involved. Speaker 1 points to the restraining order and says, “It’s all yours,” and that Speaker 0 is responsible for everything in the restraining order. Speaker 0 thanks Speaker 1 for being there and mentions he will tell the courts about video of a man saying he wants to kill him. Speaker 1 says he has no idea about that claim. Speaker 0 reflects on the state of the country, stating, “One of the problems in this country is that we're in a constitutional crisis,” and shares personal views that they report people breaking the law, and that those people are never held accountable. He says he’s the one who’s brought to court, arrested, and sued, while “the American people are just pissed off.” He acknowledges Speaker 1’s role and expresses being upset and discouraged. Speaker 0 speaks about maintaining hope despite oppression, noting that people look up to him and that he’s the one who keeps getting held accountable. He asks Speaker 1 to understand what he’s saying. Speaker 0 asserts that something must change “not for my sake, but for our children's sake,” and reiterates the constitutional crisis claim. Speaker 0 recognizes that Speaker 1 is simply doing a job but shares his frustration and desperation, asking why he should continue if it only brings pain, punishment, and abuse. Speaker 0 concedes there’s nothing Speaker 1 can do and that they are in this country’s current situation, acknowledging the police presence bringing him to court and questioning why he should keep going.

The speaker is waiting to get paid but has some cash. They offer to use what they have to see how much they can get. The speaker then presents a gift, revealing they put together a fundraiser and raised $1300. The recipient is overwhelmed and expresses gratitude, calling the speaker an angel and a blessing. The speaker expresses appreciation for the recipient's service and tells them to take care of their wife.

Mr. Covela, a 96-year-old man, was charged with a school zone violation but explained he only drives slowly when necessary, like taking his 63-year-old son, who has cancer, for blood work every 2 weeks. The judge praised him for his dedication to family, dismissed the case, and wished him and his son well. Covela thanked the judge. Translation (if needed): Mr. Covela, a 96-year-old man, was charged with a school zone violation. He explained that he drives slowly when necessary, like taking his 63-year-old son, who has cancer, for blood work every 2 weeks. The judge praised him for his dedication to family, dismissed the case, and wished him and his son well. Covela thanked the judge.

Speaker 1 describes a decision to follow conscience after twenty years in the military, mostly deployed to the Middle East. He explains that after multiple deployments he realized “we weren't there for the reasons that our government told us” and that there was no vital national interest in the current fight. He made a promise to himself about twenty years ago not to send young Americans off to die on foreign battlefields if he ever had a position of responsibility. When given that opportunity, he decided to resign, stating he did not want to send others to die in wars he believed were not in the nation’s interest. Speaker 0 notes their Catholic faith and mentions recent comments by the Holy Father highlighting concerns for innocent civilians harmed by conflict, including the killing of Father Pierre in Lebanon. The question is asked whether faith community or religious leaders’ support has helped. Speaker 1 responds that the support has been huge and that the resignation gained more traction than he expected. He emphasizes that although the decision was not made lightly, faith helped him hear “God's voice” and guided him to take action, which made the act feel easy and liberating. Speaker 0 asks if Speaker 1 has hope for America. Speaker 1 affirms having a great deal of hope, calling this an exciting moment. He highlights the power of technology to connect like‑minded people and give them a voice, despite potential downsides. He notes the significant presence and enthusiasm of young people in the room, expressing optimism about the next generation. Speaker 1 outlines what he believes must happen moving forward: during the midterm season and as the war progresses, people should be on their knees in prayer, then take action once upright. He argues that leaders must hear the public’s stance against this war and the lack of a vital national security interest, calling for the troops to come home and for efforts toward peace in the region. He asserts a desire to avoid “twenty plus more years of bloodletting” and urges people from all political parties to pressure representatives to oppose continued overseas wars. Speaker 1 clarifies that he is not advocating pacifism; if the country is attacked or there is an imminent threat, actions will be taken. The core message is that the nation must not continue down the current path, and making this stance clear to leaders is essential to preserving hope.

Judge Frank Caprio has become known as the judge with the big heart. He rose to fame for mercy, listening to defendants’ stories and considering their circumstances rather than simply issuing fines. His father, Antonio Caprio, taught him compassion: "Someday you're going to be a lawyer" and "you can't charge poor people like us." Caprio became a judge in 1985; on his first day he learned power must be tempered by empathy when a ruling reminded him of its impact on families. He would inquire about lives behind tickets; "The court's gonna charge you $170." A notable moment involved a 96 year old with an unpaid speeding ticket, case dismissed. In 2023 he revealed pancreatic cancer: "I have pancreatic cancer, there is no cure for pancreatic cancer." He published "Compassion in the Courtroom" and urged, "be kind to others, be slow to judge, and always show mercy." He is 88.

The speaker expresses gratitude for the support and acknowledges the mention of the events on January 6th, suggesting the addition of the Ruby Ridge incident. They mention Vicky Weaver and the unjust treatment they faced, highlighting the politicized nature of justice. The speaker appreciates the efforts being made and promises to continue until their goal is achieved.

Speaker 0 asks what Remembrance Sunday means and what message they have. Speaker 1 responds: “I can see in my mind's eye there were rows and rows of white stones of all the hundreds of my friends and everybody else that gave their lives for what? The country of today. No. I'm sorry. The sacrifice wasn't worth the result that it is now.” Speaker 0 expresses sympathy and says that all the generations since, including her own and her children, are grateful for his bravery and service personnel, and that it’s their job now to make the country he fought for. Speaker 1 asks, “Is it?” Speaker 0 continues: they will do, for the younger generation, and that they want to. Speaker 1 adds that it’s wonderful to know there are people like him spreading the word, and that they will, for the younger generation. Speaker 0 introduces a special moment: the DJ Darlings come over to present a gift to Alec for his brave years of service and others like him. They give him their album, which he loves and is sig ned for him. Speaker 1 says the young ladies are like his own daughters.

During the war, the speaker avoids giving a number of kills, saying, "Oh, good lord. I couldn't say." He states, "I was in the Louis Cannes. I blazed away pennies and pennies." He adds, "I I still shall I say, I'm still here." When Mister Williams asks, "was it all worth it?" he replies, "No." He continues, "I wouldn't never ever again, you know, old enough younger. And never get me again to volunteer, not me." "Never." Then, "Why do you say that? I could have. I've seen all this first name, you know, but I've been through it, I'll never volunteer for anything else."

The speaker states that the two astronauts who were saved from space received only $5 a day per diem for 286 days, totaling $1,430 in extra pay. When asked if the administration can do anything to compensate them fully, the speaker says this is the first time they are hearing about it. The speaker offers to personally pay the difference out of their own pocket if necessary.

Speaker 0 explains that if payments are not made, another collection process can be initiated. Speaker 1 asks about a specific type of collection, which Speaker 0 clarifies as being related to tax allowances. Speaker 1 further asks about the policy of labeling individuals as having "intentional gross negligence" when they had received funds incorrectly. Speaker 0 states that if intentional gross negligence was determined, no payment arrangements could be made. Speaker 1 asks if Speaker 0 was aware of the harshness of this policy when they took office, especially considering its impact on vulnerable citizens. Speaker 0 responds that they were not aware. Speaker 1 describes the situation where individuals who had not paid a small annual fee were required to repay tens of thousands of euros. Some individuals were immediately contacted, but the most vulnerable were not. These individuals were then referred to Speaker 0's center, where the label of intentional gross negligence was applied, leading to consequences.

Speaker 0 argues that COPPA and related policy proposals wrongly take individual rights away from homeowners. He says the idea that a homeowner must consult with the building department and provide a six-month period for another party to make an offer is outrageous and constitutes government overreach, which he describes as 100% true. He states that this is “absolutely maniacal” and questions how this body operates when it comes to individual citizens, calling the measure overreach at its best. He identifies as a homeowner and asserts that no one will tell him or others who have worked hard to own a three- or four-family home that they must submit the ability to sell their house first to the building department and then offer it to a nonprofit, especially when a neighbor across the street may want to buy it and they must wait six months. He further adds that it is ridiculous and that everyone in the room should be terribly embarrassed for stripping veterans bills today from today's hearings. He asks why the men and women of the country deserve better treatment and asserts that the city has failed to come through for veterans, stating that the veterans bills were stripped totally off the record for today. He ends by calling the situation absolutely ridiculous and expresses shame: “Shame. Shame on all of you.”