reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Synthetic DNA and RNA injections are genetic therapies, not vaccines. The speaker questions the mislabeling of these therapies and criticizes the CDC for redefining vaccines. They argue that the shots are not effective and are being given for non-existent variants. The speaker raises concerns about the safety of these injections, including the potential for cancer and other health risks. They highlight the contamination of the vaccines with DNA and other harmful substances. The speaker calls for the cessation of these shots, the opening of cancer databases, and the return of informed consent in medicine. They emphasize the importance of trust, integrity, and community in navigating these issues.

The speaker questions the presence of SB40 sequences in vaccines, suggesting they could lead to cancer through insertional mutagenesis. They advocate for alternative treatments like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, claiming they are safe and effective. The speaker criticizes the FDA for redacting data on vaccine contamination, questioning their transparency.

The speaker claims SV40 in literature turns on cancer genes. They further claim the spike protein impairs tumor suppressor systems P53 and BRCA, promoting cancer and inhibiting the ability to fight it. The speaker suggests cancer rates are up, and the question is how much is due to vaccines. They state that repeated shots every six months increase the chances of getting loaded with synthetic genetic material that will cause harm, including heart disease, neurologic disease, blood clotting, immunologic problems, and cancer.

When COVID-19 vaccines were sequenced, commercial annotation software highlighted functional parts of the plasmids, including antibiotic resistance genes and SV40 components. The speaker claims that Pfizer had to manually remove these annotations before submitting the plasmid map to regulators. According to the speaker, regulators received the DNA sequence, but the sponsor is obligated to annotate every open reading frame and promoter, even if their function is unknown. The speaker alleges that Pfizer intentionally removed annotations, hiding them from the FDA, which the speaker believes is a violation of guidelines. The speaker suggests the reason for hiding SV40 components is due to SV40 virus contamination in polio vaccines and its debated link to cancer. The speaker asserts that while epidemiological data is confounded by vaccine shedding, laboratory studies show SV40 is a potent oncogenic virus. The speaker claims that the vaccines contain some of the more carcinogenic components of that virus, and that these sequences are functional and have consequences.

A biochemist and toxicologist discusses concerns about the Pfizer vaccine. They claim that the vaccine contains plasma DNA, including SV40 sequences, which were not disclosed to regulators. They believe this is intentional and could lead to DNA integration and potential cancer risks. The speaker argues that the DNA in the vaccine is different from RNA and can be permanent. They suggest that safer alternatives like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin exist and question the transparency of the FDA. They urge states to protect their citizens and reconsider the use of the vaccine, especially for pregnant women and children.

In 2011, 2012, and 2014, publications revealed that pseudouridine in mRNA shots could cause rapid cancers. Remdesivir, with a 53% mortality rate, was chosen by the FDA for COVID treatment despite being deemed unethical by the World Health Organization due to high death rates in Africa. This lethal drug was administered regardless of viral load, resulting in unnecessary deaths.

The speaker discusses the issue of DNA contamination in mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and questions the FDA's handling of the situation. They explain that normally rigorous tests are required to ensure safety, but in this case, the FDA ignored those tests. The speaker also mentions that Moderna's own patent acknowledges concerns about DNA and insertional immunogenesis. They reveal that DNA fragments, including an antibiotic resistance gene and sequences from simian virus 40, were found in the vaccines. The speaker expresses shock at the FDA's lack of transparency and highlights the potential risks associated with DNA damage, such as cancer and birth defects.

The speaker expresses concerns about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines, particularly regarding the presence of DNA and contamination in the shots. They argue that the vaccines have caused more deaths in a few months than all other vaccines combined in the past 30 years. The speaker also discusses the potential risks of gene therapy and the presence of SV40 sequences and antibiotic-resistant genes in the shots. They believe that the contamination and intentional inclusion of certain sequences raise concerns about the vaccines' safety. The speaker calls for the recall of the vaccines, especially for children, and questions the transparency of the FDA and CDC in handling the data. They suggest using alternative treatments like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin.

Recent Pfizer data reveals DNA contamination and acknowledges that liquid nanoparticles can spread throughout the body, contradicting previous denials. Concerns are raised about potential links between mRNA vaccines and cancer, referencing a 2006 FDA document warning about long-term cancer risks associated with mRNA gene therapies. Despite the push for mRNA in flu vaccines, long-term safety studies are lacking. Evidence suggests that these therapies may indeed pose cancer risks. The speaker expresses confidence that within five years, the connection to cancer will become undeniable, citing existing documents and admissions that indicate serious risks, even if they are not openly acknowledged.

The speaker expresses concern about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines, particularly regarding the presence of DNA and contamination in the shots. They argue that the number of deaths reported after the vaccine rollout is higher than in the past 30 years combined for all other vaccines. The speaker also discusses the risk of gene therapy and the potential for cancer and autoimmune reactions. They mention the presence of SV40 sequences and antibiotic-resistant genes in the shots, which they believe is intentional. The speaker highlights the increase in miscarriages and stillbirths reported after vaccination and questions the transparency of the FDA and CDC. They urge for the recall of the vaccines and express frustration with the lack of action taken.

The s v 40 sequences, they should not be there. They could have chosen another plasmid that did not have the s v 40 sequences. If these sequences sit above an oncogene and they're promiscuous, that means they are likely to integrate in places more likely than other genetic inserts. Insertional mutagenesis anyway causes cancer, and that's the risk. That's why gene therapies were not brought to market for so many years because there was a risk of causing cancer from insertional mutagenesis. We never needed these vaccines. Hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, I can tell you as a toxicologist, they are not toxic. They're some of the safest drugs you can use. Endotoxin levels: they've got them all redacted. Why would you redact them if you were trying to be transparent? Why would you hold the data for seventy five years?

The speaker alleges that after receiving FDA Emergency Use Authorization for a vaccine produced via "process one," manufacturers switched to "process two." This new process allegedly introduced contaminants, including foreign DNA and SV40, a cancer-causing substance. The speaker connects this alleged change to a reported increase in aggressive cancers, particularly among young people. Referencing an NIH paper, the speaker claims SV40 is a known oncogenic DNA virus that induces cancers in laboratory animals. The speaker asserts Pfizer knew they were putting a carcinogen in process two. They speculate that this is the reason Pfizer redacted 800 pages of the manufacturing process, citing trade secrets.

The speaker raises concerns about the contamination of current vaccines with DNA and the unknown consequences of this contamination. They argue that efforts should be made to eliminate DNA contamination, even if it increases production costs. The speaker mentions a researcher from MIT who accidentally discovered that mRNA vaccines were contaminated with DNA. They criticize Pfizer for testing vaccines from one process and then vaccinating billions of people with vaccines from another process, which were contaminated with DNA. The presence of DNA in the vaccines raises risks, including potential cancer development. The speaker believes it is misleading to claim that the vaccines have undergone clinical trials when they have not been properly studied. They call for more rigorous research before commercializing vaccines.

The speaker claims COVID vaccines are not actually vaccines and have caused unbelievable problems and damage. They allege the virus escaped from a lab with six manipulated inserts and the vaccine was 80% homologous to humans, causing major side effects. The speaker states that governments were informed but ignored warnings. They further claim the vaccines' quality control was appalling, the manufacturing process changed, and they were full of contaminants that can integrate into the genome, leading to massive excess deaths and a rise in cancer. The speaker questions why the vaccines haven't been banned, given COVID's diminished threat. They criticize the vaccination of children and call the vaccines "horrible gene therapies" causing "turbo cancers." They advocate for trials for those involved and accuse medical officers and regulatory bodies like MHRA, TGA, and FDA of incompetence and negligence, likening the situation to the Nuremberg trials. They assert the vaccines were never effective or safe, citing Pfizer's initial submissions to the FDA.

The speaker expresses concern about the presence of SV40 sequences in vaccines, suggesting that their integration into certain genetic areas could potentially cause cancer. They mention the risk of insertional mutagenesis and the delay in bringing gene therapies to market due to this concern. The speaker also advocates for the use of alternative treatments like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, stating that they are safe drugs. They question the transparency of the FDA in redacting data and holding clinical data for 75 years. The speaker urges the protection of citizens and calls for one state to take the lead in doing the right thing. No questions are asked.

The speaker raises concerns about the contamination of current vaccines with DNA and the unknown consequences of this contamination. They argue that efforts should be made to eliminate DNA contamination, even if it means higher production costs. The speaker mentions a researcher from MIT who discovered that mRNA vaccines were contaminated with DNA, despite DNA not being listed as a component. They criticize the authorities for testing vaccines without DNA contamination on a small group of people, but then vaccinating billions of people with contaminated vaccines. The speaker highlights the potential risks of DNA contamination, including the possibility of cancer. They conclude by stating that vaccines from the second process should undergo more rigorous studies before being commercialized.

The speaker discusses the presence of contamination in vaccines, specifically cDNA fragments and s p 40, which is a cancer-promoting segment of DNA. They mention that s v 40, a related virus, caused cancer in millions of Americans in the past. The speaker explains that s p 40 turns on cancer genes and that the spike protein in the vaccines impairs tumor suppressor systems. They conclude that the vaccines promote cancer and hinder our ability to fight it. The speaker acknowledges that cancer rates are increasing but questions how much of it is due to the vaccines.

Speaker decries the use of vaccines and mandates, questioning why it was done. They claim, "these vaccines were not vaccines" and that "the messenger RNA vaccines of Pfizer and Moderna" caused "unbelievable problems and damage to people," and were "pushed into this" by Pfizer and Moderna. They state, "These were not vaccines. These were horrible gene therapies that could actually integrate into your genome," linking to a rise in "turbo cancers." They urge others to "stand up to trial, defend themselves, and go to court" and call it "Nuremberg trial stuff," alleging "incompetence" and "negligence," that "they were never ever effective" and that there was "no evidence that they were effective whatsoever" and "they were never ever safe."

The speaker discusses the issue of DNA contamination in mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and questions the FDA's handling of the situation. They explain that normally rigorous tests are required for genotoxicity and immunogenesis, but the FDA seemed to ignore these requirements. The speaker also mentions that Moderna's own patent acknowledges the concerns related to DNA and insertional immunogenesis. They reveal that DNA fragments, including an antibiotic resistance gene and sequences from simian virus 40, were found in the vaccines. The speaker expresses concern about the potential risks associated with DNA damage, such as cancer and birth defects. They criticize the FDA for downplaying the issue and emphasize the importance of transparency.

The speaker expresses concern about the presence of s p 40 sequences in vaccines, suggesting that their inclusion was intentional and could lead to cancer. They argue that gene therapies were not brought to market for years due to the risk of insertional mutagenesis causing cancer. The speaker advocates for the use of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin as safe alternatives to vaccines. They question the transparency of withholding data and urge the protection of citizens by standing up against experimental products. The speaker concludes by pleading for one state to take action and set an example for others. No questions are asked.

The speaker expresses concern about the mRNA vaccines developed by Pfizer and Moderna, stating that they contain deliberate toxicities. They explain that when the body is instructed to produce a foreign protein, the immune system goes into attack mode, potentially harming the body's own cells. The speaker also highlights that all four companies developing COVID-19 vaccines chose the same spike protein, which they claim is biologically active and toxic. They find it unlikely that multiple companies would independently choose the same solution, suggesting intentionality.

The speaker states that while messenger RNA (mRNA) can be used to produce missing proteins like insulin, using mRNA for vaccines is a failed and dangerous concept. They criticize the US government for not being honest about their involvement in mRNA research, specifically the Adept p three program, which aimed to use mRNA to end pandemics within 60 days.

Speaker 1 expresses concern about the presence of SV40 sequences in vaccines, suggesting it is not accidental and could lead to cancer due to insertional mutagenesis. They argue that gene therapies were delayed due to the risk of cancer from insertional mutagenesis. The speaker believes that alternative treatments like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin are safe and questions why the FDA redacted data on endotoxin levels for 75 years. They emphasize the unusual nature of the current situation and urge the protection of citizens by not administering experimental products to pregnant women and babies. The speaker pleads for one state to take a stand and set an example for others. No questions are asked.

The speaker expresses frustration that COVID vaccines are still recommended for those most likely to be injured by them. They claim Vinay Prasad, now at the FDA, attacked them on ivermectin, stating it doesn't work and that "turbo cancer" is not a thing. The speaker believes there is denial regarding the mRNA technology and its potential link to aggressive cancers, as well as ivermectin's potential as a solution. They suggest that admitting the mRNA vaccines may be causing cancer and that ivermectin may be a solution could force the shutdown of the mRNA technology. The speaker claims there are numerous publications suggesting the vaccines may be causing aggressive "turbo cancers." They state the new Trump administration doesn't want to abandon the mRNA technology, complicating the use of ivermectin, fenbendazole, and benzoyl in cancer treatment due to a lack of support.

The speaker explains that the messenger RNA in the shots is contaminated with cDNA, including a cancer-promoting segment called s v 40. They mention that s v 40 turns on cancer genes in the human body and that the spike protein in the shots impairs tumor suppressor systems. The speaker suggests that the shots promote cancer through s v 40 and inhibit our ability to fight cancer. They also mention that cancer rates are increasing. The speaker raises the question of how much of this is due to the vaccines.