reSee.it - Related Video Feed

One of the reasons I really don't like Bitcoin is because Bitcoin has become the currency of choice for espionage around the world. If you're a North Korean trying to recruit an American scientist, you're you're gonna pay them in Bitcoin. Well, if you're a Chinese person trying to report to American intelligence, you're probably also getting paid in Bitcoin.

John McAfee explains that using Gmail for email provides privacy, or rather a lack of it, despite people believing in encrypted systems like ProtonMail or encrypted messaging like Signal. He argues that encryption was designed thirty-five years ago to prevent a man-in-the-middle attack between transmission and receipt, but there is no longer a need for such protection because there is no man in the middle anymore. He states that smartphones are the surveillance devices preferred by governments worldwide and that malware installation is easy to accomplish. McAfee claims that visiting Pornhub can result in someone listening to you, because a drive-by of a website can set the download of unauthorized applications as a flag. He asserts that with the first click, malware can be installed, and this malware can both watch inputs before they are encrypted and read outputs after they are encrypted. He concludes that encryption is a worthless piece of shit and old technology marketed as a safe system. He emphasizes that there is no safety and no privacy anymore. He explains his personal choice of Gmail for one reason: Gmail is the last company that requires a government subpoena to provide information, and their lawyers have thirty days to review the subpoena. He says that thirty days is enough for him, and that he changes his email every fifteen days. He urges the audience to wake up, stating that there is no more privacy and that people are being sold a useless bill of goods with encryption. Thank you for listening.

I want to share my experience of being tortured in federal prison. Roger Ver has been arrested, and it's crucial to support him. I ended up in prison for expressing views like "taxation is theft." Roger is a true pioneer, advocating for individual empowerment globally. Despite paying a million dollars to the government, they claim it's not enough. His lawyers argue he complied with the law, yet he's being targeted. This case reflects a broader trend of the government silencing dissidents. Roger has significantly contributed to Bitcoin, which has the potential to challenge oppressive systems. It's alarming that the only person prosecuted for an exit tax interpretation is someone exposing government attempts to infiltrate Bitcoin. We can't change the past, but we can unite to shape the future. Free Roger.

I'm being extradited from Spain to the US to face 109 years in prison for tax evasion, even though I'm not a US citizen during the period in question. I believe this isn't about taxes; it's about my defiance. I was the first to invest in Bitcoin and promote its use globally as an alternative to government-controlled currencies. This threatened governments, and I knew it was dangerous. I renounced my US citizenship in 2014 and became a citizen of Saint Kitts, believing this would protect me. Despite meticulously following tax laws, I was arrested shortly after publishing a book exposing the hijacking of Bitcoin. My arrest is retaliation for promoting cryptocurrency as a competitor to the US dollar and other established currencies. Effectively, they want me dead in prison. As the founder of several major cryptocurrency companies, I seeded the first generation of cryptocurrency firms, and my actions directly challenge the status quo.

The records Joe Gebbia was trying to digitize were stored at Iron Mountain, about an hour north of Pittsburgh, in Boyers, Pennsylvania, where there is a limestone mine 220 feet underground. Since 1960, the federal government has used the mine as a retirement office. The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) keeps about 450 employees working down there full-time alongside 26,000 file cabinets holding over 400 million paper records. The site processes about 10,000 federal retirements every month by hand. A key point discussed is that the issue is not that technology has failed to digitize the records. Every administration since Reagan has tried to digitize the records, and the attempts failed for multiple reasons. The transcript says that doing it correctly, lawfully and with the Federal Office of Personnel’s required legal protections, is very expensive and politically contentious. It also claims that physical paperwork in a mine has a different level of protection than digitized paperwork. The transcript then describes a strategy attributed to Joe Gebbia and his team at Doge: they began moving the records onto the digital infrastructure controlled by the White House. Rather than digitizing under legal guardrails, the transcript says they worked around the legal guardrails and “called it a day.” The speaker describes an investigation into what Gebbia was doing with National Design Studio, saying they ran into roadblocks when trying to follow the money. The transcript states that the work appears to be done “off the books,” with no contracts on USAspending, the office not registered on SAM.gov as a federal procurement entity, and National Design Studio not technically existing. When the speaker could not follow money, they say they followed the data instead, arguing that data leaves residual traces. The transcript then connects this approach to what Larry Ellison’s company was doing over the prior decade. It describes Oracle running a network of tracking tools embedded across the internet to build “digital dossiers,” files containing very sensitive information about people, including where they lived, where they banked, what they bought, and political views, race, and other information. It says Ellison publicly claimed in 2015 that Oracle had dossiers on roughly 5 billion people. The transcript adds that Oracle was sued in federal court in 2022 for building those files without consent, and that in July 2024 Oracle settled for $115 million and shut the entire operation down. The transcript concludes by stating that five months after Oracle’s dossier operation ended, Joe Gebbia joined Doge in the White House.

Bitcoin was created by John McCarthy to catch criminals. It is centralized and every transaction can be seen. McCarthy also reveals that Moderna is involved in criminal activities. He emphasizes that Bitcoin is worthless and that Monero is the only currency that is actually used. He dismisses the idea of adding privacy features to Bitcoin, stating that it is old, slow, and cannot support smart contracts. He challenges anyone who believes Bitcoin is worth more than 5¢ to explain their reasoning.

The speaker claims the alleged creator of Bitcoin, Santoshi, denied inventing the technology in an interview. The speaker suggests three-letter agencies are involved and gave Bitcoin a rebellious persona. The speaker questions how Santoshi obtained the technology and infrastructure, arguing that anyone opposing the system is "taken out," referencing JFK, Gaddafi, Jackson, and Lincoln. They propose Bitcoin may have a backdoor and that Google possesses technology to decrypt the 256-bit encryption used by cryptocurrencies. The speaker notes Google's technology emerged in 2012, before the cryptocurrency boom.

I've always been against crypto, especially Bitcoin, because it is mainly used by criminals for activities like drug trafficking, money laundering, and tax evasion. Its anonymity and instant money transfers allow it to bypass systems like know your customers, sanctions, and OFAC. If I were in power, I would shut it down. On September 12th, Jamie Dimon called Bitcoin a fraud and threatened to fire any trader buying it. This caused a 24% drop in Bitcoin's value. Interestingly, Morgan Stanley and JPMorgan, companies led by Dimon, were the largest buyers of a Bitcoin fund in Europe. It's unethical for Dimon to criticize Bitcoin while his own company is investing in it.

The speaker says this is the second update and refers to a “five million dollar challenge” being overturned last summer, adding that “they said Mike was right,” framing the focus as “voting machine evidence.” They state that, according to an article from Law and Crime “yesterday,” Dominion dropped the lawsuit against Mike Lindell and My Pillow. The speaker says this does not mean they will stop fighting voting machine companies, and that they are “all in to get ’em get rid of ’em, get to paper ballots, hand counted.” They announce that within the next half hour they will post an “eight hundred page historical drop of the voting machine evidence” on Lyndale TV, describing it as previously unseen material compiled over the last five years. They claim it will be accompanied by a press release and call it “a historical library” with “five hundred and some” articles, stating it contains “hundred percent evidence to back each thing up.” They also say it was “part of this given to the president” and that it was “re-uh, he re-truthed it.” The speaker characterizes Dominion dropping the lawsuit as relief, saying My Pillow “never did anything,” but that when Dominion sued My Pillow for “one point three billion dollars” with employees concerned due to the CEO’s “free speech,” the situation was stressful. They say they are appealing, noting an appeal “just went out” that will be filed “today,” referring to a Colorado case where My Pillow “won a year ago,” and describing this appeal as “the last piece of that.” They claim voting machine companies are “falling like dominoes.” They reference Smartmatic in Minneapolis, described as “like a parked car,” and say a judge made a ruling before trial that the speaker defamed the judge. They then say that a week later, it “came out that Smartmatic is in fact committing crimes” with its voting machines against other countries, and they say more will “be coming out too.” They use an analogy comparing the situation to a case being dismissed in light of new evidence, but they say that, according to their lawyers, it does not work that way, and that judges can “sit on it” indefinitely or throw it out without a trial. The speaker concludes by saying it is not a conspiracy that judges are corrupt, asserting instead that judges may be in fear of going against voting machines.

Speaker 0 expresses opposition to cryptocurrency. Speaker 1 mentions that Jamie, who supports blockchain, helped launch JPMorganCoin. They explain that JPMorgan created its own blockchain protocol based on Ethereum, allowing private transactions. Speaker 0 suggests that the only use case for blockchain is criminal activity. Speaker 2 states that JPMorgan was involved in Ethereum from the beginning and played a major role in the Enterprise Ethereum Alliance. Speaker 0 comments on shutting down blockchain if they were the government. Speaker 3 compares the Mt. Gox scandal to Bernie Madoff's Ponzi scheme, where JPMorgan was involved. JPMorgan account holders sued the bank and recovered over $2 billion, but no executives went to jail.

The speaker asked for evidence of Steve's innocence, and a call between two individuals was provided. In the call, one person thanks the other for their support and expresses excitement for the future. The second person mentions a request for tokens and ETH worth a certain amount, but offers to give even more. The first person apologizes for being on their first cup of coffee. The speaker explains that this call is the alleged extortion incident, where the government claims Steve extorted the other person despite being offered more than he asked for.

My name is Roger Veer, and I'm a former American citizen now facing a possible life sentence for crimes I didn't commit. Growing up in Silicon Valley, I became fascinated with free market economics and libertarian ideals. I even ran for office as a Libertarian. My criticism of the ATF led to politically motivated charges related to selling firecrackers. After serving time, I left the U.S. Later, I became an early advocate for Bitcoin, recognizing its power to promote economic freedom and undermine government control. Now, I'm arrested in Spain on tax evasion and mail fraud charges that I believe are politically motivated, and a form of lawfare. I had sought legal counsel to ensure compliance with the law. This isn't about taxes; it's about suppressing freedom.

One of the reasons I really don't like Bitcoin is because Bitcoin has become the currency of choice for espionage around the world. If you're a North Korean trying to recruit an American scientist, you're gonna pay them in Bitcoin. Well, if you're a Chinese person trying to report to American intelligence, you're probably also getting paid in Bitcoin.

The speaker claims the individual credited with inventing Bitcoin, Santoshi, denied creating the technology in an interview. The speaker suggests three-letter agencies are actually behind Bitcoin and cryptocurrency, giving it a false origin story of a rebel fighting the system. They question how Santoshi would have acquired the necessary technology and infrastructure, given the fate of historical figures who opposed the system. The speaker implies Bitcoin may have a backdoor and notes Google possesses decryption technology developed before the cryptocurrency boom, suggesting this is not coincidental.

Speaker 0 argues that you must get your wealth out of the system and downsize all of your assets and resources, especially if you are a public figure and you have any presence on social media. The guidance is that if you’re fighting this “good fight” and you have a public presence online, you need to be downsizing your wealth and assets. The speaker stresses moving as much of your wealth into Bitcoin as possible, so that nobody knows you have it and there is no way to prove you possess it. Once it’s moved into Bitcoin, it’s described as “gone,” in the sense that it cannot be easily traced or proven in the same way as traditional holdings. The warning continues that you should avoid having Bitcoin on any centralized exchanges in a way that makes it obvious whose name is tied to the holdings. The explicit instruction is to get the money into Bitcoin and keep it off centralized exchanges where it can be seen in your name. After acquiring Bitcoin, the recommended setup is a cold storage air-gap multisig wallet. The speaker emphasizes that you should not leave Bitcoin in a system that can be easily accessed or monitored; instead, use cold storage that is air-gapped and protected by a multisignature scheme. The speaker describes the consequences of losing access to private keys: if you lose your private keys, you lose all your Bitcoin. The phrasing used is that you should “go on a boat ride and you fucking lose your private keys and it sucks,” underscoring the irreversible loss associated with losing keys. Overall, the message centers on aggressively relocating wealth into Bitcoin, prioritizing anonymity and security through cold storage and multisig setups, and recognizing the high risk of permanent loss if private keys are lost or compromised. The repeated emphasis is that you must get your wealth out of the system, stay light on your feet, and move assets into Bitcoin to maintain anonymity and reduce traceability.

A “total reset” would mean resetting an entire person’s digital life. Once a foundational identity is in place, it would be interoperable across systems. The transcript describes biometric facial recognition as a legal identity: if a person’s face appears on a CCTV camera, that face is treated as the person’s legal identity, indicating the person’s presence. The transcript then compares this to actions in countries such as Russia, describing a draft system “random” and “a lottery.” If someone is selected, the person would be seen on CCTV cameras, and authorities would come “get you.” The speaker says they were not aware of that connection. The transcript frames losing biometric identity as more extreme than losing other identifiers. It contrasts losing a social security number or registration number with losing biometric identity, and states that it is unclear how biometric identity is “got back.” It then poses a trust question: if a privacy app were being funded by the US government, would that make people trust it more or less? It also criticizes Western surveillance framing as delivering “1984” and says the point of end-to-end encryption is undermined if a keyboard logs everything a person does. The transcript concludes with a call to secure devices—“do your phone and your laptop”—so the person can continue using Bitcoin “before they start verifying your age for that.”

We discussed the tension between being open and transparent while also protecting ourselves. We agreed to be open and transparent for everything that happened 90 days ago and before, as it's all gone. It's similar to how cryptocurrencies work, where there is no trail if you don't want it.

Speaker explains that "the space ... wasn't held correctly" and admits, "I screwed up because I should have agreed to get our teams up immediately," opting to "let him have his day in court" and remain neutral. He says, "They know all these coins are Ponzi schemes" and notes that "Stu always had an answer immediately." He calls it "the kill shot" and presents a "cash out wallet, AGBZ. 8GBZB" where "three people on the team [are] cashing out to this wallet." He claims "Here's Stu Peters from the main wallet that he would never sell a penny goes to the side wallet here, AGZB," and identifies "the donation wallet" as "JCJE" while saying "donation wallet" again. He reports "$77,249.76 withdrawn" and says "drain liquidity from J Proof." He asserts "three different team members are using that wallet" and calls it "irrefutable proof" and ends with "Spread the word."

Do my family and friends know I'm in this business? Yes, they do. You think I'm stealing? How? It's not stealing, it's legal. The tokens are real, people buy them. You say the tokens are worth nothing? No, they're worth something. You can still sell. People investing don't know their money will disappear? It's a gamble and they lost. It's a legal way of making money, a legal way of stealing. We wear masks because I'm recognizable. I'm connected with celebrities. It would put a stop to my lifestyle. Do I feel bad about people losing money, like their retirement? I'm just trying to get it. So, no, I don't care.

The speaker questions the meaning of security in a decentralized system like Bitcoin. They express frustration in understanding the differences between Bitcoin, Ethereum, Cardano, and others. They criticize the lack of accountability in the industry and highlight the potential for a 51% attack on Bitcoin. The speaker laments the wasted legal fees and compares it to past events where no accountability was achieved. They praise libertarians for challenging the government's lack of accountability. The speaker emphasizes that cryptocurrencies exist to fix the broken social contract and criticize the unelected and unaccountable leaders who face no consequences for their actions. They argue that this goes against the principles on which the country was founded.

Do you remember Sam Bankman-Fried? He was seen as a genius, so powerful and wealthy that he attended meetings with prominent figures like Bill Clinton and Tony Blair while looking disheveled. Where is he now? I believe he is in prison, as noted in a Netflix series. That's right, he’s a crook. And who was responsible for his downfall? The Department of Justice.

The speaker claims that the NSA created SHA-256, the algorithmic procedure behind Bitcoin. While browsing Twitter, they found a 1996 paper titled “How to Make a Mint, the Cryptography of Anonymous Electronic Cash,” which they state was written in 1996 by the NSA. They note that the author of that 1996 paper about electronic cash was Tasoki Akamoto, which they say sounds like Satoshi Nakamoto, the credited author for the Bitcoin paper in 2008.

Joby Weeks, also referred to as Jobadiah Weeks, discusses his six-year house arrest and the controversy surrounding his involvement with BitClub Network, a cryptocurrency mining venture he helped launch and promote. Investigators describe BitClub as a Ponzi scheme that bilked victims of hundreds of millions of dollars, while Weeks frames the operation as a legitimate data-center mining business that paid members daily and built what he calls the largest Bitcoin mining pool in the world. Weeks describes his early life as a hustler who started small businesses at a young age to support his family, then became an entrepreneur who traveled to about 100 countries and founded and financed technologies in the United States. He explains that he joined BitClub as a member and vendor, selling mining hardware, computer equipment, and related services. BitClub promoted high-growth crypto opportunities and mining operations, asserting that mining hardware could generate profits and that their data centers—established in Iceland, Georgia, Norway, with power sourced from Canada and a facility in Montana—could scale to enormous output, with the Montana project described as 300 megawatts and the largest Bitcoin mine in the world. The government charged Weeks on 12/05/2019 with selling unregistered securities and wire fraud, and labeled BitClub a Ponzi scheme. Weeks insists BitClub sold physical mining hardware and not securities, providing invoices, tracking numbers, duties and tariffs paid, and descriptions of data centers and payments to participants. He claims the government raided BitClub’s data centers and seized assets, including miners and cryptocurrency, after weeks of cooperation and meetings with federal agents, including a controversial encounter at a Tony Robbins event. Weeks recounts being shuffled through jail and jail-to-jail transfers for eleven months, denied bail and a trial, with his attorney offering two choices: five years in jail innocent or one year in jail guilty. He ultimately signed a plea to secure his release, but maintains that the charges were misapplied and that there were no verified victims, citing a pre-plea assertion that “there is no victim, no crime.” He describes ongoing legal battles involving twelve prosecutors, repeated delays, and the absence of victims testifying or restitution measures. Supporters perspective includes claims that BitClub was a startup in the Wild West rather than a fraud, and that the government’s asset seizures harmed victims. A white paper with Attorney Alan Dershowitz alleges multiple constitutional and process failings: retroactive charging, selective prosecution, indiscriminate conspiracy liability, asset seizures without safeguards, discovery violations, absence of victims and restitution, unsettled regulatory backdrop, and erosion of speedy-trial protections. The white paper argues that under current standards the case would not go forward today. Weeks also references post-incident developments, including the Biden administration’s crypto actions and the Genius Act, noting the SEC’s stance that proof-of-work mining (as with Bitcoin) does not fall under its securities definition. He contends that early crypto pioneers faced punitive measures, while others who were early investors or promoters avoided similar consequences. Weeks emphasizes his belief that the government seized assets rather than seeking restitution, and he advocates for the return of miners and Bitcoin to make victims whole. Throughout, Weeks and supporters stress his intent to advance disruptive technologies and financial freedom, arguing that his actions were mischaracterized as fraudulent. They frame his six-year confinement as an injustice and call for the dismissal of charges and the return of belongings so he can continue contributing to pioneering crypto initiatives.