TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

I first stumbled across agenda 21 in about 2008, and my first reaction was to dismiss what I was reading because I didn't believe that any government in Australia would take us down this road. Then I began to see a legislative pattern emerging in parliament which concerned me greatly, and I also started to see the tenor of legislation that we were passing. I did air those concerns in parliament, and it was dismissed and ignored. The words agenda 21, ladies and gentlemen, were never meant to be spoken. And if they were, then, of course, it would be dismissed as a conspiracy theory. Because if people knew agenda 21 and what it stood for, there's plenty of information out there where they could actually learn what the end game was, and governments didn't want that to be known. My dad always said to me that people only lie for two reasons. One reason is because you're ashamed of what you're doing, and the second reason is that you don't want people to be warned just before you screw them. And I honestly believe that these secrets have been kept for both of those reasons. Ladies and gentlemen, the origins of the environmental movement as we see it began back in 1968 when the Club of Rome was formed. The Club of Rome has been described as a crisis think tank which specializes in crisis creation. The main purpose of this think tank was to formulate a crisis that would unite the world and condition us to the idea of global solutions to local problems. In a document called the first global revolution authored by Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider on pages 104 and 105, it stated, in searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine, and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers, of course, will be caused by human intervention that will require a global response. That's the origin of global warming, ladies and gentlemen. In 1975, Australia agreed to bring in a new economic order via the Lima Declaration on the second conference of the United Nations Industrial Development Organization. The outcome of this was, as I said, the Lima declaration which was a blueprint for the redeployment of tools, jobs, and manufacturing to the developing nations, leaving countries like Australia short of technology, a manufacturing base, and jobs. Blind Freddy can now see what the outcome of that has been for our country with their unworkable trade and tariffs agreements hand in hand with this that have followed as a matter of course. This has now become a reality with around 90% of our agriculture and manufacturing just gone. Australia signed the Lima declaration in 1975 and hundreds of others with the support of all major political players, Whitlam, Fraser, Hawke, Keating, Houston, Howard, Rudd, the democrats, the greens, and even the Nationals. It has been put to me that all of these treaties were the foundation for the rollout of agenda 21. And it seems that Australia has been moved around the global chessboard, and our so called leaders were either complicit or naive to the long term consequences. And now we're almost at checkmate. Sorry. In 1992, former president of The United States George Bush senior said, effective execution of agenda 21 will require a profound reorientation of human society unlike anything the world has ever experienced. A major shift in the priorities of both governments and individuals and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources. This shift will demand that a concern for the environmental consequences of every human action will be integrated into individual and collective decision making at every level. Cutting through the code, I want everyone here tonight not familiar with agenda 21 to consider what the words profound reorientation of all human society and unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources actually means. For everyone here tonight not familiar with agenda 21, I would suggest that this is the beginning of your learning curve, not the end. In 1992, Morris Strong, secretary general of the UN Earth Summit and member of the Club of Rome said, it is clear the current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and convenience foods, use of fossil fuels, ownership of motor vehicles, small electrical appliances, home and workplace air conditioning, and suburban housing are not sustainable. Put those statements together with the previous one, and it must become clear that agenda 21 is about controlling every aspect of our lives, how we eat, what we eat, how much we eat, how we move around, food production, the amount of food, and where we even live. Dixie Ray, former Washington state governor and assistant secretary for oceans and international environmental and scientific affairs stated, agenda 21 seeks to establish a mechanism for transferring the wealth from citizens to the third world. Fear of environmental crisis would be used to create a world government and UN central direction. From a report in the September Habitat One Conference, land cannot be treated as an ordinary asset controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership is also a principal instrument

The speaker discusses Agenda 21, a plan agreed upon by 179 nations in 1992. They claim that it is a totalitarian state being developed worldwide, aiming to control all aspects of life, including land, water, minerals, plants, animals, and human beings. The goal is to establish a one-world government with centralized control. The speaker argues that sustainable development is not about recycling or resource allocation, but rather about moving populations into concentrated city centers and impoverishing large portions of the population. They emphasize the need for individuals to educate themselves, spread awareness, and work together to protect personal freedom.

The speaker discusses the Earth Summit Environmental Leadership Act, which aims to continue the work of the Earth Summit and its agenda 21 for global environmental action. The act proposes a national strategy for sustainable development, led by a specific office and a high-level government official. It also encourages the United States to establish agreements for environmental protection and supports the creation of a United Nations Sustainable Development Commission. The president is urged to report on the progress made. The resolution has support from various organizations and members of the Foreign Affairs Committee. The speaker emphasizes the importance of taking action to sustain the planet for future generations.

Speaker 0: United Nations agenda 21, sustainable development. It is the inventory and control plan. Inventory and control of all land, all water, all minerals, all plants, all animals, all construction, all means of production, all food, all energy, all information, and all human beings in the world. And this is a plan that was agreed to by a 179 nations back in 1992. It's a United Nations plan. It's called the agenda for the twenty first century. And so many of us around the world think that a sustainable development just sounds so great. Isn't it about recycling and creative reuse and creating energy and food resources for everyone? And the answer is no. It really is not. It's about moving populations into city centers, concentrated city centers, and clearing them out of the rural areas. It's constructed of non governmental organizations, corporations, and government in order to dictate and what it is that happens around the world. Regionalization is the stepping stone to globalization and globalization is the standardization of all systems. All systems have to be brought into harmony in order to control them all. And the goal of agenda 21 is one world government and total control from a central unit. The principles are public private partnerships, which is fascism. And this is how it's implement it on the ground is through this joining together between corporations, nongovernmental organizations, and governments in order to cut out the actual individual, your voter, and instead to take that to a level where we literally cannot penetrate. This is a corporatocracy. It's a totalitarian state to being developed right now all over the world while we are moving towards the endgame. We are not there. And this is the opportunity that all of us have now to stand up, to speak out. We are free, and we need to continue to be free. And I do believe that we will win, but we have to become aware that there is a fight.

The negative impact of population growth on planetary ecosystems is becoming evident, with concerns about energy and water exploitation and dangerous levels of atmospheric pollution. Unless nations collaborate to address population growth, overconsumption, and environmental degradation, the prospects for a decent life will be threatened. The UN should help stabilize population and stimulate economic development in a manner that is sensitive to religious and moral considerations. Economic growth is essential to improve living standards, but unrestrained growth threatens the environment. The Rio de Janeiro conference focused on sustainable growth and global development, noting that growth is efficiently managed by the private sector, but regulation by national governments and international bodies is needed. The UN should be among the catalysts and coordinators of this process.

The Earth Summit Environmental Leadership Act, also known as HCON Res 353, aims to build upon the Earth Summit's agenda 21 for global environmental action. It proposes a national strategy for sustainable development, led by a specific office and high-level government official. The resolution also encourages the United States to establish further agreements to protect the global environment and support the creation of a United Nations sustainable development commission. The administration supports HCON Res 353, which has garnered 71 cosponsors, including members of the Foreign Affairs Committee and house delegates to the Earth Summit. This resolution emphasizes the need for the United States to take a leadership role in sustaining the planet and its resources for future generations.

The Earth Summit Environmental Leadership Act, also known as HCON Res 353, aims to continue the work of the Earth Summit and its agenda 21 for global environmental action. It proposes a national strategy for sustainable development, led by a specific office and a high-level government official. The resolution also encourages the US to establish further agreements to protect the environment and supports the creation of a United Nations Sustainable Development Commission. The president is urged to report on the progress made. The resolution has received support from the administration, the State Department, the Foreign Affairs Committee, and various US non-governmental organizations. It emphasizes the need to sustain the planet and its resources for future generations.

The speaker represents civil society and shares a personal passion for the ocean, tracing her fascination from Jacques Cousteau to becoming a deep worker submersible pilot. On a first dive, she saw a plastic hanger at the bottom of the ocean, which steered her toward focusing on the high seas, the 45% of the planet that belongs to everyone as our global commons under UNCLOS. She notes the historical arc from May and Emperor Justinius through the Magna Carta to the Law of the Sea Convention in 1982. The high seas are under peril for many reasons, including the shrinking Arctic ice and the opening of the northern passage, which will require future discussion and focus. Why we should care about the ocean: billions of tons of fish are caught each year, and about a third of the fish harvested are used to feed livestock, such as chickens, making them taste more like fish. She highlights unsustainable fishing practices and the aid of advanced extractive technologies. She references a map of one of the largest fishing nets in the world capable of containing 12 Boeing 747s. The World Bank estimates that poor ocean management leads to approximately $50,000,000,000 in lost revenue annually. She mentions a real example: tuna was sold last year for $1,700,000. She also points to Palau’s policy—closing its waters to shark finning and fin soup—and how it transformed a fin-related value from about $200 per fin into tourism-generated value of about $1,900,000 over their lifetime, a point raised by the President. The Teramar project is introduced to connect people to the global oceans, the high seas, and to make the oceans belong to everyone. It offers a passport, a daily online newspaper, an education platform, a government structure, and a way to connect to oceans as never before. The phrase “Fish do not vote, but we do” emphasizes civic engagement in ocean stewardship. The aim is for every politician to end up with a policy framework and a decision on how they treat the oceans, with the hope that sustainability will be ensured because “without money at the bottom, and without [it] it’s not going to work.” She advocates for the United Nations to lead, calling it the right place with global reach to create a sustainable development goal for the UN, a planetary mandate for the next fifteen years on how we treat our oceans. She urges all people—7,000,000,000 of us—to sign up, obtain a passport, and make our voices heard so that the UN and ambassadors understand what we want, and so that politicians know that “no sustainable ocean means we won’t vote them back into power.”

United Nations Agenda 21 is a plan agreed upon by 179 nations in 1992. It aims to inventory and control various aspects of the world, including land, water, minerals, plants, animals, construction, means of production, food, energy, information, and human beings. Contrary to popular belief, Sustainable Development is not just about recycling and creative reuse. It involves moving populations into concentrated city centers to regulate global activities. The ultimate goal is to establish a 1 World Government and achieve total control from a central unit. This is implemented through public-private partnerships and the use of chips. It is important for us to be aware of this development and stand up for our freedom.

Speaker 0 outlines a narrative linking the origins of the environmental movement to the Club of Rome, described as a crisis think tank that purportedly specializes in crisis creation. The speaker cites a document, The First Global Revolution by Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider, claiming it states that pollution, global warming, water shortages, famine and similar dangers would fit the bill as a new enemy to unite the world and justify a global response to local problems, thereby claiming “the origin of global warming.” The speaker then connects this to Australia, asserting that in 1975 Australia accepted a new economic order via the Lima Declaration at the UNIDO conference. The Lima Declaration, they say, was a blueprint for redeploying tools, jobs and manufacturing to developing nations, leaving Australia short of technology, a manufacturing base and jobs, and that unworkable trade and tariffs agreements followed. They claim these treaties were the foundation for the rollout of Agenda 21 and contend Australia has been moved on a global chessboard with leaders either complicit or naive to long-term consequences. The segment cites 1992 remarks by former U.S. president George Bush Sr. about Agenda 21, describing it as requiring a profound reorientation of human society and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources, integrating concern for environmental consequences into decision making at every level. The speaker urges the audience to consider the implications of “profound reorientation of all human society” and “unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources.” The speaker references Morris Strong, then secretary-general of the UN Earth Summit, stating that affluent middle-class lifestyles are not sustainable, including high meat intake, frozen foods, fossil fuels, vehicle ownership, and other consumption patterns. The implication drawn is that Agenda 21 is about controlling every aspect of life—what and how we eat, how we move, food production, quantity of food, and where we live. Dixie Ray, former Washington state governor and assistant secretary for oceans and international environmental and scientific affairs, is quoted as saying Agenda 21 seeks to transfer wealth from citizens to the third world. A fear-based trajectory is described where fear of environmental crisis would be used to create a world government with UN central direction. The speaker quotes a Habitat One report suggesting land cannot be treated as an ordinary asset and that private land ownership contributes to social injustice, implying a redistribution of wealth through land and resource control. A report from the president’s council on sustainable development is cited as advocating a new collaborative decision process for better decisions and more rapid change in resource use. Harvey Ruben of the Wildlands Project and Jay Gary Lawrence are invoked to suggest that individual rights would be subordinated to the collective, and that participating in UN-planned processes would provoke conspiracy-minded groups to resist, leading to alternative labels like comprehensive planning or sustainable development. The narrative claims that costs are rising for citizens while services are cut, portraying this as wealth redistribution and redeployment of resources that harms the working poor. It references debates over land rights and water allocation, the native vegetation act, and development and planning acts as threats to food producers and long-term security, with alluding to heritage status used to justify control over land titles. The speaker argues for legislative Council checks and balances as a safeguard against parties colluding to pass restrictive policies, urging public participation to restrain erosion of common law, and portraying agenda 21 as an ongoing threat since 2008. The account then traces the Club of Rome’s 1972 Limits to Growth and its environmental alarmism, linking Ted Turner and Mao to early endorsements of the movement, and cites 1987 and 1996 statements about a new world order and an environmental crisis unlocking a one-world government. It asserts the Earth Summit produced the Earth Charter, co-written by Morris Strong and Mikhail Gorbachev, as a new set of commandments with environmentalism as a new world religion, and connects this to Agenda 21. Ted Turner’s 1996 reductionist population statements are included, along with a 1998 Baltimore Sun report on Turner’s donations to the UN aimed at stalling population growth and supporting sterilization to “save mother earth.”

The speaker, representing civil society, shares a deep passion for the ocean and highlights a turning point when, during an early dive, a plastic hanger was seen at the bottom, shifting focus to the ocean, particularly the high seas. They emphasize that the high seas represent 45% of the planet and belong to everyone as our global commons under UNCLOS, with assets that belong to all people. Historical context is touched upon, noting a lineage from the Magna Carta through May under Emperor Justinius to the Law of the Sea Convention in 1982, underscoring the enduring importance of the oceans as a shared global resource. A series of urgent concerns about the ocean’s future are raised. The Arctic is melting, shrinking ice opens the northern passage, and this area requires future discussion and focus. The speaker asks why the ocean matters and provides several concrete points: about a million tons of fish are caught each year, and roughly one third of that harvest is used to feed livestock, such as chickens, to make them taste more like fish. They warn that unsustainable fishing practices are prevalent and illustrate the scale of extractive technologies with a map-like image of one of the largest fishing nets capable of containing 12 Boeing 747s. Economic dimensions are highlighted: poor ocean management leads to approximately $50,000,000,000 in lost revenue annually, according to the World Bank. A tuna specimen sold last year is cited at $1,700,000. The speech also references Palau’s ban on shark finning; they note that shark fins were formerly sold for about $200 per fin but that, through tourism generated by preserving sharks, the value rises to about $1,900,000 over Palau’s lifetime. The speaker stresses the need to connect ocean use with people and livelihoods for true sustainability, arguing that money at the bottom supports these efforts. This leads to the creation of the Teramar project, designed to connect everyone to the global oceans: providing a passport, a daily online newspaper, an education platform, a government structure, and a means to connect to the oceans as never before. The underlying message is that people do vote, and if they demand sustainable oceans, politicians should adopt a policy framework and make decisions accordingly so that oceans are treated sustainably. The United Nations is identified as the appropriate leader for a global Sustainable Development Goal to guide ocean stewardship for the next fifteen years, establishing a planetary mandate. The speaker urges all 7,000,000,000 people to sign up, obtain a passport, and make their voices heard so that the UN and ambassadors can hear the public’s demand, and so that politicians understand that “no sustainable ocean means we won’t vote them back into power.”

The speaker discusses the need to balance population growth and economic development while considering religious and moral values. They highlight the importance of coordinating economic growth to improve living standards, but caution against the environmental threats posed by unchecked growth. The conference in Rio de Janeiro emphasized the concept of sustainable growth and global development. The private sector plays a key role in managing growth, but national governments and international bodies, including the United Nations, should also be involved. International trade is crucial for stimulating economic growth, and entities like the European Economic Community, NAFTA, APEC, and the World Trade Organization can contribute to ensuring sustainable development.

Monica Medina, the Assistant Secretary for Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs, provided an update on US environmental priorities during the UN General Assembly. She highlighted the US Senate's ratification of the Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol, which aims to phase down the production and consumption of super polluting chemicals. Medina emphasized the importance of global cooperation in addressing climate change, plastic pollution, and biodiversity loss. She discussed various events and initiatives focused on these issues, including the launch of a plastics disclosure and reporting initiative and the call for countries to conserve at least 30% of land and waters by 2030. Medina emphasized the need for action and multi-stakeholder engagement to protect the environment and combat the climate crisis.

The negative impact of population growth on planetary ecosystems is becoming evident, with concerns over energy and water exploitation and dangerous levels of atmospheric pollution. Unless nations collaborate to address population growth, overconsumption, and environmental degradation, the prospects for a decent life will be threatened. The UN meeting in Cairo focused on population growth, highlighting the difficulty of addressing divisive issues with moral dimensions. The United Nations should help stabilize population and stimulate economic development sensitive to religious and moral considerations. Economic growth, essential for improving living standards, poses environmental threats without careful coordination. The Rio de Janeiro conference addressed sustainable growth and global development, noting that growth is efficiently managed by the private sector, but requires regulation by governments and international bodies. The United Nations should be among the catalysts and coordinators of this process.

The United Nations Agenda 21 is a plan agreed upon by 179 nations in 1992. It aims to control all means of production, food, energy, information, and human beings worldwide. Contrary to popular belief, sustainable development is not just about recycling and creating resources for all. It involves relocating populations to concentrated city centers and clearing rural areas. Agenda 21 is implemented through public-private partnerships, which is a form of fascism. It seeks to establish a one-world government and total control from a central unit. This corporatocracy is currently being developed globally, but there is still an opportunity to stand up and fight for freedom.

This conference is crucial in our efforts to save our planet. It holds extraordinary power to alter our current trajectory and create a better world. As a representative of We The 15, I urge you to take action and join us in this mission. Together, we can make a significant difference. This is my message from Earth to Come.

The Earth Summit Environmental Leadership Act, also known as HCON RES 353, proposes a national strategy for sustainable development based on agenda 21. It calls for the creation of a United Nations sustainable development commission and urges the United States to initiate agreements to protect the global environment. The resolution is supported by the administration, the State Department, and various environmental organizations. The speaker emphasizes the importance of taking action to sustain the planet for future generations and urges colleagues to support the resolution.

Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum are applauded for initiating the eco industry initiative and integrating it into the forums' work. This initiative will influence proposals presented to governments at the 1992 Earth Summit. It is hoped that this will provide a basis for a new role for business after 1992, positioning them as principal implementers of the movement toward a sustainable planet. The 1992 conference will emphasize the need for significant changes in motivating economic life at both the corporate and individual levels.

The speaker discusses the Agenda for the 21st Century, a plan agreed upon by 179 nations in 1992. They explain that sustainable development is not about recycling and resource creation, but rather about moving populations into concentrated city centers and controlling all aspects of life, including land, water, minerals, plants, animals, and human beings. The speaker emphasizes that social equity is not about providing clean water and air, but rather about impoverishing large portions of the population and bringing down developed nations. They argue that major corporations want unrestricted movement of workers and goods to reduce wages and exploit and control populations. The speaker urges individuals to educate themselves, spread awareness, and work together for personal freedom.

The UN's 30 by 30 agenda aims to seize 30% of all land and water on Earth, disregarding private property rights. The European Union is implementing it, and California and Joe Biden are using similar language, mentioning conserving 30% of lands and waters by 2030. The speaker claims this isn't about conservation but about taking, facilitated in the US by the sustains act, which allows the government to receive private funds for conservation programs. This act assigns value to environmental services provided by privately owned land, such as pollination, photosynthesis, and clean air/water, monetizing them through partnerships between private investors and the government, without landowner consent. The speaker asserts this is a seizing of American assets aligned with the UN's goals, without public consent or input. Representatives, according to the World Economic Forum, are now solely responsible, without needing to consult the public.

The Mental Leadership Act, also known as HCONRes 353, proposes a national strategy for sustainable development in line with Agenda 21. It suggests the creation of a specific office and the appointment of a high-level government official to coordinate these efforts. The resolution also encourages the United States to establish agreements for global environmental protection and to form a United Nations sustainable development commission. The president is expected to report to Congress on the progress made. HCON Res 353 has received support from the administration, the State Department, the Foreign Affairs Committee, and various environmental organizations. It emphasizes the need to sustain our planet and its resources for future generations.

The Earth Summit Environmental Leadership Act, also known as HCON Res 353, aims to build upon the Earth Summit's agenda 21 for global environmental action. It calls for sustainable development under the guidance of a specific office and a high-level government official. The resolution also urges the United States to establish further agreements to protect the global environment and support the creation of a United Nations sustainable development commission. The president is requested to report to Congress on the progress made. The resolution has received support from the administration, the State Department, the Foreign Affairs Committee, and various US non-governmental organizations. It emphasizes the importance of taking action to sustain our planet and its resources for future generations.

The speaker discusses the need to balance population growth and economic development while considering religious and moral values. They highlight the importance of coordinating economic growth to improve living standards, but caution against the environmental threats posed by unchecked growth. The speaker mentions the Rio de Janeiro conference's focus on sustainable growth and global development. They suggest that while the private sector is efficient in managing growth, national governments and international organizations like the United Nations should also be involved. The speaker emphasizes the role of international trade in stimulating economic growth and suggests entities like the European Economic Community, NAFTA, APEC, and the World Trade Organization can contribute to sustainable development.

A resolution expressing Congress's support for the United States to take a leading role in implementing the decisions made at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro is passed. The resolution outlines a national strategy to implement agenda 21 and other Earth Summit agreements through domestic and foreign policy. It also calls for cooperation with other countries to protect the global environment and supports the creation of a United Nations sustainable development commission. The resolution is supported by the administration and various organizations concerned with environmental issues. The United States has already made progress in implementing the conference's results, including pledging funds for climate-related projects and increasing forestry assistance. The resolution is passed with a two-thirds majority.